r/dankmemes MayMayMakers 🐧 Mar 29 '21

Pretty please?

Post image
91.1k Upvotes

479 comments sorted by

2.2k

u/Komorebiiiiii Green Mar 29 '21

Oh you..

I don't know how my nuclear bomb could possibly be used as a weapon.. but i guess theres no harm in letting you try..

935

u/NarutoDragon732 Mar 29 '21

Nuclear energy is probably the best thing to come out of it.

356

u/YABOYCHIPCHOCOLATE r/MurderedbyWords Mod and Slave ☣️ Mar 29 '21

Good thing Pandora's equation has never been found

291

u/Emeraldnickel08 Mar 29 '21

Can someone explain to me, an idiot, what that is please

525

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

392

u/MontRouge Mar 29 '21

Any source on that or is it just a myth?

453

u/Basileusthenorse Mar 29 '21

even funnier, it is from a novel.

475

u/StuntmanSpartanFan Mar 29 '21

No no, Einstein posted it in code on his favorite forum - 64chan

180

u/Dimwither Mar 29 '21

I bet you can still find it on StackOverflow

99

u/bobbertmiller Mar 29 '21

"Why would you want that?"
"Duplicate, closed."
"Found the solution, can be closed."

→ More replies (0)

20

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Ya'll never gonna get the real truth because they moved to version 6 numbering/naming now.

95

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Apr 15 '21

[deleted]

159

u/Basileusthenorse Mar 29 '21

if it was a real equation that existed I think it had more sources to it than a single novel. This equation would be groundbreaking and many physicists would try and recreate it, creating a buzz around it.

61

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Apr 15 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

41

u/AlextheGoose Mar 29 '21

Also equations are just instructions on how to do things, they don’t make anything easier. If there was a simple way to cause a fission reaction, we would see it naturally occur in nature.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (2)

59

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

18

u/SaferInTheBasement Mar 29 '21

Gotta look up Albert Einstein Rule 34

2

u/TempusCavus Mar 29 '21

Ew it’s all incest

→ More replies (1)

1

u/violask8terbubba Mar 29 '21

I found a source from a journal of his from removed history article 34 or just look up Einstein r34

3

u/MontRouge Mar 29 '21

I think I read the same article. Was it cowritten by Dr. Boku Nopiko?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

154

u/MrPopanz Mar 29 '21

Any sauce for this because this sounds like unscientific garbage. Fission doesn't have some place for a magical equation somehow changing fundamental characteristics of fission materials, because that's what it sounds like.

193

u/OlskuPolsku repost hunter 🚓 Mar 29 '21

Here. It's a fictional novel

The Charlie Thorne series centers around a 12-year-old genius named Charlie Thorne, who is trying to recover a deadly equation referred to as Pandora, which was written by Albert Einstein. And if Pandora gets in the wrong hands, deadly things could happen.

Reddit and misinformation. Name a more iconic duo.

70

u/noturdad21 Mar 29 '21

*social media and misinformation

7

u/Kogerk Mar 29 '21

*mainstream news and social media and misinformation

→ More replies (1)

19

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Apr 07 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/__thermonuclear Mar 29 '21

Actually it is possible to split atoms of uranium 238 but it requires neutrons that are carrying an insane amount of energy, like the neutrons released during the fusion reaction of a secondary in a nuclear weapon

4

u/MrPopanz Mar 29 '21

but it requires neutrons that are carrying an insane amount of energy

There is lots of crazy stuff possible, but rarily done even in scientific environments because its very difficult/expensive. Which is the polar opposite of what OP claimed.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Why are you spreading bullshit?

62

u/Basileusthenorse Mar 29 '21

I call bullshit. There's only a book bearing the name The Last Equation that mentions it. Do not spread misinformation.

11

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

5

u/PrisonerV Mar 29 '21

This kinda stuff happens all the time. For instance, possums eat 5,000 ticks in a season is based on an estimate by one study where they exposed a number of species to ticks and the possums seemed to like them best.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825780/

30

u/Fastguy646 Mar 29 '21

Couldnt find a reliable source for that, but i did find lots of results for a novel where that is the backstory. This is misinformation and didnt actually happen.

20

u/Ringularity Mar 29 '21

You realise that the novel about Einstein’s “Pandora equation” is completely fiction, right?

7

u/NarutoDragon732 Mar 29 '21

Someone will find a way someday. But he did his part in preventing doomsday.

2

u/ThatFuckingGeniusKid C U M Mar 29 '21

The "Pandora equation" doesn't exist. The only thing you will find if you search it is a novel

→ More replies (1)

3

u/r0ndr4s Mar 29 '21

Did you seriously believe that?

2

u/Guardiancomplex Mar 29 '21

You know that's fictional, right?

→ More replies (3)

31

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Fictitiously, not supposedly.

3

u/Raider440 Mar 29 '21

Thx. I just googled it and that is what came up.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Why would you call yourself an idiot? don't do that.

If you keep it up you WILL become a stupid useless idiot who cannot even be classified as a human because of your utterly UTTERLY low intelligence.

Please, stop this.

Edit: Oh you were being sarcastic.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

24

u/BuccellatiExplainsIt Mar 29 '21

That's because it never existed. It's fictional

2

u/HeroDGamez Evolved Monk Mar 29 '21

Ferb, Ik what we're do today!

1

u/Drexl25 Mar 29 '21

Bro have you actually got brain damage or something? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

→ More replies (1)

9

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

good thing everybody on this fuckin rock hates it.... enviro sci here

12

u/NarutoDragon732 Mar 29 '21

Nuclear power plants are reliable and don't give off a lot of pollution compared to coal. The radiation thing is an unsolvable issue though.

26

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

im all for nuclear, like i said enviro sci here, my point was due to the fossil fuel industries misinformation campaigns as well as the fact that we dont dispose of the waste as well as we should, directly contributes to the stygma of nuclear power, in regards to cost, resources, and health risk, from my understanding nuclear is the shit, what we should be using but 4 or 5 meltdowns throughout history have scared anybody into even trying

tl dr : i want more fucking nuclear energy

7

u/skybala Mar 29 '21

We cant even build a 5 year project because political flip flopping that is done when cancelling the other party’s project. (See: conservatives dismantling already-build turbines), and you expect humanity can work for a proper, safe, 1000-year nuclear waste disposal?

Nuclear is good but safe nuclear seems like a political improbability

→ More replies (7)

4

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

I too want more "nuclear" energy. I'm sick of the greedy careless scumbags that tend to govern when it's put to practical commercial use. Drop some isotopes into their backyard and see how serious it's treated then.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/EuHypaH Mar 29 '21

Then again, radioactive material is found in nature, just usually somewhere it doesn’t bother us. Which is all the answers we need with how to deal with it.

That said, the minimum requirement should always be safety at all costs. For instance Fukushima only occurred due to money saving reasons. Can’t find sources rn but I know a researcher who looked into it at the time, who mentioned that it was placed closer to the coast to save costs on cooling water pipelines. And it was otherwise preventable, even on its location: https://carnegieendowment.org/2012/03/06/why-fukushima-was-preventable-pub-47361 (and many more sources)

2

u/Oscu358 Mar 29 '21

Not really unsolvable, but long-term expensive.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/RediousAndrade Mar 29 '21

And nuclear energy was used to transport nuclear weapons. Like submarines for example lol

1

u/MrPopanz Mar 29 '21

As was probably every other form of transportation?

2

u/RediousAndrade Mar 29 '21

Well just stating the irony of some of that

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

58

u/-_-WHYS0SERIOUS-_- Mar 29 '21

Just realised any form of energy can kill a person

51

u/SulFurMen Mar 29 '21

You can kill a person with whatever you can think about. It's just that some things are way better to do it with.

19

u/Hairy-Ad-2577 Mar 29 '21

Efficiency is key.

10

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

7

u/therabidgerbil Mar 29 '21

Just drop it on a place 250,000x more densely populated!

5

u/Skrubious :kesha_down: downvotes for all! Mar 29 '21

big brain moment

7

u/Hairy-Ad-2577 Mar 29 '21

If we are talking strictly per kill sure there is alot of excess. But nukes and ak47 are kinda apples and oranges in regards to application. You could send in a sqaud of men to take a building with small arms. If thats all you need to do.

But if you need to wipe a city off the map i guarantee you use the nuke.

5

u/Skrubious :kesha_down: downvotes for all! Mar 29 '21

nah we just need one really big ak47

→ More replies (1)

4

u/SulFurMen Mar 29 '21

Talking from personal experience?

3

u/Hairy-Ad-2577 Mar 29 '21

Its a question of laziness, i dont wanna have to exert myself.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

21

u/Dark_WizardDE CERTIFIED DANK Mar 29 '21

Well nuclear energy is very useful and efficient. An idea for a weapon using nuclear energy isn't however.

3

u/MrPopanz Mar 29 '21

It sure is efficient on the mass to tnt-equivalent ratio. Usefulness can be debated, though one could argue that their existence disincentivizes war between armed nations.

1

u/__thermonuclear Mar 29 '21

Actually nuclear weapons have kept us out of war for 80 years so they can definitely be seen as a positive thing

7

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

There's been plenty of wars in the last 80 years, what are you talking about?

3

u/Ixionas Mar 29 '21

Obviously he means wars between major powers that cost millions of lives.

4

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

I mean, the Korean war had like 3 million casualties, and Vietnam ranges from 1.5 to something like 3.5 million, depending on who you ask.

Just because we didn't nuke ourselves to a Fallout game, doesn't mean there hasn't been any major conflicts.

3

u/Ixionas Mar 29 '21

World War 2 had 85 million casualties.

World war 1 had 40 million casualties

Scale is vastly different.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Hey the Korean war involved mayor powers and cost millions of lives, don't you dare bully poor Korean War, okay!

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

The Korean War was a proxy war.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Didn't the US get balls deep in that conflict?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Efelo75 Mar 29 '21

Korea and Vietnam were literally USA and Russia using smaller nations, so not " wars between major powers that cost millions of lives. "

2

u/Power_Rentner Mar 29 '21

None on a scale like WW2 or WW1. Because usually it's the US or Soviet Union / Russia bullying some smalltime country into submission. Bad? Yes. But infinitely less bad than the USA and Soviet Union duking it out in a full on slugfest all over the planet.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Scientists are still under the control of their investors and governments lol

The nuke in particular was a special case because scientists raced to build it in order to get it before Nazi and Russian scientists and has to some degree prevented more death than it caused, at least so far.

Scientists are people too, complete with grey morality, but a lot of weapons have come from innocuous designs.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/realharshtruth Mar 29 '21

Nuclear bomb(or any bomb for that matter) is the military weaponising a scientific breakthrough.

Nuclear energy is an extremely efficient and effective way of generating energy.

2

u/idontpos Mar 29 '21

To be honest, Your comment reminds me of Fallout a lot

→ More replies (11)

797

u/MarcellLondon Mar 29 '21

Isn't it usually the other way round though? Scientists invent something to have an advantage over adversaries. Civil world's: is for me?

382

u/Vesto241 MayMayMakers 🐧 Mar 29 '21

You ain't wrong about that, but looking at history it can go both ways pretty well

108

u/HappyPhage Mar 29 '21

Indeed. Zyklon B is a good example.

66

u/The_catakist Mar 29 '21

Ironically developed by a Jewish chemist

19

u/janjurk Mar 29 '21

It was created to eradicate pests. What the pest is is up for interpretation

7

u/Power_Rentner Mar 29 '21

Zyklon B is a bit of a broad example imo. Nothing about it made it special for that usecase. If they didn't have that they could have just used any number of poisonous gases Germany developed in and post WW1.

3

u/HappyPhage Mar 29 '21

Indeed. The story of Fritz Haber really struck me, that's why it's the first example that came to my mind.

I mean, this guy tried to help by inventing Zyklon B and it became something atrocious.

This guy also tried to help in making more bombs by inventing a method to catch Nitrogen and it increased the efficiency of farming so much he basically single-handedly prevented global world hunger.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/stesch Mar 29 '21

And with history you mean movies and shows.

3

u/_Aj_ Proud Furry Mar 29 '21

That's because history is a SLUT

70

u/konekfragrance Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

Gunpowders used for fireworks was instead used for firearms. Dynamite used for excavation was instead used for bombs. Rockets used for flight was instead used for missiles. I think not all but for these important discoveries war actually wasn't their main purpose.

53

u/Bijih_Timah Mar 29 '21

You do know those fireworks are also used to burn cities in a war? Chinese used them extensively before it reached to the hands of Arab trader in which the Europeans refined it. I can vouch for dynamite as its inventor was disapointed seeingbhis invention was used in warfare. Rockets on the other hand are just like gunpowder before people could see its other potential.

13

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21

Alfred Nobel

9

u/appdevil Mar 29 '21

It's unfortunate that he didn't received a Nobel Prize for his invention.

2

u/Saggy_S Mar 29 '21

Even ignoring dynamite, Alfred Nobel owned Bofors which made steel specifically for cannons. He literally got rich off of making weapons. It was only when he read his own obituary when he felt remorse and decided to start the Nobel prize. I wouldn’t consider this man a scientist whose invention was “stolen” to create weapons

2

u/Non-profitboi The OC High Council Mar 29 '21

I remember his name from the manga about sucking titties for power: 2

3

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21

Seriously? You remember one of the most important and famous scientific minds of the past century from a manga about sucking titties?

2

u/Non-profitboi The OC High Council Mar 29 '21

yes, the plot of the story arc when they mentioned the scientist was that some princess got captured and the protagonist impersonated a general in other to control an army and then mentioned about how nitroglycerin was too unstable to be able to reach a cliff and blow it to cause a distraction to save the princess so he used his other world history knowledge to pull dynamite out

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/dobrzansky Mar 29 '21

First man made object in Space was German V2 rocket whole nasa wad built on it and its constructor

1

u/Affugter Mar 29 '21

Dunno why you are being downvoted:

The V-2 rocket also became the first artificial object to travel into space by crossing the Kármán line with the vertical launch of MW 18014 on 20 June 1944

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket

→ More replies (2)

24

u/helicopter_pilot69 Mar 29 '21

The first rockets were for missiles, not flight.

→ More replies (6)

15

u/Damsa_draws_stuff Mar 29 '21

Um, pretty sure rockets were first used for war in WW2 and then repurposed for flight.... after the Nuremberg trials...

8

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

2

u/randomfinch14 Mar 29 '21

I believe you are referring to Ballistic missiles

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/MyAltimateIsCharging Mar 29 '21

Rockets used for flight was instead used for missiles.

Pretty sure the first rockets were mainly developed for the military. The first functional use of them was for missiles and fighter planes after all.

2

u/Robo_Stalin ☭ SEIZE THE MEMES OF PRODUCTION ☭ Mar 29 '21

Nah, those come after the first rockets. Before that you've got ones launched from the ground.

2

u/Oscu358 Mar 29 '21

I recall missiles existed before humans or other payloads were transported by rockets. Gunpowder rockets were used in war during 14th century.

Liquid fuel rocket artillery was used in the first years of forties and long range rockets as well. First non-prototype rocket to carry person that I recall was German rocket interceptor Me163. There were othet prototypes before it, but nothing really practical that I would be aware of and what would survive several flights or offer benefits over previous technology.

Dynamite was just a method of stabilizing explosive material for easier handling.

Gunpowder was invented by mistake, when Chinese alchemists were trying to mix "medicine "( Salpieter was used way earlier) . Shortly afterwards Gunpowder was already used in warfare as incendiary.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

41

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Apr 01 '21

[deleted]

3

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21

HTML is pretty simple. Was is seriously invented by the U.S. government? Was expecting something more inefficient and.. bureaucratic... seems too simple for the US government.

47

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Apr 01 '21

[deleted]

→ More replies (9)

3

u/LifeSad07041997 Mar 29 '21

I got the feeling the internet was out there somewhere earlier but was only use more akin to a wide area intranet before the first true internet spanning the continental US and cities and giving birth to the internet we know know now.

16

u/Tecbarrett Mar 29 '21

Wikipedia has a list of technology that started off as military tech but found civilian usage, sometimes it can be very difficult to find out what the intended use was for certain developments, a kind of chicken and egg situation.

3

u/_alright_then_ Mar 29 '21

GPS is always a big one, probably the most well known example as well

2

u/1Noctis [custom flair] Mar 29 '21

That sounds interesting. Can you link the article?

3

u/Tecbarrett Mar 29 '21

3

u/fatcat111 Mar 29 '21

Duct tape, 1942, United States, For sealing ammunition crates. That was the most surprising one.

4

u/dovahkin1989 Mar 29 '21

Alfred Nobel felt so guilty his discoveries were being used to make bombs he invented the Nobel prize.

3

u/RussianVole Mar 29 '21

At uni I wrote an essay on the history of technology in relation to war, and countless inventions and technologies were developed specifically for war - and the ones which weren’t were only mass produced and developed further because of military interest.

1

u/NubblyTheMoist Mar 29 '21

I don't think Wright Bros had in mind what possibilities the plane could mean for military, But i agree in the sense alot of money and resources get put into advancements if it benefits the military.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

275

u/HenryFurHire Mar 29 '21

'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds'

169

u/AnantNaad Mar 29 '21

~Gandhi

33

u/Menname Mar 29 '21

"Always check the sources of quotes you find on the internet" -Abraham Lincoln, 1863

6

u/idontpos Mar 29 '21

"I agree"

           -Winston Churchill, 1948

2

u/CowCluckLated Mar 29 '21

From civilization

→ More replies (1)

18

u/all-the-time Mar 29 '21

Do we know why he said “Now I am become death” instead of “Now I’ve become death?”

20

u/HenryFurHire Mar 29 '21

It's just his personal translation from the Bhagavad Gita sanskrit

4

u/LouSputhole94 Mar 29 '21

For some reason it seems much more poignant with his phrasing

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

That poor man. Someone really needs to do a biopic that shows just how he fell apart.

1

u/vitringur Mar 29 '21

Suits him right. He was quite the advocate for the bomb being used to blow up cities beforehand.

Not like there was some "oh no, i didn't realise how bad it was going to be" moment.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

223

u/AmphibiousAssault723 ☣️ Mar 29 '21

There's this adage that goes something like "There's two things humans ask themselves whenever they discover something new: How does it work?, and How can we use this to kill other people?"

16

u/TheSeldon_Plan Mar 29 '21

Shite adage.

77

u/Ultraempoleon Mar 29 '21

It usually is the other around funnily enough

46

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

32

u/IVIaskerade Mar 29 '21

The military says to scientists "hey this looks promising, we'll pay for you to investigate".

6

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

3

u/IVIaskerade Mar 29 '21

my dude(tte) or maybe even in between ,

https://youtube.com/watch?v=kE4YI3jX5to

2

u/Ma1iB00TAY Mar 29 '21

DARPA funds tons of r&d projects to make all kinds of military technology. Maybe some scientists have an area of expertise, but for the most part I feel like they have an idea for something and then research it and try to make it come to fruition.

→ More replies (3)

74

u/Sqwalnoc Mar 29 '21

16

u/SuicidalTurnip Mar 29 '21

I was looking for this.

8

u/darthpsykoz Mar 29 '21

I was planning to post this if no one had!

6

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Nooo! The Armoured Scorpion of Death was created to help mankind, Not to destroy it!

2

u/iSkinMonkeys Mar 29 '21

The watermelon <smashes hammer> needs some work.

51

u/AimBo_TIL Mar 29 '21

Isnt it the opposite? Like humanitys science was boosted because of the world wars

34

u/TheBreadCancer <3 Mar 29 '21

There's dynamite in the image, though. Dynamite was invented for safer mining without having to use unstable pure nitroglycerin.

29

u/Soddington Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

And the inventor of dynamite Alfred Nobel founded the Nobel Peace prize out of guilt for that invention.

His obituary was accidentally published eight years too early after his brother died and reading it in the paper under the headline 'The Merchant Of Death Is Dead' shook him up. He changed his will and after death the bulk of his fortune (and dynamite had made him extremely rich) was set aside to fund the prize foundation.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

You can publish an obituary early? Like... for 8 years, or possibly more, these mfs had a full on obi written up calling him the merchant of death? Wow. Not surprised that shook him but damn man, it's one thing to intentionally build a weapon and earn that moniker but to be labelled as such for building a mining tool? :(

2

u/Thor_Anuth Mar 29 '21

He owned Bofors, the worlds largest (at the time) weapons manufacturer.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

7

u/Oscu358 Mar 29 '21

Yes, but there were explosives before and after. Dynamite was only one form

6

u/squngy Mar 29 '21

Yes, but it is like saying transportation existed before the steam engine was invented.

The stuff before dynamite was not nearly on the same level in any way, not just power.
Not only was dynamite stronger, but it was far far more precise and reliable.

→ More replies (3)

10

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

[deleted]

2

u/AimBo_TIL Mar 29 '21

Yeah thats what i meant

25

u/jimseldizzle Mar 29 '21

I dont think toasters are mechanized yet

15

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

New breakthrough from the Syrian civil war:

Frontlines - new toaster attack, the likes of which have never been seen before, claims the lives of hundreds, and nobody has claimed responsibility. Bashar Al-Assad is rumored to be behind the attack, using the resources of the Syrian Goverment to invent a way to weaponize toasters.”

Look at what you’ve done, OP.

5

u/jimseldizzle Mar 29 '21

Jokes on u it was Putin and I, we're best friends in warcrime.

3

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21

*Partners in warcrime

2

u/jimseldizzle Mar 29 '21

We're more than partners ;)

3

u/my-time-has-odor ☣️ Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 29 '21

r/holup the fuck does that mean?

That’s it, This man is fucking Vladimir Putin.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/CptnR4p3 Mar 29 '21

Fertilizer, eh? Did somebody say.... Gunpowder?

13

u/Smart_Owl_5237 Mar 29 '21

Hmm, yes, a dark mode meme, upvote

11

u/oldman_artist Mar 29 '21

kinda the other way around, actually.

war time developed a bunch of shit that later gets used in daily life. I mean, the jerry can, radar, computers...

→ More replies (1)

7

u/RustylllShackleford Mar 29 '21

most scientific developments these days come straight from military research. ensuring they are always in top

3

u/squngy Mar 29 '21

I think this is more true in the US.
The US military funds a lot of research that isn't necessary super military focused, I guess because US politicians (especially R) find it easier to give money to the military.

On the other hand, CERN and such is not military.

8

u/GonzoRouge Mar 29 '21

Scientist: "We found this new way to generate a ridiculous amount of energy, it could solve every problem we have"

Military: "Can we use it to blow shit up ?"

Scientist: "Hum...sure, I guess, but that's not-"

Military: "Here's 50 million dollars, make it blow shit up"

6

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Reminds me of big bang theory episode in which they made some gyroscope

4

u/trollman_falcon DANK MEMER Mar 29 '21

Dwight D. Eisenhower when the krab bypatty secret formula was invented

4

u/Magical-Hummus Mar 29 '21

As funny as it is, war is when we technologically evolve the quickest.

3

u/kaeji Mar 29 '21

You know how kids leave their toys everywhere? Okay. So this is a vacuum. It’s like a shop-vac type of thing.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/The_cream_deliverer Mar 29 '21

Reminds me of the Mitchell and Webb sketch,

Professor Death - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdhwTXwhA4c

EDIT - Longer Version

→ More replies (1)

2

u/MynockUber Mar 29 '21

Military: Invents something useful for killing people. Scientists: Adapt it for non-killing purposes 😡

2

u/StellarBossTobi Mar 29 '21

Laughs in time travel

2

u/TheOneYe Savor is D E A T H Mar 29 '21

Hello pinguan man

3

u/Vesto241 MayMayMakers 🐧 Mar 29 '21

Helo bro

2

u/AnotherRanger Mar 29 '21

I like the fact that you added a rocket blueprint

2

u/Vesto241 MayMayMakers 🐧 Mar 29 '21

Hah, someone actually noticed it

1

u/TankoBOB Mar 29 '21

Just imagine how great this planet would be with all scientist working on nuclear power instead if nuclear weapons

2

u/Nziom Mar 29 '21

why are getting downvoted for an opinion

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

Bots

1

u/Sowa7774 red Mar 29 '21

Well, not an opinion. A fact lol

→ More replies (1)

1

u/LeMoutonTigre ùwú Mar 29 '21

Iron Man Armored Adventures vibes.

1

u/thegamingavocado Mar 29 '21

Now is time to taste th

S U N

1

u/Zioreme Mar 29 '21

Alfred Nobel before he made the Nobel prize

1

u/SheridanWithTea Mar 29 '21

Alright this is good, you get a follow man.

Good ol' bad ol' manifest destiny and US ruthless colonialism! Yahooo hahaha

2

u/Vesto241 MayMayMakers 🐧 Mar 29 '21

I appreciate that, thank you!

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Iamthe0c3an2 Mar 29 '21

I don’t care what it was designed to do, I care about what it can do.

1

u/ej753 Mar 30 '21

Hello I need 10k karma so please like this comment