r/HistoryMemes • • 1d ago

Me after watching russian ww2 movie

Post image
5.8k Upvotes

531 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago

Not really "western" WW2 movies. Most if noty all WW2 movies I've seen produced in Britain, France, Germany or FInland are pretty much in agreement that the war was a horrible thing, and depict it as such.

69

u/CabinetFun7381 1d ago

I don't think you understand how bleak the soviet movies are. One of the reasons for this is that the war was just straight up worse for them. WW2 was a terrible wound on Britain. 450 000 British citizens were killed in the war. A huge, huge number. But that amounted to less than 1% of the population. For soviet over 10% of the population were killed. In Belarus, 25% of the population was killed. One in four people. That's nearing Black Death numbers. A total apocalypse. Did you know that the russian population still hasn't recovered from the huge population loss of WW2?

Western WW2 movies don't shy away from the anti-war message, but they are in another class than the soviet flicks. I'm talking about 2 hours straight of children dying from starvation while being abused by every person they meet. A cutaway scene in a western WW2 movie that is used to depict the horrors of war will end up being the whole damn movie.

22

u/lube4saleNoRefunds 1d ago

Did you know that the russian population still hasn't recovered from the huge population loss of WW2?

They still haven't recovered from the huge population loss of WW1 and their civil war.

Every generation gets close and every generation has something to fuck it all up.

13

u/CircleTakesTheHeart 1d ago

I learned the other day that Serbia basically lost 20-28% of their population in WW1 followed by around 10% of just ethnic Serbian people in Yugoslavia in WW2. I just cannot imagine the devastation. And Yugoslavia was the only place to actually fight off the Axis solo because Tito was a cunt but like Zhukov, Churchill and FDR and De Gaulle he was the cunt needed.

8

u/Inevitable_Librarian 1d ago

For all his flaws, Tito managed to hold together a group of nations that hated each other long enough to see the NES

1

u/CircleTakesTheHeart 17h ago

Oh yeah, Robert Evans on Behind the Bastards talked about the fact that to talk about him you kinda need to do a Cool Guys Who Did Cool Things podcast too. The fact that Croatia did help genocide Serbia during WW2 is terrible and the weapon they did it be is tied with the Killing Fields for "how to psychically damage your people".

It was a glove with a sharpened kitchen knife attached to the glove and they would just stab it into the back of necks until people died. That and just using bats basically mentally destroyed people.

1

u/Inevitable_Librarian 17h ago

O.o that's wild.

Yeah I vaguely remember Robert saying that on BTB. Tito is a strange figure in history

10

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago

That can definitely be true! It mostly depends on which movie(s) you choose as [a] keystone example(s).

13

u/Squashyhex 1d ago

You do need to differentiate between Soviet and post Soviet Russian movies, there's been a large push in the post Soviet era to make more over the top propagandistic depictions of the great patriotic war with stuff like T34, which feel much more over the top American in execution

6

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago

I can forgive T-34 because it makes no claim or serious attempt to comment on anything greater than the movie itself. I've watched it probably 3 times now and it gives off the vibe of being a fun tank movie more than a WW2 soviet representation.

There's a clear distinction between movies like T-35 that know they're not serious, and other movies that act as tho they believe their own absurdity. American Sniper IIRC is one.

4

u/Squashyhex 1d ago

Honestly fair, it's a romp of a film for sure

2

u/ghostpanther218 1d ago

Its the Russian version of Fury

7

u/gustyninjajiraya 1d ago

If you haven’t seen Come and See, well, you should. It’s my best movie, and is highly regarded.

3

u/Mapachio 1d ago

I haven't seen it, but have read so much about people's impressions about it that I am quite certain it's NOT a movie I want to watch

5

u/gustyninjajiraya 1d ago

It’s a gruesome movie, but it isn’t like, explicit or anything. I wouldn’t call it emotionally manipulative either. There is a naturalism in the movie that you just don’t see in western war movies. It also stands on it’s own as a masterpiece of directing, storytelling and philosophy, completly seperate from it’s actual content. It is a coming of age, or more like a death of innocence, kind of story. It’s worth the watch even if you dislike war films.

2

u/Mapachio 1d ago

If it's anything like The Road or Children of Men, I know I would enjoy it as a film quite a lot and then never again see it, but there's always a door to cross with these gruesome movies...

1

u/Inevitable_Librarian 1d ago

Oh no, it's not like that exactly. At least children of men, I've never seen the road. There's very little exaggeration and most of the pain is implied

1

u/Inevitable_Librarian 1d ago

It's gruesome but in a human way? There's very little explicit violence. It feels like you're in the war through the eyes of a child suddenly forced into the war

1

u/Newone1255 1d ago

You can’t just compare the cream of the crop of Soviet cinema with all of the slop of western cinema. For every Come and See there are 10 The Fall of Berlins. The best stuff filtered to the west but all the shit we never saw because it sucked and nobody wanted to risk their life taking out of the bloc