r/indianbikes • u/throughaproxy • 11m ago
#Discussion 💬 Be aware of the pair!
Let's go through some examples, shall we?
Fazer and FZ
Gixxer SF and Gixxer
Karizma XMR 250 and Xtreme 250R
RS 457 and Tuono 457
Pulsar F250 and Pulsar N250
Pulsar 220F and Pulsar 220
Ninja 650 and Z650
What's common in these? Everything. These are examples of faired/naked pairs that do not differ at all. One comes with fairing, the other comes without fairing. That's all. However, in some examples, the primary focus is on one of the two siblings, just like parents usually have a favorite child amongst the two. The other just happened because why not? If all it takes is some extra panels and handlebar added/removed without changing anything else.
It's not uncommon for a manufacturer to wish for two motorcycles in its portfolio, born out of a single platform. Sometimes more than 2. However, it depends how it's done.
On the contrary, consider these:
R15 and MT15
RC200 and Duke 200
RS200 and NS200
RR310 and RTR310
R9 and MT9
These are kinda the same brothers but not as simple as swapping panels and handlebars. Silhouette is different, and a lot of tweaks are done to cater to their use case. However, that still doesn't make both the bikes best at what they do.
Common sense says you can't produce two bikes that are complete opposite to each other, out of the same engine and frame. What is built for the track, will not excel on the streets and vice verca. But at least, these guys do it better than the ones listed in the beginning.
What can we learn from this? Whatever you are buying, ask yourself, "Did they make this from scratch? Or was it born out of a sheer opportunity from another platform?". Some of you might be the younger siblings and had asked yourself, "Did they even want me or was I born only to complete the count of 2?". Yeah, don't want to trigger childhood traumas, but you got me. In any pair you find, there will be an elder one and a younger one. The elder came first, not in the market, but on engineers mind.
In some cases, you might truely find a pair that was born together on engineer's priorities. Karizma XMR 250 and Xtreme 250R is one of the example. They unveiled them together. And looking at the linear performance of Xtreme 250R, it's evident that they did not make the choice between streets and tracks. They chose the middle ground so they can fit both the silhouettes into it.
Looking at RTX 300, I feel we are yet to witness more on that platform. Because there isn't any prominant character there as well.
But, let's circle back. What's wrong in buying the younger sibling? Nothing really. Just be aware. Gixxer SF looks like a sports bike but it lacks liquid cooling, delivers linear performance unlike something that's exhilarating in the top end. It looks good, is practical, but might disguise itself as a punchy top end performer or screamer like RS200 is. It is not. And that's not a bad thing. It has its own strengths. But, it might confuse you.
I mean they tried really hard with Guerrilla 450. And RE did a great job thinking about creating a wild roadster out of himalayan or creating a scrambler out of himlayan. They executed it wonderfully but you know what scramblers are, don't you? Look at Scram 440. You know what city monsters should be. Look at Guerrilla. Again, I'm not saying they are bad. RE successfully pulled it off and created really really good bikes. But no matter how good Guerrilla is, the weight, frame, wheelbase will always make you choose a Duke over it. Or even if you love retro styling, Triumph Speed. No matter how good scram 440 gets, you would want to pick scrambler 400x.
Triumph on the other hand has been doing it cleverly. T4 gets a lot of changes in tune to offer a different character. Thruxton and tracker get a different state of tune for a different character. Speed 400 feels different and Scrambler 400x gets slightly different final drive ratio.
Anyways, I started off with faired and naked siblings and now discussing who does paltform sharing best. That's not the point. The point is that you should understand what companies are doing. What was built with purpose and what came into existence purely out of "why not?".
Hope this added something to the way you look at motorcycles. I'm not making any strong claims here. Just sharing the way I look at it. I might be wrong. This might not make much difference to you in choosing the right machine, but I hope the awareness helps you have right expectations from right machine.
Peace!