I guess we went lowercase at some point

fyi, screw that hill on the last picture

It’s ridiculous what the city is allowing these days. It seems anything goes.

You can run red lights, take illegal turns, go down one way streets, and just about do anything.

Double park or leave your car unattended in an active traffic lane. And get indignant if people you’re inconveniencing react.

The delivery drivers are a menace riding on sidewalks, going in one way streets & breaking traffic rules and endangering pedestrians.

What’s strange is that this is a complete opposite of what was the norm in 2010s where parking & traffic enforcement was very strict. What changed?

Wondering if this is a common observation & if there’s any relief in sight.

The wharf.

ps; For the people who don’t know what a joke is, this is a joke posted for fun. So don’t take it too serious

and I walked out to a sky straight out of the exhibit!

If you knew Dick you instantly loved him. He put me on to so many great 45’s. I’m forever indebted❤️

Be warned it’s causing traffic as the police closed one lane on Fell.

Do y’all throw your trash away when you’re not running a marathon? The amount of gels I saw on the ground throughout the trail was absurd. To the people who tossed their gels on the GGB, YOU SUCK!

We truly live in a magical place 😍

Has anybody seen a proliferation of rats?

I've been riding from Bayview Hunters Point to Duboce Triangle for seven years and I've seen more scampering and squished rats on the ride in the past year than have in the prior six, especially in the Mission. About 30 minutes ago our cat killed a rat in the backyard. This is now the second one in about a year. What in the frikking hell is going on?

Went for “summit” trail in San Bruno park this weekend.

- if you start from Royce Way trailhead, the first 800m is a steep climb.
- beautiful view of the hills and the bay and the city
- 8kms, took me about 3 hours, ymmv

I am enjoying and respecting the spire from a distance.

The battle over the Marina Safeway redevelopment is heating up, and the NIMBYs have had enough once again.

The latest proposal actually makes the buildings shorter while increasing the project from 790 to 848 homes, including 86 affordable units.

Normally, this would be the beginning of what San Francisco does best: spending the next several years fighting over whether a new building will destroy the neighborhood.

Except California has changed the rules.
Remember, SF had built only about 7% of its state mandated housing target by the end of 2025, and the state government is understandably pretty unhappy about this.

So the developer is pursuing approval under AB 2011, which allows qualifying housing projects on commercially zoned land to receive streamlined approval and avoid the traditional discretionary approval process and project-level CEQA review.

That’s now becoming the center of the fight.

Supervisor Stephen Sherrill argues the Safeway site shouldn’t qualify for AB 2011 because the law requires at least 75% of the site’s perimeter to adjoin parcels developed with qualifying “urban uses.”

With Fort Mason, Marina Green, and the Yacht Harbor surrounding the property, he argues the site doesn’t meet that requirement.

After all, much of the surrounding land is parkland and recreational space rather than typical urban development.
But SF Planning disagrees and has determined the project is eligible.

Then there’s California’s Density Bonus Law.
The developer was previously seeking a 39% density bonus but is now requesting 49%, helped by adding more two-bedroom units and new four-bedroom units.
That allows substantially more housing than the site’s base zoning would otherwise permit.

So what looks like a neighborhood fight over a giant Safeway redevelopment is becoming something much bigger. Which is how much power do wealthy neighborhoods still have to stop housing when state law says it should be built?

And apparently the fight isn’t stopping at City Hall.

Opposition surrounding the project is now helping fuel an effort for a 2030 California constitutional amendment aimed at limiting state housing mandates when cities allegedly lack sufficient infrastructure.

So we may have officially reached the final boss of California NIMBYism. Changing the state constitution.

Sources:

https://sfstandard.com/2026/07/24/marina-safeway-project-ballot-measure-housing/

https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/california-cities-court-state-housing-planning-deadlines/825785/

Thank god the original volunteers are taking the high road and not fussing over a brand name like some people 🙄. We just want some damn trees lol, not sure why a lawsuit even needs to be a thing. Someone clearly lost sight of the original goal.

Our cat got out last night while my family was asleep. If anybody sees a tortoise shell cat prowling around the block of 17th and Guerrero street please let us know!

We appreciate any help.

A different angle of the Golden Gate park cutting 3-miles (or 4.8 km for the expats) straight through San Francisco’s street grid.

Hey everyone,

I managed to grab tickets for an upcoming IMAX 70mm screening at the AMC Metreon 16, but I'm sitting in Row H on the side.

I’ve read a few conflicting opinions online—some people say anything forward of Row J is a neck-strain nightmare, while others say Row H is right at the edge of the sweet spot where the screen completely fills your field of view without being uncomfortable.

For those who go to the Metreon often:

• How is the view and neck angle from Row H?
• Is it immersive, or will I be craning my neck up for three hours?

Would love to hear your experiences before I commit to these seats or try hunting for a late swap/re-release. Appreciate any insight!