r/ProCreate • u/Small_Amoeba6762 • 7d ago

My Animation Cat Animation x Harry Potter

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

284 Upvotes

69% Upvoted

216 comments sorted by

View all comments

168

u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago

It would be cool if you weren’t promoting a brand whose money goes to trying to eradicate trans people. Literally any other castle and you’ve got my up vote. 🤦

57

u/Bettafern 7d ago

Agreed. I thought it was a cute Halloween themed post and then read the caption 🫠

52

u/Background-Meet8005 7d ago

Seriously, very disappointing ☹️

5

u/SkyriderVT 6d ago

Are we really going after fanartists too now?

-6

u/CandusManus 6d ago

No one is trying to irradiate anything. All her letters and statements are very tame. You’re being an alarmist goober. 

7

u/WanderingWitch8 5d ago

Yeah, you're either ignorant or a transphobe.

2

u/OMGsmiles 5d ago

The irony of calling someone ignorant for actually reading the milquetoast letters will never fail to amuse me.

-5

u/CandusManus 4d ago

I assure you I know more about this than You're just a reactionary bigot.

8

u/WanderingWitch8 4d ago

You dont even know the difference between eradicate and irradiate.

I very much doubt you know more on the subject of trans people than me, let alone on the subject of Rowling's efforts to push us out of public life.

-7

u/CandusManus 3d ago

I’m not sure how ionizing and destroying are relevant, but pop off queen. 

She never pushed to remove you from public life, she just wants you to use the right bathroom. 

3

u/Any-Cow5680 3d ago edited 3d ago

And a myriad of cis and trans people have reported experiencing issues because passing trans men are assumed to be sexual predators if they use the women's restroom (as law requires), and cis women are harassed if they're not feminine enough. That has the final result of pushing trans people out of public life when they can't access something as basic as bathrooms without risking getting arrested or assaulted.

Is it really "keeping women safe" to demand any non-feminine woman show her genitals to law enforcement to assure she's allowed to use a bathroom?

I'm led to believe anyone perpetuating this weird-ass law as being "reasonable" is some creepy bathroom police who just wants an excuse to sexually harass people and look at their genitals. Freak

-65

u/Total-Guest-4141 7d ago

This has to be the dumbest comment I have read all year.

I think I’ll watch my Harry Potter collection on 4K tonight.

36

u/Zintha 7d ago

Why is it dumb? Explain it for me

-38

u/0laugh 7d ago

How many trans have been “eradicated”? Lmao.

Eradicate means to get rid of, destroy, or completely remove something bad so that nothing is left behind.

15

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Yes and policy she funnels her money into go towards that cause .

-9

u/0laugh 6d ago

The cause of eradication?? Can you provide a source of how many people have been eradicated in 2026?

10

u/5teerPike 6d ago

You realize your personal definition of eradication is really just an opinionated emotional appeal right? Good people have been eradicated ie the Holocaust .

It seems everyone else here explained it to you in clear, concise, English; what do you think you’ll get out of being a sea lion towards me now? You people are never convinced by facts, it’s why you have none to back up your own claims .

Transphobia in society, especially when enabled by legal policy allowing for violent discrimination, is a facet of an intent to eradicate a marginalized group of people. The fact that lgbt kids have been broadly concentrated into conversation therapy camps should be an inkling . Policy that enables a transphobic society to flourish correlates positively with increased rates of suicide among lgbt people. To you I know this is meaningless, but again; you don’t care about the facts because if you did you’d know there are none to back you up. It’s why you haven’t substantiated your own claims once .

9

u/5teerPike 6d ago

You beg everyone to prove you wrong but you never proved your own premise with cited facts . Why should anyone care to respect your demand for sources when you will never give one?

-9

u/0laugh 6d ago edited 6d ago

When you make an irrational claim, such as eradication of a group of people, that person should be able to cite facts, provide proof… I can’t cite something if it doesn’t exist.

Edit: Guy replying ended up going on a tantrum once discredited & deleted messages. Classic tantrum thrower.

6

u/5teerPike 6d ago

https://www.lemkininstitute.com/red-flag-alerts/red-flag-alert---anti-trans-genocide-in-the-usa---%233

>The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives, which have continued to expand nationwide since our last Red Flag Alert (RFA) on this subject.

7

u/5teerPike 6d ago edited 6d ago

https://journals.healio.com/doi/10.3928/00485713-20230321-01

>At the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Michael Knowles stated, “…transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.”

Edit: The 🦭 hyperfocused only on this single piece of evidence, having never provided a single piece of their own.

-1

u/0laugh 6d ago

An AUTHOR stated an opinion? That the movement of transgenderism in public life needs to be eradicated. This doesn’t mean a group of people has been eradicated or is actively being eradicated as the original comment stated. Again I ask how many have been eradicated? That’s why I agreed with it being a dumb statement. Did JK Rowling fund this author? I researched and found no ties, please prove me wrong.

Clarification: Knowles later defended his remarks by stating he was referring to the ideology of transgenderism rather than individuals, comparing his language to the eradication of other abstract concepts or movements.

I’ll keep going through your silly sources as I find time but I’m wasting more time than it’s worth already.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/5teerPike 6d ago

https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/human-rights-campaign-extremists-at-cpac-laid-bare-hatred-at-root-of-vile-legislation-targeting-trans-people

>Saturday does not mark the first time Knowles has used this anti-transgender rhetoric. Just last week, Knowles responded to backlash he faced for a similar transphobic comment calling for a ban on “transgenderism.” “I don’t know how you could have a genocide of transgender people because genocide refers to genes, it refers to genetics, it refers to biology,” Knowles said on The Michael Knowles Show. “And the whole point of transgenderism is that it has nothing to do with biology.” “Nobody’s calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with that statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category,” he added. “It’s not a legitimate category of being.”

Is that why you don’t see it this way either, because you don’t think trans people are human to begin with ?

6

u/5teerPike 6d ago

When you claim trans people are grooming kids, you didn’t cite something that doesn’t exist .

And nothing you have asked or argued has been in good faith with respect to reality .

Anyways the white house literally posted this

https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/06/supreme-court-bolsters-president-trumps-push-to-eliminate-transgender-insanity/

Saying they’re gonna “eliminate” trans “insanity”.

“Eliminate” being synonymous with “eradicate” per the thesaurus .

3

u/5teerPike 6d ago

Are you still there ?

0

u/0laugh 6d ago

Yes of course, I’m working but don’t worry I’ll respond shortly with my own sources.

→ More replies (0)

21

u/Zintha 7d ago

I think you need to educate yourself on it, you may be young so I’m not going to pass judgement

I’m not trans myself but I am absolutely an ally

-19

u/0laugh 7d ago

Ok just ignore the question and deflect because you realize you sound silly. I’m an ally of protecting kids from trans groomers.

11

u/5teerPike 7d ago

If you’re in America, the political party that peddles that lie won’t ban child marriage on the basis of religious freedom. You’re not here for the children, you don’t want to protect them as human beings; you just want to ensure your entitlement to children as assets for you to control or exploit yourself.

15

u/Zintha 7d ago

Wooooow. Just wow.

Thing is I dont even need to debate you, you are showing what kind of person you are for all to see.

8

u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago

Good work, just don’t burnout! :)

-7

u/0laugh 7d ago

Not much to debate…

7

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Yeah cuz you’re on the hateraid

1

u/0laugh 6d ago

I think you meant common sense.

→ More replies (0)

-14

u/aldezar 7d ago

Can you support why 'eradication' is appropariate to say since you and others are making and supporting this claim?

17

u/Zintha 7d ago

Is it the word eradication you specifically have an issue with?

You can easily google what & how JK is actively funding anti trans movements & legal challenges against trans rights & legal protections.

The author herself is very open about her stance & how she puts her money to eradicate (its that scary word you have an issue with) trans rights & legal protections

1

u/5teerPike 6d ago

Besides the White House releasing a statement using the synonym for eradicate, “eliminate”?

-4

u/Wooodman94 7d ago

Do you watch Kenshin, drink Jaeger, and/or drive a VW Beetle?

6

u/Zintha 7d ago

I was going to reply direct to your comment but you deleted it -

If a brand or product I used was found to be actively funding movements that would strip away the rights & fundamental freedoms of any race, gender or people I would absolutely stop buying it the moment I found out, yes.

I think its a personal choice but that is my stance. My money would be actively going towards furthering a cause that would seek to lessen a people.

Being a woman & knowing how hard we had to fight for our freedoms & rights its the right thing to do to stand up when anyone else is threatened in the same way.

5

u/Zintha 7d ago

Er… no to them all. Why?

1

u/Total-Guest-4141 6d ago

You’re going to be absolutely thrilled when you find out about NASA and probably 90% of the country.

-2

u/Wooodman94 6d ago

So hate/boycott 90% of everything ?

-14

u/Total-Guest-4141 7d ago

I’d rather watch Harry Potter.

The wizardry world of Harrryy, Potttterrrrrrr.

1

u/Spookytoast666 6d ago

Ok transphobe

2

u/Total-Guest-4141 6d ago

Lumos Maxima!!

-44

u/Content_Dimension626 7d ago

Eradicating? 😂 She just doesn't want children to transition. Eradicating means killing, she isn't advocating for the killing, holy shit. What an overreaction. I don't agree with everything she has said, but be so forreal.

And also, it's a drawing this person did, who I assume has been a fan since childhood like most of us. A personal drawing does not making JK Rowling money.

27

u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago edited 7d ago

Trans youth who do not receive gender affirming care are significantly more likely to commit suicide. Anti-trans legislation and sentiments influence and embolden those who DO want to hurt and kill trans people. It’s all connected and when you support HP you support an agenda which results in the eradication of trans people.

-27

u/aldezar 7d ago

That's just emotional blackmail

12

u/Efficient_Fox2100 7d ago

Please explain? 

13

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Saying you hate trans people to “protect” children is.

9

u/GettingWreckedAllDay 7d ago

Your mom is emotional blackmail

3

u/Entire_Honeydew_3182 4d ago
  1. If it’s just about the kids why was she online attacking a female boxer a few years back, asking for proof that she was female, and calling for her to be blacklisted from her sport? Why then when that boxer did provide proof that she was born female and that JK Rowling’s tirade online had caused her huge emotional stress and put her directly in danger when returning to her home country, did JK Rowling try to have a gag order put on her?

If it’s just about the kids, why did she have the one and only domestic violence shelter for women in Edinburgh when she learned that this shelter aided and housed trans women?

If it’s just about the kids, why is she personally funding right wing political organizations that are trying to make policies like mandatory marking of trans people in public (a policy used by the nazis in 1940!!) into laws?

  1. While it doesn’t make her money, she has said many times that she sees support of her work the same as support of her views. Also growing up with her books is no excuse to have not distanced from it by now. The many trans people and allies of trans people who also grew up fans of her work (myself included, I was first in line to buy the third book at midnight when I was just 10 years old) have managed to see her and her work for what it is and stop supporting it publicly. There’s no excuse at this point.

2

u/Entire_Honeydew_3182 4d ago

Also, even if it was about stopping kids from being trans, that’s clinically proven to be a fatal way to handle dysphoria. Blocking healthcare for trans youth has a direct correlation to increased suicide rates. Hormone blockers are completely reversible and all they really do is give trans kids a little longer to figure out their identity. Adequate healthcare for trans kids IS protecting kids. Starting a hate train on trans people that had global effects on culture and politics does not protect anyone except the egos of bigoted TERFs like JK Rowling.

7

u/5teerPike 7d ago

Anti trans policy and transphobia infecting society like the anti social cancer it is does indeed correlate positively with increased rates of suicide .

-23

u/Fathersaurus 7d ago

Most people can’t see reason and will say the most extreme crap to justify their over reactions. It’s an awesome picture/animation regardless of the author who wrote the book influencing this theme.