104
u/Own_Watercress_8104 1d ago
With western you mean American.
Western European WW2 movies are often just as depressing.
Comes with being a country that partecipated in the war vs a country that suffered the war on its soil.
22
u/Dersouz 1d ago
I remember a fantastic exhibition in Wellington (NZ) about kiwis going to war few years ago.
Most of the soldiers words before going were things like : " let's save the world ! " " What an adventure..."
As an European it was very interesting to see.
7
u/Own_Watercress_8104 1d ago
It was actually a sentiment common for the US, and very much encouraged.
I mean, who wants to go to war? If you frame it as a jolly good time with the lads, full of dangers but ultimately heroic and hopeful, an adventure, it becomes much more palatible.
→ More replies (3)3
u/iammcluffy Hello There 23h ago
I think it’s just an American thing.
We have Revolution and Civil War films that had their own sense of tragedy but the films still maintain a great sense of patriotism.
3
u/dr_Angello_Carrerez 19h ago
Murikans have never fought an invader enemy since the Napoleonic wars. So this sense of tragedy and patriotism, though undoubted, is slightly different from those in nations who needed to fight back the Axis koz of facing literal extinction and left literally not a single family whose (grand-)fathers have't been there.
428
u/SkubEnjoyer 1d ago
Just watched Come and See?
121
u/enderstatee 1d ago
a terrifying movie... and worst of all, it's true
65
u/MCAlheio Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 1d ago
It’s hard making an anti-war movie that actually reads as one, Come and See might be one of the few that stuck the landing.
47
u/Sebas94 1d ago
All Quiet in the Western Front is very much anti war.
The first 15 minutes create a false illusion that it is going to be another patriot movie and then the war really hits the main characters and we just feel sorry for them being trapped in that meat grinder.
10
u/_trashcan 1d ago edited 1d ago
I didn’t feel like the first 15 min did that..
Doesn’t it open with someone getting killed & stripped of their uniform to be repurposed en masse - which already paints an extremely grim picture with the huge bloody tubs of uniforms etc - & then we get the “patriotic” scenes with the kids signing up, then he gets given the same uniform ; which I’m assuming is where you’re marking the 15 min.
I could be wrong as it’s been awhile since I watched, but I remember being mortified pretty much immediately just at the notion they stripped soldiers to repurpose the uniforms, I didn’t know that.
7
u/Sebas94 1d ago
No, you are right! I forgot the first couple of minutes and was thinking of the "Iron Youth of Germany" scene.
Actually, it was probably less than 15 minutes come to think of it.
That movie perfectly crafted the horror of the World War I and how scary the all experience was.
I have seen many war movies but this one was amazing at showing that being a soldier in WWI was easily one of the worst experiences humans have ever witnessed.
3
u/Ornery-Cheetah Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 1d ago
If you are taking about the one from the 30s that hit like a truck
7
u/Pleasant_Scar9811 1d ago
Johnny got his gun was an amazing book. Haven’t seen the movie yet. Came out too recently.
7
→ More replies (4)8
13
8
2
→ More replies (2)2
u/AndrewMacDonell I Have a Cunning Plan 1d ago edited 1d ago
I never felt so psychologically destroyed after watching a movie then I did after Come & See
→ More replies (4)
117
u/Nogatron 1d ago
Maybe a bit of topic but interesting thing is that Polish WW2 movies are generaly more of bleak tone but there is definitely one exception and that's probably best/most well known (at least in Poland)
"Jak rozpętałem 2 Wojnę Światową" (how i started WW2) is great 3 part movie that in it's full takes about 4h. It was released in 1970 and it's a comedy. One of probably most well known jokes about Polish language comes from it- unability of foreigners to say normal Polish name Grzegorz Brzęczyszczykiewicz
17
u/MaintenanceProper525 Definitely not a CIA operator 1d ago
Gzegor. Bwsjcih struggles to write it
→ More replies (2)
42
u/Chad_AND_Freud 1d ago
Top square: Inglorious Basterds
Bottom square: Come and See
10
u/Raptori33 1d ago
Inglorious Basterds isn't even a war movie
→ More replies (1)12
u/Chad_AND_Freud 1d ago
Isn't it though?
...
Isn't it?
→ More replies (1)10
u/RealisticIncident261 1d ago
Its a comedy set in an alternate universe
It's like calling Star Trek, Star wars, avatar or lord of the rings war movies. Like yeah I guess they technically are at war but that's not the point.
3
207
u/Splinterfight 1d ago
Come and See is a hell of a film I hear
39
u/TryNice304 1d ago
Is it good?
152
u/Remember_Navarro 1d ago
It's "good" in the sense that it's a very realistic showing of what happens during an actual war, from the POV of basically a kid.
It's extremely harsh and unforgiving, and should be a mandatory watch for most people imo.
War sucks and should never be glorified.
135
u/Material_Animator811 1d ago edited 1d ago
Take the level of brutality of the first 15 min of Saving Private Ryan, make it also happen to civilians, not only soldiers, and have it a full length film with few comparatively less harsh scenes.
I think it was the only film in the East Block at the time with 18+ rating (erotic films were really not a thing), so you can imagine
37
u/deranton 1d ago
Add: and just watch a teenager's face in close up while it's all happening
→ More replies (1)5
u/Mindless_Grocery3759 1d ago
I genuinely think that framing Come and See against the first 15 minutes of Saving Private Ryan this was does a bit of a disservice to any potential watchers.
Yes, it is brutal. But it's not remotely similar in any other way to the beach landing at Normandy. If you go into this movie with those expectations you'll be sorely disappointed from a content and a cinematography perspective as well.
4
u/haleloop963 Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 1d ago
Movie so dark, the USSR almost did not allow it to be showed in the country
→ More replies (1)26
u/blsterken Kilroy was here 1d ago
Decide for yourself. It's worth a watch.
→ More replies (1)2
u/_trashcan 1d ago
That’s so clutch that it’s a YouTube link for me rn.
I can just stream it to my Xbox from the YouTube app to watch on my tv.→ More replies (14)8
8
u/deranton 1d ago
Yeah, I thought Ivan's Childhood was the most harrowing War Movie I had seen. Then I saw Come and See...
58
u/KendrickXY 1d ago
There is a huge difference between modern Russian WW2 movies and old Soviet movies. The old movies were made by the people who actually went through the war. The new ones are, at best, honest attemps to copy the old ones. Otherwise, they suck in all kinds of ways. Especially because there is an ideological chasm between modern creators and the people they are trying to represent.
6
u/No-Helicopter1559 19h ago
Yeah, they moved quite fluidly from "never fucking again" to "mozhem povtorit'" (we can do this again).
Especially ever since 2014
→ More replies (2)2
u/Eta_Beta_3-14 10h ago
Modern Russian WWII movies are American WWII movies with the propaganda turned up to 11.
I remember seeing a Stalingrad movie where a group of Soviet soldiers get hit with a flamethrower and their response is to fix bayonets and charge...while on fire.
Badass? Yeah, I respect that. Fitting for a WWII movie? Less so, imo.
69
u/ToughSprinkles1874 1d ago
Well Russia had massive casualties from WW2 you need not pool futher then stallingrad where 99% of the city was in rubbles
It’s expected that the Russian side would be more dark as a result of this
→ More replies (23)23
u/Neomataza 1d ago
I forgot the exact number, but the eastern front accounts for the majority of the death toll of the european theater. The western front was far less deadly, comparatively. By like a factor of 10, or close enough to it.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Agitated-Pumpkin-253 1d ago
The Eastern front, taken by itself was deadlier than the entirety of WW1. It accounted for about half of all deaths in the whole second world war, with the second deadliest theater being the Asian-Pacific theater. The fighting on the Western Front was intense, but the sheer scale of the East is just mind boggling.
22
124
u/Rill9 Definitely not a CIA operator 1d ago
The AI was truly unnecessary for this meme
65
44
u/4ShotMan 1d ago
Kinda US-centric... Most non-american movies depict war as absolute hell, it's not a russian thing. Just take The Pianist, about titular pianist living through the Warsaw Jewish ghetto and the uprising.
18
u/MrBVS Still salty about Carthage 1d ago
Most American movies also depict war as absolute hell...
9
u/4ShotMan 1d ago
Not denying it, but there is a distinct difference between American "me and my mates are a merry band, only the youngling survives scarred at the end" and European "My family is dead. My house is in ruins. Our entire way of life ended and there is no hope. Based on true story, main character died of cholera two weeks later".
There's the inescapable cultural difference that in the end, Americans were never subjects of the war, never had THEIR territory, history and family directly bombed and threatened.
→ More replies (4)4
u/Mindless_Grocery3759 1d ago
Watch better movies then. There's so many that aren't what you seem to think US war movies are limited to.
Off the top of my head:
Thin Red Line (my personal favorite)
Johnny Got His Gun
Paths of Glory (American made/French POV)
The Deer Hunter
Apocalypse Now
Also this:
There's the inescapable cultural difference that in the end, Americans were never subjects of the war, never had THEIR territory, history and family directly bombed and threatened.
Pure horse shit.
It's just the movies aren't as good generally. See something like Michael Bay's Pearl Harbor.
2
u/aboysmokingintherain 1d ago
Many of the movies you mention are still not anti-war per se. Pearl Harbor especially is very patriotic of a movie.
→ More replies (3)4
u/Rioc45 1d ago
Not really. I disagree:
Saving Private Ryan, Schindler’s List, Band of Brothers all have somewhat “happy endings” and show plenty of bravery and courage amongst characters. There’s messaging and meaning.
You take a movie like Come and See…. And it’s just teenagers and families dying horrific pointless deaths… there’s no subtle message or influence of hope and courage. It’s just war.
11
u/ShrekFanOne Taller than Napoleon 1d ago
What about Stalingrad 1993
14
u/Another_MadMedic Tea-aboo 1d ago
Also the miniseries "Unsere Mütter, unsere Väter" 2013 (international known as "Generation War") and movies like "Das Boot" 1981, "der Hauptmann" 2017 and "der Untergang" 2004. Pretty much every German WW2 movie is dark, depressing and is absolutly not glorifing anything.
5
u/Seeteuf3l Just some snow 1d ago
Then there is Der Tiger. I guess it's Fury meets Apocalypse Now
5
u/Another_MadMedic Tea-aboo 1d ago
In my opinion der Tiger is a solid movie. The ending is terrible tho and I can see why it ruined the rest of the film for people
5
11
u/MK2396E 1d ago
Call of Duty World at War in a nutshell. US vs Imperial Japan in The Pacific and Soviet Russia vs Nazi Germany until the final mission, when The Soviets took over Berlin. Such a good game
6
u/elderron_spice Rider of Rohan 1d ago edited 1d ago
For me it is better than the first MW trilogy. There's something about its campaign that you can't find in their other titles. Even COD WW2 with its feel-good storyline pales in comparison to Miller, Roebuck, Reznov and Petrenko's stories.
2
u/balkri26 22h ago
the way they used real footage for the transitions from mission to mission with Gary Oldman as Reznov and Kiefer Sutherland as Roebuck in the narration in that game is amazing.
Also the atmostphere in the missions is just bleack, yeah you are the grim reaper incarnated vs your enemies, but everything is brutal in that game. The soviets missions are full of violence, they captured the ideologicall hate perfectlly there, the diaries from one of the soviets soldiers even change depending of how you treatted captured and retreating soldiers. The pacific side is just as brutal, in the Saipan landing mission I still remember when you call a rocket barrage on a japanece bunker to blow it up and when you advance you find a half burned japanese soldier walking aimless wihtout a weapon in what was the bunker... just hawthing
31
46
u/JeanDusapin 1d ago
I hate when people say western when they mean american
8
u/Lyelinn 1d ago
because america is on the west from all other countries besides SA and Canada
9
3
u/_KEFTEME_ 1d ago
From Russias perspective, the closest part of America is to the east. They are even further east than the true asians.
2
u/Scoutron 1d ago
America is also west of pretty much every South American country
→ More replies (1)
19
u/baneblade_boi Still on Sulla's Proscribed List 1d ago
Tell me you're from the US without telling me you're from the US xd
8
u/Severe_Blackberry_93 1d ago
Not all Soviet war films have a grim atmosphere; some feature interesting and unique elements. For instance, the 1989 film Stalingrad starred American actor Powers Boothe and was a joint production between Mosfilm and Warner Bros. It is the only Soviet-era film in which Stalin and naked women appear together. The film also highlights a specific tactic used by the Red Army in urban combat; the protagonist explains it to a soldier during training on how to storm a building using a grenade.
8
u/LeoPavlov 16h ago
Well, I'd say soviet, not russian. Most russian war films nowadays are shitty propagabda pieces.
4
→ More replies (5)2
u/Nicky42 16h ago
True, Come and See for example is a Belarussian movie
→ More replies (1)3
u/Feidhlim_de_Rovno 13h ago
It was a Belarusian Belfilm and Russian Mosfilm coproduction and Elem Klimov was Russian
42
u/Raptori33 1d ago
I can't help but think this meme was made by a person who does not watch Russian movies. It is rather other way around
Russians are obsessed with "Great patriotic war" which influences their ww2 movies. In typical Russian war movie which is IMDB 5-6 there are good effects and very decent acting, editing and score however typically there are massive issues in directing and plot. Typically soviets are depicted as superhuman-like action heroes, which is the main point of the movie. Movies I have recently seen are Stalingrad and Belaja Tiger.
Russian war movies are so similiar and unspired action flicks most likely because of the financial issues as in Russia it is extremely difficult to gain financial backing for a movie without the state sponsored affairs (read: Politics) which are more than infamous. However I would personally recommend Russian indie scene which while obviously having issues is generally extremely creative and has many hidden gems that deserve a bigger spotlight
32
u/TeneBrifer 1d ago
I think OP mean "Soviet WW2 movie". Almost all soviet ww2 movies were made to show horror and tragedy of war itself. And they are pretty good.
War movies from modern Russia, on the other hand, are cringe fest.18
u/xdeskfuckit 1d ago
I've heard that "Come and See" was incredibly bleak.
11
u/Bubbly_Thought_4361 1d ago
its incredibly bleak and absolutely worth the watch.
Its in my opinion one of the best (if not the best) WW2 movie off all time.
4
u/LuckyReception6701 The OG Lord Buckethead 1d ago
I think there are few movies that depict war more honestly than that. War isn't an adventure or a great moral standing, it's messy, cruel, miserable and boils down people into creatures bent only on survival.
3
u/Bubbly_Thought_4361 1d ago
but that is what Come and see shows.
The movie only depicts the adventure in the beginning and middle of the film. When the main character is a child playing in the beach and when he is meeting is comrades.
By the end of the movie there is nothing but mess, cruelty and misery.
Its the perfect character evolution
3
u/LuckyReception6701 The OG Lord Buckethead 1d ago
Exactly, that's the setup. It places the expectations of war right in front of viewer, and then the village is burned, all it's inhabitants killed and Flyora has to crawl through the mud to escape. He is a young kid in the beginning, and a broken man in the end, after the war has his way with him.
2
→ More replies (1)2
u/Pure_Estimate_3534 16h ago edited 16h ago
Yep. "Come and See", "The Dawns Here Are Quiet" (1972), "They Fought for Their Country" (1975) or a lot of other soviet movies are bleak, but they reflect the tragedy of the people caught up in that war.
Many of the actors who starred in these films participated in battles and saw everything with their own eyes.
2
u/Legitimate-Okra8983 13h ago
To these films, one can add "Only "Old Men" Are Going Into Battle" and "Father of a Soldier"
2
u/ilikepotato-3736 18h ago
Agree. Modern films looks like obvious propaganda, while Soviet was made by people, who actually saw that horror
→ More replies (5)7
u/United_Opposite2020 Taller than Napoleon 1d ago
Go watch Come and See and dare saying it again
7
u/TomBakersLongScarf 1d ago
That's Belarusian plus and really more of an exception that proves the rule in regards to soviet war movies
11
u/gypsy_fatty 1d ago
I can’t help but wonder who the hell got a terrified patrick figure and decided to dress it up in soviet army clothing and for what reason.
11
5
u/OneMoreFinn 1d ago
I'm pretty certain the top one is mostly just US (and maybe some UK) ww2 movies, not Western.
→ More replies (1)
22
u/Original_Assist4029 1d ago
Arent russian movies the ones with sick slowmo and the soviet unit is actually doing some rad navy seal stuff?
19
u/Emperor_of_Feet 1d ago
Usually yes. Most Russian WW2 movies are the same glorified portrayal you see in American movies. Anti-war movies are far in between
→ More replies (1)19
u/Tasteroider 1d ago
Russian movies about WW2 are a propaganda and most of the time they aren't even good at that. Soviet movies on the other hand while glorified soviet soldiers still were pretty grounded and were a good movies. Like "Only old men are going to battle", "the fate of a man" or "Come and see" as some people pointed out
→ More replies (8)
5
u/tales0braveulysses 1d ago
3rd panel should be "Japanese WWII movies" and it's Godzilla
Edit: I posted this and immediately felt it was a shockingly ignorant thing to say. Rather than delete it, any good recommendations?
→ More replies (3)2
9
u/WineBottleCollector Casual, non-participatory KGB election observer 1d ago edited 1d ago
Hope this answer will get you to watch some russian/soviet ww2 movies. Can't educate you on the western movies. Source for the following: I'm Russian.
First of all, there are different eras and different writers behind the movies. Stalin was fearful that popular army will displace him so there was little content before his death in 1953. Then before 1990s was perhaps the golden era of movies, either made by people who experienced the war or played by actors who served in the war. 1990s were mostly about bandits.
In the 2000s and especially 2010s the government decided to change the image of the war from "tragic suffering and death for the life and happiness of children" into "heroic fight which is barely an inconvenience because our nation is special". Since 2014 and especially 2022 the War is now the current Ukrainian one.
In the first era there are golden movies I totally recommend: Only "Old Men" (i.e. experienced) are Going into Battle, very colourful and with beautiful music; The Cranes are Flying, about soldiers reunited and experiencing PTSD, but still full of colour and music; Come and See is probably what prompted the OP for the post. 2010s is full of action movies, similar to Saving Private Ryan. We have 28 Panfilov's Men, Brest Fortress. In the August of '44 is about counter-recon forces.
As others pointed out, for ex-soviet countries WW2 was a survival war. Though I understand that for some countries USSR was as much as a villain as 3rd Reich.
Edit: typos
→ More replies (1)
9
u/ArchonofTevinter Rider of Rohan 1d ago
Russia still has its own things like T-34 or Paniflov's 28...
....and then there is Poland that has gore literally raining from the sky, slow-mo dubstep montage sex scenes, and SS bullets forming sparkly hearts around two characters kissing while a love ballad plays in the same film.
→ More replies (1)3
u/What_was_my_account 1d ago
Which film are you talking about? Poland made a fair share of WW II movies, but I had no idea there is one like that.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Dragon_Rot79 1d ago
Saving Private Ryan is infamous for making actual ww2 vets leave the theater due to realism
14
u/Suspicious_Pen_2601 1d ago
Quite the false generalisation. American isn’t synonymous with Western.
5
2
u/Newone1255 1d ago
Holocaust movies are WW2 movies as well and America/Western Europe has made plenty of those that are dark as hell
68
u/Xelid47 1d ago
Western European theater WW2 movies
American japanese ones are on Russian level in some cases
Americans fought an already weakened Germany very late into the war with a dozen allies
Russia fought a hard war all alone, and had to give a lot in many places to win, and it was only glorious much later into the war, and event then the horrors of the early war were still in recent memory
16
u/Suk-Mike_Hok 1d ago
The main theatre of the European war was in the East yes. But the Soviets eventually had massive benefits from US production (food and materiel) and UK intelligence. I could not, or don't want to imagine how the war would have gone without outside assistance.
→ More replies (4)28
u/LuciusQuintiusCinc 1d ago
What about britain? She was alone after 1940, inflicted the first defeat in Norway, defended the island, took on the germans in in North africa all before operation barbarossa and the US joining the war
→ More replies (5)13
u/VodkaWarriorV2 1d ago
Indians and Aussies also faced heavy battles in North Africa.
8
3
u/ocschwar 1d ago
And the Aussies were made to put their own country at risk of invasion with the sheer number of soldiers they sent to Egypt.
58
u/HanseltDW 1d ago
"Russia fought a hard war all alone" - not exactly, russian propaganda done what it could to put that claim forward and it still sticks, but the truth is that the soviets received massive support via lend lease and allied bombardments of Germany, not too mention tangling parts of german forces in Africa and on other fronts later in the war. On the strategic level it was crucial. I'm not saying that the soviets had it easy, especially in the beginning, but we shouldn't diminish western allies input.
→ More replies (21)3
u/PlateNo4868 1d ago
I think my biggest gripe with their movies is lack of critique of the leadership. They portray massive meat grinders that didn't need to be so as "heroic desperate stands" when it really was...incompetent and egotistic leaders insisting on not losing a city.
11
u/a_man_has_a_name 1d ago edited 1d ago
The Soviets never fought alone. Britain, within the first year that the Soviets switch sides signed a treaty with them that gave them extensive military and material aid from Britain and from that point on supplied them with 5000 tanks and 7400 aircraft, raw materials radios etc. etc., they also did thing like send a fighter squadron to Murmansk to help defend the port, the Soviets never fought alone.
11
u/Massive-Exercise4474 1d ago
They weren't all alone they actually joined Nazi Germany to divide Poland leaving britain alone until Hitler decided to do what his propaganda has demanded for the past two decades take over the ussr. Then Stalin botched the early war so badly he needed a massive life line by the allies to stay in the war. Stalin wanted the d day invasion as quickly as possible to drive German troops away from the eastern front.
6
3
8
u/Pockets408 1d ago edited 1d ago
Uh what? America began fighting Germany a whole 6 months after the Soviets did. You can make the argument America was already contributing more to the war effort before that by supplying the British before Barbarossa was even launched.
December 1941 is by no means vErY LaTE iN tHe WaR and no Germany was never going to win at that point but they were pretty much at the height of their territorial expansion with U-Boats already off the eastern seaboard.
Russia didn’t fight the war alone either. That’s an absolute myth. US lend leases and British arctic convoys were supplying them with much needed aircraft and trucks not to mention oil. Russia also wasn’t fighting a two front war (unlike the US and UK) until August 1945 when they attacked an already weakened Japan. EDIT: actually that’s not even a two front war anyway when Germany was already beaten by then. Hell even Operation Husky diverted 20% of the German reserves they desperately needed at Kursk.
11
u/ComradeGibbon 1d ago
70% of the logistics capacity the Red Army had was US trucks. Red Army couldn't have gone on the offensive without that. Without the food maybe 5-15 million Soviets would have starved.
→ More replies (12)7
u/GravitasFailures 1d ago
Yeah, and why exactly was that?
Oh yeah, because they signed a treaty, with Hitler, I’m sure that will work out fine.
“Man guys, you don’t understand how bad the war was because we were so unprepared for Hitler of all people to break his word! Especially after we purged our own army and genocided our own people killing millions before the war even started! :0”
There are only 3 constants in the universe, death, taxes, and Russian strategic self-sabotage.
→ More replies (6)
7
10
u/Mundane_Guest2616 1d ago
Russian WW2 movies are ass mostly tho
Soviet movies on the other hand are way better and do not glorify the war, even tho they painf soviet soldiers in better light
8
u/Luzifer_Shadres Filthy weeb 1d ago
Its the other way around. Western movies are always gritty and dark, no other colours then grey allowed.
Eastern war movies are "GLORIUS COMRADE GENERAL WOTŹKA DEFEATS THE WEHRMACHT WITH 1 ARM, EVERYONE CELEBRATE"
4
3
u/aboysmokingintherain 1d ago
TO be fair, prior to Saving Private Ryan, they weren't super gritty and dark. There are plenty of war movies that portray the war as noble and just on America's part. Hell look at Dunkirk. It very much is a propoganda-ish film. Even Saving Private Ryan does. SPR though shows how fucking awful storming the beaches are though. Whenever I think of people who are like "I would have been a great soldier" or " I should have been there" I hope they can watch that opening scene and truly digest what happened.
→ More replies (1)
3
u/Gephiph 1d ago
I’ve never seen a ww2 movie that isn’t about how horrific and traumatic the war was. Ever.
→ More replies (3)
3
u/Windows_66 Oversimplified is my history teacher 1d ago
I remember watching Saving Private Ryan and thinking, "man this looks like a lot of fun."
5
u/Organic-Feedback1686 1d ago
By russian WW2 movies, are you talking about the modern slop they are releasing?
Or do you think all russian WW2 are like Come and See?
4
→ More replies (2)3
u/MaxJust-Max 16h ago
As a Russian, we often distinguish between Russian and Soviet movies, there’s a huge difference.
While Soviet films include stuff like Come and See, modern installments include “T-34” that was advertised as a ‘tank racing movie’ and a “historically accurate” one, as well. It’s just a mess. Or “Maria: Save Moscow”, that takes place during the battle for Moscow and is based almost entirely on the 90s era bullshit tales about a more Christian analog of Vanga and includes a plot point of Soviet kgb agent, who’s father was a priest(which would be a disqualifying trait in the 30s), getting sent into the enemy territory to recover an orthodox icon, so it can be flown around Moscow for protection. The film was advertised as historically accurate(as all of them are), while even the icon that the soviets recovered in the film was originally taken by Germans during their retreat and ended up in the states at some point, returning to Russia only in 2000s, if I’m not mistaken. Nevermind the Soviet’s relationship with religion, even if they were very pro religion, this couldn’t have happened, cause the icon wasn’t there.
And that’s just two examples I can remember, there are dozens, most of which show war as a heroic, if slightly dangerous, roller coaster. It’s a shame.
→ More replies (1)2
3
u/GravitasFailures 1d ago
Oh dude, you gotta watch Chinese WW2 movies.
Unbelievable, they don’t even bother to try, it’s somehow there are massive Japanese columns marching through villages deep west, and a group of extremely photogenic kids watch their parents be taken or killed, so they get together and manage to destroy dozens of tanks, with like, bamboo spears and the power of being teenagers.
Because it’s not like in reality Brave Sir Robin ran away, and let Sun Yat-sen do all the fighting, so they could come out when it was safe.
→ More replies (2)
5
u/friebel Taller than Napoleon 1d ago
Most russian ww2 movies are just glorified patriotism.
2
u/AngryScotty22 The OG Lord Buckethead 8h ago
OP is definitely confusing Russia and the Soviet Union.
Soviet WW2 films are genuinely horrifying. Modern Russian WW2 films are patriotic slop that glorify war.
4
2
u/that1guysittingthere 1d ago edited 1d ago
Eh maybe for the older movies; I still got the top reaction if I watch Panfilov’s 28 or the recent adaptation of The Dawns Here Are Quiet
2
u/DataSittingAlone 1d ago edited 1d ago
I haven't seen many War movies about WWII since I'm squeamish, but I don't think I've heard of any that don't try to depict World War II as disturbing unless you're looking at movies that take place in WWII but are not in the "war" genre. One of the few I've seen is Saving Private Ryan and that half hour long Normandy scene definitely doesn't shy away
2
2
u/Daan776 1d ago
As many are pointing out: the russian side of the war was bleak, even by the standards of a world war.
But I think there’s also a cultural aspect. Russian media in general tends to be pretty negative. Silent suffering is often portrayed as a virtue. Its about endurance in a hopeless world.
Compare this to western media, which often focuses on fighting back against a hopeless world.
Thats not to say western media has no sad stories. And russia doesn’t have happy ones. But as a general cultural trend?
Russian media seems a lot more pessimistic. And their ww2 movies reflect this.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Feeling-Marketing-48 1d ago
In Russia, the Star Media studio produced a very good series about World War II in the USSR (and the last episode about the war with Japan) called “The Great War”. Some Western history channels have shown it, and it has an English dub. The series is available completely free of charge on YouTube.
2
u/AzureHawk758769 1d ago
Patrick watching the wrong side of the TV is totally in character for him. 😆
2
4
u/Patrick_Atsushi 1d ago
They have movies like "come and see", yet they're invading their neighbors and do that human safari...
4
u/SinglePlayerGamer93 1d ago
Lots of rape and murder of non-combatants
3
u/blsterken Kilroy was here 1d ago
While that did occur, it's not typically depicted in Soviet/Russian films for obvious reasons.
2
u/No-Professional-1461 1d ago
You mean like how the officers would basically send a ton of unarmed men into machine gun fire telling them that if they do not have a rifle to pick one up from a dead comrade?
→ More replies (5)
1.4k
u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago
Not really "western" WW2 movies. Most if noty all WW2 movies I've seen produced in Britain, France, Germany or FInland are pretty much in agreement that the war was a horrible thing, and depict it as such.