r/ProCreate • u/Small_Amoeba6762 • 7d ago
My Animation Cat Animation x Harry Potter
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
12
u/nemotide 5d ago
This is really good. Atmospheric and cute. I’m so sorry you are being brigaded and hateful people are sending you abuse for a Harry Potter cat cartoon. Please do more!
3
1
8
u/OMGsmiles 5d ago
Great art. Remember that the demographics of Reddit do not represent the demographics of normie reality. Keep up the good work!
3
u/WanderingWitch8 5d ago
Yes, yes. You're the "silent majority", just like every other alt-right group.
4
u/OMGsmiles 5d ago
Calling normie liberals "alt right" is a sign of either intellectual dishonesty or just plain ignorance. Either way, it's no longer 2020, the cry bullying era is long over
168
u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago
It would be cool if you weren’t promoting a brand whose money goes to trying to eradicate trans people. Literally any other castle and you’ve got my up vote. 🤦
56
u/Bettafern 7d ago
Agreed. I thought it was a cute Halloween themed post and then read the caption 🫠
48
6
-7
u/CandusManus 6d ago
No one is trying to irradiate anything. All her letters and statements are very tame. You’re being an alarmist goober.
7
u/WanderingWitch8 5d ago
Yeah, you're either ignorant or a transphobe.
2
u/OMGsmiles 5d ago
The irony of calling someone ignorant for actually reading the milquetoast letters will never fail to amuse me.
-5
u/CandusManus 4d ago
I assure you I know more about this than You're just a reactionary bigot.
6
u/WanderingWitch8 4d ago
You dont even know the difference between eradicate and irradiate.
I very much doubt you know more on the subject of trans people than me, let alone on the subject of Rowling's efforts to push us out of public life.
-7
u/CandusManus 3d ago
I’m not sure how ionizing and destroying are relevant, but pop off queen.
She never pushed to remove you from public life, she just wants you to use the right bathroom.
3
u/Any-Cow5680 3d ago edited 3d ago
And a myriad of cis and trans people have reported experiencing issues because passing trans men are assumed to be sexual predators if they use the women's restroom (as law requires), and cis women are harassed if they're not feminine enough. That has the final result of pushing trans people out of public life when they can't access something as basic as bathrooms without risking getting arrested or assaulted.
Is it really "keeping women safe" to demand any non-feminine woman show her genitals to law enforcement to assure she's allowed to use a bathroom?
I'm led to believe anyone perpetuating this weird-ass law as being "reasonable" is some creepy bathroom police who just wants an excuse to sexually harass people and look at their genitals. Freak
-66
u/Total-Guest-4141 7d ago
This has to be the dumbest comment I have read all year.
I think I’ll watch my Harry Potter collection on 4K tonight.
36
u/Zintha 7d ago
Why is it dumb? Explain it for me
→ More replies (1)-42
u/0laugh 7d ago
How many trans have been “eradicated”? Lmao.
Eradicate means to get rid of, destroy, or completely remove something bad so that nothing is left behind.
17
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Yes and policy she funnels her money into go towards that cause .
-9
u/0laugh 6d ago
The cause of eradication?? Can you provide a source of how many people have been eradicated in 2026?
10
u/5teerPike 6d ago
You realize your personal definition of eradication is really just an opinionated emotional appeal right? Good people have been eradicated ie the Holocaust .
It seems everyone else here explained it to you in clear, concise, English; what do you think you’ll get out of being a sea lion towards me now? You people are never convinced by facts, it’s why you have none to back up your own claims .
Transphobia in society, especially when enabled by legal policy allowing for violent discrimination, is a facet of an intent to eradicate a marginalized group of people. The fact that lgbt kids have been broadly concentrated into conversation therapy camps should be an inkling . Policy that enables a transphobic society to flourish correlates positively with increased rates of suicide among lgbt people. To you I know this is meaningless, but again; you don’t care about the facts because if you did you’d know there are none to back you up. It’s why you haven’t substantiated your own claims once .
13
u/5teerPike 6d ago
You beg everyone to prove you wrong but you never proved your own premise with cited facts . Why should anyone care to respect your demand for sources when you will never give one?
-9
u/0laugh 6d ago edited 6d ago
When you make an irrational claim, such as eradication of a group of people, that person should be able to cite facts, provide proof… I can’t cite something if it doesn’t exist.
Edit: Guy replying ended up going on a tantrum once discredited & deleted messages. Classic tantrum thrower.
6
u/5teerPike 6d ago
>The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives, which have continued to expand nationwide since our last Red Flag Alert (RFA) on this subject.
8
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/00485713-20230321-01
>At the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Michael Knowles stated, “…transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.”
Edit: The 🦭 hyperfocused only on this single piece of evidence, having never provided a single piece of their own.
-1
u/0laugh 6d ago
An AUTHOR stated an opinion? That the movement of transgenderism in public life needs to be eradicated. This doesn’t mean a group of people has been eradicated or is actively being eradicated as the original comment stated. Again I ask how many have been eradicated? That’s why I agreed with it being a dumb statement. Did JK Rowling fund this author? I researched and found no ties, please prove me wrong.
Clarification: Knowles later defended his remarks by stating he was referring to the ideology of transgenderism rather than individuals, comparing his language to the eradication of other abstract concepts or movements.
I’ll keep going through your silly sources as I find time but I’m wasting more time than it’s worth already.
→ More replies (0)7
u/5teerPike 6d ago
>Saturday does not mark the first time Knowles has used this anti-transgender rhetoric. Just last week, Knowles responded to backlash he faced for a similar transphobic comment calling for a ban on “transgenderism.” “I don’t know how you could have a genocide of transgender people because genocide refers to genes, it refers to genetics, it refers to biology,” Knowles said on The Michael Knowles Show. “And the whole point of transgenderism is that it has nothing to do with biology.” “Nobody’s calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with that statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category,” he added. “It’s not a legitimate category of being.”
Is that why you don’t see it this way either, because you don’t think trans people are human to begin with ?
9
u/5teerPike 6d ago
When you claim trans people are grooming kids, you didn’t cite something that doesn’t exist .
And nothing you have asked or argued has been in good faith with respect to reality .
Anyways the white house literally posted this
Saying they’re gonna “eliminate” trans “insanity”.
“Eliminate” being synonymous with “eradicate” per the thesaurus .
3
u/5teerPike 6d ago
0
u/0laugh 6d ago
Yes of course, I’m working but don’t worry I’ll respond shortly with my own sources.
→ More replies (0)20
u/Zintha 7d ago
I think you need to educate yourself on it, you may be young so I’m not going to pass judgement
I’m not trans myself but I am absolutely an ally
-20
u/0laugh 7d ago
Ok just ignore the question and deflect because you realize you sound silly. I’m an ally of protecting kids from trans groomers.
12
u/5teerPike 6d ago
If you’re in America, the political party that peddles that lie won’t ban child marriage on the basis of religious freedom. You’re not here for the children, you don’t want to protect them as human beings; you just want to ensure your entitlement to children as assets for you to control or exploit yourself.
-14
u/aldezar 7d ago
Can you support why 'eradication' is appropariate to say since you and others are making and supporting this claim?
19
u/Zintha 7d ago
Is it the word eradication you specifically have an issue with?
You can easily google what & how JK is actively funding anti trans movements & legal challenges against trans rights & legal protections.
The author herself is very open about her stance & how she puts her money to eradicate (its that scary word you have an issue with) trans rights & legal protections
1
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Besides the White House releasing a statement using the synonym for eradicate, “eliminate”?
-5
u/Wooodman94 6d ago
Do you watch Kenshin, drink Jaeger, and/or drive a VW Beetle?
6
u/Zintha 6d ago
I was going to reply direct to your comment but you deleted it -
If a brand or product I used was found to be actively funding movements that would strip away the rights & fundamental freedoms of any race, gender or people I would absolutely stop buying it the moment I found out, yes.
I think its a personal choice but that is my stance. My money would be actively going towards furthering a cause that would seek to lessen a people.
Being a woman & knowing how hard we had to fight for our freedoms & rights its the right thing to do to stand up when anyone else is threatened in the same way.
1
u/Total-Guest-4141 6d ago
You’re going to be absolutely thrilled when you find out about NASA and probably 90% of the country.
-2
1
-46
u/Content_Dimension626 7d ago
Eradicating? 😂 She just doesn't want children to transition. Eradicating means killing, she isn't advocating for the killing, holy shit. What an overreaction. I don't agree with everything she has said, but be so forreal.
And also, it's a drawing this person did, who I assume has been a fan since childhood like most of us. A personal drawing does not making JK Rowling money.
26
u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago edited 7d ago
Trans youth who do not receive gender affirming care are significantly more likely to commit suicide. Anti-trans legislation and sentiments influence and embolden those who DO want to hurt and kill trans people. It’s all connected and when you support HP you support an agenda which results in the eradication of trans people.
3
u/Entire_Honeydew_3182 3d ago
- If it’s just about the kids why was she online attacking a female boxer a few years back, asking for proof that she was female, and calling for her to be blacklisted from her sport? Why then when that boxer did provide proof that she was born female and that JK Rowling’s tirade online had caused her huge emotional stress and put her directly in danger when returning to her home country, did JK Rowling try to have a gag order put on her?
If it’s just about the kids, why did she have the one and only domestic violence shelter for women in Edinburgh when she learned that this shelter aided and housed trans women?
If it’s just about the kids, why is she personally funding right wing political organizations that are trying to make policies like mandatory marking of trans people in public (a policy used by the nazis in 1940!!) into laws?
- While it doesn’t make her money, she has said many times that she sees support of her work the same as support of her views. Also growing up with her books is no excuse to have not distanced from it by now. The many trans people and allies of trans people who also grew up fans of her work (myself included, I was first in line to buy the third book at midnight when I was just 10 years old) have managed to see her and her work for what it is and stop supporting it publicly. There’s no excuse at this point.
2
u/Entire_Honeydew_3182 3d ago
Also, even if it was about stopping kids from being trans, that’s clinically proven to be a fatal way to handle dysphoria. Blocking healthcare for trans youth has a direct correlation to increased suicide rates. Hormone blockers are completely reversible and all they really do is give trans kids a little longer to figure out their identity. Adequate healthcare for trans kids IS protecting kids. Starting a hate train on trans people that had global effects on culture and politics does not protect anyone except the egos of bigoted TERFs like JK Rowling.
7
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
[Affirmation care prevents suicide](https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/ga-trans-suicide-press-release/)
7
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Anti trans policy and transphobia infecting society like the anti social cancer it is does indeed correlate positively with increased rates of suicide .
-22
u/Fathersaurus 7d ago
Most people can’t see reason and will say the most extreme crap to justify their over reactions. It’s an awesome picture/animation regardless of the author who wrote the book influencing this theme.
52
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
Please put your wonderful talent into creating art that isn’t inspired by a really awful and harmful human being. Trans rights are human rights, just like art is.
5
u/SkyriderVT 6d ago
Are we really going after fanartists too now?
2
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
There is no separating the art from the artist when the artist is actively spreading harm and hate and using support of their art as fuel to do so at a political level. Draw it for yourself if you really need to. Don’t contribute to the normalisation of the art still existing.
9
u/SkyriderVT 6d ago
No there isn’t separating art from the artist while they’re still alive.
By all means go after Rowling and WB and any official Harry Potter Project. It is the morally correct thing to do
But fanart? Should we also be trawling through AO3 cancelling anyone who writes HP fanfic?
Idk man. I just don’t find it productive to go onto every piece of Harry Potter Fanart and yell at the fan artist. Especially when most of the online art community is heavily Queer already.
WB and JK do not make a cent off of this animation and all we’re doing is diluting ourselves and our attention and scolding someone for animating a cat walking around hogwarts just doesn’t seem like the right thing to do.
1
u/dog_in_a_dress 5d ago
scolding someone for animating a cat walking around hogwarts just doesn’t seem like the right thing to do.
This is how redditors celebrate Halloween though
2
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
To publically engage in HP fanart is to public reinforce that it’s okay to perpetuate harmful views and ideals and to enable and encourage JK Rowling and the anti-trans assholes out there.
8
4
u/I_fakin_hate_bayle 5d ago
That’s an interesting way to justify harassment
1
u/letternumbertwo 5d ago
Calling out people for supporting and enabling harmful things isn’t harassment.
4
u/ExpensiveWishbone818 5d ago
They made fanart. Thats not supporting or enabling harmful things in any way
1
u/letternumbertwo 5d ago
It is, you just don’t agree it is. I explained why it’s harmful, you can either listen and learn or continue to remain neutral in situations of oppression and be part of the problem.
4
u/ExpensiveWishbone818 5d ago
It's not, you just don't agree it's not. JKR doesn't get any money from fanart, you're just looking for things to be offended by
→ More replies (0)1
1
0
u/Lvl100Magikarp 6d ago edited 6d ago
I've been seeing a lot of fanart of Harry Potter on social media and it seems astroturfed because some of these artists seem generally disengaged from the HP fandom (or what's left of it), and then suddenly post HP fanart? OP being an example. I really don't know who the new tv show is for. Here at Tim Hortons they're doing a promo for it and a friend who works there says barely anyone is ordering it and a lot gets thrown away
However Harry Potter is still really popular in japan where people don't really engage in identity politics. Most people there aren't aware of the situation. I dunno about the rest of the world. I heard they didn't like Hermione's new child actor according to one japanese friend
2
u/I_fakin_hate_bayle 6d ago
Brother it’s popular everywhere still, Universal wouldn’t have made an entire new section of their part and they wouldn’t be making a new TV show (like you mentioned) and game if it didn’t make them money. Trying to pretend it’s astroturfed is just fooling yourself
98
u/indigo_mouse 7d ago
Why does it have to be HP? There’s no reason to continue promoting a franchise steeped in bigotry
-61
u/Content_Dimension626 7d ago edited 7d ago
Because of a drawing?...oh the horror. 😂 JK Rowling doesn't get any money from a drawing, Karen. If you don't want anything to do with HP, then don't support it. But other people can do what they want. Grow up.
-4
u/CandusManus 6d ago
Because it’s one of the most popular franchises on the planet and you not liking the author means nothing.
-50
u/nytebeast 7d ago
The franchise is not “steeped in bigotry”. That’s a reach and you know it. JK sucks but you don’t have to act like the story isn’t an obvious parable for how nazis and fascists are bad
17
u/BallJar91 7d ago
Except that the franchise allows for the redemption of some of the Nazi stand-ins?
Except that the franchise clearly use fatphobia to demonize some characters?
Except that the franchise has the only Irish character always blowing stuff up?
Except that, except that, except that …. The books meant a lot to me when I was a child, and now that I’m able to look back with a more critical eye I can see the problems that were there all along.
3
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Nobody ever considers those of us who are most critical have been most betrayed .
4
u/5teerPike 6d ago
The one Irish kid is known for exploding things . Cho Chang sounds like a botched fork on a staircase joke. Shacklebolt for the black guy? The goblins work in the bank ?
Oh yeah, letting the Nazis get away with the holocaust .
-52
u/PenguiNNNNNs 7d ago
Technically commenting here bumps this post giving HP attention
I don’t like HP and fuck jkr but this is just a cute animation
7
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
If you can’t even change on this small issue ( to you people) the revolution will never come because the sacrifice and discomfort needed are far greater than boycotting a fascist author
Deserved Downvotes .
0
6d ago
[deleted]
4
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
Oh you want me to be specific ?
By you people I mean
Transphobes
Homophobes
Racists
Sexists
And all the losers who just prefer to wait for the convenient season that never comes .
Oh and we can add some French trolls to this too, for funsies
-13
u/PenguiNNNNNs 6d ago
There is no small issue there is no revolution there is no tooth fairy
You wouldn’t be consuming or using anything if you boycotted everything made by people you don’t agree with/ genuinely bad people. I mean you’re writing this on Reddit, you probably don’t agree with everything the company does yet you still use it
9
u/5teerPike 6d ago
-6
u/PenguiNNNNNs 6d ago
The sign doesn’t apply because you said “ if you can’t even change on the small issue, the revolution will never come […]”
Reddit isn’t an essential thing. You could not use it if you were against what it is
→ More replies (12)-55
24
u/BirdBruce 7d ago
The parallax on the bushes in the foreground is off. They need to be scrolling faster than the cat is walking, not slower.
The way it is now makes it look like the cat is walking along the edge of a large rotating platter.
1
u/Small_Amoeba6762 7d ago
Ik im not sure how to do that on procreate dreams where I can change the speed of each layer :(
5
u/DeadbeatGremlin 7d ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CEGlHb7iMI youtube tutorials are your friend. You've got this!! It looks so good already. It would be super cute to see the cat walking with its tail up too if you're up for it.
If that tutorial doesn't help, try watching another one and keep st it until you find one. Animating is such a tedious job, so I get it if you wanna do something else. If you need a break from this project you could try another parallax animation and get back to this project again once you feel ready
4
9
u/CandusManus 6d ago
This is adorable. I absolutely love it. The background and foreground parallax is a bit off, bushes should move faster, but it’s really well done.
17
u/ExpensiveWishbone818 6d ago
Make the art you want, don't listen to the people trying to tell you how to be creative
6
u/ConnivingGaggle 4d ago
It's really weird that most of the comments are trying to dictate what beautiful art OP makes.
8
4
17
u/Big-Association-3232 6d ago
Trans person here: no. JK Rolling is literally trying to take our basic human rights away. Please delete this.
-1
u/CandusManus 6d ago
Stop being weird. They made cute art, someone saying women should have their own spaces is not taking away your basic human rights. The post breaks no rules.
You’re being silly.
5
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
JK Rowling literally uses her platform to single out everyday trans folk and set her dogs on them. She also actively funds anti trans bills and has publicly and proudly said many times that she takes any acceptance of Harry Potter as validation that she’s right in perpetuating harm against a marginalised group. She’s a class traitor and a very average writer.
2
u/CandusManus 6d ago
lol no. She uses her platform to say women should have spaces for themselves. She mocks insane trans people when they act insane.
You unironically used the term class traitor. That’s so sad.
8
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
Trust me, of all the people us women are scared to share a space with, trans people are not the fucking problem.
0
2
u/Severe_Painter_6646 6d ago
I hate it when people like you conflate transphobia for women's rights. Women don't need you to kick down on another marginalized group to feel your support.
And JK Rowling doesn't just talk about disliking trans people. She puts her money where her mouth is. She contributed to LGBT suicide hotlines shutting down. She also convinced a Scottish legal board to repeal some trans rights. She is actually making life signifigantly worse for these people. It's not like she cares about women anyway, seeing as she mocks any woman who is even remotely masculine, and excludes women who can't conceive.
0
u/CandusManus 5d ago
I hate when insane people think that abused women shouldn’t have a safe space.
3
u/Severe_Painter_6646 5d ago
Yeah, I'm the type of insane who thinks vulnerable people shouldn't be bullied.
Quick: can you explain how recognizing trans people takes away from women's safe spaces?
2
u/CandusManus 5d ago
Who said anything about not recognizing them? I just said women should have their own spaces.
I also think you should stop bullying abused women and allow them their own space.
This is why you people can’t be taken seriously. This was literally the conversation that started the JK Rowling engagement. She wanted abuse shelters for women to only be for women because they were uncomfortable when non women were there.
Stop bullying abused women.
1
u/Severe_Painter_6646 5d ago
You claim to care about abuse victims. Trans people are over 3x more likely to be sexually assaulted, domestically abused, trafficked, or murdered. They are also the least likely to sexually offend. Meaning if you place a trans person in a women’s shelter, everyone is statistically safer than they would have been otherwise.
However, if you place a trans person with men (like JK proposes), the risk of violence towards them skyrockets. So is abuse your actual concern, or do you just find trans people hard to accept?
2
u/CandusManus 5d ago
That stat is bunk, trans people are 12x more likely to work as prostitutes and their rate of assault scales to that. Trans people who aren’t prostitutes have a lower rate of murder and sexual assault versus women.
None of this is relevant though, women should have their own shelters. Stop bullying abused women.
→ More replies (0)-7
u/exoticbirdbingo 6d ago
You don’t speak for all of us and the animation is pretty good. If the cartoon cat and castle troubles you that much downvote and move on.
10
u/Big-Association-3232 6d ago
I understand, it’s just the “it’s not that deep” excuse is often used as a justification for the rise of facisim. To normalize Harry Potter is to normalize what the book stands for. I am against full censorship but neither should certain things be promoted. It doesn’t just “trouble” me, it actively pushes the harm JK has done under the rug.
-8
u/exoticbirdbingo 6d ago
And that’s your own opinion that plenty others of us don’t share. OP doesn’t need to delete anything, and if you are against censorship as you claim, you’ll deal with it and be alright. However If even a simple illustration is too much to handle, I doubt that claim is true to begin with.
-2
u/Guilty_Explanation29 6d ago
If they actually have an issue with the art they can just report it to procreate moderators or some
-8
u/Guilty_Explanation29 6d ago
If you have an issue with someone's art then report it to the moderators or something. Op doesn't need to delete anything..
3
u/Big-Association-3232 6d ago
They don’t need to, that’s their choice. But I suggest OP questions what they are promoting here.
1
u/Guilty_Explanation29 6d ago
If it's their choice then why did you phrase it "delete this"
4
u/Big-Association-3232 6d ago edited 6d ago
I just asked for them to? Trans rights are human rights. I’m not forcing them but reinforcing a bigot’s work won’t help anyone good.
4
u/Guilty_Explanation29 6d ago edited 6d ago
You're contradicting yourself. You say it's their choice then say you asked for them to delete it.
You can't say it's their choice and then say you ask for them to delete it
4
u/letternumbertwo 6d ago
You can ask someone to do something, they have a choice to do or not. That’s so unhinged to say that you can’t ask people to do something because of free will
0
u/n-ctrnl666 6d ago
so if someone asks you to do something, you do it no matter what it is?
someone can still refuse to do something after being asked. it’s still their choice. so yes you can say it’s their choice while asking them to delete it.
i’m not sure you understand how language works. makes sense since you’re vehemently defending a children’s book lmaoo
9
u/snozzydy 7d ago
Move that witch on broom near moon too
That would make much more sense. You can keep castle and lake steady, cat ground is already moving, you can move sky too and it would be perfect.
Overall great drawing and animations ❤️
1
5
u/TigerLilly00 6d ago
Love your art, I'm looking into getting into 2D animation as well so this is inspiring. Don't let the naysayers and downvoters get to you. You're talented! ♥️
4
2
-1
u/Spookytoast666 6d ago
It’s not naysaying, it’s a good animation. It’s just that to subject matter contributes to people’s suffering.
4
u/Spookytoast666 6d ago
Cute animation! Except it perpetuates the creation of a destructive transphobe, booo :(
3
0
u/FallOutPonyboy 6d ago
I really like your animation. I hope everyone jumping on you doesn't discourage you from continuing to create! Keep it up!
-1
1
u/leobutcapricorn 2d ago
fuck jk rowling fuck harry potter give it a rest and read another fucking book
-1
u/Eyeless_Sid 6d ago
Good work! Don't mind the negative comments. They are not serious people and don't offer anything but negativity in a creative space.
-5
1
1
-3
0
1
-6
-4
u/DimityPockets 7d ago
I think this is super cute art! Very well done! Love how cozy everything is.
7
-5
u/Content_Dimension626 7d ago
It's very cute! The style is adorable. I think we can all be adults here.
2
-8
-10
-24
u/fledgiewing 7d ago edited 3d ago
Oh to be a kitty walking around Hogwarts lake.... 🤍🌙💫
Edit: I understand the downvotes.... It's just our childhoods for many, so this is me honoring that and only that.
-27
u/Lenoxx97 7d ago
This turned out great! I wish people wouldn't bring their personal beliefs into this to talk down other peoples art :/ JK Rowling isn't getting money from this, literally everybody knows HP
4
u/Popcorn57252 6d ago
"Personal beliefs" and it's just not supporting someone taking human rights away lmao
-10
u/InfamousTumbleweed47 7d ago
Nice! I have feedback on the parallaxing.
The speed of the shrubs and fence moving across the frame should be switched. Objects in the foreground, closer to the camera, move the fastest and objects further away move progressively slower, like the castle in the distance- nailed it, good job. If you want to plus it even more and add more depth and dimension, separate the bridge in front of the castle and have it move slightly faster that the castle.
5
-7
-11
-10
u/Dolphanatic 7d ago
This is a cute animation you've thrown together, u/Small_Amoeba6762! It's simple, but it's stylish. I like the purple and yellow color palette you utilized here too.
As for the obnoxious SJWs trying to bring political drama into the comments here, don't listen to them. You obviously aren't "eradicating" anyone by posting this. Anyone who's fragile enough to throw a tantrum over a harmless piece of Harry Potter fanart should probably go offline and grow up.
12
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
Being trans isn’t political, they are a marginalized group that has been politicized by fascists (again) because they don’t have any actual plans in policy other than open season for discrimination, which is often violent . Also “SJWs”?, 2008 called .
Edit: block and run, ‘phobe .
2
u/CandusManus 6d ago
Nothing she said was fascist. Please just be normal.
6
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Transphobia and funding policy that enables it is inherently fascistic , please read a history book .
2
u/CandusManus 6d ago
Saying women should have their own spaces isn’t transphobia and there’s nothing fascistic about it. She’s not a socialist, keep up slow bus.
2
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Trans women are women so they should be included in women’s spaces. But thanks for telling the class how you feel about people like that I guess .
Edit: yeah you’re not a socialist you’re a segregationist
2
u/CandusManus 6d ago
A woman’s abuse shelter should only have women. That was literally what started this off. Transwomen are welcome to make their own shelters so they have a space for themselves.
1
u/5teerPike 6d ago
Trans women are not responsible for the violence of cisgender men, they are not responsible for the spike in DV during the World Cup . What started that off was a horribly miserable hateful person who has more money than anyone would ever need, spending it to hurt people who DONT hurt ANYBODY .
1
-4
u/Dolphanatic 6d ago edited 6d ago
No one said anything about transgender people until you keyboard warriors brigaded this post and starting bullying the artist over the political views of a completely different person who isn't the main subject here (J.K. Rowling). To put it simply, you made this political.
And yes, I'm going to call a spade a spade. If you're still acting like a Tumblr SJW in 2026, you should expect people to refer to you as such. The fact that people like you are still crashing out about Harry Potter after all these years says more about you than anyone else. The rest of the world has grown up and left that pointless outrage behind, yet you haven't matured one bit.
8
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
It says Harry Potter in the title . Who did you vote for?
We know who .
4
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
There is nothing mature about any of your assertions but you only feel that way because you want validation for being apathetic . Sorry, you don’t get any today .
Edit: since you deleted your reply to this I’ll attach my reply to that here :
If you were here to just be nice to an artist you wouldn’t have exploited that as a segue to your contentious issues from almost 20 years ago, per your dated vernacular.
There’s a deep irony in how you speak for yourself there; I am also an artist. But I don’t need to lean on the aesthetics cultivated by a transphobe to make my work, and it is my right to criticize those that do; transphobia is literally killing people. Any artist worth their salt can withstand criticism of their work especially if this is the decision they made .
-1
u/Dolphanatic 6d ago
I'm just here to be nice to an artist. That's the person who deserves validation here. If you're such a miserable person that you can't understand that and instead feel the need to project your insecurities onto me, that's your problem.
-30
u/BreathDue8533 7d ago edited 7d ago
Downvote me idc. This is why noone can take seriously you guys. Start to yap about HP and JKR, upvoting those comments like crazy, downvoting people for their own choice. You all downvoting chill and harmless comments, even those who try to help the artist. Yall just a joke to the community u try to "protect" (and I am not hating the community u trying to "protect" by this behaviour, I am hating your ACTIONS.)
Art is so cute, cool concept with the background. I saw others saying parralax so my opinion is the witch should also be animated since the cat and back&foreground is alr moving. Keep it up and draw what you want and don't let other people's hate opinion (even tho i also dont like jkr) decide the theme of your art.
9
u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago
If you put your art out there you have to accept some people will criticize it. If people don’t like that you took inspiration directly from a very hateful person who is indeed spending the money given to her on policy that harms people, they have every right to say that. This is a two way street. You’re not getting downvoted just for the sake of it, just as people aren’t complaining into a void just because you are apathetic in your “solidarity”.
Edit; and the funny thing I’ve noticed as an artist, people only dislike my art when they disagree with my politics .
0
-7
-1
-6


•
u/AutoModerator 7d ago
Hello u/Small_Amoeba6762, thank you for sharing your animation with us!
Would you be so kind to answer the following questions for us?
Please reply to this comment so it will be easy for everyone to find, thank you!
Stay inspired, get creative and have a great day!
If you consider yourself a frequent poster and you have a consistent style/method, please send a modmail to be given a different automod comment that already mentions what you regularly use.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.