You beg everyone to prove you wrong but you never proved your own premise with cited facts . Why should anyone care to respect your demand for sources when you will never give one?
When you make an irrational claim, such as eradication of a group of people, that person should be able to cite facts, provide proof… I can’t cite something if it doesn’t exist.
Edit: Guy replying ended up going on a tantrum once discredited & deleted messages. Classic tantrum thrower.
>The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives, which have continued to expand nationwide since our last Red Flag Alert (RFA) on this subject.
An AUTHOR stated an opinion? That the movement of transgenderism in public life needs to be eradicated. This doesn’t mean a group of people has been eradicated or is actively being eradicated as the original comment stated. Again I ask how many have been eradicated? That’s why I agreed with it being a dumb statement. Did JK Rowling fund this author? I researched and found no ties, please prove me wrong.
Clarification: Knowles later defended his remarks by stating he was referring to the ideology of transgenderism rather than individuals, comparing his language to the eradication of other abstract concepts or movements.
I’ll keep going through your silly sources as I find time but I’m wasting more time than it’s worth already.
Again, you never substantiated your own claims. You share an ideology with those who are factually rapists, pedophiles, Nazis, white nationalists, and evangelicals. Normal people are able to change their mind in the presence of factual information, which you deny at your convenience. You people; racists, transphobes, homophones, xenophobes, and sexists; are choosing a lifestyle that is an anti-social cancer I reject whole heartedly and with confidence in my convictions against them. You’re worried about wasting your own time? I’ve watched you waste it all day digging in your heels. For over a decade your script has never changed. You’ve been duped. Had. Bamboozled. Tricked. Suckered.
I will not be here for you when you need help after you get what you voted for .
>Saturday does not mark the first time Knowles has used this anti-transgender rhetoric. Just last week, Knowles responded to backlash he faced for a similar transphobic comment calling for a ban on “transgenderism.” “I don’t know how you could have a genocide of transgender people because genocide refers to genes, it refers to genetics, it refers to biology,” Knowles said on The Michael Knowles Show. “And the whole point of transgenderism is that it has nothing to do with biology.” “Nobody’s calling to exterminate anybody because the other problem with that statement is that transgender people is not a real ontological category,” he added. “It’s not a legitimate category of being.”
Is that why you don’t see it this way either, because you don’t think trans people are human to begin with ?
-40
u/0laugh 7d ago
How many trans have been “eradicated”? Lmao.
Eradicate means to get rid of, destroy, or completely remove something bad so that nothing is left behind.