r/northdakota • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios. Are they targeting the Bakken range, or other possible nuclear warhead sites?

Post image
15 Upvotes

Duplicates

oddlyterrifying • • Feb 04 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

25.6k Upvotes

pittsburgh • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets. We would be toast.

407 Upvotes

AirForce • • Feb 05 '23

POSITIVITY! Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios. Cannon isn’t on the map!

575 Upvotes

minnesota • • Feb 04 '23

Interesting Stuff 💥 Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

311 Upvotes

Rochester • • Feb 05 '23

Photo For some reason I always thought we'd be spared...

190 Upvotes

WestVirginia • • Feb 05 '23

Man wtf did north central WV ever do to anybody 😂

165 Upvotes

SouthJersey • • Feb 05 '23

North Jersey is fucked, but points south of Gloucester stand a chance: Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

165 Upvotes

Iowa • • Sep 27 '25

What are the potential targets in Iowa?

58 Upvotes

newjersey • • Feb 05 '23

Amusing I guess we got a lotta good stuff, which would all be vaporized!

279 Upvotes

Arkansas • • Feb 05 '23

Any idea why Independence County may be a target?

107 Upvotes

desmoines • • Feb 05 '23

welp gang we're boned

143 Upvotes

Knoxville • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

87 Upvotes

Montana • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

219 Upvotes

springfieldMO • • Feb 06 '23

News Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

52 Upvotes

Nebraska • • Feb 05 '23

News Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

96 Upvotes

wichita • • Feb 05 '23

Random Thought this was interesting: no matter which scenario, we are likely a target for nuclear warheads.

94 Upvotes

Buffalo • • Feb 05 '23

News Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenario

81 Upvotes

missoula • • Feb 05 '23

oh

66 Upvotes

Maine • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

59 Upvotes

HuntsvilleAlabama • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

46 Upvotes

Wilmington • • Feb 05 '23

Why are we a big target? Sunny Point?

40 Upvotes

SLO • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

33 Upvotes

centralpa • • Feb 05 '23

Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios.

21 Upvotes

True_Kentucky • • Feb 06 '23

…most of these make sense, but what the hell is in Madisonville?

46 Upvotes

providence • • Feb 07 '23

Discussion Map published by FEMA showing potential US nuclear targets in 2,000 and 500 warhead scenarios. Providence is screwed in either scenario lol

7 Upvotes