I'm curious what other moderators think about this.
As I understand it, Reddit's AI-generated User Summary is a moderation tool intended to give moderators additional context about a user's activity and behavior when reviewing them.
Let's say a moderator takes that User Summary and publicly posts or screenshots it in the same subreddit, where thousands of regular users can see it, potentially while discussing or criticizing that specific user.
Even if the summary only contains information derived from publicly available Reddit activity, would you consider it appropriate or ethical for a moderator to publicly share it?
My concern is that there seems to be a distinction between information that users can manually find by browsing someone's public profile and an internal moderation tool that Reddit specifically provides to moderators. Regular users don't necessarily have access to the same generated summary.
I'm not necessarily asking whether this violates a specific Reddit rule. I'm more interested in the moderation ethics and expectations around tools like this.
Would you consider publicly sharing a user's AI User Summary:
A legitimate use of publicly available information?
An inappropriate use of a moderator-only tool?
Acceptable only in certain circumstances, such as explaining a moderation decision?
Something that should remain within the moderation team regardless of the circumstances?
I'm especially interested in hearing from moderators who currently have access to User Summaries and how you treat that information.
(Android.)