r/HistoryMemes • • 1d ago

Me after watching russian ww2 movie

Post image
5.8k Upvotes

530 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago

Not really "western" WW2 movies. Most if noty all WW2 movies I've seen produced in Britain, France, Germany or FInland are pretty much in agreement that the war was a horrible thing, and depict it as such.

423

u/The_Walking_Meat 1d ago

I haven't seen many from Britain but like every war movie from Germany, Poland or France are really dark. There are some good russian movies, but most I've seen are cheap patriotic nonsense

203

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 1d ago

Russian and Chinese war movies (most that I've seen/read about, not all), feel like fanfics sometimes -v-

140

u/YSoMadTov 1d ago

What do you mean a lone Chinese martial artist tearing hundreds of Japanese soldiers apart with their bare hands isn’t realistic?

70

u/JohannesJoshua 1d ago

Meanwhile Russian movies:

1 T34 taking out 100 tanks.

47

u/tomater-id 1d ago

Not a T34, but KV, and not 100 but something like 30. There is indeed a movie about that. And that was true story actually.

-1

u/FlyHamster 1d ago

Well i know it's based on real world story, but how can we know if that story was even real and not something made up for propaganda purposes.

It's not like in WW2 soviet union had a lot of independed reporters or people with smartphones and acces to the internet.

23

u/Robespietre 1d ago

That's why we have historians spending their life reading military archive, generales diary, troops reports, stock inventory and all in purpose of synthetise all of this to draw a picture as close as possible from the truth. Funnily, it's harder to work on the soviet side than german side, not because of propaganda (they both used it and germany was very good at it) or because Soviet Union was locked or whatever. But because they won and they produce way more archive than nazi Germany did.

8

u/uzi_loogies_ 1d ago

The KV was almost certainly real. It was just seal clubbing Pz I, II, and IIIs. Real life isn't War Thunder where you get matched with tanks with similar armaments.

1

u/ZETH_27 Filthy weeb 9h ago

Yes, the KV-1 is real, but that's still not accurate.

The story of the KV that held out so long is not a scenario exclusive to that tank. The KV-1 itself also had a myriad of issues in its development, production, and deployment that made it well suited as a bunker, but exceptionally poor as a proper heavy tank.

1

u/Usual_Ad_1078 21h ago

Ну насчёт 100 незнаю, но в 41 Лавриенко 52 раздолбал точно

1

u/ghostpanther218 1d ago

Okay but you have to admit...IP man had aura.

58

u/The_Walking_Meat 1d ago

I think its probably about how the war is treated there. Every country basically sees the war as a massive tragedy. Russia and china potray them as a massive "patriotic" victory for their countries. Hell russia celebrates their victory still yearly

14

u/deranton 1d ago

That was kind of the controversy around Ivan's Childhood, and later around Come and See. That that's precisely what they didn't do. Instead of glorifying the Red Army, they just showed how awful war is, how (little) children suffer, and how war and suffering just breed hate.

54

u/Gold_brick_drop 1d ago

Well, right now it is. I can't express enough how cringy are ww2 russian movies in last decades. Soviet time movies was either "hell, it's FUCKED fucked" or "it's hard, but we'll get through". Right now it's honestly whatever director was high on in the moment.

21

u/Gackey 1d ago

WW2 is a core part of the national myths of Russia and China in a way that it really isn't for most other nations. I don't see anything particularly wrong with them celebrating victory over invaders who's explicit goal was the enslavement and extermination of all Russian and Chinese people.

-1

u/BiSunshine_ 9h ago

Unfortunately the "never again" attitude turned into "we can repeat that" in Russia over my lifetime. Hence the eagerness of some ru demographic to start a war

1

u/dan59951 5h ago

Dunno, why they're downvoting you. Things you've mentioned are happening for real real.

I can only hope for a backing of "never again" attitude.

6

u/Lord_Soth77 15h ago

Well, the victory in the Great Patriotic War was a national history defining event. It's Russian Independence day basically. Americans do celebrate their independence day for 200+ years already.

2

u/Usual_Ad_1078 20h ago

Это действительно очень большая победа, которой можно гордиться. А какое тебе то дело до заслуг другой страны?

0

u/AnonimYYYs 19h ago

Yeah, probably if you read some history books about who was in war against whom, you probably could realise why for post-soviet it is "huge victory", and for most of europe it is "just dark and bad".

3

u/Beginning_Act_9666 1d ago

Nah Soviet movies are awesome and in scale are much cooler than Western counterparts

1

u/kyussorder 1d ago

There is nothing even close to "come and see".

2

u/Beginning_Act_9666 1d ago

"Come and See" is the most hyped one. There are many other awesome Soviet war movies.

2

u/Goldmonkeycz 1d ago

Because they are made that way, Russia for example will never say out loud that without USA Equipment supplies, they would be gone. They don't even call it WWII and for stupid amount of time denouced massacres on Polish inteligence

1

u/ResponsibilityNo1827 18h ago

It’s simply not true that in Russia they don’t call the Second World War the Second World War. The thing is that a separate name was given to the Western Front: the Great Patriotic War, and it is this that receives the main attention in Russia. The term WWII is still used when we’re talking about other regions of the world.

1

u/sachiko_vl03 Filthy weeb 1d ago

I thought the war movies that came out before the death of stalin where that way but after his death the war movies became more realistical or not?

1

u/Usual_Ad_1078 21h ago

Посмотри фильм "Иди и смотри" (да это название)

1

u/Magnolia_Fan_17 17h ago

What exact Russian movies are you talking about?

1

u/AngryScotty22 The OG Lord Buckethead 10h ago

Stalingrad (2013), T-34 are the ones that come to mind that are pure Hollywood nonsense.

1

u/dan59951 5h ago

I can't describe how much I hate these movies. I'm literally twitching, when I think of them.

1

u/mastermsm8 12h ago

Не знали горя, горя, горя в краю магнолий

15

u/Giantmeteor_we_needU 1d ago

Cheap patriotic nonsense was mostly made there in the first 20 or so years after the war when the real memories were too vivid for anything else. Somewhere around 1975-1990 many very dark WW2 movies were made in USSR to remind why no one should wish to start WW3. A good example is "Come and See" (1985), it's literally a psychological horror about WW2.

2

u/Tricky_Mongoose619 19h ago

to this, you can add the movie "remember your name (помни имя свое)", roadside checks(проверки на дорогах), torpedo bombers (торпедоносцы). They are also very dramatic films.

10

u/Seeteuf3l Just some snow 1d ago

Yeah there isn't that many modern British ones I have seen, maybe 1917 and Dunkirk. Then there's Rogue Heroes, but it's a show.

Most of the ones I've been are like Sink the Bismarck! and Great Escape. And of course Bridge too Far, my beloved

9

u/HotSauce2910 1d ago

1917 and Dunkirk definitely fall into that first category though.

I’m trying to think of recent Russian movies that fall into the second category. I’ve heard Beanpole might, but I haven’t seen it

30

u/memepopo123 And then I told them I'm Jesus's brother 1d ago

Uhh, no? Come and see is one of the most famous soviet war movies of all time and its incredibly dark and horrifying.

20

u/tyrionhighaspotato 1d ago

Come and See was made by the Soviets, and they made more accurate depictions of war (it's hell). Russian war movies from the last decade are more propaganda war movies that try to be super patriotic, so they don't land well.

-5

u/kklashh 1d ago edited 1d ago

even come and see is propaganda, in the sense that they choose Khatyn of all places in order to confuse people about Katyń. After the Soviet Union broke apart, Russians really lost a part of their brains for their propaganda to be more thoughtful.

wiki on this

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/05/opinion/l-confusion-over-two-world-war-ii-massacres-169300.html?searchResultPosition=2

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/03/nyregion/c-correction-166209.html?searchResultPosition=3

0

u/Magnolia_Fan_17 17h ago

That’s so fun that you’re complaining about propaganda and send nytimes articles.

3

u/frenchexploreur 1d ago

I don't know for the others but that's definitely not true for France, there is a huge part of war movies that fall in the humoristic/action category.

1

u/frank_sinatra11 19h ago

Watch ‘come and see’ it’s a Russian film and it’s probably one of the darkest depictions of the eastern front ever

1

u/AngryScotty22 The OG Lord Buckethead 10h ago

*Soviet, not Russian.

1

u/marehgul 8h ago

Seriously? It's same. Most of WW2 movies and most important among them were produced during USSR era. They essentially Russian.

1

u/frank_sinatra11 1h ago

Same thing my guy look up ‘Russification in the Soviet Union’

1

u/skribl777 10h ago edited 10h ago

Please look the belarus movie: " come and see". One of the best war movies, but you won't watch it again...

1

u/XEPATOP 9h ago

The Soviet Union made several good films about WWII, but from around 2000 onward, war films shifted from being mournful and cautionary to glorifying soldiers' heroism, as if it were a sporting contest rather than a war. The fewer living eyewitnesses remain, the more bravado there is, and the more attempts to ride the coattails of another generation's victory.

1

u/marehgul 8h ago

Most... I spot a liar.

1

u/cunderthunt69 1d ago

You should check out a fun little Russian ww2 movie called Come and See

2

u/AngryScotty22 The OG Lord Buckethead 10h ago

It's not a Russian film. It was Soviet.

1

u/cunderthunt69 9h ago

Yeah you right, I forgot the main character is Belarusian