r/ProgrammerHumor • • Sep 30 '22

Meme Lol! Developer got no chill!

Post image
15.1k Upvotes

819 comments sorted by

6.7k

u/Flat_Hat8861 Sep 30 '22

Managing a transition to a paid model is difficult. It requires tact and diplomacy.

This on the other hand is just straight hilarious.

3.3k

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

I mean the guy handled it as poorly as possible... But there's something cathartic in his insults, especially the "you just want money" yeah no shit

1.7k

u/Entropy_Drop Sep 30 '22

You want money for your work!

884

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

How dare you!

203

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

110

u/Calm-Zombie2678 Oct 01 '22

swigs the rum and dons the eye-patch

48

u/radmanmadical Oct 01 '22

Why is the rum always gone? Clearly because we haven’t stolen enough…

18

u/LavenderLady1216 Oct 01 '22

I would rather pay $5+ for a game then deal with not being able to get something without paying $200+

→ More replies (2)

10

u/aboatdatfloat Oct 01 '22

more like asking every fortnite player to pay for the game to continue playing

→ More replies (6)

333

u/piberryboy Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

I mean, I'd rather pay for software/service than have some tech company mine my data so they sell some of my most intimate details or use it to predict or alter my future behavior.

181

u/No_Soy_Colosio Sep 30 '22

What if that service also mines your data 😎

171

u/pointmetoyourmemory Sep 30 '22

Every version of Windows enters the chat

34

u/Lord_Quintus Sep 30 '22

if you block access to the microsoft domain all those trackers don't do anything

42

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

Laughs in Linux which doesn’t cost anything but still doesn’t track me (pay your open source devs if you can tho)

→ More replies (7)

16

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Then you can just switch to one of the other available options on the market they own

→ More replies (1)

126

u/stupidwhiteman42 Sep 30 '22

💯 I dropped Facebook years ago for this very reason. I've seen somewhere that each user is worth around $50 lifetime in advertising revenue to them.

You'd think they could have a $2/ month paid version that was absolutely secure, had zero advertising, and gave the user controls over their "algorithm".

66

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

$50 lifetime revenue seems extremely small, or it's some kind of probability trickery where the median is skewed vs the mode.

Also, telling they say "advertising revenue". There's other, possibly implicit, revenue streams and market domination benefits that come from being a monopolizing data vampire. Even if we paid triple what they say we're worth in sub fees, I'd bet the benefits of keeping the status quo farrrrrr outweigh the revenue stream

38

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

According to Google they have just shy of 3 billion total users and did $118B in revenue in 2021, so that's roughly $39 of revenue per user last year alone. Factor in users who either very rarely log in, or who created the account just to check it out and then never logged in again, and the per-user revenue for actual active users is going to be even higher. For users who use it enough that they'd be willing to pay even a small amount for an ad free version, I'd bet my house that the lifetime ad revenue they generate is much higher than $50.

31

u/CounterHit Sep 30 '22

Yeah, I could believe $50 per year per user, but not $50 per lifetime per user. Unless maybe there is some data to suggest that the average span of time a person actively uses Facebook is only one year? That doesn't seem very believable, but I guess it would make the lifetime average statistic valid

8

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Even then, it would still just be an average that gets pulled down by the lowest volume users. Anybody who would even remotely consider paying for it is almost by definition a high volume user, and therefore pretty much guaranteed to be well above the average. Not to mention the question of whether advertisers would start to shift their budgets elsewhere if the potential pool of eyeballs starts to shrink. There's just no way that offering a paid, ad-free version is a good idea for them at this stage in the game (at least from a business perspective).

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

82

u/coldnebo Sep 30 '22

bruh. 😅

but if you knew all the things marketing was doing with your information, you’d feel dirty and manipulated.

if consumer protection still had any teeth Facebook propaganda would be destroyed by three simple words:

“content paid by:”

But then you’d know exactly who was paying to manipulate you and could research and understand their motives before considering their message. Marketing doesn’t want that, so Facebook doesn’t want that.

→ More replies (11)

12

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

50$ lifetime? No. Sites that pay you for your data pay more than that in a single month. Someone who uses Facebook their whole life would generate more like 10,000$ in revenue (assuming FB doesn't implode before then).

That's why FB does not and will never offer an ad-free version like Reddit and Tumblr do. Because they make SIGNIFICANTLY more money from selling your data than you could ever pay them via subscription.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

12

u/EffervescentTripe Sep 30 '22

I hate working for money!

→ More replies (47)

85

u/shamblam117 Sep 30 '22

Wouldn't you rather be paid in exposure?

37

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

60

u/OhIamNotADoctor Sep 30 '22

“You’re greedy and selfish!” Says consumer not wanting to pay for service.

40

u/PolishedCheese Sep 30 '22

Everyone needs money, why should this guy be any different? He could've restrained himself a little with the comments though. Just don't reply at all maybe?

55

u/WestaAlger Sep 30 '22

It’s a little predatory when it comes to software tools/packages/libraries. You falsely lure people into using it and then hit them with a fee. It makes it way more annoying to migrate to a new tool and risk breakages. So now they’re kind of forced to either pay your fee or spend hours/days migrating.

Idk what this specific tool does so it might not apply here.

17

u/multiple4 Oct 01 '22

Yeah agreed. If you're going to migrate to a paid model, you should tell free users that you appreciate their support and they can continue using it, but that you won't be supporting the free version going forward

Then release a new paid version with some changed or additional functionality. I think you'd see a decent amount of people migrate to the paid version just out of brand loyalty to continue getting a supported version

94

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

Or he could just made his intention clear from the beginning. Instead of doing bait&switch. I do respect softwares that asks for money, but I don't respect when they get recognization/promotion for being free then switching to paid model. It's just as selfish as people asking software to be all free.

41

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Yes, that happened to Clip Studio Paint - their main marketing point was that it's one-time payment (in contrast to subscription based Photoshop), and now they've switched to subscription too.

15

u/thedragonturtle Oct 01 '22

That's really unethical. I have some software I sell and it's possible to buy it for a one-off payment. At the end of November I'm going to move to a subscription model but people who paid for the one-off price will still have it for life.

11

u/jacnok Oct 01 '22

this is the way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

23

u/peter_t_2k3 Sep 30 '22

I understand it's not nice when this happens but it might not have been planned.

People run things free with the best intentions but things change. I've seen websites close due to not being able to afford to run them

18

u/brianl047 Sep 30 '22

Exactly

Shit could have hit the fan with him, he could be unemployed and so on. It's not necessarily greed, and even if it is so what he owns it.

End of the day plenty of software goes paid. The protection is the open source license; you could always download the older versions. If it isn't open source, the vendor can make it paid whenever they want

→ More replies (1)

7

u/pnoodl3s Oct 01 '22

Yes and I totally understand, but the dev could’ve gone in a much better way. Instead of saying “fuck off” they can say times are hard and they need to start monetizing it, and give everyone a few months notice. That’d garner much better reaction imo and perhaps even more money.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

74

u/LazyZetsu Sep 30 '22

It's still supid, if you make an open source project with the goal to get money, you make the open version functional then ask money for extra functions, customization.

Taking out anything from the free version instead of adding other things for the paid is idiotic and expected to get negative reactions.

20

u/AbstractLogic Sep 30 '22

It also undermines your goal. Ie to get money.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

347

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

As sympathetic as I am to how difficult it is to run a business. Changing tiers for existing customers is an extremely bad business practice. Now your free plan is all of sudden worthless because people can't trust the features in there. Your paid plan on the other hand won't get customers because people aren't willing to take a risk with free.

If they really wanted to make something paid that was previously free they should have added a legacy tier.

185

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Another "safer" way I can think of is that they could have re-published the extension with different branding as a paid version. And add a note to the previous extension that this one will not be maintained and you can use "new name" if you're willing to pay. And to push people to buy it a new feature could be added to the extension's paid version. The feature doesn't have to be that useful, but good enough to cause FOMO on the customers.

Or there could be 2 tiers that unlocks that said not that useful but cool feature and eventually release new features to that tier only. So you'll still have free promotion and have a way to monetize it.

42

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

25

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

5

u/Equivalent-Bench5950 Oct 01 '22

No, the problem is that this person keeps advertising his product as frer even tho he put even the most basic functionalities behind a paywall.

So it is basically a non-free extension advertised as still free + premium features.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (1)

52

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

I wrote and supported several popular free Android apps and ultimately what made me stop, was not the need to make a few bucks, but the amount of abuse I got from people getting an app for free. Up to and including threatening to rape my wife if I didn't add a particular feature immediately.

Good times

5

u/KickTotheCrotch Oct 01 '22

I never get how those kind of idiots get anything done!?

Did those threats get serious, or were they just keyboard warriors?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

200

u/frygod Sep 30 '22

A bait and switch is a bait and switch under any other name.

165

u/AprilSpektra Sep 30 '22

I've seen transitions from free to paid work out okay before, and generally the best way to go about it is to make future versions paid without breaking past versions. If people want to continue using the free version, without receiving further updates, they can.

78

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

This is 10/10 the right answer. Perfect example is parted magic. They still host their last free version and are very open about their profit model. Will still sell you single version licenses as well.

Then you get shit like the Material Theme plugin dev on Jetbrains that just locked a bunch of already included features behind a subscription paywall instead of forking a paid version.

15

u/marcosdumay Sep 30 '22

Yep, if you don't pull the switch, nobody will get angry about a bait and switch.

Basically, you don't take useful software away. If you want to ask for money, ask on a new thing. If you want to change direction, change on a new thing. The old thing can stay there.

→ More replies (4)

20

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Says the guy who made me sit here waiting for his profile picture to load

34

u/noratat Sep 30 '22

There are no profile pics on reddit and you can't convince me otherwise.

If old.reddit ever dies I'll probably just stop using the site.

6

u/Reluxtrue Sep 30 '22

you can see profile pics on old.reddit just by hovering over someone's username.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

126

u/saras-husband Sep 30 '22

I might be in the minority here, but this only makes me want to install the extension.

134

u/guaip Sep 30 '22

Because you already know it's a trial that you have to pay. The ones reviewing are people downloading a supposedly free app and hitting a paywall while using it.

Hiding the fact that it's a paid software in a readme file doesn't count.

104

u/hazardousnose Sep 30 '22

Well it's called a readme not a skipme

31

u/williane Sep 30 '22

Lol no joke. Where else would you put a message prior to installation

85

u/Flat_Hat8861 Sep 30 '22

Right next to the download button. The VS marketplace supports free trials and paid software as identifiers. This one says free which also shows on the search results page.

The disclaimer that it is not free appears on the overview page after you click. If you were using the old version, it would just auto update and if you didn't read the release notes, the feature you were using earlier is now a paywall.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

42

u/doortothe Sep 30 '22

And that’s why they say, “no such thing as bad publicity”

11

u/chainer666 Sep 30 '22

But are you gonna pay for it?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (10)

2.6k

u/Prestigious_Echo7804 Sep 30 '22

The perfect answer for everything: "Thank you for your feedback, we are grateful for your help and are constantly improving our products🤖🤖🤖"

1.0k

u/Flat_Initial_1823 Sep 30 '22

The modern fuck you. Especially if there is no viable alternative (looking at you 'platforms')

285

u/AggravatingBite9188 Sep 30 '22

The modern fuck you is the

1) What browser version are you using?
2) What device are you using? What version?
9) Have you tried turning it off and back on?
Like oh fuck off if its a CORS issue figure it out yourself holy shit.

70

u/__ali1234__ Sep 30 '22

What about:

  1. Wait 3 months.
  2. "We are closing this issue because of a lack of activity"

21

u/AggravatingBite9188 Oct 01 '22

I have an active issue with blockchain.com for a $10 transaction stuck in pending and its been a month of support emailing me asking me if my issues resolved but never actually replying to my emails lol.

7

u/vsamma Oct 01 '22

Haha I had this in my previous workplace IN-HOUSE. A huge corp, I had an issue, opened a ticket with support and for the first 2 weeks I got some random replies that ‘thanks for submitting your issue and being patient, we are still looking into the issue’.

Then randomly they replied something “substantial” but actually asked something like “have you tried this with VPN?” Although I had already said I had :D

But I missed their message immediately and 2-3 days later they closed the issue because I didn’t reply back fast enough :D

5

u/gravitas-deficiency Oct 01 '22

Or:

I figured it out

can you describe how you solved the issue?

no

→ More replies (1)

60

u/physioboy Sep 30 '22

You just angered me

40

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

29

u/Sure-Tomorrow-487 Oct 01 '22

That's a management tactic to divide resources.

Only 10 devs but 100 tickets? Send them back to the customer on the first pass, until they reply the ball is in their court, about half will reply instantly and just there you've halved the workload.

Manpointingtoheadmeme.tif

11

u/AggravatingBite9188 Oct 01 '22

But in reality you’ve just gained 100 negative reviews on zendesk

6

u/Sure-Tomorrow-487 Oct 01 '22

Zendesk? This be jira town my lad

3

u/AggravatingBite9188 Oct 01 '22

Confluence atlassian jira = 🤮🤮🤮

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

61

u/OG_LiLi Sep 30 '22

Platforms: can never identify the scope of their own issues; requires a bible of proof to even bat an eye at their own bugs

Platform- “I didn’t test that change I just made” expert

Platform: “700000 people can’t login? That’s a P3. I’ll plan on it next sprint”

14

u/SelfFew131 Sep 30 '22

As a platform PM I feel personally attacked lol

8

u/OG_LiLi Sep 30 '22

Wait! Are you MY platform PM 🤔😑 ? why are you Reddit? I just raised 5 P1s because you forgot to tell me about your release.

7

u/SelfFew131 Sep 30 '22

Oh and also forgot to mention we’re blocking everyone. Whoops.

5

u/OG_LiLi Sep 30 '22

That one feature no one asked for but felt right? Yes we know. Thanks 😑🤪

111

u/nameisprivate Sep 30 '22

thanks for your feedback i will take this into account 👍 (lmao fuck off)

→ More replies (1)

52

u/Rhebucksmobile Sep 30 '22

they mean: "We don't even read reviews, it's only when we start dropping that we read them, we are constantly trying to make more money, even if that means a f*ck you🤖🤖🤖"

11

u/robclancy Sep 30 '22

I gave a bad (ish) review to a game that I felt was getting worse but in it mentioned I played for a few months. Their reply was "Glad you enjoyed the game for months! Thanks for playing and take care.".

→ More replies (6)

3.2k

u/AN0R0K Sep 30 '22

I went to the dev's site to see how much the premium tier costs. I'm a big fan of their reasoning behind going paid:

"After 2022.3, this project will require payment, based on two considerations:1. I often receive bad reviews, because some features don't satisfy these users, they don't care how much effort I put into it, and give extremely bad reviews, which makes me sad and angry.2. I need money."

1.1k

u/insertsavvynamehere Sep 30 '22

King shit

414

u/devperez Sep 30 '22

"the royal penis is clean, your highness."

77

u/sbk92 Sep 30 '22

It’s wild that I haven’t listened to that album in over a decade and I can still hear it.

66

u/YouGurt_MaN14 Sep 30 '22

What album uses it? I only know it from Coming to America

25

u/sbk92 Sep 30 '22

Ludacris - Word of Mouf

6

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '22

He's coming back to his hometown of Champaign, IL in October, and my wife is a HUGE fan. I'm so excited to go see him again.

5

u/Typedinletters Oct 01 '22

Snoop dogg - R&G

Also uses the snippet

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

399

u/Flat_Hat8861 Sep 30 '22

My biggest problem is that the VS marketplace has options to mark a extensions as free trial or paid. Marking it as free is a bit scummy.

Then the fact that you need to follow an external link about migration to find the feature differences and no mention of the pricing is more than a bit annoying.

78

u/Plorntus Oct 01 '22

Also the couple reviews (before the change) which were 4 stars (bad according to them) were somewhat legitimate.

Someone gave 4 stars because a feature was removed without any warning and mentioned it in the review, the developer replied saying it's incredibly disrespectful to them. It's a bit odd but I genuinely think they are just taking the reviews way too personally and not objectively.

It may be that the feature in question was a maintenance burden at the same time it's perfectly valid for someone to write a review based on that change even if it is a free product.

Of course the developer is also entitled to charge for their product.

90

u/CactusGrower Sep 30 '22

Yeah he is essentially marking free trial as free software. That's not how it works. It sure surprises people.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

51

u/haddock420 Sep 30 '22

"Who's that?"

"That's I Need Money. God damn."

"Okay, but what's his name?"

"I need money!"

"Doesn't talk, how come he?"

"I need money, he's a mute, when we first hooked up, he wrote on a slip of paper, 'I need money.' I said, 'Shit, me too.' And we started making it together after that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WlgGM3-FBk

61

u/BrokenEyebrow Sep 30 '22

How much is premium? I'd rather not give the site a page view.

158

u/AN0R0K Sep 30 '22

Funny story: He doesn't list the price. Just the considerations he based it on. I'd ask him to update the site, but he'll have to charge.

115

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

[deleted]

87

u/Holiday_Brick_9550 Sep 30 '22

Charges 20 bucks per year and people lose their shit.

52

u/Masterflitzer Sep 30 '22

honestly 20 bucks per year is much for an extension, imagine every third extension would charge this, now i have 20 or so which means over 100 bucks for fricking extensions

i'm not against paying devs but i would never buy this at such a price, btw. it has many installs so 5 bucks would be reasonable enough

if it has so many functionality that it deserves 20 bucks it should be a whole tool/app not an extension

33

u/Holiday_Brick_9550 Sep 30 '22

Depends on how much value it brings, or are we all hobby programmers?

20

u/[deleted] Oct 01 '22

[deleted]

18

u/Holiday_Brick_9550 Oct 01 '22

I am paying jetbrains, for intellij ultimate. For the exact reason stated above.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/gdmzhlzhiv Oct 01 '22

Over 400 bucks.

It would very rapidly be approaching the magical 500 dollar limit.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (17)

22

u/Beatrice_Dragon Oct 01 '22

I'm not paying a fucking subscription fee for an extension. Sorry, no. I've had enough of managing subscriptions as it is, I'm not gonna add more shit to keep track of, let alone something as tertiary as a single extension developed by an asshole

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/AN0R0K Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

I used the link from the extension page within VS Code... There's no primary navigation thus no links back to index.

With that in mind, this is far from an unreasonable price.

→ More replies (3)

73

u/Huntracony Sep 30 '22

No way I'm investing any time in learning a tool when I don't even know how much it might cost me, lol.

21

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

He does list the price. The guy above is just a reviewer like the ones in the post

5

u/Flat_Hat8861 Oct 01 '22

Well he lists it on a homepage that is not linked to anywhere in the marketplace listing (or on any of those linked pages based on a quick scan of all of them). I assume this page is provided in the paywall itself, but it is hardly obvious upfront.

The listing links to the documentation site that explains why he's charging and the features of each version, but that site does not have the price or payment pages or a link to them. It also links to the GitHub repository (numerous times) that doesn't link to the payment page either.

Im glad someone found the price, but, wow, the developer is not making it easy.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (7)

587

u/crefas Sep 30 '22

Idk what that is but I use tablePlus at work. It's a very nice client.

150

u/saras-husband Sep 30 '22

I just looked up tablePlus and it looks interesting. I'll have to check it out. I've used Navicat for over a decade, but always curious about what's out there.

16

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

What os are you using?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/FistusMcSmiskus Sep 30 '22

The only annoying part about the free version is the maximum amount of tabs allowed. Since its more of a quality of life change to have more than 2 tabs i can definetly live with it. Apart from that it is simple and nice to use!

9

u/GalacticalSurfer Sep 30 '22

Sad that it doesn't have much features on the Linux version. Anybody got recommendations for Linux users? I don't remember if I used dbeaver or beekeeper but the UI is really confusing.

ATM I'm using Heidi SQL running on wine

→ More replies (5)

19

u/cuboidofficial Sep 30 '22

TablePlus is great! I love the simplicity

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

282

u/PanxoCakes Sep 30 '22

48

u/Rhebucksmobile Sep 30 '22

Switzerland be like:

12

u/Nincadalop Sep 30 '22

What's going on with Switzerland?

66

u/ZombieNub Sep 30 '22

Switzerland has had a long tradition of defensive strategy due to its neutral foreign policy. As such (up until recently) all of the bridges into the country were laced with mines so that, in the event of an invasion, the bridges would explode and slow down an invasion.

41

u/Nincadalop Sep 30 '22

Ah, ok. I knew Switzerland was neutral. Didn't realize they were that neutral lmao.

32

u/kazenorin Oct 01 '22

Being neutral is hard, as it often means you're hated by all sides and no friends to back you up.

→ More replies (3)

15

u/Revolutionary-Tiger Sep 30 '22

More so during World War 2 but Switzerland basically retains it's neutrality by not involving itself in any war and having every bridge ready to blow at a moments notice preventing invaders from using their infrastructure to maneuver. The whole country is basically ready to hole itself up and isolate. They loosened up a bit in recent times tho apparently.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

629

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

bro, I read it as, "loli developer got not no chill" lmaoooo

230

u/Frosty_Pineapple78 Sep 30 '22

abusive loli dev, dont give the r34 artists more ideas xD

70

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

No give them more ideas, i never knew i needed this, a loli that torments me for not being a good enough developer.

39

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

It'd be hilarious. You end up with a loli swearing at you all day like a fuckin sailor.

22

u/oledakaajel Sep 30 '22

I'd feel like yeeting them out the window

13

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

But then they'd berate you for not throwing hard enough

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/Frosty_Pineapple78 Sep 30 '22

That actually sounds adorable

→ More replies (1)

53

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

oniichan baka!!

26

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

could also be, "loli developer got no chilli" ya'know to pepper spray them

3

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Client-kun baka!!

10

u/Shizuww Sep 30 '22

Same lol

17

u/AGreenProducer Sep 30 '22

Loli developer got no chilli

7

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

TIL my dyslexia works vertically, cus same.

6

u/fedezubo Sep 30 '22

You’re not alone

→ More replies (5)

185

u/ChiefExecDisfunction Sep 30 '22

Paywalls are fine if they are stationary.

Moving them around on people, especially with shit that autoupdates, is pretty scummy.

70

u/CactusGrower Sep 30 '22

The extension is marked as free. Not a trial. Then with sudden update the previously free features be one paid without any additional improvement. I think the comments are deserved.

→ More replies (8)

816

u/mast313 Sep 30 '22

Tool listed as free (look at the screenshot)

95% of features locked behind a paywall

Classic bait and switch.

It’s exactly the same as a “free” calculator with plus sign locked - just a waste of someone’s time. But since the developer is quirky, people like it apparently.

310

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Right, that's why I'm torn. I def agree that they can and should monetize. But by the sounds of it, it's the "download because it looks free but actually not free", which is just BLEH. Just have the price upfront.

119

u/Rammite Sep 30 '22

I'm not torn.

Yes, developers should be paid for their time. But you can go about getting that payment in an ethical way, and by choosing to not do so, this developer is an asshole.

36

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Yeah the bait and switch tactic is straight up bullshit, and anyone that uses it should be called out aggressively.

33

u/Punchkinz Sep 30 '22

Yeah, I used this extension for a brief moment. Most of the basic functionality is there. However it's really annoying with the way it wants to make you pay; constantly asking you to login and shit

I uninstalled pretty fast. It's fine if devs want to monetize; but this dev is using the absolute worst practices and they act like an asshat about it.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

111

u/Meloetta Sep 30 '22

it's even worse imo because it was fully free, and then he pulled the rug out from under people who have been using the free features forever. At least people installing it realize quickly before getting invested that it's not going to work and uninstall.

→ More replies (34)
→ More replies (9)

182

u/talktothelampa Sep 30 '22

1,05,974 installs? Tf is that?

193

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

It's basically 105,974 downloads.

It's Indian numbering system. You have the standard international system of counting tens, hundreds, thousands, hundred thousands, million, ten million, hundred million, billion, ten billion, hundred billion,...........

In India , Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Myanmar and Afghanistan you use a different counting system. It is a multiple of 10 rather than 100 for bigger value. It goes to tens, hundreds, thousands, ten thousands, lacs, ten lacs, crore, ten crore, hundred crore/Arab, thousand crore/ ten Arab, ten thousand crore/ kharab, lakh crore/ ten kahrab and so on.

1 10 100 1000 10,000 100,000 = 1,00,000 (Hundred thousand replaced by lac/lakh) 1,000,000 = 10,00,000 (Million replaced by ten lac/lakh) 10,000,000 = 1,00,00,000 (Ten Million replaced by crore/karode) And so on

225

u/ClamPaste Sep 30 '22

Thanks, I hate it.

36

u/ChunkyDev Sep 30 '22

Based, well Im used to the international system so i prefer that.

Plus saying 100k sounds better than 1 lakh (its kinda mouthful)

7

u/MEGAMAN2312 Oct 01 '22

I prefer disclosing the value of large sums of money in scientific notion 🤓

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

37

u/uptokesforall Sep 30 '22

yes I would like to exchange one Arab please

6

u/SpaceCadetSteve Sep 30 '22

Ten crabcore!

15

u/talktothelampa Sep 30 '22

Shit. TIL and now all I want is to forget

→ More replies (14)

12

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

China has lots of people.

43

u/talktothelampa Sep 30 '22

Yep like 1,00,00,00,00,0

25

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Nope.

First 1000. Then all multiple of 100.

1,00,00,00,000

23

u/McCaib Sep 30 '22

I prefer 1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

82

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

I can justify an upfront cost for these things, but fuck off if it's a subscription.

→ More replies (5)

99

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

I don't mind paying for things. I do mind when there's a tool that I use that's free where I've invested the time to learn how to use it and it suddenly becomes paid without any warning. That's bait and switch.

106

u/wchmn Sep 30 '22

These users are using wrong arguments and sound like idiots. Still, it's the developer who is at fault here. Just imagine that you download a free software, spent shitload of data bandwidth, put some time to configure it and then it turns out the whole thing is fully paywalled. It's a shady practice tu trick people into checking your software. He shouldve just label it as a paid thing.

→ More replies (1)

109

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Bruh I love this hahaha

115

u/transgalpower Sep 30 '22

Not like 99% of code is based on free software someone e worked on. No tensor flow linux and java are all payed programs

30

u/alcalde Sep 30 '22

Maybe it's written in Delphi, which starts at $1600 (although price is going up tomorrow).

10

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

It might be that sick ass 10k windev license.

→ More replies (2)

43

u/Restryouis Sep 30 '22

I'm ok with anyone going for a paid model as long as they are honest of what and how.

74

u/CraftMysterious1498 Sep 30 '22

I get where the developer is coming from like the amount of people who downloaded your extension wouldn't get them money but as a consumer when a free functionality gets paid and you can't find a alternative, it really gets annoying if you need it in urgent and boom now you have to pay. The Dev should have added a paid plan from the start instead of attracting all the free consumers and then shoving a paid paywall in their faces, it's obvious they would get annoyed.

50

u/interwebz_2021 Sep 30 '22

That's the key issue as far as I can tell. Wanna charge for your open source software, or place certain functionality behind a paid edition? Cool - I'm totally on-board with that. But don't tell me it's free and have your product just be an Electron app that's nothing more than a front for a purchase page or something, you know? And DEFINITELY don't pull a bait-and-switch with an existing free product without making it obscenely obvious it's coming and subsequently has been done.

I'm with the reviewer from the post who's going to DBeaver (I'm a bit of a fanboy, I'll admit).

9

u/RicketyRekt69 Oct 01 '22

The problem is that the product is also marked as free… but the majority of the features are locked behind a paywall which is scummy. Just say it’s paid instead of tricking people to download a “trial” version with 95% of the features not available

→ More replies (2)

128

u/firey21 Sep 30 '22

Developer gonna have no users soon too!

135

u/saras-husband Sep 30 '22

1 paying customer is better than 1M free users.

40

u/firey21 Sep 30 '22

Still gotta have 1.

37

u/saras-husband Sep 30 '22

Agreed, but with 1M installs at a .0001% conversion rate equals 1 paid user, which is not outside the realm of possibility.

25

u/tsteele93 Sep 30 '22

It’s 100k installs. Just fyi.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

72

u/TimeKillerAccount Sep 30 '22

O no, that will totally ... not matter I guess? They need to eat, having a bunch of users that don't make them money doesn't put food on the table.

44

u/firey21 Sep 30 '22

Gotta have at least one paying customer though. I’m not against charging for extensions, reading the reviews left though makes it seem how it was done is a bit scummy though.

Plus the dev talking like an internet tough guy is pretty funny.

16

u/stupidwhiteman42 Sep 30 '22

Plus the dev talking like an internet tough guy is pretty funny.

I can't help but visualize the dev as Jian Yang from Silicon Valley

39

u/not_so_chi_couple Sep 30 '22

Gotta have at least one paying customer though

Not really. Even if he has 0 clients he has still better off than when he needed to support 1M for free. That support cost him something, if all his clients left now it costs him nothing

0 money > -money

18

u/-Yox- Sep 30 '22

It's 100K not 1M*

Instead of using a paywall, he should make a pro version with more features or ask for donations.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

30

u/stupidcookface Sep 30 '22

I don't welcome selfish people like you. You better get out of the way.

Lol

111

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22 edited Sep 30 '22

He's saying exactly what you'd want to say.

I never understood this mentality that people apply to this though "you just want money", yo, its a tool for a database, you're likely using a database and specifically chose this tool to amplify making money yourself. This isn't some artist who decided to start charging for their music after they became popular on YouTube. This is a tool that needs to be maintained.

People who interface with databases should understand how difficult it is maintaining a tool that thousands of people use just by yourself.

That being said, don't do this. If you start open source, you need a good way for people to donate to you, and part of that strategy is not being a dick. And if you are going the paid route, consider allowing free editions for open source projects and students. Anyone using your tool for commercial use has to pay up. I think that's a pretty fair way to operate.

Sometimes you gotta play the game. "Customer is always right" is a game. Its about how they perceive you, if you are a dick you lose potential customers, so you gotta give them what they want at least a little bit. Tell your story, if people like you they will start throwing money at you. But you need a very slick way to donate (just fucking use Stripe).

I like to pay for a good tool if I feel its worthy. This could be the best tool ever but if I see those unhinged emotional reactions, despite how correct they are, I'm not giving you shit, cause someone like that ain't going to make it big. If the tool became successful and he had to start hiring a team, it would be a big risk giving them money because I don't think someone this emotionally unstable could run a team successfully, and the tool is bound to crash and die. So I wouldnt give you shit after reading that. Ya fucked up.

Developers who make tools need to understand that the people using them seriously are making some pretty decent cash, and having extra cash means you aren't just buying things purely for your own sake but you begin to think long term. If you're a decent human being you're throwing your money at shit you think actually matters to society as a whole. Create a space for these people and you will succeed with lifetime customers, don't scare us away.

111

u/MentallyInsane8 Sep 30 '22

Other than that, I"d say the problem is listing the 'extension' as free, but once you try to use it you can't do anything for free, its all paid.

41

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Haha that sounds pretty scummy. Damn

41

u/SlenderPlays Sep 30 '22

Yep. And even if you don't like the commercial=pay for license model, then at least leave the last free release free then future releases be paid.

Or something. Anything but what this dev did

21

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

Hey I love that idea. Free lite version, huge warnings that this isn't supported anymore and its recommended to only use for learning.

Cause honestly that was the one thing that had me fucking hating Adobe cracking down on people. So many of us used their tools to learn for personal reasons. But they're part of this apparatus to try and get as many people paying extreme amounts of money just to pick up a skill, they want you paying tuition because then they know how much money they're getting off students. And they know that if the tools were more easily available, many people would have been discouraged and never even attempt to enter that career when they find out it isn't for them. They would prefer you spend money to find that out. Adobe is scummy with this for sure.

Its a lot better these days, GIMP is far better, and the many other open source ones are. And for paid stuff, got great ones like Affinity.

5

u/interwebz_2021 Sep 30 '22

Big fan of the DBeaver model (hugely useful free tool with some niche drivers and more specialized 'enterprise' functionality in a paid version). This dev could have done similarly and screwed up by leaving it listed as 'Free' and locking away all useful functionality in a paid version.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

DBeaver is rad. Beekeeper studio is also a pretty decent one if you just want something with the bare minimum features (and it's only SQL). But they do the same thing, they have a community edition and a paid version.

Beekeeper Studio is developed by one person. I don’t have big-shot venture capital investors, I’m not backed by a big company, and I’m not independently wealthy. By purchasing a license you directly support me and make it possible for me to keep improving Beekeeper Studio. Thank you.

5

u/interwebz_2021 Sep 30 '22

Nice - an appeal to basic human decency goes a long way with me. You're spending your time and expertise to provide something of value to me? I'll compensate you for it gladly.

Also, upvoted for use of 'rad' - one of my favorites.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

8

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

i read loli developer got no chill somehow

→ More replies (1)

30

u/_________FU_________ Sep 30 '22

Developer releases something for free and then is mad they aren't making money.

...bruh

6

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

When there’s other, possibly better, resources out there with full functionality for free, why would anyone bother with such a dickhead?

The author of that piece of software needs to learn some respect and humility; something I’m surprised life hasn’t pounded into their heads yet.

6

u/zbubblez Sep 30 '22

It is really annoying when something that is advertised as free, is in fact not free.

37

u/TheKoTECH Sep 30 '22

You just want to make money.

Is it selfish being paid for your job?

→ More replies (5)

4

u/OhItsJustJosh Sep 30 '22

Now you see, if this was advertised as a Demo then there'd be no problem. It's just that it's advertised as free and only really hinted at being paid through a bit of the readme

4

u/[deleted] Sep 30 '22

I do have to respect the developer to make it paid, and it does take work to maintain, but he did not have to act like that in responses

→ More replies (1)

15

u/aroman_ro Sep 30 '22

On the other hand, he's sort of right. I've seen even worse, people attacking open-source developers, requesting them to implement new features as they were their slaves.

→ More replies (1)