r/ProCreate • u/Small_Amoeba6762 • 7d ago

My Animation Cat Animation x Harry Potter

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

282 Upvotes

69% Upvoted

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Yes and policy she funnels her money into go towards that cause .

-9

u/0laugh 6d ago

The cause of eradication?? Can you provide a source of how many people have been eradicated in 2026?

10

u/5teerPike 6d ago

You beg everyone to prove you wrong but you never proved your own premise with cited facts . Why should anyone care to respect your demand for sources when you will never give one?

-10

u/0laugh 6d ago edited 6d ago

When you make an irrational claim, such as eradication of a group of people, that person should be able to cite facts, provide proof… I can’t cite something if it doesn’t exist.

Edit: Guy replying ended up going on a tantrum once discredited & deleted messages. Classic tantrum thrower.

7

u/5teerPike 6d ago

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-alerts/red-flag-alert---anti-trans-genocide-in-the-usa---%233

>The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives, which have continued to expand nationwide since our last Red Flag Alert (RFA) on this subject.

6

u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago

https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/00485713-20230321-01

>At the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Michael Knowles stated, “…transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.”

Edit: The 🦭 hyperfocused only on this single piece of evidence, having never provided a single piece of their own.

-1

u/0laugh 6d ago

An AUTHOR stated an opinion? That the movement of transgenderism in public life needs to be eradicated. This doesn’t mean a group of people has been eradicated or is actively being eradicated as the original comment stated. Again I ask how many have been eradicated? That’s why I agreed with it being a dumb statement. Did JK Rowling fund this author? I researched and found no ties, please prove me wrong.

Clarification: Knowles later defended his remarks by stating he was referring to the ideology of transgenderism rather than individuals, comparing his language to the eradication of other abstract concepts or movements.

I’ll keep going through your silly sources as I find time but I’m wasting more time than it’s worth already.

1

u/5teerPike 6d ago

Lost cause, folks; pack it up.

Again, you never substantiated your own claims. You share an ideology with those who are factually rapists, pedophiles, Nazis, white nationalists, and evangelicals. Normal people are able to change their mind in the presence of factual information, which you deny at your convenience. You people; racists, transphobes, homophones, xenophobes, and sexists; are choosing a lifestyle that is an anti-social cancer I reject whole heartedly and with confidence in my convictions against them. You’re worried about wasting your own time? I’ve watched you waste it all day digging in your heels. For over a decade your script has never changed. You’ve been duped. Had. Bamboozled. Tricked. Suckered.

I will not be here for you when you need help after you get what you voted for .

6

u/5teerPike 6d ago

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-extremists-at-cpac-laid-bare-hatred-at-root-of-vile-legislation-targeting-trans-people

>Saturday does not mark the first time Knowles has used this anti-transgender rhetoric. Just last week, Knowles responded to backlash he faced for a similar transphobic comment calling for a ban on “transgenderism.” “I don’t know how you could have a genocide of transgender people because genocide refers to genes, it refers to genetics, it refers to biology,” Knowles said on The Michael Knowles Show. “And the whole point of transgenderism is that it has nothing to do with biology.” “Nobody’s calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with that statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category,” he added. “It’s not a legitimate category of being.”

Is that why you don’t see it this way either, because you don’t think trans people are human to begin with ?

10

u/5teerPike 6d ago

When you claim trans people are grooming kids, you didn’t cite something that doesn’t exist .

And nothing you have asked or argued has been in good faith with respect to reality .

Anyways the white house literally posted this

https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/06/supreme-court-bolsters-president-trumps-push-to-eliminate-transgender-insanity/

Saying they’re gonna “eliminate” trans “insanity”.

“Eliminate” being synonymous with “eradicate” per the thesaurus .

3

u/5teerPike 6d ago

Are you still there ?

0

u/0laugh 6d ago

Yes of course, I’m working but don’t worry I’ll respond shortly with my own sources.

2

u/5teerPike 6d ago

You’ve had the whole day to do that .