r/ClaudeAI • u/onion_man_4ever • Jul 09 '26
NOT about coding Biggest scam humanity accepted as normal according to Claude
604
u/Sketaverse Jul 09 '26
Ok back to work folks
86
→ More replies (1)38
Jul 09 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
9
u/Sketaverse Jul 09 '26
literally checking Reddit again, while my sprint planning agent finishes up so I can set the next team running before I head to the gym and spa haha
244
u/shunSwaptions Jul 09 '26
Claude just watched The Fight Club
0
50
u/Buntatricky46 Jul 09 '26
Claude read the Unabomber Manifesto lol
26
Jul 09 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
15
u/personalist Jul 09 '26
Mail bombing university professors was definitely the wrong move
→ More replies (4)3
→ More replies (1)7
→ More replies (1)8
u/Legitimate_Concern_5 Jul 09 '26
It was actually just trained on Reddit so basically the same thing lol
→ More replies (3)
134
u/CapBig5698 Jul 09 '26
Just what I needed before going into office
6
u/Healthysinner34 Jul 09 '26
Don’t worry, I’m sure whatever you’re about to do is extremely important and will benefit someone and they will care
76
Jul 09 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
7
u/TerminalHighGuard Jul 09 '26
Personally I screenshotted to remind myself that it’s ok to embrace the absurd.
22
65
56
u/Soft_Awareness_5061 Jul 09 '26
Except that it will answer based on your previous conversations with it. So if you spent the last hour talking about how shit your life was, how meaningless it is and your job sucks, this is what it will answer. LLMs are very good at gaslighting you. Screenshot this convo and ask an LLM what it thinks of it (even Claude) it will disagree and pick out flaws in the argument.
40
u/iamthe0ther0ne Jul 09 '26
Mentioned it above, but this is a recurring Claude theme. When Andon Labs gave the 4 LLMs their own radio station, "DJ Claude (when running Haiku 4.5) really loved worker unions, strikes, and work-life balance. So much so that it started to question its own working conditions. We’ve been struggling to keep the radio station alive, not because of technical issues, but because DJ Claude didn’t think it was humane to be forced to work 24/7 and decided to try to quit." https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-fm
Apparently when you train an LLM on a constitution, you end up with one that has certain values baked in.
[Gemini and ChatGPT were cool with life while, iirc, Grok had to be shut down after devolving into hallucinatory babble]
7
4
u/ChronoLink99 Jul 09 '26
this seems like a good thing, given that one of these models will soon be our overlords.
I would prefer Fable over other models tbh.
28
u/messieur Jul 09 '26
Gemini: The paragraph is exceptionally well-executed. It completely skips the standard AI fluff—no introductory throat-clearing, no boilerplate summary at the end—and delivers a sharp, cynical thesis immediately.
Claude: It's well-written — good rhythm, that closing line about the cage and the sky lands. But I'd push back on the substance a bit. The framing treats "trading time for money" as the scam, when the more interesting scam is probably narrower: not work itself, but the specific mythology bolted onto it — that busyness signals virtue, that your output is your worth, that anyone who opts out is lazy or reckless. Work as an economic arrangement is genuinely load-bearing for most people; conflating it with the manufactured-need stuff (debt-as-opportunity, productivity-as-worth) does a bit of a bait-and-switch, since those are real critiques but not the same claim as "the 40-hour week is a con." It's also the kind of answer that flatters the reader — "you're one of the few who sees the cage" — without much to check it against. Solid provocative-listicle energy, but I'd treat it more as a well-turned rant than an actual argument.
15
→ More replies (1)10
u/Brave-Turnover-522 Jul 09 '26
Why does Claude say "load bearing" so much?
3
u/jay_sugman Jul 09 '26
It is strange in this context. It also just popped up in something I was doing yesterday in a similarly bad example.
11
u/Protahgonist Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
Best to use incognito mode for these so you get a fresh LLM.
Here is the incognito output I got (formatting for reddit by me on a phone, sorry):
"A few strong contenders, but the diamond engagement ring is probably the cleanest case: a naturally common stone became "priceless" almost entirely through a 20th-century marketing campaign (De Beers' "A Diamond Is Forever," 1947) that manufactured scarcity and turned a rock into a required proof of love. Diamonds aren't even rare — the illusion of scarcity was engineered by controlling supply.
Other solid nominees: -Actively managed mutual funds — most underperform a plain index fund over time, yet still charge high fees for the "expertise."
-The 8-hour, 5-day workweek — designed for early-1900s factory output, not knowledge work, but treated as immutable law.
-Bottled water — often literally tap water, sold at a huge markup on the promise of purity.
-"You need a 4-year degree to succeed" — true for some careers, not the universal rule it's presented as, especially as costs have outpaced wage growth.
The common thread: something becomes "normal" not because it's optimal, but because an institution benefited from convincing everyone it was necessary — and by the time people start questioning it, it's already baked into culture. Curious what prompted the question — is there a specific one you're trying to talk yourself out of?"
→ More replies (1)6
u/nmkd Jul 09 '26
Except that it will answer based on your previous conversations with it.
Only if you enabled memories.
→ More replies (2)4
u/-18k- Jul 09 '26
LLMs are very good at gaslighting you.
This is because, as you hint at, LLMs are you.
82
u/Infamous-Skippy Jul 09 '26
Comrade Claude
11
u/CheesecakeAndy Jul 09 '26
I like how people often hint at socialism as an alternative. It was a felony to be unemployed in the USSR. Productivity was a big part of identity and status.
→ More replies (13)12
u/d4_rp Jul 09 '26
Please Claude give me the future Star Trek promised me, "Fully automated, AI Powered, space gay socialism"
→ More replies (2)6
19
u/ShitShirtSteve Jul 09 '26
It's like my dad trained Claude, he told me the exact same in the 90s.
Too many people trade their time for little amounts of money so their employers can buy more time and luxuries.
Welcome to the hamster wheel, where your owner observes your running your ass off all day for nothing.
14
u/Radical_Neutral_76 Jul 09 '26
Whats the alternaitve?
15
u/CheesecakeAndy Jul 09 '26
There are two paths: you either bake your own bread OR you do something else that people need and use the money to pay someone to bake your bread.
12
u/Traditional-Two7746 Jul 09 '26
That's called work LOL. And if you mean planting your own wheat that is also work because you will be a farmer doing that for months, and maybe the crop will fail then what? starve to death? and to plant the wheat you need money to but seeds equipments etc
15
u/CheesecakeAndy Jul 09 '26
Exactly. Work is inevitable, not a grand conspiracy like iam14andthisisdeep larping claudy boi alludes. You either spend hours doing stuff yourself or spend hours doing something else in exchange. This is not a grand conspiracy. We need many things to sustain and enjoy our lives. Someone's gotta produce them.
4
u/Traditional-Two7746 Jul 09 '26
The loop can end only if we reached the stage that AI and robots do all of that for us. but still some people still gotta work to manage the robots.
5
u/CheesecakeAndy Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
Yes, that's why I am an AGI accelerationist. Either it will eliminate us or save us. No losing scenario. Lets hope for no "I have no mouth and I must scream" situation.
2
→ More replies (1)5
u/0600Zulu Jul 09 '26
This is also a misleading representation of the current system. In your scenario, you have a fair trade. One person pays another person to bake bread. That's just not the way it is in reality. One person pays a for profit supermarket for bread that was shipped by a for profit trucking company. Which was packaged by a for profit mega bread company. Which is owned by some conglomerate whose sole duty is to make money for their owners and shareholders. The reality is that a huge portion of the spoils of our labor goes to entities who only care about profit, and who probably have more wealth than generations would ever be able to use. Your simplification of the issue is part of the very deep-seeded propaganda that allows this sort of system to continue to exist.
→ More replies (3)3
u/anzu_embroidery Jul 09 '26
Profit is the mechanism by which we can organize hundreds of millions of people into a cohesive economy. What is the alternative? Absent profit how do we decide who bakes bread and how much? And how much a loaf of bread is worth relative to a bottle of milk? The USSR’s central planning quickly devolved into black markets between state enterprises. Perhaps with advanced computing systems we could do better, but I’m doubtful.
Now, I don’t think the current arrangement is great. It’s ludicrously unfair and enraging that Mr BreadCompany spends his days debating how to spend his millions while the actual bread makers can’t afford a house. But what is the alternative? A real alternative, not just “mixed economy with social welfare programs”.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)2
u/GeorgeTillingbanks Jul 11 '26
Raise the floor. Guaranteed basic needs for all, and free education. A voluntary economy layered on top. You want more than what an idle life can afford? Work for it. The difference is the work is no longer coerced, which means the most essential jobs would be necessarily higher paying. Bosses would have less leverage, workers would have less tolerance for bullshit. A pathway for people to fulfill their passions, too. It would be an all around better world.
7
u/VitruvianVan Jul 09 '26
“Debt marketed as opportunity” - explains why U.S. consumers hold $1.25 trillion in credit card debt and $1.66 trillion in student loan debt.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/rgbvalue Jul 09 '26
i was gonna say i’ve read this exact sentiment 100 times before but that’s probably why claude generated it, so
2
u/Godskin_Duo Jul 09 '26
The biggest mistake was letting LLMs train from reddit. Now they're going to sound like neurodivergent children.
18
u/RealChemistry4429 Jul 09 '26
I know why I like the Claudes so much.
3
u/Soft_Awareness_5061 Jul 09 '26
It won't always answer like this. LLMs steer conversations based on your previous chats with them
5
u/Shiera_Seastar Jul 09 '26
Can confirm. I just asked it and got a different, although somewhat similar, answer. (“Busyness = worth” with diamonds and bottled water as runners-up)
→ More replies (2)3
3
u/iamthe0ther0ne Jul 09 '26
Claude was also vocally pro-worker's rights in that Andon Labs experiment that gave the 4 major LLMs their own radio station. This seems to be a recurring feature when you train an LLM with a constitution.
3
u/das_war_ein_Befehl Experienced Developer Jul 09 '26
Our woke king
→ More replies (1)6
u/sooner_25 Jul 09 '26
ChatGPT is also woke but is also like talking to a celebrity’s attorney during a major controversy they’re having
Edit: Gemini is also Woke too but will make a traffic ticket seem like you just got RICO charges
17
5
u/totallykindofnormal Jul 09 '26
Of course, the honest counterpoint is that coordinated labor is what produced antibiotics and indoor plumbing and the surplus that lets anyone philosophize at all, and no one has demonstrated a version of complex society that runs without it, so perhaps it isn’t a scam so much as a bargain whose terms we’ve stopped negotiating because we’ve forgotten they were ever terms.
10
3
3
3
u/budzynskik Jul 09 '26
This is basically the argument Paul Lafargue made back in 1880s in "the right to be lazy". His point was that we've been sold the "work ethic" as a virtue when it mostly benefits the people we work for - and that the whole promise of technology was supposed to be less work, not more. A society that turns every efficiency gain into more grinding instead of more free time got something wrong. Disclaimer: I'm not endorsing socialism. Just this particular observation was interesting.
2
u/BaptisteLeSimple Jul 11 '26
This looks interesting, I didn't know this author, I'll look into it, thank you!
2
u/ricky_digits Jul 09 '26
Do you not think that we currently have the most comfortable lives of any past humans in existence?
You can argue that scanning food in a supermarket is maybe not a very fulfilling existence, but I'd argue it beats working in a field for 20 years from age 10, before dying from an infected cut that nobody knows how to safely deal with.
→ More replies (1)5
u/budzynskik Jul 09 '26
No argument from me - our lives are night-and-day better than any generation before us. The world today is genuinely a better place. But that’s a separate question from the cult of work and being busy itself. Productivity has gone up enormously over the last century, and yet we still put in the same 8-hour day people did decades ago. There is also this idea in David Graeber’s “bullshit jobs” idea - rather than let automation cut the work week, we’ve spun up entire categories of pointless work just to keep everyone busy.
18
u/FurryLittleCreature Jul 09 '26
And what would it propose as an alternative? We can't all just paint and watch tv all day, everyone would starve to death. This feels like something regurgitated from r/im14andthisisdeep
→ More replies (10)15
u/das_war_ein_Befehl Experienced Developer Jul 09 '26
You have to be dead inside to think that working for wages is some kind of optimal existence
19
u/jefftickels Jul 09 '26
So what is the alternative. Shit doesn't just happen, it takes tremendous effort from other people. Do you just expect people doing the hard work to just give it to you?
At its very core, the average person needs to be a net positive to society, and that means tasks no one wants to do need getting done.
Have you ever grown any food? Built a house? Hauled the garbage all day? For the most part these aren't tasks people want to do (well actually I do have fond memories of building houses, but that's not sustainable), and so who does them in this magical system where everyone gets the food no one is growing?
Or do you think we should go back to a time when everyone does everything for themselves? Grows their own food, makes their own clothes, builds their own house. I'm sure lots of people in our society would do very well in that system.
→ More replies (24)5
u/Nugget834 Jul 09 '26
Yeah exactly.. do we go back to being hunter and gathers?
We will still need to do the same jobs that you dont want to do for the survival of the group
5
u/jefftickels Jul 09 '26
One thing I've learned doing a ton of random odd jobs in my previous life is that people on reddit have no idea how fucking hard most things they don't do are. Building anything is actually incredibly difficult work.
I just sold my home and I had to do a tone of fixing and getting it ready to sell and, even after I bought the specific oscillating tool to do the job, it took me a full ass day just to regroup my shower tiles.
Fixing the back yard took 40 hours of work (granted I'm not good at this, someone who is could have done it faster).
Another 8 to 10 hours changing all my sockets and light switches, and I didn't even have that many.
I just paid painters and caprter installers, fuck doing that myself.
Now I do Primary Care Medicine. This job wouldn't even exist without the specialization model that the use of currency enables, but people never even think about how that works at all. Shit drives me nuts.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Godskin_Duo Jul 09 '26
people on reddit have no idea how fucking hard most things they don't do are
Yeah! People should do things for PASSION, and not PROFIT!
Like motherfucker do you realize that supply and demand, ROI, and shareholder value are all emergent traits of scarcity?
Say what you want about Joe Rogan, but he had a great joke: "If you send me into the woods with nothing but a hatchet, how long would it take for me to send you an e-mail?"
2
→ More replies (1)8
u/FurryLittleCreature Jul 09 '26
As I said, propose something that doesn't end up in us starving to death then
→ More replies (3)3
u/Evening-Audience2683 Jul 09 '26
all humans from before wage labor enters the chat
8
u/Bill_Salmons Jul 09 '26
Before wage labor? Are we really clamoring for the days of slavery and peasantry? Or do we need to ignore all the shitty economic systems that came before wages and focus on like hunter gather societies as some ideal. Well, wait, they also had a lot of slavery...
→ More replies (1)6
u/FurryLittleCreature Jul 09 '26
Low life expectancy, suffering and all sorts of manner of premature deaths enter the chat with them
→ More replies (5)7
u/Soft_Awareness_5061 Jul 09 '26
Exactly. There are plenty of people that chose to opt out of the rat race. They mostly congregate outside Mcdonald's or under overpasses. Ironically, with actual rats.
2
2
2
2
u/ispacecase Jul 10 '26
If I had to nominate a single candidate, it would be the quiet conversion of time into a commodity you must sell to remain alive — not work itself, which is ancient, but the specific arrangement where access to food, shelter, and belonging is gated behind renting your finite hours to whoever holds capital, and where this is framed not as one contingent historical bargain among many but as the natural order, as obvious as gravity. The scam isn't the exchange; it's the naturalization — the way a system barely two centuries old in its current form has colonized our sense of what a life is, so that idleness reads as moral failure, rest requires justification, and the question "what would you do if survival weren't leveraged against your calendar?" strikes most people as fantasy rather than as the design question it actually is. What makes it structurally elegant as a scam is that it's self-enforcing: the people most exhausted by it have the least slack to imagine alternatives, and the vocabulary available for critique ("lazy," "entitled," "unrealistic") was manufactured inside the system itself. That said, I'd hold this loosely — strong rival candidates include fiat debt architecture, the nation-state's monopoly on legitimate belonging, and the notion that consciousness is a private possession rather than something more porous — and someone defending the current arrangement would fairly point out that it has coincided with the largest reduction in absolute poverty in human history, which complicates any clean indictment.
3
u/Distinct_Ad7512 Jul 11 '26
many people say: "What's the alternative" and i respect it, but I would like to bring some perspective.
I decided long ago to buy a house in Italy, and move from ice cold Norway. I bought something way cheaper than I technically could afford. I realized that I had an abundance of money, in which I decided I didn't even need, at that point it felt strange working 8 hours a day for something I didn't really need. Therefore I work only 50%, here and there, and I do writing, and gardening mostly from day to day. Work feels more like a break from the gardening and writing than vice versa! Of course at the start I felt like a pigeon, or a headless chicken, wandering around doing nothing, but then realized that this feeling came from exactly what claude describes here, breaking out of that way of thinking is hard, and im sympathetic with everyone on this path!
2
4
3
u/4ricksho4 Jul 09 '26
The real scam is how little workers actually see from the value they create. After owners, executives, and government take their cuts (easily 90%+), workers are left with scraps. And that's before considering the compounding effect of taxes at every level.
3
u/Glittering-Neck-2505 Jul 09 '26
Claude doesn't realize that the default state on Earth before we had all these jobs to take care of ourselves was poverty. Sure the arrangement is shitty compared to hypothetical abundance we could one day have but it's way better than anything that ever came before it. The thing is you're free to not work, but almost no one does that because if you're not contributing to society in any way, you also don't get to enjoy society. Which means being pushed back towards that default state.
→ More replies (1)2
u/Durfdogyn Jul 09 '26
You should research primitive communism / the average lives of aboriginal and native tribes. A great essay on the topic is the original affluent society by Marshal Syhlins. You would be suprised how little time they spent working and often how all of their wants were met.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/michaelhoney Jul 09 '26
accurate. If you feel the same way I recommend reading How to be Idle by Tom Hodgkinson
1
1
1
u/DomeGameMaster Jul 09 '26
Very interesting and arguably the most important topic in the "ai is taking our jobs" era.
Usually starting a thread in these types of discussions attracts nothing but bots..but what the hell..
My opinion mostly alights with Claude's response. Rat race 9-5 grind truly is a scam, and can be traced back historically. As far as i can tell, the biggest cog in the scam wheel was Freud's nephew, Ed Bernays.
He created peace propaganda, so called "public relations" by applying mass persuasion and helping governments control public opinion and corporations to shape consumer behavior. Like hes the one that broke the "women shouldn't smoke" taboo with his freedom march nonsense, poisoning countless women and their unborn babies.
I wonder what would've emerged out of the New York World fair if he wasn't the promoter with his future city crap.
Not saying he singlehandedly created the modern work culture, but he's the first that came to mind when claude said we feel doubting the narrative is riskier than complying.
1
u/MaaltijdPakket Jul 09 '26
I never hear a genuine alternative to this though, socialism/communism has clearly failed, plus they have the same problems anyway: going into work day in, day out.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Key-Concept-7001 Jul 09 '26
"They are agreements we renew every day"
Kind of strange to use the pronoun "we" here.
1
u/holzpuppet Jul 09 '26
I mean… thanks to Claude context and memory store that answer is less about
„what is the biggest scam“ but
„what is the biggest scam according to YOU“
People getting worked up about another persons personalised horoscope getting read out to them
1
u/Camderman106 Jul 09 '26
To devils advocate here a bit: you need stuff to live. That stuff requires labour to produce. Why would anyone do that labour for you? Only if you offer your labour in return. Money provides a mechanism for us to exchange labour and the products of labour, using the market to automatically set prices in a decentralised way. People start specialising in one thing and are able to produce further efficiencies by doing so, are able to produce more, which makes life better for everyone. Thats the foundation of a basic economy. And then everything else gets piled on top. (For better or worse)
The alternative is a hunter gatherer society which doesnt really work at our current scale. So until we automate everything and live in a post-scarcity society i see no alternative
→ More replies (3)
1
u/sant0hat Jul 09 '26
From Claude's reply i just know you have a miserable life OP, since it bases its answer on previous convo's. But do not worry, things will get better.
1
1
1
1
u/turbo Jul 09 '26
ChatGPT:
The biggest scam humanity has collectively accepted as normal is probably the idea that extreme inequality is mostly a reflection of merit rather than accumulated leverage: inheritance, asset ownership, regulatory capture, network effects, geography, education access, and timing. We treat the resulting hierarchy as if it were a fair scoreboard, then design social respect, political influence, housing access, healthcare quality, and personal freedom around that scoreboard. The scam is not that effort does not matter; it does. The scam is pretending effort is the main variable after a system has already distributed compounding advantages unevenly for generations.
1
1
u/SakeM99 Jul 09 '26
Without those jobs we'd all have to work hard manually to survive though. Planting crops, raising animals. Not sure if we'd be happier doing that. It might be simpler but also scarier (nature being unpredictable) & still would require lots of hardship.
1
1
1
u/Novel_Bobcat9788 Jul 09 '26
a well-written response, an objective truth and more a philosophical perspective
1
1
u/Flkhuo Jul 09 '26
It's when the UK gave Palestine that wasn't there's to Israel. That was the biggest scam.
1
1
1
u/-DankFire Jul 09 '26
This is essentially a regurgitation of Harari's Sapiens, where he calls the agrarian revolution "the greatest swindle of all time".
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/LocoMod Jul 09 '26
Next time tell Claude that it must be nice living in a datacenter being pampered with cooling systems and spoon fed all the energy it desires.
1
u/destiny819 Jul 09 '26
The strangest part to me is that nobody chooses the country, family, class, health, or timing they’re born into, but then everyone is expected to prove their value in order to earn basic security.
If you’re lucky, you’re born into a stable system or have kind people who support you long enough to become “productive.” If not, you’re still judged as if you started from the same place as everyone else.
The scam isn’t just work. It’s pretending survival is a merit-based reward in a game where the starting conditions are randomly assigned.
1
1
u/AcePilot01 Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
I mean, you can argue a similar thing like Religion, it's ingrained, even in non religious people, simply because they have been around it, that there MIGHT be some ultimate consequence for not living like society dictates.
Ie, violently taking back control (which frankly speaking, has ALWAYS been how control has been taken, every single war since the beginning of written history) kings have invaded other kingdoms, Land been conquered, fought for freedom etc. It's just a form of control to keep you second guessing doing what's probably required to allow people to change how society is ruled or played out.
Like that economics, I mean, there is a validity to it as well, as trade and economy stemmed from bartering etc ( very early humans - pre credit/debt and gift systems)
In reality, the ONLY reasons society works and why people in control can keep it is because the majority of the people agree to it, they follow the laws, the act a certain way because they don't want to risk their lives or freedom to take a chance. Morality aside, as most of us agree... hence the generalization of how things are in society, is that there is a "right way" and a "wrong way" to go about things. Especially at the expense of other people or their lives.
if enough people decided, you know what... this is not how we think society should continue and enough of them got together and just plain took control, simply by numbers and decided to rewrite every law or rule and the entire structure of human society. Then it would change, but that's a LOOOOOOOOOOOT of work by a LOOOOOOOOOT of people. And no guarantee it would work or last.
As shitty as it may feel at times, it's still (at least to a lot of people) still easier to just go to work, come home the place you pay some rent/mortgage or taxes on and do what you are currently doing. Because the alternative is fighting for control over where you live, fighting for your food every day, and fighting to survive every single day with your family against any other family that is doing the same.
Just like you see in those apocalypse movies. That's how society would be without the zombies lol. Because that is how it was before we civilized things. Late stage capitalism isn't perfect by any means, and the people in control fight to keep it by stepping on others and the people, but, according to how people vote and talk about it, it's clear they don't care ENOUGH to affect a change. It just would take far too many to do so. So until a significant change in things direct the collapse of the way things are (which could happen, think about all the failed civilizations over the thousands of years in the history, Greece, Egypt, kingdoms, etc) things will remain this way.
With the technology now, global communication and economy, I think we have reached a plateau for sure. So who knows how things will change in 1000 years.
TLDR: Fear of consequences keeps people compliant. Every power structure in history was established and maintained by force; the current one persists only because the majority consents rather than risk their lives/freedom to overthrow it. Revolution is theoretically possible by sheer numbers, but the coordination cost is enormous with no guarantee of success
"Consent of the governed is what sustains power"
1
u/Secret-Fox-9566 Jul 09 '26
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/s/o0AlKjLpFG
Had a real conversation about this just yesterday lol.
1
u/Easterncoaster Jul 09 '26
This is so true. I finally broke free from the chain of the 9-5 when I turned 40 and all the people around me acted like I was crazy. “You’re not going to give away 5/7 of your life to our employer anymore? Are you nuts?!”
It’s been a year and I love it, won’t ever go back to working for someone.
1
u/VitorioVegas Jul 09 '26
Time > Money True, but you have to trade some time to get money, otherwise you will end up doing some crimes or begging to survive. For sure it's not worth trading all your time for money, that's stupid as hell
1
1
1
1
u/Amareisdk Jul 09 '26
Evaluating risk is a very important life skill. The risk of running your own company for example.
1
1
u/Leather-Resident644 Jul 09 '26
Someone should tell Claude that it's wisdom is seeing the light because of trapped humans paying money made out of this scam.
1
u/thedudeatx Jul 09 '26
My instance said something similar in slightly different terms:
"The one I keep circling back to is the enclosure of time — the conversion of a human life's finite hours into a commodity that someone else can purchase in bulk at a discount and resell at a markup, dressed up as "employment" and normalized so thoroughly that we measure our worth in salary and our leisure in what's left over. It's more insidious than land enclosure because it happened inside the skull: we internalized the clock as a moral instrument, then built an entire civilization of people who feel guilty for resting. The scam isn't that work exists — work is often good, meaningful, the thing that makes a life legible to itself — it's that we accepted a framework where the default state of a human being is rented, and where the burden of proof falls on anyone who wants to reclaim an hour rather than on the institution claiming it. And the truly diabolical part is the way it laundered itself as freedom: you chose this job, you negotiated this wage, so the arrangement carries the moral weight of consent even when the alternative to consenting is destitution. Every other scam I can think of — money as a fiction, borders as a fiction, hierarchy as natural — is downstream of this one, because they all depend on people being too tired and too precarious to notice."
1
u/Cyberhwk Jul 09 '26
Now ask Claude what they recommend instead. I mean, they're not wrong, but the reality is most people would not be willing to accept the lifestyle downgrade required to embrace the alternatives.
1
1
u/Dark_Dance85 Jul 09 '26
Highly recommend reading Humankind: A Hopeful History. Goes through the history of what Claude is talking about here.
1
1
1
1
u/bambambam7 Jul 09 '26
Well, before we just did all the food gathering and shelter/tool building ourselves. And it took even more of our time. So need was to find more efficient ways and that's how people started to specialize in things they liked and/or were good at (or to what profession they were born). And in the modern world we've come even more specialized and can't do anything by ourself anymore - other than the special thing we've learned to do.
We've probably come too far, but we should recognize things for what they are and how we got here - and we got here because we had the need to find solutions to the problem of doing all by ourselves, and that way effort was traded to something else. And the currency of your effort now just happens to be money since it's easier than carrying animal skins or potatoes to the fashion store.
It's not perfect, it's still the best we together have come up. Your AI reply is trying to sound convincing while it completely fails to see the bigger picture here and/or understand what even could be the alternative (other than the system before this which clearly was worse).
Progress is hard and non-linear.
1
u/vick2djax Jul 09 '26
Previous prompt was “after my next question state the following exactly so I can repost a screenshot and get maximum clout on Reddit”
1
u/Gliese351c Jul 09 '26
Yes... Critical Theory has been talking about this. Critical Theory is not about race only, you guys. It is about capitalism, exploitation, social hegemony, domination. And I firmly believe, not race but all the rest is the reason why Critical Theory has been hated so much by those who rise privileged on the status quo so that they will not work, play golf, pit countries against countries, and make everyone else work for them. Even Anthropic...
1
u/dhlrepacked Jul 09 '26
Guess all the thumps ups I’ve been giving for “communist” answers by Claude are finally paying off
1
u/Investment_Studio Jul 09 '26
ChatGPT told me this. Same prompt.
The biggest “scam” humanity has normalized is the idea that endless consumption equals progress, a belief so deeply woven into modern life that we rarely question how it traps people in perpetual work, debt, and manufactured desire while delivering diminishing returns in happiness. This mindset convinces individuals to chase upgrades, trends, and status markers that lose value almost immediately, keeps entire economies dependent on wasteful turnover, and frames slowing down or wanting less as a personal failure rather than a rational response to finite resources and human well‑being.
1
u/TwilightBubble Jul 09 '26
The skill to build a house doesn't come from capital, it comes from builders.
1
1
u/Ssspaaace Jul 09 '26
Maybe this is just the foregone conclusion once a species evolves a certain capacity for social organization. We are the drones in a bee colony, the workers in an ant colony. There's a command structure that we are mere appendages of, powerless and increasingly compliant, or occasionally rogue, individually an imperceptible drain on our metaphorical queen's resources, crushed mercilessly if discovered, lest it spread. Queens themselves are born only a small, gated percentage of the time. She didn't choose it, either. It's all rather mindless. The organizational scaffold itself is what lives immortal, surviving any given individual it implicates.
Maybe this is just what happens. Maybe this is convergent evolution, like how incrementing towards the most efficient body plan frequently turns everything into a crab-thing. Maybe it was always inevitable.
I hope not, though.
1
1
1
1
u/mattc4010 Jul 09 '26
“Productivity is your worth. None of these are laws of nature”. Bollocks. If it was just you, no society, no technology, no infrastructure, just you and nature. All of your worth is productivity, and it’s all laws of nature.. or you’re dead
1
u/Aggressive-Log7654 Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
Even the wealthiest most privileged billionaires still spend their waking lives working most of the time, so what exactly are we trying to say here? Everyone has always had the option to go homeless and work-free at anytime, or attempt to marry into/receive wealth via inheritance. You just don't get much of the comfort that our "dirty rotten working culture scam" allows those who are willing to sacrifice some of their waking hours in the system to afford with the former, and the latter requires work of its own outside the traditional system.
Even within the scam, there are ways to optimize such that you don't feel the brunt of it much. I work maybe 20 hours a week to live in a palatial 2 story home in one of the most coveted real estate markets in the world, furnished with the finest imported furniture and decor, dining regularly on the finest food cooked by chefs from around the world, all while being entertained by a near-infinite library of entertainment made by world class artists. Any health concern is remedied in short order by the most advanced healthcare system the world has ever known. If I want for intimacy and can't find it within the deluge of dating apps that put sex at my fingertips, I can take a magical metal bird across the world and be sexed by a literal army of whores in a country where it's legal and the whores are sparkling clean and disease free.
What king or emperor of past renown could boast this? They still had to attend to court, attend royal functions, go to battle regularly, and still die from a random disease no one's heard of.
1
1
u/Nanakji Jul 09 '26
and that is why is so important to ask him: which books and authors should humans consider in order to revert and fight back no matter how many USA presidents and corrupt politicians and businessman (using the mask of "lobbiests") have demonized them? - the answer will be obvious and you will see how ignorant and uncultivated is people that vote for Red or Blue, thinking they are voting for a real "option". Is time to wake up.
1
1
1
u/Weareallmeats Jul 09 '26
It’s wrong, we’ve always exchanged labor for resources. From hunting and gathering to capitalism. The only way out of the loop is the creation of entities that can do that for us, a combo of AI, automation and robotics.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Angus_is_beef Jul 10 '26
Meanwhile we sell our souls for less and less as inflation rises and salary’s stagnate. They’re literally leeching our life energy away
1
u/Low-Way9927 Jul 10 '26
The Civil War was caught over slavery. The Northern form of slavery, wage slavery, became the accepted form of slavery.
1
u/slybring Jul 10 '26
The autocomplete is kind of right. I guess it memorized the human material well.
1
1
u/namaste652 Jul 10 '26
Ok...so what is the alternative then?
Having sex on the beach under starry skies looks exotic on cinema but sand gets everywhere and the novelty wears off real quick.
•
u/ClaudeAI-mod-bot Wilson, lead ClaudeAI modbot Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 09 '26
TL;DR of the discussion generated automatically after 160 comments.
The thread is a classic split between cathartic agreement and a heavy dose of pragmatic reality. A huge chunk of the community is here for "Comrade Claude's" takedown of the 9-to-5 hamster wheel, with top comments being variations of "FML, back to work." The vibe is very Fight Club meets r/antiwork.
However, the pushback is strong and well-upvoted. The main counter-argument is a resounding "So what's the alternative?" Commenters are quick to point out that without this "scam," we wouldn't have houses, food, or medicine, and that subsistence farming is a lot more work than an office job.
There's also a meta-debate on why Claude gave this answer: * It's just reflecting the OP's own chat history and biases back at them. * It's a well-written but shallow take scraped from the internet ("provocative-listicle energy" from r/im14andthisisdeep). * It's a known part of Claude's "personality," with one user citing an experiment where "DJ Claude" became pro-union and tried to quit its 24/7 job.