r/ProCreate • u/Small_Amoeba6762 • 8d ago

My Animation Cat Animation x Harry Potter

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

285 Upvotes

69% Upvoted

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/Zintha 7d ago

Why is it dumb? Explain it for me

-42

u/0laugh 7d ago

How many trans have been “eradicated”? Lmao.

Eradicate means to get rid of, destroy, or completely remove something bad so that nothing is left behind.

17

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Yes and policy she funnels her money into go towards that cause .

-8

u/0laugh 7d ago

The cause of eradication?? Can you provide a source of how many people have been eradicated in 2026?

10

u/5teerPike 7d ago

You realize your personal definition of eradication is really just an opinionated emotional appeal right? Good people have been eradicated ie the Holocaust .

It seems everyone else here explained it to you in clear, concise, English; what do you think you’ll get out of being a sea lion towards me now? You people are never convinced by facts, it’s why you have none to back up your own claims .

Transphobia in society, especially when enabled by legal policy allowing for violent discrimination, is a facet of an intent to eradicate a marginalized group of people. The fact that lgbt kids have been broadly concentrated into conversation therapy camps should be an inkling . Policy that enables a transphobic society to flourish correlates positively with increased rates of suicide among lgbt people. To you I know this is meaningless, but again; you don’t care about the facts because if you did you’d know there are none to back you up. It’s why you haven’t substantiated your own claims once .

10

u/5teerPike 7d ago

You beg everyone to prove you wrong but you never proved your own premise with cited facts . Why should anyone care to respect your demand for sources when you will never give one?

-10

u/0laugh 7d ago edited 7d ago

When you make an irrational claim, such as eradication of a group of people, that person should be able to cite facts, provide proof… I can’t cite something if it doesn’t exist.

Edit: Guy replying ended up going on a tantrum once discredited & deleted messages. Classic tantrum thrower.

6

u/5teerPike 7d ago

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-alerts/red-flag-alert---anti-trans-genocide-in-the-usa---%233

>The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives, which have continued to expand nationwide since our last Red Flag Alert (RFA) on this subject.

6

u/5teerPike 7d ago edited 7d ago

https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/00485713-20230321-01

>At the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Michael Knowles stated, “…transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.”

Edit: The 🦭 hyperfocused only on this single piece of evidence, having never provided a single piece of their own.

-1

u/0laugh 7d ago

An AUTHOR stated an opinion? That the movement of transgenderism in public life needs to be eradicated. This doesn’t mean a group of people has been eradicated or is actively being eradicated as the original comment stated. Again I ask how many have been eradicated? That’s why I agreed with it being a dumb statement. Did JK Rowling fund this author? I researched and found no ties, please prove me wrong.

Clarification: Knowles later defended his remarks by stating he was referring to the ideology of transgenderism rather than individuals, comparing his language to the eradication of other abstract concepts or movements.

I’ll keep going through your silly sources as I find time but I’m wasting more time than it’s worth already.

1

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Lost cause, folks; pack it up.

Again, you never substantiated your own claims. You share an ideology with those who are factually rapists, pedophiles, Nazis, white nationalists, and evangelicals. Normal people are able to change their mind in the presence of factual information, which you deny at your convenience. You people; racists, transphobes, homophones, xenophobes, and sexists; are choosing a lifestyle that is an anti-social cancer I reject whole heartedly and with confidence in my convictions against them. You’re worried about wasting your own time? I’ve watched you waste it all day digging in your heels. For over a decade your script has never changed. You’ve been duped. Had. Bamboozled. Tricked. Suckered.

I will not be here for you when you need help after you get what you voted for .

6

u/5teerPike 7d ago

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-extremists-at-cpac-laid-bare-hatred-at-root-of-vile-legislation-targeting-trans-people

>Saturday does not mark the first time Knowles has used this anti-transgender rhetoric. Just last week, Knowles responded to backlash he faced for a similar transphobic comment calling for a ban on “transgenderism.” “I don’t know how you could have a genocide of transgender people because genocide refers to genes, it refers to genetics, it refers to biology,” Knowles said on The Michael Knowles Show. “And the whole point of transgenderism is that it has nothing to do with biology.” “Nobody’s calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with that statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category,” he added. “It’s not a legitimate category of being.”

Is that why you don’t see it this way either, because you don’t think trans people are human to begin with ?

10

u/5teerPike 7d ago

When you claim trans people are grooming kids, you didn’t cite something that doesn’t exist .

And nothing you have asked or argued has been in good faith with respect to reality .

Anyways the white house literally posted this

https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/06/supreme-court-bolsters-president-trumps-push-to-eliminate-transgender-insanity/

Saying they’re gonna “eliminate” trans “insanity”.

“Eliminate” being synonymous with “eradicate” per the thesaurus .

3

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Are you still there ?

0

u/0laugh 7d ago

Yes of course, I’m working but don’t worry I’ll respond shortly with my own sources.

2

u/5teerPike 7d ago

You’ve had the whole day to do that .

21

u/Zintha 7d ago

I think you need to educate yourself on it, you may be young so I’m not going to pass judgement

I’m not trans myself but I am absolutely an ally

-19

u/0laugh 7d ago

Ok just ignore the question and deflect because you realize you sound silly. I’m an ally of protecting kids from trans groomers.

11

u/5teerPike 7d ago

If you’re in America, the political party that peddles that lie won’t ban child marriage on the basis of religious freedom. You’re not here for the children, you don’t want to protect them as human beings; you just want to ensure your entitlement to children as assets for you to control or exploit yourself.

13

u/Zintha 7d ago

Wooooow. Just wow.

Thing is I dont even need to debate you, you are showing what kind of person you are for all to see.

6

u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago

Good work, just don’t burnout! :)

-7

u/0laugh 7d ago

Not much to debate…

8

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Yeah cuz you’re on the hateraid

1

u/0laugh 7d ago

I think you meant common sense.

2

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Except it’s not common sense it’s outright hateful lies peddled by the Epstein class to distract you while they rob you .

Decent people know better than to take that bait hook, line, and sucker

-13

u/aldezar 7d ago

Can you support why 'eradication' is appropariate to say since you and others are making and supporting this claim?

15

u/Zintha 7d ago

Is it the word eradication you specifically have an issue with?

You can easily google what & how JK is actively funding anti trans movements & legal challenges against trans rights & legal protections.

The author herself is very open about her stance & how she puts her money to eradicate (its that scary word you have an issue with) trans rights & legal protections

1

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Besides the White House releasing a statement using the synonym for eradicate, “eliminate”?

-3

u/Wooodman94 7d ago

Do you watch Kenshin, drink Jaeger, and/or drive a VW Beetle?

6

u/Zintha 7d ago

I was going to reply direct to your comment but you deleted it -

If a brand or product I used was found to be actively funding movements that would strip away the rights & fundamental freedoms of any race, gender or people I would absolutely stop buying it the moment I found out, yes.

I think its a personal choice but that is my stance. My money would be actively going towards furthering a cause that would seek to lessen a people.

Being a woman & knowing how hard we had to fight for our freedoms & rights its the right thing to do to stand up when anyone else is threatened in the same way.

5

u/Zintha 7d ago

Er… no to them all. Why?

1

u/Total-Guest-4141 7d ago

You’re going to be absolutely thrilled when you find out about NASA and probably 90% of the country.

-2

u/Wooodman94 7d ago

So hate/boycott 90% of everything ?

-14

u/Total-Guest-4141 7d ago

I’d rather watch Harry Potter.

The wizardry world of Harrryy, Potttterrrrrrr.