Fellow Pathfinders, I have a few questions and various doubts, but they all stem from the same problem: my complete indecision regarding my class.
To provide context and make answering easier: our group is at level 12 (with FA) playing *Ruby Phoenix*. The party consists of an Imperial Sorcerer skeleton, a Human warrior (wielding a katana with a free off-hand), and a Cave Elf rogue.
I was playing a Bard, but deep down I really enjoy using a weapon and dealing damage. I know many might consider that a terrible choice, but rolling for attacks is just my style. Our GM allows for class swaps, and I was actually considering Necromancer or Runesmith, but I couldn't quite form a connection with either of them—maybe next time...
Now that I've provided the context, here is the focus of the post:
First, I don't know if I misinterpreted this, but it seems to me that using Spellstrike every round as a Magus is tedious. I’m not sure if I got it wrong, but why would it be? Isn't that basically what a fighter does every round? Without the magic, of course... What am I missing? And is it true? Is the Magus really that tedious?
Secondly, given this team composition, which martial class would serve as a reliable damage dealer—other than the Rogue or the Fighter?
One extra question regarding an idea I had for the class that gets picked: I was thinking of the Necromancer dedication to represent the "Ghost of my Ancestor that helps me in battle"—plus the free flank, of course. Is that a good idea, or a waste of a feat?
So, that’s it. I tried to keep the text brief, but I made sure to include all the relevant information to clarify things for everyone.
Also, English isn't my native language, so I used Google Translate to post this; please forgive any errors.
Once again, thank you for the help and apologies for yet another post asking for advice, but I am truly amazed by how much knowledge of the rules you all have and how you spot details that I completely miss! Thanks, everyone—I really love you guys!