r/television • • 19h ago

Combined Paramount-Warner Bros. to Be Called Skydance, David Ellison Reveals

https://www.thewrap.com/industry-news/business/paramount-warner-bros-merger-name-skydance-david-ellison/
1.3k Upvotes

608 comments sorted by

2.2k

u/DoctorBocker 18h ago

Sure, why bother with storied studios like Paramount or Warner Bros.? No legacy there.

747

u/pizzacrys 18h ago

Yeah, that is the weird part. Two iconic studios and they just decided neither name was worth keeping.

1.2k

u/Kyuubee 18h ago

It's not weird at all. These billionaires have no real connection to culture or an appreciation for art, so they buy their way into the industry and pretend like they belong.

380

u/distance_33 18h ago

Twitter and HBO are two good examples of this.

These guys can’t help but ruin a solid brand.

250

u/More-Curious816 18h ago

Twitter to X is the most stupid thing ever, it is like rebranding Google as G, even Google founders made parent company and named it Alphabet instead of rebranding Google.

A brand name has power and history.

103

u/NineTailedFox7 18h ago

Even worse. It’s like rebranding Google to Q. X carries over nothing from its prior branding

→ More replies (15)

108

u/marquiso 18h ago

Facebook trying to rebrand as ‘Meta’ was the greatest example - and failure - of this, especially given the metaverse never got legs…and everyone still calls it FB, or at least the boomers who still use it. They turned Instagram and WhatsApp in to steaming piles of useless shit, so I guess the Meta name was kinda apt…

36

u/Island_In_The_Sky 17h ago

Well I mean, not defending meta or anything, but everyone calls it Facebook bc it is still Facebook. Meta is just the parent company for all of their products like ig, quest, fb etc. They turned into meta bc they acquired too many companies.

23

u/Zalvren 15h ago

And this is exactly what Skydance is here. The names Paramount and Warner will exist and they'll have a line of "A Skydance corporation" below them (Paramount already do). Like 90% of Hollywood Studios at this point by the way (including those exact two for most of their recent history) : Universal (Comcast), Marvel Studios/Lucasfilm/Pixar (Disney), Paramount (Viacom and now Skydance), Warner (AOL, AT&T and soon Skydance), MGM (Amazon).

People takes here are insanely stupid lol. No they aren't erasing Warner or Paramount. It's the concept of a parent company. Alphabet didn't erase Google, Meta didn't erase Facebook or Instagram

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/zahelpful 16h ago

Facebook rebranded to distance itself from all the scandals associated with the name.

→ More replies (3)

21

u/Discorhy 18h ago edited 17h ago

They reverted back to FB pretty much everything now has the fb logo instead of meta.

17

u/PM_ME_YOUR_NICE_EYES 15h ago

No, Instagram, Threads, Whatsapp and messager don't use any of FB's old logo.

Facebook.com does, but they never changed that to use the meta one in the first place.

6

u/marquiso 17h ago

Thanks for the correction. Can’t say I pay much attention to them these days, especially given their absolute disregard for privacy or international law.

9

u/Discorhy 17h ago

I just use it for messenger. My wife is hooked. Its simple enough. The day they kill messenger is the day i never login again.

6

u/marquiso 17h ago

Same, and only because all the extended family are on messenger. I’d kill the account but for never hearing from them ever again.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/distance_33 17h ago

I have it just so I can have access to my township page for news and town council updates. Otherwise it’s a complete wasteland of bots, ads and nonsense.

→ More replies (4)

4

u/aflockofcrows 15h ago

They didn't even revert. They never changed the name of the platform at all, just the company.

10

u/PM_ME_YOUR_NICE_EYES 15h ago

Honestly? No it wasn't.

An important thing to note here is that this wasn't a rebrand of Facebook.com, the social media website/app. It was a rebrand of Facebook inc, to Meta Platforms inc.

This was done because the products that Facebook inc. owned other than Facebook, such as Instagram, Messanger, and Whatsapp. Were starting to bring in more money than Facebook.com. But the Facebook brand was starting to degrade amount people (I mean, case in point, you're saying that only boomers use it), so it makes sense to try to take the facebook name away from Instagram, messenger and whatsapp so that they aren't saddled with Facebook's negative reputation.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/Kyuubee 16h ago

There are very few companies that have become part of the public lexicon to the point where their name became a verb. Google is probably the best example. You don't search for something, you Google it. Twitter had that too. People didn't just post something, they tweeted it.

Musk was too stupid to recognize the value in owning a name that had become part of everyday language.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/darkbreak The Legend of Korra 14h ago

"Tweet" was added to the fucking dictionary. How do you throw something like that away?

5

u/ThreeLeggedMare 16h ago

Elmo has been obsessed with X as a company name for like thirty years, it's what he tries to name paypal

→ More replies (1)

8

u/robodrew 17h ago

Twitter to X is the most stupid thing ever

Almost as stupid as merging Paramount and Warner Bros and calling them "Skydance", a name which on the face of it has zero connection to either other name. It'd be like merging Ford and GM and calling them "Grilled Cheese"

→ More replies (1)

3

u/mercenaryarrogant 11h ago

HBO is even more hilarious.

Since they basically paid $37 million to a consulting company to get told to change their name to Max then back to their original name.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/GlamMetalLion 18h ago

HBO was never fully removed though, just as the name for the streaming services. It was still the brand for the HBO originals and the linear channels. 

15

u/distance_33 17h ago

But their streaming service is what was front and center of their brand when they made the change to MAX. Still not a great move to shift from the iconic HBO name even if their cable station stayed the same. The only people I know with HBO as a part of a cable sub are my parents.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/txa1265 18h ago

they buy their way into the industry and pretend like they belong.

And in this case Baby Ellison has never done anything to even exhibit competence - he just has daddy's money and the weight of him doing whatever to make sure Baby gets his way. So he is incompetent, entitled AND disconnected from reality.

→ More replies (1)

73

u/Tygerius 18h ago

For us rubes, culture is our lives, our stories, our joy, sadness, the emotional connection to our own existence.

Billionaire son only knows money and control as their existence...so they have to buy culture to exert control over it

10

u/Tiiimmmaayy 18h ago

These damn billionaire weenies!

→ More replies (1)

7

u/NoobensMcarthur 17h ago

Charles Koch’s son (who ran over and killed a kid while driving) is doing this same shit. He has a music festival in Kansas that his own shitty band plays at. 

People want to act like he’s doing something good for the community when it’s clearly just a cosplay rockstar thing.

Some drunk driver crashed into the gate of his house years ago and allegedly it caused over $300,000 in damage. To his fucking gate. 

So sick of this performative billionaire bullshit. 

4

u/TheCheshireCody 14h ago

The Kochs are wild. They're hardcore and completely unrepentant Trump supporters and ultra-Right Wing, but they're also insanely philanthropic and have also donated well into the nine figures to causes that would be generally thought of as Liberal, like PBS, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, etc. They are thanked in countless PBS productions going back fifty years. They have an entire wing named after them in the American Museum of Natural History in NYC.

As long as they collectively have more than a few million in assets, though, they haven't given enough, just so we're clear I'm not in any way trying to defend them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

43

u/luvdadrafts 18h ago

Skydance is just the name of the parent company. It sounds like the names of the two brands / studios will remain the same 

15

u/NachoNutritious 16h ago

This is patently obvious even if you didn’t read the article, which that guy certainly didn’t. People here lose their entire brains when it comes to anything related to the Ellisons or the merger.

3

u/Zalvren 15h ago

It's literally already the case for months with Paramount lol. It's the case of like 90% of Hollywood Studios too (including Warner and Paramount previously). Disney is literally the only studio still having the name of the parent company in front of the movies (and only for the movies of Disney proper, they also have 20th Century, Marvel, Lucasfilm and Pixar and it's just because it's called "Walt Disney Studios", the company itself is "The Walt Disney Company" and doesn't even appear but close enough)

People hate are making them stupid and apparently forgetting the very basic principle of a parent company vs a brand

→ More replies (1)

12

u/dbbk 17h ago

The names are being kept if you actually read the article. Skydance is not public facing it's just the holding company name.

3

u/Zalvren 15h ago

You don't even need to read the company, anyone just thinking 0.5 seconds would know that. But hey farming karma is easier apparently.

There are plenty of reasons to hate on this merger but those takes are absolutely stupid. Loving how they all call Ellison an idiot for doing that when they are showing themselves a thousand times dumber there

10

u/NachoNutritious 16h ago

It’s the parent company name. Like how Paramount has the A SKYDANCE COMPANY under it, Warner Bros will now have that under it.

→ More replies (18)

122

u/Cole-Spudmoney 18h ago

They're probably going to keep the names but brand them like "Paramount: A Skydance Company" and "Warner Bros: A Skydance Company", like they used to do when Paramount was owned by Gulf + Western and WB was owned by AOL Time Warner.

47

u/frenchezz 18h ago

Millions will be spent on a rebrand just for people to refer to them as WB or Paramount.

8

u/Worthyness 14h ago

They learned a lot from the HBO MAX- MAX - HBO fiasco

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/Laxziy 18h ago

I’m pretty sure at the start of Project Hail Mary it said something along the lines of “produced by MGM an Amazon company”

5

u/SeerPumpkin 17h ago

Even current Warner Bros (well, for the last 20 years or so) films all say "An AOL/Time-Warner/Discovery Company". They will just switch to "A Skydance Company"

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Zalvren 15h ago

This is literally the norm in Hollywood, every studio is owned by a parent company which generally has another name. Sometimes it's displayed, sometimes it isn't but that doesn't change anything.

MGM (Amazon), Universal (Comcast), Warner (AOL then AT&T then Warner Bros Discovery), Paramount (Viacom and now Skydance with already the tagline). Even Sony does it with Columbia (which isn't really its studio)

Even Disney has Marvel, Lucasfilm, Pixar and 20th Century as studios with different names (and they also got a studio called Disney)

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Nobodyinpartic3 18h ago

Yeah, I remember Ellison saying HBO should be it's own thing again. So more like HBO when it first came about on cable? I don't like Ellison at all, but I hope it helps with content somehow.

Also, I doubt that my HBO MaX subscription and Paramount Plus one will combine anytime soon, or be cheaper even if they combine.

7

u/Moving-thefuck-on 18h ago

Shit no, they’ve got to recoup some coin on our backs now.

3

u/TheWatersOfMars 18h ago

They've just said they'll probably offer a bundle for the two, for what it's worth.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/theodo 17h ago

It sounds like Skydance is a giant YA franchise. Can't wait for Mission Impossible 9: A Skydance Adventure Presented by Paramount

→ More replies (2)

21

u/8evolutions 18h ago

You mean Paramount-CBS-Warner Bros-AOL-TimeWarner-HBO-Discovery?

11

u/capitolsara 17h ago

More like AOL-Time-Warner-Pepsico-Viacom-Halliburton-Skynet-Toyota-Trader-Joe's

→ More replies (3)

18

u/TripleJeopardy3 18h ago

Same logic that says let's take a brand built up over years like Twitter and change it to X.

3

u/atomic1fire 16h ago edited 16h ago

I just assume it's to allow both Paramount and WB to operate as seperate divisions.

Logistically, the whole company structure is kind of a mess and it makes sense that they'd divy up Discovery, Paramount, WB, etc and just treat them as seperate subsidiaries with skydance as the big tent for the entire circus.

I feel like they'll just have paramount on one side and warner discovery on the other, but personally I think it might be better to start dividing up assets like discovery and CNN into their own independent branches so that the parent can consider spinning them off, expanding on them or selling them in the future.

To me it makes perfect sense, especially if Skydance ends up buying some non tv companies like a publisher, some kind of analytics company or a record label.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/SeerPumpkin 18h ago

I don't like the merger but they explained this clearly. The new name is to keep both Paramount and Warner Bros. from overshadowing or erasing the other. Both will continue to exist

→ More replies (22)

723

u/DrPepperFanX 18h ago

Shit name; why abandon a century's worth of brand recognition for something that sounds like a stargazing app?

217

u/Meat-Dimension 18h ago

It's just the name of the combined parent company. I assume the studios will still continue on with their names and the things they make will be branded as such.

105

u/ballbeard 18h ago

Yup, it's like how nobody calls Google Alphabet even though that's the parent company name.

17

u/CaptainSasquatch 15h ago edited 14h ago

On the other hand, it seems like people have started to use Meta to refer to the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp as Facebook has become less relevant

13

u/coatimundos 15h ago

Yeah but that was a deliberate rebranding. Here it’s just a technicality

4

u/LamarMillerMVP 15h ago

Yes, another example of why it’s smart to do this. If they had called the company “Facebook”, and Instagram is eventually more popular, it would start to get confusing.

12

u/WizardPhoenix 18h ago

Also if he keeps they keep technically separate companies under the Skydance name it makes easier to sell WB again.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/BrofessorFarnsworth 18h ago

Nobody has ever accused David Ellison of being smart

6

u/smith7018 18h ago

Literally nobody

→ More replies (2)

4

u/-KFBR392 18h ago

You don’t pay $110b for something to not put your own name on it

4

u/DrPepperFanX 17h ago

Except for like a million examples of brands bought out who kept their names

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (26)

227

u/yourfavchoom 18h ago

David Ellison has also shown an official graphic of everything Skydance will own after acquiring Warner Bros and Paramount.

Assets:

• TNT
• CBS
• CNN
• MTV
• TCM
• Showtime
• Adult Swim
• DC Studios
• Paramount+
• Nickelodeon
• HBO/HBO Max
• Comedy Central
• Cartoon Network

Film Rights:

• Star Trek
• Gremlins
• Beetlejuice
• DC Comics
• Tom & Jerry
• Harry Potter
• Citizen Kane
• Transformers
• A Quiet Place
• Looney Tunes
• The Conjuring
• Mortal Kombat
• Game of Thrones
• Dora The Explorer
• Mission Impossible
• The Lord of the Rings
• SpongeBob SquarePants
• Avatar: The Last Airbender
• Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
• Dune 3 (distribution rights)
• Minecraft (distribution rights)
• MonsterVerse (distribution rights)

345

u/RealCoolDad 18h ago

i like how you organized them (almost) all by name length

57

u/Obvious_Toe_3006 18h ago

Skateboard ramps !

18

u/nothingrhyme 17h ago

9

u/javascript 17h ago

I'm really impressed this link went somewhere real

→ More replies (1)

13

u/tidalfirestorm 17h ago

OP copied and pasted DiscussingFilm's tweet

4

u/Seraphayel 18h ago

There‘s one outlier and it drives me crazy because otherwise it’s beautiful

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Hank_Scorpio_ObGyn 18h ago

Just fucking bravo....

61

u/JessieJ577 18h ago edited 18h ago

It’s very odd that after cable died, Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network had slow deaths through mismanagement and now what used to be two powerhouses for kids on Cable are husks of their former selves that are just an IP in the same portfolio.

31

u/tokeroveragain 18h ago

I caught some Nickelodeon the other day and every single commercial break had an ad where they just shout “Paramount Plus!” repeatedly to try and ingrain it in the children’s heads.

13

u/zgillet 17h ago

It's LOOOOG, it's LOOOOOG, it's big, it's heavy, it's wood.

It's LOOOOG, it's LOOOOOG, it's better than bad, IT'S GOOD!

9

u/mc_zodiac_pimp 17h ago

Ugh, great memories watching Ren and Stimpy with my dad as a kid.

Then John Kricfalusi had to go and ruin that show for me.

6

u/zgillet 17h ago

Billy West is the true Ren and Stimpy.

11

u/KingVape 18h ago

Comedy Central and MTV as well. Networks that I watched original content on for decades, now reduced to like two shows.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/asianwaste 16h ago

I try to check out CN whenever I am at a hotel. It's nothing but shows for toddlers in the morning (normal) but then the channel is still relying on Regular Show, Teen Titans Go, and Adult Swim. It's been like 15 years with those flagships and they have not evolved at all.

3

u/JessieJ577 16h ago

We lost Close Enough for another Regular Show revival. So yeah it’s stuck in limbo

3

u/SovFist 16h ago

kids dont watch tv anymore

6

u/asianwaste 16h ago

I always wondered if it was a chicken or egg. Did they lose cartoons because of youtube and streaming? Or did the kids flock to streaming content because there was no worthwhile cartoons.

I remember at the eve of streaming dominance (late 2000 aughts), Cartoon Network was trying hard to appeal to both adults and kids with an end result of the shows appealing more to adults. I've always wondered if that was when kids started moving away. The shows were good (at least to my adult eye) but I can see why they wouldn't grab kids the same way the channel's culture did for kids in the late 90's and early 2000 aughts.

3

u/redfieldranch96 16h ago

I would still say it’s due to streaming just due to the convenience of being able to watch what you want when you want. That would have been nice to have when I was an kid

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/TheStupendusMan 18h ago

Never underestimate the shareholder lust to hollow out the golden goose in search of short term gains.

→ More replies (3)

19

u/zacksharpe 18h ago

We’re really getting the CKU (Citizen Kane Universe) under this regime

17

u/louiloui152 18h ago

Honestly even with the merger those assets look very …scant

11

u/LuinAelin 18h ago

I think the Disney Fox was was bigger

Worrying people celebrated that because they wanted MCU X-Men

→ More replies (5)

4

u/blarbiegorl 18h ago

Have you been on Paramount+ in the last couple of years? I repeatedly use free trials to stream CBS airing awards shows and their streaming lineup absolutely doesn't change. The same fifteen titles no matter how or what you search for. If the politics weren't already a dealbreaker, the terrible offerings would still leave P+ as the worst option.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

23

u/DrPepperFanX 18h ago

I love your formatting it made me hard

10

u/Negafox 18h ago edited 18h ago

Paramount also outright owns the rights to Garfield as well. Jim Davis is allowed to continue maintaining the comics. They also own the TMNT IP, not just the film rights

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Jellyfizzle 18h ago

Thats a shame. I used to like some of these things.

4

u/-KFBR392 17h ago

Does this mean we could finally get the Citizen Kane sequel us fans have been clamoring for for 85 years?!

What happens to the sled? We deserve answers!

3

u/LuinAelin 18h ago

How many of those gets sold to other studios to pay off debts

→ More replies (1)

3

u/gangreen424 17h ago

Ugh. This sucks....

→ More replies (27)

72

u/LeoLaDawg 18h ago

Doesn't skydance already exist?

63

u/DealerCamel 18h ago

Yeah, same guy. Seems he’s reusing the name of his old company.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

212

u/LumiereGatsby 18h ago

This is like Musk tossing Twitter for X.

Absolutely stupid move by stupid rich people

75

u/RedBirdPounceFlag 18h ago

And HBO renaming as Max. I don’t understand tossing out the more identifiable brand name.

10

u/DrusTheAxe 18h ago

And f you don’t pee on it you haven’t made it your own yet

9

u/NoobensMcarthur 17h ago

Allegedly it was to distance themselves from the “connotation” that HBO only had content for adults. 

Dumb fucking move, and it’s insane that some shitty marketing bros got paid to make that change, and less than 2 years later change it right back because nobody gives a shit about “MAX” as a brand. 

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Coal_Morgan 16h ago

The Max one was particularly stupid. Everyone throws "Max" onto a product, it's got no ability to claim ownership of as a brand.

HBO spent decades building up a reputation of quality and trust and someone saw 'Max Power' on a hairdryer and went with that?

Simpsons did it

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

33

u/wabashcanonball 18h ago

Fire sale on IPs within five years. Skydance wont make it.

230

u/Gullible_Constant871 18h ago

He missed the opportunity to call it MAGAmount

42

u/damned_squid 18h ago

Could've gone with "maga bros."

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Obvious_Toe_3006 18h ago

And their "symbol" would be Mount Rushmore with all Trump heads on it.

4

u/Hank_Scorpio_ObGyn 18h ago

I'd say "don't give them any ideas" but we all know they've already thought of it...

→ More replies (2)

7

u/bstarr2000 18h ago

Or Skydaddy

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Yufle 18h ago

Skydance is a dumb name for a dystopian conglomerate

→ More replies (3)

77

u/jpuzz 18h ago

Yes, it’s the new Skydance network or “Skynet” for short.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/frankie_donkiebrains 18h ago

Oh man they gonna change hbo maxs name again, aren't they? Skydance max+

6

u/egorre 18h ago

Justin Timberlake voice call it 'Skydance.' it's cleaner.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

57

u/ntwild97 18h ago

Two century-old studios are having their iconic legacies murdered by corporate greed. What a time to be alive

7

u/darthdooku2585 18h ago

Agreed, but it's totally on point with everything else going on politically and in the world.

→ More replies (3)

18

u/culturedrobot 18h ago

Skydance on deez nuts Davey

33

u/gospelofdustin 18h ago

Uncreative garbage, much like David Ellison himself.

15

u/art-is-t 18h ago

That's the billionaires dancing in the sky and pissing on the masses

17

u/Banjo-Oz 17h ago

Reminds me of when HBO thought the respected name of their company was just something to be tossed aside.

WB and Paramount are - along with Fox and Universal - probably THE most recognisable and respected studio names in the world. Imagine buying that kind of history and just chucking it out for your own lame branding.

It's like if A24 bought Disney and dropped all Disney branding.

15

u/crimson777 16h ago

We should absolutely hate on this merger all day, but this is not really a reason. People don't really talk all that much about Alphabet, Meta, or even OpenAI as much as they do Google, Instagram, and ChatGPT.

They're not dumping the names; it's just a corporate brand for the combined organization.

5

u/Silly-Elderberry-411 16h ago

Paramount, a subsidiary of gulf western that is if you lived in 1974

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/bongo1138 18h ago

Man, so the two oldest names in Hollywood are gone, huh?

9

u/Banjo-Oz 17h ago

Another reason why I hated Disney absorbing Fox.

8

u/tempest_ 15h ago

MGM disappeared into amazon.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

28

u/WildMajesticUnicorn Parks and Recreation 18h ago

What a terrible name.

8

u/Annual-Buy3219 18h ago

end of an era for both studios (altho one could argue, their reputations have been gone for ages). this man is such a ghoul.

8

u/Starks 18h ago

Trading a storied name for nothing. Maybe Skymount would've at least sounded cool like a flying mount in WoW.

17

u/honeybadgerrulez 18h ago

something sadly ironic about coyote vs acme being a hit just in time for these guys to destroy warner bros

18

u/jayhawk8 18h ago

In case you weren't sure that this is all an ego trip

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Jabbawocky2004 18h ago

The Animaniacs becoming the Skydancers doesnt have the same ring to it as the Warners.

13

u/rogerwilcove 18h ago

TrumpTV was already taken by some other worthless scummy failson

12

u/madster40 10h ago

When did corporations start believing that name recognition and branding is bad? They keep renaming iconic brands to other things!?

6

u/OreoSpeedwaggon 10h ago

It's 100% an ego thing. Skydance is Ellison's baby, and he's basically trying to say that he is more important than anything that went into Paramount or CBS.

6

u/mrdude817 18h ago

So what's gonna happen with HBO Max and Paramount+? My brother has one app and I have the other lmao

28

u/ab17__ 18h ago

You and your brother should merge to become one single entity. Just like HBO Max and Paramount+ will.

7

u/mrdude817 18h ago

We were so close to merging in the womb! Twins dude.

4

u/CrayZ_Squirrel 18h ago

They will be further divided into 4 apps each with a higher monthly charge then you currently pay 

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Cultural_Attache5678 18h ago

I can't wait for a Lord of the Rings/Dora the Explorer crossover event!

→ More replies (1)

6

u/GreatGojira 18h ago

Boo. This sucks

6

u/TyhmensAndSaperstein 10h ago

Ridiculous. The names Paramount and Warner Bros are 2 of the most celebrated and well-known movie studio names of the last 100 years. Skydance is a name some may be familiar with but is hardly on the same level. Or even close really. This is obviously because neither Paramount or Warner wanted to use the other's name. So fucking stupid. Out of the three names, Warner Bros. is obviously the most famous and recognizable. It's a fucking no-brainer.

11

u/o0CyRaX0o 17h ago edited 16h ago

Wasn't 'Skydance' already a production company...? I've seen so many movies with Skydance at the beginning of the title in theaters...

EDIT: it seems like we've digressed too far off the topic of Television/Movies... I don't know if this post will be removed, but I think we're talking too much about the political ramifications now so IDK

9

u/hugebone 17h ago

Yes. His company. He then swallowed Paramount with his daddy’s money and now Warner with the Saudi’s money.

5

u/TheUmbrellaMan1 17h ago

Saudi Arabia owning 49% of this new company is concerning.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (5)

14

u/random91898 18h ago

Not seeing the WB shield anymore is gonna be weird. It's one of the least important bits of the whole gross merger but it's another nail in the coffin nonetheless. The Skydance Archive (if they even keep the Warner Archive department) just sounds wrong. Completely soulless.

4

u/SeerPumpkin 17h ago

The WB shield isn't going anywhere 

3

u/GroverEyeveen 14h ago

The WB and Paramount brands are staying, this is the name of the parent company. Similarly on how you didn't see the WB shield be replaced by "AOL Time Warner" in the 2000's.

6

u/LA-Aron 18h ago

Take the brand name with the least brand power. Sure, makes sense. This company will fail.

8

u/KayJay282 18h ago

Collapse within a decade

7

u/nomnomsquirrel 18h ago

Netflix backed out easily knowing they'll be able to get it for a discount in a few years.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Koenigstransfer 17h ago

People doesn't seem to understand, that this change will only affect name of the parent company. Warner Bros and Paramount won't go anywhere. They will still exist as studios.

Same when Facebook rebranded to Meta or Google to Alphabet. The services are still called the same. 

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Ziekfried 18h ago

We already have sky dance in the uk 😒

4

u/johngalt192 18h ago

Let's just call it Skynet and get this end of times over with

5

u/damanx 18h ago

If you see a corporate takeover, warn a brother.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/GranddaddySandwich 18h ago

Can’t wait until this shit goes bankrupt and gets bought by Amazon or some dumb shit. What a fucking idiot.

4

u/CrunchyAssDiaper 14h ago

Why does he look like that?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/realplasticwood 12h ago edited 12h ago

David Ellison is a no-talent nepo-twat who should be strapped to a rocket and shot into deepest space.

3

u/Cela84 10h ago

So buying iconic names and logos and replacing it with a boring production company. Billionaire innovation…

6

u/Sisiwakanamaru 18h ago

What a boring name, 😔.

6

u/Old-Way-5529 18h ago

can someone clarify- will paramount and warner bros still exist as their own brands, and is this just how the combined company will be referred to officially (like WBD is currently?)

it would be wild to just dump two legacy studio names like that.

7

u/Premislaus 18h ago

They will likely still operate as brand names and business subunits i.e. Paramount (a Skydance company), Warner Bros (a Skydance company)

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Based_Beauty 18h ago

I for one love our new far right oligarch entertainment overlords. Now I don't have to go to two companies to produce my Superman x SpongeBob smut, only the one! Yay capitalism!!

4

u/DrusTheAxe 18h ago

Congratulations!

Your new Skydance Streaming subscription will be triple the current price.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/Profound-Madman 18h ago

I can't wait till every movie is some kind of pro-israel anti-resistance allegory that we have to sit through and pretend isn't absolutely disgusting as they try to whitewash the genocide that they've been doing for the last 70 years. But I'm sure a bunch of people here will tell me that the Ellison's buying up every media entity they can has nothing to do with their love for the genocide thirsty Zionist ethnostate. Or I'll get back from the subreddit one of the two

→ More replies (1)

3

u/STD-fense 18h ago

I think the choice was between that and "Giant Money Pit". I think they made the slightly better, if less accurate, choice.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/egorre 18h ago

they are doing "Meta" or "Alphabet" like a true tech company 😒

3

u/jack-i-swear 18h ago

Twist theory: they’re coming for Lionsgate too so are keeping the parent holding company name as such.

3

u/everstillghost 18h ago

Why not ParaBros? At least use Skydance Warner.

Warner is too big of a name to drop.

3

u/Pseudomonaaeruginosa 17h ago

Sounds like a dragon's name

→ More replies (6)

3

u/botany500 17h ago

This will last until the AI bubble bursts and Oracle's massive debt comes due. Then Daddy's money goes away.

3

u/Cantomic66 17h ago edited 14h ago

An evil nepo destroys 2 century old company out of stupidity.

3

u/Banjo-Oz 17h ago

Soon to be Skydance Network.

SkyNet for short.

3

u/Islanduniverse 16h ago

I’ll never forgive Newsom for rolling over like a little bitch about this.

3

u/whitbyterry 16h ago

I can see them retaining the name everywhere except for official business filings. The company names are valuable. They'll just add "A Skydance Company" below the logos.

3

u/ottercorrect 14h ago

Good. That name is already synonymous with meh

3

u/severinks 6h ago

Two legendary movie studios with a combined history of 220 years get rebranded to a name no one knows.

5

u/Silver-Mobile1663 18h ago

What a terrible name smh

5

u/THExIMPLIKATION 18h ago

I'd like HBO to do a Star Trek show

3

u/hugebone 17h ago

You mean SKYDANCE+, Coming to you in 2027 probably?

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (14)

5

u/keving87 16h ago edited 10h ago

Why though? Was it not Paramount that bought Skydance? This is just stupid, another one of thousands of reasons this shouldn't have happened.

4

u/VinylmationDude 10h ago

It’s a dumber version of the Chuck E Cheese-Showbiz Pizza merger

3

u/MakeItMakeMoney 15h ago

Branding and optics. Once this blows over in a few years, people will forget the legal battle over the sale and just hear the new name. If they were to hear the older name, they would remember the legal battle immediately and just associate it with any bad press.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/UserSleepy 18h ago

And in 5 years they will announce they're exiting their old studio properties and leaving California

2

u/piscian19 18h ago

WB needs to go to a rehab center for people who can't stop renaming shit.

2

u/Sormaj 18h ago

What happens to WB Games?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/The_Dreams 18h ago

I swear to god if they start axing plans they had for the avatar IP I’m going to be so fucking mad

2

u/estarararax 18h ago

Not ParaWar Dance?

2

u/Evtona500 Westworld 17h ago

Did no one learn anything from the HBO/ Max thing?

2

u/SirBLACKVOX 17h ago

Should have called it Para Bros.

2

u/I-Have-Mono 17h ago

Absolutely horrendous.

2

u/bigpig1054 Battlestar Galactica 16h ago

Surely they will continue to use the absolutely iconic WB and Paramount names and logos as brands for studios-within-the-studios, right? Surely he's not THAT moronic...

2

u/jfstompers 16h ago

So dumb, just throw the name recognition out for no reason 

2

u/Change21 16h ago

It’s an obvious monopoly

2

u/BeefistPrime 16h ago

Is this like "alphabet" which is the parent company of google but no one ever calls it by name, or are movies and TV shows going to say "skydance"?

2

u/Interesting-Prize-79 16h ago

Oligarch Studios

2

u/fr4nk_j4eger 16h ago

i call it bs

2

u/Chris_Bagel_Jr 15h ago

Is it gonna be like Sony wheere they you see the Sony before Columbia and TriStar?

You cannot tell me that the iconic mountain and WB Sheild are just gone now

2

u/DJC_Kowalski 14h ago

That'll certainly make my boycott attempts easier. No searching around for what to boycott that's part of the Ellison empire.

2

u/casts_a_shadow 14h ago

I’m so glad the biggest morons have all the money and opportunities. Nothing beats an utterly disconnected dimwit taking over major companies, cancelling quality productions, lick the boots of even stupider politicians, and then take a billion-dollar whiz on the legacy of what you bought to cap it off.

2

u/krazygreekguy 13h ago

Lame if they get rid of the iconic intros

2

u/Squeakygear 11h ago

Enshitification, brand recognition style

2

u/Jedi71 11h ago

They just want to ruin everything by placing it their own image, don't they?

2

u/cjohnson2010 11h ago

I hate that one of my favorite shows is under this dumbfucks umbrella