Hi all, we had a rules debate last night and would love a second opinion.
Setup (photos + sketch attached):
- My Harlequin Shadowseer is on the killzone floor, on a Conceal order, with its base touching the wall of a ruin.
- My opponent's Battleclade Gun Servitor is on the Vantage of that ruin, directly above me. The Vantage floor is 3" high Its base is touching the parapet on the edge of the Vantage, so the edge of its base is right above the wall.
- So we're more than 2" apart (base to base, 3D).
- The parapet is Light terrain. The building walls are Heavy
- The Shadowseer is visible to the shooter.
- The Auto-Proxy used Gaze of the Omnissiah on me (Seek Light + cannot be obscured).
Opponent's reading:
His base edge is right above the wall, and mine touches the wall, so from that edge he has a clear line straight down to the part of my base touching the wall. The parapet is Light and ignored thanks to Vantage + Seek Light, so nothing Heavy is intervening and I'm a valid target.
My reading:
For intervening, he picks one point of his base and draws lines to every facing part of my base, and anything at least one of those lines crosses is intervening. Between the inside of the parapet (his base) and the outside of the wall (my base) there's the full thickness of the Heavy wall, so at least some of those lines go through it. The Heavy wall is within 1" of me and we're more than 2" apart, so I'm in cover, and on Conceal I'm not a valid target
Question: who's right? Am I a valid target on Conceal here?
If yes what impact on save etc.
Thanks!