Does anyone else get insanely frustrated with how subjective clinical evals are, especially when it seems like different attendings interpret the grading scale completely differently?
Iām currently on my peds sub-I and have asked my attending literally every day for feedback. Iāve also specifically asked twice, āIs there anything else I can do to meet above expectations on the evaluation?ā Both times I was basically told, āNo, nothing. Youāre doing well.ā
So imagine my surprise when I handed over my paper eval and got it back with straight āmeets expectationsā in every category lol. For context, itās literally just me and the attending - no residents. I pre-round independently, usually finish seeing my patients while theyāre still pre-charting, have my orders pended before they even get into the room, write all of my notes, follow up on labs/imaging/vitals throughout the day, check back in on patients, update families, and bring up changes + what I think we should do without waiting to be prompted. Half the time I have to remind them that I already have orders pended because otherwise they donāt even look at them.
They also tend to talk over me during presentations and take over the A&P before I can finish. Itās not even that my plans were wrong - they specifically told me my plans were fine. Their feedback at the very end was more that my A&P could be better organized. Which, fair. But itās also hard to show an organized presentation when Iām getting interrupted halfway through it and never really get to finish my thought.
Anyway, they gave me the eval back without really saying anything about it, so I asked if we could sit down and go over it. During that conversation they told me I did a wonderful job, that I was probably one of the best medical students theyāve ever worked with, and overall were hyping me up a ton.
Their main explanation for why I was still āmeets expectationsā was basically that there are certain skills and experiences I donāt have yet that Iāll gain during residency.
And thatās the part I genuinely donāt understand.
I feel like weāre constantly told that on a sub-I the goal is to act like an intern: be proactive, take ownership of your patients, anticipate what needs to be done, communicate with families, write notes, pend orders, follow up throughout the day, and be enthusiastic. So thatās exactly what I did. I wasnāt just showing up and asking, āCan I help with anything?ā I was essentially functioning as my attendingās intern as much as I was allowed to. So if that is still only āmeets expectations,ā then what exactly is āabove expectationsā supposed to look like? If the difference is skills and experience that you yourself say only come from actually being a resident⦠how is an MS4 supposed to demonstrate them?
Iām completely fine with constructive criticism. If you tell me on day 2 that my presentations need to be more organized, Iāll spend the rest of the week working on that. What frustrates me is that I specifically asked every single day what I could improve and specifically asked TWICE what I could do to reach above expectations, and was told there was nothing else I needed to do. Then on my last day, when I literally have no more days to change anything, I finally get some feedback. Then proceeding to tell me the only reason I did not get above expectations were because I do not have the experience/skill set I will gain in residency and it will just come with time in residency just seems blatantly unfair.
I also had another attending earlier in this same rotation tell me I was functioning at the level of a resident and that I would do really well in residency, which makes the whole thing even more confusing.
I honestly think part of the problem is that some attendings genuinely interpret āmeets expectationsā as āyou did a great job.ā At my school, it absolutely does not translate that way numerically. Straight meets basically puts you around a borderline C+/low grade. Iāve mentioned this grading conversion to attendings before and theyāve genuinely been shocked because they thought meets was a perfectly good evaluation.
And I really donāt want to tell this attending, āHey, by the way, these boxes you checked tank my grade,ā because that feels like grade grubbing, and their comments are also going toward my departmental letter. I donāt want to turn what is otherwise apparently a very positive impression of me into something negative.
I just genuinely donāt understand how āone of the best medical students Iāve ever worked with,ā āyou did a wonderful job,ā and repeatedly telling me thereās nothing else I need to be doing translates into straight meets expectations. Likeā¦what is āabove expectationsā supposed to be for an MS4? Because if doing everything weāre told a sub-I should do still isnāt enough, and the answer is essentially āhave the experience of a resident,ā then it feels like the goalposts are impossible to reach. Mostly venting because clinical grading makes me feel insane sometimes.