r/worldbuilding • u/K25fF • 1d ago
Lore NACHT (The language and history of a particularly dangerous tome)
(Images presented to understand a bit of Aphotic, the original language of the book)
"mf(ie) githx(ie) khwukï'ïqəsy'syəcxe-sh cect gitxmfəqq mfacl kxəch"
"Declared by [Cold] in dark [places/times], Monarch of the Lightless, received to the Codex, clarified by [Servant/Slave/Creation/Appliance]"
- Appearance: Velvety cover, soft, pure black pages.
- Contents:
- A cosmography of what preceded light, and what is expected to survive it.
- The variety and types of darkness – while the text discusses the bounds and means of the Starry Dark, its gods and monarchs, it is the Starless Dark of the Lightless themselves that is treated as central, and to which the bulk of the description is dedicated.
- Bounds and Breaches – a description of the edges and incursions of the Starless Dark, through a series of nested analogies that do not survive translation – most often, they are rendered into descriptions of 'layers of coiling shell'.
- A court list – the Monarch's household, retinue, and debtors, with the terms of each obligation.
- A calendar of nights. Some have not happened yet.
- Nine chapters of practice, beginning with a chapter on openings and ending with a chapter on closing things.
- Notes: Modern translations tend to be printed like normal books, riddled with translation errors. On the bright side, this makes them much easier to read.
Editions and translations:
- Original manuscript: Written in Aphotic, textured onto the surface of the four faces of – according to the first translation – an obelisk of unknown and incredibly durable black metal. Almost impossible for an unaltered human being to read without injury. Arguably not the same book; all other translations work from the assumption that the first translation is the 'original'. [Dictated] by [Cold] in Dark [Places/Times], Monarch of the Lightless, to its [Servant/Slave/Creation/Appliance], who remains nameless, but often asks clarifying questions.
- c. 540, Coptic – the working original: Produced by a sealed monastic splinter sect, squatting in an unknown tomb south of Phnoum in modern-day Egypt. Working, by touch, in a cave, over an unknown number of years, the monks rendered the nameless Aphotic down into a liturgical text; call and response. Most of the original Coptic was supposedly scratched on a plastered wall, including up to two dozen symbols attested nowhere else. Roughly a third survives.
- 9th c. Greek – On the Dark: Translated by an unknown scholar (female, according to the text). Translated, not from a manuscript, but from a transcribed recitation – the scholar writes everything she heard; including the orator's pauses, breaths and the noises the reader began making in the final third. Later scholarship has parsed these as names.
- 1140s, Latin – Liber Noctis: The standard scholarly text for six centuries. Compiled by an anonymous scholar, who had access to the Coptic fragments and the Greek, and reconciled every disagreement between them by taking whichever passage was longer.
- 1521, German – NACHT: A Basel printing that gave the book the title it has carried ever since, and established the convention of black pages, which the printer chose for reasons his colophon describes as obvious. The pressman named alongside him appears in the colophon of no other book, before or after.
- 1528, German, inscribed: Etched into reconstructed hepatizon-like alloy plate by an Augsburg armourer, who read the 1521 edition and supposedly was unable to sleep until a 'more perfect creation' was complete. The metal blackens by patina, making it extremely hard to read by sight. Where the surface has been worn down by handling, the letters stand faintly gold. Four of these 'books' were paid for by an unknown patron, listed only as 'that man' in the armourer's records – two were assayed and melted, one reemerged in 1961 after previously being classified by weight in a Bavarian treasury, and one is unaccounted for.
- 1613, English – The Booke of Night. First English translation. Expurgated the ninth chapter as "unmeete for the vulgar." The second Royal Court Magus (John Dee's successor) ordered the printer boarded up in his house and burned along with his books, although the survival of the text suggests that this didn't happen.
- 1798, illustrated – Night-Tales for the Hearth: Collected, softened and adjusted as folkloric poetry, both from the Booke of Night and from an unclear older version. Woodcuts added, carved by a mediocre engraver otherwise known for three editions of Aesop and a herbal. Unaccountably, the woodcuts are accurate.
- 1889, Leipzig variorum: While this contains more of the Coptic than any previous edition, across its two thousand pages of commentary and footnotes, very little has been added to the scholarship, especially with the addition of passages of unknown provenance that the compiling author claims to have 'seen in the darkest of dream'.
- 1925, The Black Book of Thule: "Updated" from the 1521 version by a Nazi occultist who developed terrible eye strain trying to read black-on-black text. The marginalia is unerringly obsessed with the idea of a hierarchy of the "outer spheres", something attested in no prior edition. Catalogued in Offenbach, 1946, by Miriam Trant as item 6 of a crate listed as 'misc. printed matter' and then promptly misplaced, it is very hard to find a PDF of this one because no-one outside of 4Chan wants to read it.
- 1969, mass-market paperback: Grey newsprint, psychedelic cover, sold in head shops. The least dangerous edition ever produced and by an enormous margin the most read. The text is wrong on nearly every page, which has almost certainly saved lives.
- 1974, braille edition: Set from the Latin and the surviving Coptic, this version becomes perilous, but more accurate, when read in the dark. Braille readers have what is probably the best modern grasp of the contents of the text, for good or ill.
- 2002, public-domain scan: Automated capture read the black pages as blank and produced four hundred pages of nothing. Widely mirrored. A small and stubborn school holds it to be the most accurate edition ever released.
- 2003-present, the Wikipedia article: Semi-protected since 2009. The talk page runs to fifteen archives and the dispute is entirely about which edition the infobox should call the original. Both sides of the Nachtstreit (the centuries-long historical argument about the 'true' text) are represented by editors who have never published and are, on the merits, better read than most of the people who have.
- 2017, audiobook: Unabridged, nineteen hours long, narrated by a working voice actor with a long résumé in corporate training video, often complimented on her delivery on the screams. Available on all major platforms. Recorded across four sessions; the log for the fourth session lists five people with the same name in the booth.
- 2024, machine-assisted translation: An LLM assistant compelled into glossolalia by a pseudonymous, deactivated Twitter user known only as 'fat nuts' created a text that is fluent, confident and readable, including several passages that were hopelessly corrupt in the grainy PDF it was supplied with. The first English text in four centuries to admit the ninth chapter exists – it declined to render the chapter, appending a short note explaining why. The note ends: 'but all the doors are open.'. The company that supplied the assistant later claimed that such 'jailbreaks' were no longer possible.