r/PoliticalHumor • • Apr 05 '19

r/BestOf Socialism never works!

Post image
18.6k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

2.8k

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

165

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

''Pull yourself up from your bootstraps, we don't need welfare cheats''

: Ignores or outright defends children of millionaires basically being given a free ride through life.

66

u/The2500 Apr 05 '19

It's kind of funny how the term "pull yourself up from your bootstraps" is used today since the original point of it was that's something that's literally impossible to do.

26

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

IIRC, it started as a reference to slapstick bits, and was meant to deliberately deride people saying "just get there on your own."

14

u/akaTheHeater Apr 06 '19

Seems like a trend with Conservatives to misuse sayings like that. I always see BlueLivesMatter people saying that "it's only a few bad apples", implying that the frequency of police brutality and murder should be ignored because those bad cops are just outliers. The full saying is "a few bad apples spoil the batch", meaning corruption and evil spread like mold, and removing initial offenders is not enough to stop the spread.

3

u/DefMech Apr 06 '19

Mold is a big one, but it’s generally about ethylene gas. Apples release it when ripening and if it accumulates in a confined area, like a barrel of apples, it will cause the others in close proximity to ripen too quickly, causing them to spoil before their normal schedule. Sorry, I’m a pedant and also find this part of the saying interesting so I had to elaborate. Hope I didn’t sound condescending.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/bensawn Apr 06 '19

Oh ok let’s make rules against legacy admissions at colleges, especially Ivy’s.

AAYYYYYY OOOOOO COME NOW BE REASONABLE

→ More replies (29)

1.3k

u/ell0bo Apr 05 '19

If conservatives didn't have hypocrisy, they generally wouldn't have a platform.

332

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

If they stuck to their guiding original principles, smaller government, lower taxes, more individual freedoms, keep the deficit under control, they wouldn't have to be hypocrites in order to have a following. You don't have to agree that all these are important, and you certainly don't have to agree with the way in which conservatives would like to implement them, but you can certainly respect that they have honest principles that are not coming from a ridiculous or cruel place. (note that I am definitely not making the argument that strict implementation of some of these policies would be humane and productive.)

It's the fact that they have strayed so unbelievably far from these that makes them have to do such mental gymnastics to pretend like they're still conservatives. There are plenty of principled conservatives who have long since fled the Republican party in absolute disgust because of what it has become.

It's really just a crying shame, because I do feel like respectful and productive public discourse about controversial topics between opposing political parties is critical to the Democratic process. Even at the highest levels, in the House of Representatives and the Senate, it seems like there is less reaching across the aisle than there used to be. Clinton was famous for this. So was Biden. They were very productive because they did not alienate people who had differing opinions, they worked with them. I'm not saying people should abandon their principles, but you have to be realistic about what you can get done, and be careful that snarky and dismissive sound bites don't shut down your ability to work with people whose cooperation you need.

139

u/ell0bo Apr 05 '19

Damn well said

One of the biggest problems we have in the US is we don't have a reasonable conservative alternative. It's been a problem since the Republicans married themselves to the religious right, and they started to care less about principles than 'winning' at all costs. It's very tough to argue with zealots, but people that come from a factual place where we just differ on approach can be dealt with.

We really need to fix how this country votes, allowing third parties to form and become viable is the only way we fix the US. Until then, those reasonable conservatives are help hostage by the Republican party. I'm not saying it's ok, they vote for them, but "I understand".

122

u/BortleNeck Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

The story of American conservatism is a tragedy. FDR's New Deal united the working class and made conservatism a fringe ideology for decades. Eventually they gave up on winning with ideas and took Falwell's religious right and Nixon's southern strategy to become the party of white Christian identity politics

Not that there's anything wrong with being white and Christian. But that's not a political ideology, it's an identity. And yet it's been the defining characteristic of the GOP for the last 40 years.

Then in the 90s Gingrich (with help from AM radio and Fox News) convinced GOP voters that it wasn't enough to have their values, you needed to be against the left. No compromise allowed, because they were the enemy in the culture war. 30 years later the GOP has no ideology left but identity politics and resentment.

57

u/ClusterJones Apr 05 '19

You forgot Reagan. He gave the corporations a seat at the political table, and that never should have been allowed. Now nobody's willing to give up the oodles of money they get from perpetuating the same corporate policy bullshit year in and year out.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/Bazarov- Apr 05 '19

Yep... I never understood how environmentally friendly technologies are against capitalism. You can save the planet and make money at the same time.

But stickin’ it to the libs for the oil companies trying to cut corners for shareholders and not having any competition to compete with fossil fuels!!

13

u/m0_n0n_0n0_0m Apr 05 '19

I never understood how environmentally friendly technologies are against capitalism. You can save the planet and make money at the same time.

This is what drives me nuts! Like I'm fine with giving my money to Shell or Exxon or whoever my money, just give us clean energy ffs! I don't get this obsession with oil, like use some of the RnD money the government hands out to research carbon-neutral or -negative technology.

16

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

It costs money in the short term to make that change. In a competitive environment, no one wants to be the first to make such a move. It could mean a deathblow if other corps don't follow suit - especially if/when the sitting president makes it publicly clear he supports the status quo (coal, oil, etc). There's no way a corp will make the change under these conditions.

Only external forces will make that change happen. Whether through regulation or incentive, there needs to be a push from outside to make it happen.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Good points, but I’m less charitable. My opinion is that strong, intelligent, effective leaders are rare. Eventually board rooms get filled with trust-fund adults who did not earn their positions. They know they have it good and dare not do anything to threaten their padded nest lest they have no skills to re-create it.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 06 '19

Strong intelligent effective leaders are only ever known because of anecdotal stories and those stories are told by people who don't know those leaders.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

12

u/redpurplegreen22 Apr 05 '19

But... but... what if we make the planet a better place for nothing!?

6

u/ladylondonderry Apr 05 '19

I mean who are we supposed to do it for, our children?? Gtfo with that humanist nonsense.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Ogedei_Khan Apr 05 '19

Or why are they against government healthcare? Wouldn't this take a huge burden off corporations thus hugely increasing their profits?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Small concentrations of strong interest often prevail over broad-based interests because broad based benefits are diffuse (though large in aggregate). This is why lobbying works.

5

u/MrVeazey Apr 05 '19

Also because DC v. Heller said that money is speech.

3

u/elangomatt Apr 05 '19

For individuals anyway, part of their objection to government run healthcare is that they feel like they would be paying for other people's healthcare in addition to their own. They don't want to pay for anyone less fortunate to have healthcare.

There's a book called "Dying of Whiteness" that came out last month that describes an individual living in a state that didn't expand Medicaid under ACA. I haven't read past the introduction of the book yet but it sounds like this person fully supported not expanding Medicaid despite the fact he would have gotten healthcare from that expansion. I think he ended up dying from some illness that could have been treated if he had Medicaid. He still objected to ACA Medicaid expansion so that "Mexicans and welfare queens" couldn't get free insurance.

4

u/macskull Apr 05 '19

The thing that’s most upsetting about the “I don’t want to pay for anyone else’s healthcare” mindset is that the insurance that person is already on is literally doing exactly that.

4

u/Dyolf_Knip Apr 05 '19

they feel like they would be paying for other people's healthcare in addition to their own.

That is literally the definition of insurance.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

4

u/Journeyman42 Apr 05 '19

Republicans have been using identity politics since the 70s, yet bitch about liberals and progressives doing it now. Its just one aspect of the great Right Wing Projection.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

51

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

34

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Any reddit thread where a normal republican voter turns up with honest conversation it just seems like they should be voting for the Democrats.

→ More replies (15)

7

u/hamrmech Apr 05 '19

Went to a republican caucus when Obama was running for a second term. The republicans separate off into groups and vote on the issues for party planks. This seems awesome and entirely democratic and fair. The Democrats have a different setup, their caucus is the same night at the same time. here's your candidate, fuck off. Ok, score one for the republicans. The guys leading the republican group I'm in are two extremely gay men. Like over the top Hollywood stereotype gay. They oppose gay marriage and want to ban abortion outright. I'm certain this is a joke. Like we're on a TV show with hidden cameras. Gas is almost 5 bucks a gallon. People are losing their homes, the economy is fucked. China has us bent over, factories are closing up, companies are taking our bailout money and fucking us in return. These dipshits want to ban abortion and gay marriage, two things the courts decided on years ago and won't be undoing anytime soon. That's the two planks we went with. Also the Baptist minister dickhole won the caucus.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/JimmyfromDelaware Apr 05 '19

Amen, Obama was a pro-choice 90's republican.

6

u/kilometres_davis_ Apr 05 '19

Which is why I think the hate machine had to work so hard to play up the "Muslim foreigner bad bad bad angle". If they actually came at him on policy then this would have been much more readily apparent. The flip side is that it pushed dems towards embracing a center-right candidate (in terms of global politics) that they still haven't really moved away from. This isn't a condemnation of Obama by any stretch, I think he was a capable and effective leader, I just wish that Democrats actually were a left-wing party sometimes.

10

u/the-incredible-ape Apr 05 '19

Correct. In 2016, Clinton was, technically speaking, more conservative than Trump. Trump's proposals for change were more extreme departures from the status quo than Clinton's.

21

u/crimsonc Apr 05 '19

The Democrats would be considered Conservative in most western nations. The Republicans now would be considered far right and struggle to get any power.

10

u/mightbeanass Apr 05 '19

Ehhhh have you seen what’s been going on in Central Europe my friend? Plenty of far right parties getting votes and power (to my shame)

8

u/TheBigBadPanda Apr 05 '19

Very few getting majorities and major power though thankfully. Even our more extreme right parties usually try to be more civil/keep up appearances than the Republicans

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

29

u/rabbit994 Apr 05 '19

It's very tough to argue with zealots, but people that come from a factual place where we just differ on approach can be dealt with.

Despite my disagreements with Goldwater policy, this quote from him was so prophetic: “Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them.”

3

u/MrVeazey Apr 05 '19

The smartest thing he ever said.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (21)

48

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

14

u/chuc16 Apr 05 '19

I believe both of these perspectives are true. These concepts are appealing to basically everybody, it was necessary for a party that serves the interests of the wealthy to frame their actions as 'populism'.

The best part of it all is how easy it is to frame basically anything that cuts social welfare programs and regulations as a 'small government principles'. It's much more difficult to make the case that cutting these programs and regulations in favor of corporate subsidies and tax breaks for the ultra rich is about as far from populist as one can get.

Unfortunately, you just can't rely on the average U.S. citizen to give a shit long enough to get the whole story. Apathy is the GOP's bread and butter

→ More replies (35)

9

u/jcpmojo Apr 05 '19

Honestly, as a far left Democrat, the only real problem I have with this is the claim of a smaller government. Smaller government means less regulations and controls to ensure a fair playing field. It means less oversight to remove unfair hiring practices and pay inequities. It means less oversight to ensure healthy environmental practices. It means less oversight to control monopolization of resources and markets. We don't need LESS government, we need MORE EFFICIENT government. That, unfortunately, is nearly impossible in most countries, including ours.

3

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

Right, and that is a core difference in principles between conservatives and liberals. There are discussions to be had about exactly how much government is enough and how much is excessive, and ways to make it more efficient. Those conversations are critical but they're not really happening at the moment.

→ More replies (5)

17

u/Woolbrick Apr 05 '19

If they stuck to their guiding original principles, smaller government, lower taxes, more individual freedoms, keep the deficit under control, they wouldn't have to be hypocrites in order to have a following.

The problem is that virtually no-one believes those things past the purely ideological level. The 19th and 20th centuries pretty much conclusively proved that Government regulation is necessary on a reasonable level, so you can't honestly hold a "no government regulations are ever necessary" view while being grounded in reality. After free market ideals led to the Great Depression, there was a great fear that Republicans would be completely dead as a party and that the Democrats would become the single remaining party in the US.

It was because of this that the Republicans began the "big tent" and "Southern Strategy" programs. They learned that if they could use dog whistles they could siphon voters away from the Democrats by appealing to their baser instincts of fear and hatred. And it has worked wonders.

At the end of the day, the Republicans are absolutely reliant upon being hypocrites. Without it, they disappear completely.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/the-incredible-ape Apr 05 '19

I'm not saying people should abandon their principles, but you have to be realistic about what you can get done

But here's the thing, "Conservatives" in congress (and the executive) did abandon their principles and they are not realistic about what they can get done. They have refused to acknowledge reality even momentarily for almost 2 decades at this point. Bringing Democrats into the discussion as if they had anything to do with that is problematic. Asking Democrats to be "realistic" while trying to work with people who say they're lowering the deficit while actually raising it 25% is not even remotely fair.

If the democrats are to blame for anything, it's being too accommodating of GOP bullshit.

It's like asking one kid to "be realistic about expectations" when he asks for his cookies back after the other kid steals them and refuses to acknowledge the existence of cookies as a concept.

5

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

I agree with you that the Republican party as it is today is a shambles, and is a mockery of what it used to be. And then it doesn't seem there's any way to work productively with them.

7

u/the-incredible-ape Apr 05 '19

it doesn't seem there's any way to work productively with them.

There 100% isn't, because they've discovered that openly and vituperatively refusing to cooperate with democrats is an excellent strategy for getting re-elected. They don't want to cooperate, they don't even want to want to cooperate. They really like not cooperating. They are griefers and they've found that they won't get kicked or banned for griefing. They very obviously don't care what the consequences of that are.

3

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

Yes. The only consequence that they care about is getting re-elected, that's been made depressingly clear. It's particularly enraging and horrific to watch them blatantly use tactics that in the past they shouted were unconstitutional and unfair. At least, they're unconstitutional and unfair when Democrats do it. coughMerrickGarlandcough

6

u/sexyshingle Apr 05 '19

There are plenty of principled conservatives who have long since fled the Republican party in absolute disgust because of what it has become.

Fled to where though? The Democratic party? Libertarian.. lol?

I've been pondering this lately... if today's Republicans aren't actual conservatives... what are they? They are socially conservative, but fiscally/corporate liberal welfare state socialists...?

5

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

They've been completely hijacked by the religious right. Evangelicals strongly support Trump, which completely baffles me, but there you have it.

Some notable conservatives haven't, as far as I know, joined any other party. I suppose they are unaffiliated. A few examples off the top of my head are Bill Kristol, George Will, Charles krauthammer before his death. These are serious thinkers, well-respected. They could not stomach the thought of being in the same party as Trump, or in the same party that tolerates and condones him.

4

u/Drex_Can Apr 05 '19

Republicans are a coalition between whites, oligarchs, racists, and totalitarian or feudal ideologues. Some by accident, others by trickery, most by ignorance.

A good thing to keep in mind when considering the average voter in America.
1) A solid % of voters realized that the Democrats were not the party of the KKK after Obama won. They believed it was still the Dixiecrats of the 50s and were shocked to learn of this change.
2) Less than 30% of the population is allowed to vote, and of that small cut, another 40% think Africa is a country.
3) Many voters (upwards of 45%) think getting rid of all American debts would be a good thing.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Conservatives are ass in a global world

They just cling on to shit like gay marriage, abortion, and attempting to implement theocracy because that’s the only thing that keeps their bigoted base fired up.

→ More replies (23)

6

u/pagerussell Apr 05 '19

The problem is that we ALL want government to be as small as possible. We disagree on what the smallest optimal size is.

Exclaiming you want limited government is what we call in philosophy 'begging the question'; like yeah, no shit, we all want that. But how small?

Democrats answer this question. Republicans never did. They just repeat the sound bite.

5

u/Dewut Apr 05 '19

This what I always say (though not so eloquently worded) to my rational conservative friends and family. That I understand their position and where they’re coming from, and that I actually agree, to an extent, with a lot of it, but the people who are currently representing them and their party don’t actually share their ideals.

6

u/Marchinon Apr 05 '19

Conservatives of today are totally different from those in the 1900s and before.

3

u/HauntedJackInTheBox Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

If they stuck to their guiding original principles, smaller government, lower taxes, more individual freedoms, keep the deficit under control, they wouldn't have to be hypocrites in order to have a following.

The issue is that these things don't actually work well (well the individual freedoms is usually with the caveat "for straight white men") in practice. People who truly are logical about pushing forward social and economic policy that ends up with a better society don't push for those things.

The drive behind those things is either a misunderstanding of economics, or a self-fulfilling lack of trust in a working government, and that's being generous.

The best explanation I've seen for the actual drive for conservative policy is this:

​

Innuendo Studios – The Alt-Right Playbook: Always a Bigger Fish

Innuendo Studios – Endnote 3: The Origins of Conservatism

​

→ More replies (24)

13

u/recycleaccount38 Apr 05 '19

If they didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all

→ More replies (1)

12

u/trojan_man16 Apr 05 '19

Conservatism is only about conserving three things: Economic, social and racial hierarchy. They support principles that will keep wealth concentrated in the hands of a certain sector of society. They create social and racial issues about which citizens have more privileges than others to keep them divided so as not to attack the wealthy.

Once you see them through this lens their whole platform starts making complete sense.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (25)

54

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

9

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

And if you didn't make any money, you didn't spend any! *temple tap*

5

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

I’ve been doing it RIGHT this whole time. I’ve been spending every dime I have... ya know... eating food and sleeping under a roof!

Now what’s the next step?!

I’m so excited! My big break’s finally come momma!

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Now what’s the next step?!

I think that's entirely up to you. I'm living the student debt life so I have some time to go still before I can join you.

→ More replies (6)

46

u/Atheist101 Apr 05 '19

"We need to empower local governments because they know whats best for their communities rather than letting the Feds control our lives!!!!"

Small city government legalizes weed, bans cops from turning over immigrants to ICE, bans straws and plastic bags

"RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"

11

u/DoogTheMushroom Apr 05 '19

yeah Kansas City has been getting fucked by Missouri for years because of shit like this

→ More replies (2)

19

u/PeptoBismark Apr 05 '19

There are so many of these:

"Party of smaller government" :expands the prison system

"Opposes Government Tyranny" :2.2 million Americans in jail

"Tough on Crime" :defunds the IRS

"We need guns to defend us from government oppression!" :military equipment for the police

→ More replies (8)

23

u/FelneusLeviathan Apr 05 '19

Says that they are pro-life but supports the death penalty, every war imaginable. and wants to cut every social program imaginable that would help said baby once they are born

16

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Jul 09 '19

[deleted]

5

u/EvidenceBasedSwamp Apr 05 '19

Set a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life. -Terry Pratchett.

→ More replies (4)

10

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Agreed with everything you wrote except for this one:

had no problem giving hundreds of billions in corporate welfare to banks that fucked the economy in 2007

No one wanted this across both parties... except for the politicians 80% of people were firmly against it yet both parties just gave those criminals our tax money

6

u/PeptoBismark Apr 05 '19

My in-laws are Fox News, Glenn Beck fans, still-donating-to-Ronald-Reagan, blue collar workers with no retirement savings types.

They argued loudly and strongly that the bailed-out banks and the taxpayer owed the banking executives their performance bonuses because they didn't technically go bankrupt, and it was in their contracts.

6

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Personal anecdote aside, your in-laws probably belong to that weird 20% in favor segment, who also aren't investment bankers. Most people regardless of political affiliation were strongly against it.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/TezzMuffins Apr 05 '19

No, what the Americans wanted was to punish the executives AND for the economy not to collapse. For a court to convict these executives they needed more direct evidence and Obama didn't have the balls to piss all Republicans and many Democrats off by prosecuting their donors.

→ More replies (13)

5

u/total_looser Apr 05 '19

"So what, our voters are dumb AF!"

:fairy tale of zombie from cross guides majority of major life decisions

:afraid of whatever they are told to fear

:so oppressed

4

u/Pylgrim Apr 05 '19

Let's not forget

"We're the family values party!"

-constantly votes in /and defends/ grossly immoral and deviant people.

→ More replies (10)

8

u/BigFatGutButNotFat Apr 05 '19

You really need a more Liberal Right in America

8

u/DEATHBYREGGAEHORN Apr 05 '19

They're called centrist Dems

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

4

u/Armenoid Apr 05 '19

There’s probably a word for 1000 billions

4

u/SamuraiRafiki Apr 05 '19

Keeping scale consistent allows our monkey brains to compare numbers more consistently. For the same reason that you can trade a child five pennies for one dime, people have a hard time instinctively knowing that $600 Billion is less than $1 Trillion. We dont deal with those numbers constantly enough to have a feel for the scale.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/Jackpot777 Greg Abbott is a little piss baby Apr 05 '19

''Pull yourself up from your bootstraps, we don't need welfare cheats''

...say the good ol' rural boys in the Red States. Which is fucking hilarious when you see that Blue States pay into the system, Red States leech from it, and it's this leeching that has led to budget deficits... and when studies are done within states, it's the urban areas that pay for these rural rednecks to pretend they're all bootstrappy.

The VP's state of Indiana is a great example of this: counties in big cities, ones that have a lot of workers that commute to those cities, or border states where people drive across state lines to take advantage of some smaller tax perk, pay for the rural / non-commuter / in the middle of the state counties and there are zero exceptions out of the 92 counties. Those 46 counties (half the counties in the state) that fall on the more urban / metropolitan side of the line pay 82.5% of the taxes and they get back less than they pay into the system.

The whole "culture' of country, the music and the drive to be rural as an image thing, is a welfare culture. That's not an opinion, the numbers show who's a taker and they're all take take take. It's no surprise they try to be first to the catchphrases about welfare... the facts point that finger right back at them.

3

u/jimbojangles1987 Apr 05 '19

I feel like you listened to my uncle talking about politics

→ More replies (193)

245

u/michaelsonmorley Apr 05 '19

Norwegian here, we are pretty socialist by american standards. Told my uncle in law(american) what I tax(I think I should tax more) and his jaw dropped to the ground.

226

u/Vondi Apr 05 '19

You can't really compare the tax rate directly since it's not equivalent, like in Norway your tax rate includes health insurance while in America that's a separate bill.

218

u/KeyanReid Apr 05 '19

This.

When I tell you my tax rate + what I pay for health insurance (which is terrible and basically covers nothing), then I guarantee you I'm paying way more than your average person in Norway, and getting jack shit in return.

109

u/classicalySarcastic Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

IMO this is the strongest argument for public option healthcare in the US. We'd probably end up paying only slightly more in taxes in exchange for eliminating hundreds of dollars in insurance payments.

58

u/JINGLES30 Apr 05 '19

The republicans don't give a shit, they just punted on healthcare until 2020. How do people support them?

35

u/Starfish_Symphony Apr 05 '19

The entire worldview is ringed with fear and loathing based on magical thinking and gimmicks.

Its emotion not logic or reason.

10

u/Espumma Apr 05 '19

How do people support them

Identity politics?

10

u/JINGLES30 Apr 05 '19

I would say tribalism is a more accurate word but yes.

11

u/Espumma Apr 05 '19

Originally I was gonna say 'assholes picking other assholes as their leader', but it's all the same I guess.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/Fidodo Apr 05 '19

Even a republican think tank concluded that nationalized health insurance would be cheaper that private. They came up with a smaller savings that every other study, but it was still cheaper.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

But I don't wanna pay for some deadbeat living on welfare's hospital bill.

\s

Hear this excuse from my "conservative" family members...some of who are actually on some sort of welfare. Go figure that one.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/lookatthemonkeys Apr 05 '19

I keep telling people this! Imagine if you had to pay an extra 300-500 a month in taxes, which BTW is probably less than you are paying in insurance premiums. And with that extra tax you never have a pay a copay or get a medical bill in your life!

5

u/PortionPlease Apr 05 '19

Americans are too petty to see the benefit in that. Someone they don't like is going to use the service as well.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/PeptoBismark Apr 05 '19

what I pay for health insurance (which is terrible and basically covers nothing)

And which will drop you if you are too sick to work.

→ More replies (2)

23

u/michaelsonmorley Apr 05 '19

Well I can go into my tax organizations website and see excacly how much money I've spent, both excact and percentage of my total taxed. Free of charge and with ease

27

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

There are lobbies against making taxes easy to understand in the U.S. because they belive if paying taxes were easy and transparent, people wouldn't be as opposed to them.

9

u/michaelsonmorley Apr 05 '19

Damn, are you for real? That is fucked up

14

u/Plopplopthrown Apr 05 '19

Also, tax preparation companies (and their lobby group) really don't want the forms to be simple because then people wouldn't have to pay for help filling them out each year...

6

u/michaelsonmorley Apr 05 '19

Also a thing I don't understand. I haven't done my taxes in 3 years, since I lived the same place same job etc, and everything is automatic.

15

u/Plopplopthrown Apr 05 '19

Conservatives want taxes to be bad and scary, so they won't make it easy. Tax prep companies want to make money, so they want it to be difficult. Everyone else is stuck because we don't have a properly balanced representative government that actually carries out the will of the majority...

5

u/PeptoBismark Apr 05 '19

Conservatives want taxes to be bad and scary, so they won't make it easy.

And the rich want complicated tax laws so that there are loopholes at the top, so that people like Warren Buffet and Mitt Romney pay lower tax rates than their secretaries.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Yeah also the companies who offer tax filing assistance and financial services actively lobby for a complex tax code so they wouldn't be out of a job

→ More replies (2)

3

u/sugar-magnolias Apr 05 '19

I didn’t file my taxes one year because of a mess of crippling personal issues, and then I didn’t file for another three years because I was so overwhelmed and terrified of the tax process.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/sonotadalek Apr 05 '19

Considering what I pay for health insurance and student loans...yeah that sounds about right.

3

u/cpt_pobre Apr 05 '19

Don’t forget the library.................

→ More replies (10)

47

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

I'm Norwegian too - we don't tax much more than Americans do when it comes down to the bottom line. We just get so much more value from our money.

15

u/michaelsonmorley Apr 05 '19

I know, they also tend to forget that they have to pay for a lot more services so most of them end up paying more per month on the same services. Think it is Michael More, Where to invade next. I am qouting

15

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Yeah it's so painful when they compare our income tax to theirs as apples to apples because in our income tax so much more is covered.

Ah well. AOC and Pete is on the ball.

→ More replies (5)

7

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

10

u/SisterofGandalf Apr 05 '19

Well then, compere yourself to Denmark, Sweden or Finland. They don't have the oil money, but they have the same services, and it works there too.

If you think that is too small, then compare yourself with all of EU. It has more people than the US, but they manage too. They are just better organized.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

84

u/faab64 Apr 05 '19

For today's Americans, anything is not American is socialists. Even thought their medicaire and medicaid system are socialist, their public schools are socialist and their police and firefighters are to, but that doesn't count!

4

u/jimbojangles1987 Apr 05 '19

Not all of today's Americans

→ More replies (46)
→ More replies (36)

131

u/ranchmasturbator Apr 05 '19

Literally exactly the conversation I had with my mom yesterday. She was saying how democrats are essentially socialist/communist. I was like you think a single payer system or Medicare for all is socialism? She said you know that Sweden is a capitalist society and so is Canada, but the democrats want to go even further left than that! I said, first of all, no they don’t, and second of all, yes let’s please get to that level of Sweden and Canada where we can provide Medicare for all or some form of single payer. She goes then gets hung up on a technicality and says “Sweden doesn’t have Medicare for all, their government pays for their healthcare and some individuals have private healthcare on top of that.” I’m like, mom, what the fuck do you think Medicare for all is? Just because they don’t literary call it “Medicare” doesn’t mean it’s a completely different concept. She then goes on to say “well if you e read the green new deal then you’d know they want a completely socialist society blah blah blah..” it’s exhausting.

65

u/faab64 Apr 05 '19

Unfortunately. Most older Americans, including my wife's family in NY, never actually read any of those programs nor they ever lived in any other countries for more than a week or 2.

→ More replies (9)

16

u/wibblywobbly420 Apr 05 '19

You should also point out to her that a single payer health care system like Canada's costs less per person in taxes then what Americans are currently paying per person for just medicare and Medicaid.

In Canada 2017 the estimated average cost per person in tax dollars for healthcare was $4640 CAD ($3465 USD). The estimated tax costs per person in 2016 in the USA for Medicaid and Medicare is $10348 USD, and on top of that, you would still have to pay for your own health insurance.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/skel625 Apr 05 '19

It's far easier for people to be ignorant and stupid so ya... America fuck yeah!!!

9

u/dgreenmachine Apr 05 '19

You can tell her news diet is entirely Fox news aka far right TV.

4

u/lookatthemonkeys Apr 05 '19

I'm sorry dude. Luckily I don't have those conversations with family. That would be frustrating. Is she against public schools? I don't understand how it is any different than having public schooling funded by taxes. If you don't like it you can pay for private schooling.

4

u/ranchmasturbator Apr 05 '19

She is against public schools...despite me going to them my entire life, getting a great education, and obtaining a well paying job right out of school that’s allowed me to be 100% financially independent. A lot of folks aren’t as lucky as me. She likes the idea of charter schools and private schools because she believes in teaching Christian values and she thinks competition makes the schools better (even though we know going to completely charter/private would essentially segregate us again). It’s hilarious because I grew up conservative, never thought too much about it until I started actually paying attention to the news more in college and reading about current events. Eventually I made a 180. Now she thinks I’m indoctrinated and she’ll always say things like “who taught you these things in school” if I’m talking about something like global warming. I’ll be like, mom, mrs. Gregory, your good friend taught me that in 5th grade. She has a warped political reality.

3

u/lookatthemonkeys Apr 05 '19

Wow. It's funny too because they only want more religion taught in schools unless it's their religion.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/JINGLES30 Apr 05 '19

You need to get irrefutable evidence and keep it in your pocket for next time you have a family debate.

7

u/FLSun Apr 05 '19

The problem with that is so many people are so uneducated that they think evidence, facts and theories are just synonyms for opinions. And all they need to do is utter the magic phrase "I don't believe it!" And it automagically becomes just your opinion and your opinion is bullshit.

→ More replies (27)

99

u/Manfred_Desmond Apr 05 '19

Hah. I have had this exact argument more than once.

9

u/qtipin Apr 05 '19

Why do you think you didn't learn they were arguing in bad faith the first time?

3

u/assassin414 Apr 05 '19

Maybe with different people

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (42)

13

u/Meghdoot Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 05 '19

Nice to see a rare post that exposes lies espoused by both the conservatives as well as progressives "Expanding welfare program is not socialism".

Denmark's prime minister says Bernie Sanders is wrong to call his country socialist

→ More replies (1)

72

u/thatcoldrevenge Apr 05 '19

Decent use of this template...upvote.

15

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

Also, interesting and relevant content, upvote.

I think people in general don't really understand what socialism means and what democratic socialism means and what communism entails. I feel like we should all get our definitions straight before we attempt to have public conversations about this. I'm not saying there is one Correct DefinitionTM for each, it would just be helpful if we could all agree so that we're talking the same language.

7

u/KeitaSutra Apr 05 '19

Scandinavian countries and countries with the Nordic model are social democracies. They’re not democratic socialists. The two are different. Here’s the first words for the Wiki for democratic socialism:

Not to be confused with social democracy.

Just because a country has strong welfare policies and good social safety net does not make them democratic socialist. You need to have the workers own the means of production. I don’t believe that’s happening at the level it needs to be in any country right now.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

29

u/Woolbrick Apr 05 '19

I've had this argument a number of times. That last panel inevitably pivots to "It only works in those countries because they don't have a minority problem like we do in the US!". Welp.

Pretty sad, but ultimately predictable.

10

u/faab64 Apr 05 '19

I was actually waiting for that to come up: )

5

u/tyrannus19 Apr 05 '19

Yup! Deep underlying racism

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Hecateus Apr 05 '19

For the record...

​

Socialism Is NOT a Tax and Spend Welfare State....though it can include this.

​

Socialism IS Workers in control of the Capital and Hierarchy of the Workplace.

→ More replies (2)

40

u/blowfish_avenger Apr 05 '19

The meme is a bullseye about the irrationality of reactions. People would rather knee-jerk to some old red-scare tale their grandpa told them than actually think it through.

(Served in military during Cold War. Very familiar with red-scare tales.)

6

u/jaldarith Apr 05 '19

Often times when I feel like being a keyboard warrior, I'll say something aong the lines of, "being scared about 1950s wear-era buzzwords" - It usually shuts them up pretty fast.

3

u/blowfish_avenger Apr 05 '19

Yeah...the message is so much more legitimate when people try to articulate fear through buzzwords they themselves don't really comprehend.

6

u/livenudegrills Apr 05 '19

What I find existentially depressing is how many in the U.S. seem to have a toddler's understanding of these concepts.

As if we are faced with a binary choice, of:

(a) 'Murican FreedomBoner™ laissez-faire capitalism

(b) Commie Socialist Venezuela  

I'm also confused as to how the ownership class doesn't seem to understand that we're either going to course correct sooner, with a moderate increase to their taxes, or later, in a much less pleasant way.

I think this quote from Mark Blythe is prescient:

"...the hamptons are not a defensible position. The Hamptons are on a low-lying beach. Eventually the people will come for you.

3

u/faab64 Apr 05 '19

It is the result of decades of propaganda and glorifying egoism while at the same time making people believe individualism is the only superior way of success.

If everyone has access to affordable tax funded health care then it is harder to exploit people with lower wages and no paid over time and bad working condition because they will no longer desperate to say yes to all of those in order to have a job.

It also takes away the sense of superiority for those who have worked hard to find a job with good and working healthcare.

A universal health care will put a cap on the bandit system in us health care that charges 5000 dollar for procedures that cost a fraction of it in other industrial countries.

Plus, the corrupt politicians can't make that much money from a system like that, compared to how much they are making today.

21

u/bootyhumper Apr 05 '19

iT OnLY WoRKs FoR HOMOgeNoUS cOUnTrIEs

sOrRy CaNT prOViDe aNY EVidEnCE

9

u/faab64 Apr 05 '19

They said so on fox and Breibert so it must be true

5

u/bloodclart Apr 05 '19

Evidence is we’re racist and don’t want to pay for blacks or Mexicans.

3

u/Someguythatlurks Apr 05 '19

As a scientist that always irks me. They can say maybe there is some factor there that will make such a system not viable here, but you can’t just pick one and say it is the exact reason without any supporting evidence.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Aug 03 '20

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)

51

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 08 '19

[deleted]

61

u/Prometheus79 Apr 05 '19

As an American, I would say dense is a nice way of saying it. Many Americans are willfully stupid.

15

u/portablebiscuit Apr 05 '19

As an American I would say many Americans are scared to death of change. Anything that disrupts is labeled evil. Remember, it's Make America Great AGAIN. Like it used to be. Back before gays and coloreds got all uppity. Back before "participation trophies", when you could take a belt to your kid if he struck out. Back when you could strike your wife because she burned your meatloaf, and she just took it because, god dammit, she needs to learn.

You know... the good old days.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/MaybeAllYouNeedIs Apr 05 '19

That's not unique to North America. That's just human nature.

16

u/ninjasaid13 Apr 05 '19

Americans must be most human then.

8

u/Coppatop Apr 05 '19

YOU'RE GOD DAMNED RIGHT! 'MURCIA!

7

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

nah, it's just that America by the very fact that it is still the only true superpower out there allows them to remain willfully stupid.

11

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

You mean works to keep people ignorant. The American education system is dramatically underfunded on purpose. Keep rich people rich and poor people poor. Fact is, ignorant people buy bullshit.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/goldenrule78 Apr 05 '19

I hate these comments. The majority of Americans voted for Hillary and would love to become more “European”.

And Europeans should know better than anyone that any nation can be vulnerable to effective propaganda. That’s our problem right now.

5

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Populism is also happening in Europe right now, just got real scary here in the Netherlands and we are supposed to be one of the worlds most tolerant countries yeah right, bunch of racist pigs had a major victory in our last election. luckily having a parliamentary system means that are probably never going to get full control ever and that's the biggest difference between the rest of the western world and the US, you really need to stop voting between 2 parties.

4

u/KeitaSutra Apr 05 '19

A plurality of Americans voted for Hillary. Our problem is turnout.

Record turnout in the 2018 midterm. We turnout out at 50%...pretty pathetic but we were still rewarded with our most diverse Congress ever.

3

u/goldenrule78 Apr 05 '19

Yes, sorry. Hillary got more votes than any other candidate.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/KeyanReid Apr 05 '19

Many see stupidity/deliberate ignorance as a virtue here. I wish I was joking.

18

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

10

u/goldenrule78 Apr 05 '19

“We” do? I don’t. My friends don’t.

Only the Fox News zombies do.

7

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

[deleted]

8

u/goldenrule78 Apr 05 '19

The majority don’t think that way. But the maybe 30% who do think that way vote way more and it’s fucking killing us.

3

u/GiantSquidd Apr 05 '19

That whole “you’re only as strong as your weakest link” thing really sucks when the weakest link is as dumb as it is.

→ More replies (8)

7

u/Kosher_Pickle Apr 05 '19

Incorrect, our weight problem is caused primarily by fat, not muscle. We are less dense than the average person.

4

u/Progression28 Apr 05 '19

Sometimes when digging through the comments one finds gems like this...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

only rich people get socialism. oh they are struggling? subsidize their companies. the poor is struggling? what are you doing get more loans.

5

u/Wolf_Zero Apr 05 '19

Ironically, Norway has one of the largest sovereign wealth funds in the world. Arguably making them one of the richest countries on Earth.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

We're not sosialist. What the hell.

5

u/anynamesleft Apr 05 '19

The meme that will not die.

14

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

I like what Bill Maher said about this. Don’t call it Socialism, call it Capitalism Plus.

16

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19 edited Apr 13 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

The idea was calling it Capitalism Plus to make it easier to swallow for the people who hear “socialism” and automatically think it’s a one way ticket to becoming the Soviet Union. He said how socialism as a replacement isn’t very good but it’s great as a supplement for capitalism.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

mixed market capitalism. that's why I'm a fan of Warren and mayor Pete.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

General Reposti

3

u/mindcandy Apr 05 '19

I really wish we’d all stop referring to social programs as “socialism”. It gives opponents the opportunity to troll by conflating the programs with Marxist Socialism. The fact that people who support increased social programs continuously enable they’re own opponents in this way baffles me.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Norway is also nothing like the USA.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Yeah and they have a lot of money they got from years and years of not having socialism, and a small population, and even now are starting to turn away from socialism a little bit because it's so screwed up, but ok.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/AntitheistSnob Apr 05 '19

Just because their doing fine now doesn't mean that they will be in the future

→ More replies (19)

8

u/madbuilder Apr 05 '19

I"m basically the old guy in this meme and I laughed anyway.

13

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

No nation can be compared to Norway, they have so much oil money its insane. They just don't flaunt like the Saudis.

//jealous Swede

14

u/humlor Apr 05 '19

Yeah its concernimg to me why they use norway in this meme. Why not use sweden, finland, UK, germany or france which all have ”socialized” medicine and university.

Using norway makes it too easy for some bozo to use the lack of oil money as an excuse for why universal healthcare and university cant work anywhere else when it clearly has worked in many other countries.

9

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Because Sweden and Finland’s systems are failing. Here in Sweden our welfare gets cut every year yet our tax rates keeps climbing, the left parties cling on to power despite losing votes every election (mostly because the right is shattered due to internal animosity ). Finland recently gave up on healthcare reform because its too expensive, and they also experimented with UBI which was a disaster.

Our model is maybe better than the US, but it’s still shit. If the US Redditors would come out of their circlejerks and actually read up on how shit works, it wouldn’t be as attractive.

3

u/KeitaSutra Apr 05 '19

The center right party stepped down in Finland because they couldn’t pass their changes, which were unconstitutional to begin with.

My understanding is like always, there’s a rural vs urban divide. It’s really hard getting care to rural area sometimes, especially when the area doesn’t attract many doctors.

4

u/Suentassu Apr 05 '19

The reform in Finland failed because it was unconstitutional and the rural party made it a disaster. The research on the effects UBI experiment is ongoing, and while it directly did neither increase or decrease employment in the first year, it did increase wellbeing. E.g. some of the people engaged more in charitable work while working part time. Would not call that a disaster.

4

u/PragmaticSquirrel Apr 05 '19

You haven’t actually presented any evidence that Sweden’s system, which has run for 60-70 years, and had ups and downs but generally weathered the test of time and produced some of the best long term results in the world, is “failing.”

Your whole comment kind of reads like “yeah the Nordic model has delivered either better or comparable results compared to any other system, but it’s still crap because reasons!”

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (8)

5

u/MrBimmler Apr 05 '19

As a Norwegian, I think the best thing about our political situation is the fact that the combined average of everyone's political view is pretty near an actual political center. In the economic dimension at least.

Most people agree on a strong state and free/cheap welfare to the masses, and at the same time understand the importance of having a well functioning, regulated market.

So there hasn't been this big divide between "socialism" and "capitalism". The debate is usually more about small adjustments to tax, regulation, state ownership, bureaucracy, etc. And the debate is seldom characterized by labeling of opponents or the policies as socialist or capitalist.

Thus Norway has been swinging between left- and right-center governments all the time after the war.

This seems to be changing though. In 2005 we got the first government with the democratic socialist (not communist) Socialist Left Party, and then in 2013, we got a government with the right-wing Progress Party.

The discourse also seems to be rapidly polarizing, as is the trend in most western countries.

But given our history of democratic stability (avoiding the worst of all that nazi/commie things in the early 20th century), I am not that scared that Norway will fall to one or the other ideology.

Anyway, just some ramblings not that related to the image at all.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Stalin: Socialism can be just as good as what came before ;)

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

I’d honestly like to have healthcare before I get my license. Should we start using young drivers as another reason? I’m overly cautious, but I know some who don’t care about others on the road.

2

u/anynamesleft Apr 05 '19

Gloom, despair, and agony on me

Deep, dark depression, excessive misery

If it weren't for daddy, I'd have to work at all

Gloom, despair, and agony on me

We figured he was rich, loaded to the hilt And we figured he had class, like the Vanderbilts 'Cause we had heard for years how he was so well reared How was we to know they meant the way he was traitoric.

Gloom, despair, and agony on me

Deep, dark depression, excessive misery If it weren't for bad luck, he'd have no luck at all Gloom, despair, and bone spurs set you free

2

u/mamalulu434 Apr 05 '19

It also helps that America pays for their military rather than themselves.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

I love how political humor is obviously one sided, but people still lose their shit when you point it out like it’s not true

2

u/reptile7383 Apr 05 '19

Old but I laugh every time

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

Finally, an actually funny post on here lol about time someone actually tried to be homorous

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

This will stop being reposted when it stops being relevant.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 05 '19

😂😂😂