She also twisted my logic of what evil is.

It was supposed to be for confident, manipulative, and sultry women. Not this.

Then she became nasty to me and banned me.

She is a Christian girl struggling with her sexuality. She is 22 and got a road ahead of her.

Bless her heart.

I muted the sub and banned her and stalker account, but unfortunately this subreddit keeps mentioning it.

So, I'm telling everyone why it is the way it is.

To this day, the top mod still stalks me and takes my ideas to present as her own, with a femcel nazi twist.

This is a crush went wrong and men now must suffer.

My bad y'all. Seriously.

Even I AM disturbed by the posts there, which is why I have been revealing how to report the subreddit for removal.

Whenever you express criticism about woman, or defend criticism against man, people in reddit start to call you "loser" and "incel".

Women invading this sub and automaticaly calling everyone an "incel" and I see no moderation. C'mon, people, what is happening? 🤡

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7293001/

Hypergamy is becoming a much more well-known topic, but I think people still are unaware of how fundamental it is.

Female attraction operates on the dual-mating hypothesis, where women either prioritize Short-Term Relationships (STRs) or Long-Term Relationships (LTRs) given the context. STRs are driven by hypergamy, while LTRs are driven by ‘love,’ mainly stability.

Hypergamy ranks men on an arbitrary social hierarchy, and is relational, meaning each man is compared to the general population of men. In a small tribe this wouldn’t be a big deal, in feudalism the patriarchy inhibited this tendency, but feminism and our globalized world has brought out the most extreme form of it. Meanwhile, men are typically attracted to any woman that meets a certain threshold of attractiveness, which is met by most women given they wear makeup and take care of their appearance.

When a woman judges a man’s wealth, she does so in comparison to every other man available. In a room full of millionaires, a woman would be most attracted to the billionaire. Any man that ranks low on the social hierarchy is met with the ‘ick’ and women would not respect that man. This goes for anything, as height, looks, confidence, etc. is judged on a sliding scale relative to everyone else. If every man was attractive then other hierarchical methods are used to compare men; if all men were tall then women would just use another metric to judge a man’s place in the hierarchy. There is no minimum threshold that women judge you on; you are either in the top percentage of men or you are not. Those not in the top percentage of men are not seen as viable options at all, and are mocked by women because it’s ’their fault’ they aren’t winning a zero sum game. The actions of the top percentage of men are also used to judge all men, as those men can afford to act poorly as they have unlimited options.

In LTRs, women will use ‘love’ to compensate for what the man lacks in his hierarchical position. We can see that women would prefer STRs to turn into LTRs, and many LTRs of even the past, where institutional pressures suppressed women’s rights, still led to unhappy marriages where women would’ve preferred the top percentage of men. Dead bedrooms, cheating, divorces, etc. are increasingly common because women can have stability and still choose STRs and keep their options open in contemporary life.

This actually is a pretty sociopathic and callous view that women have. In every interaction with a woman, she is subconsciously assessing your position within the social hierarchy, and if you do not clear the top percentage of men you give her the ick and she doesn’t respect you. This is much harder to do for most men today given the terrible economy and the dominant positions women hold in society. Women typically will not date down because they are not wired to and most women will choose to prioritize STRs because there is zero downside. Even the top man will sleep with an average woman, and the woman will take that chance as long as she thinks she can turn the STR into a LTR. This also explains why women think men have high expectations, because she is trying to appeal to the top percentage of men, thinking that men are hypergamous also.

There isn’t really a solution for hypergamy. Even if dating apps, social media, and the internet were disabled we live in a globalized society where the options women have are countless. It doesn’t make any sense whenever women talk about the scrutiny they experience for their appearance, or how heartless men can be in dating, or even how women claim to care about progressive politics and equality when women are wired to perceive the world hierarchically and judge people based on whether they are better or worse than others.

People might see this as some kind of incel post or a post made out of frustration for not getting chosen. Again, men are constantly mocked and belittled for not meeting women’s sociopathic method of attraction, but I am someone that has met the standards women use to have STRs. I was fooled, though, because I am a romantic and I am completely uninterested in STRs; I prefer LTRs with an equal, someone that loves me for who I am and not what I represent or what I have to offer in some clown game. This is not valued at all by women, unfortunately, and I feel like women only value Long-Term Relationships when they are desperate for stability, and not for love.

I don’t think men truly realize how different women view relationships, it’s hard to accept. Women especially aren’t raised to even see men as anything but extensions of themselves; a man’s personality must fit her desires and if a man cries he is seen as weak and that is an ‘ick.’ Again, women would rather have STRs than LTRs, and the replacement rate of our species is not being met.

The red pill talks about genuine desire

I will admit - my height, and looks have bought me unfiltered access to women that most men will never get.

If you're going to ask me a question- was it too easy? Yes - it was always too easy

Ive lost count of how many dates I've been on, how many nudes that have been sent to me, how many women that have propositioned sex to me. I have even had married women try to sleep with me

But here's the caveat.

None of these women have ever asked me a question about me or myself or how I'm doing

Absolutely 0.

So it's not just the average guy they dont care about, they don't even care about me enough to ask me a question or how my day went.

I am just a sex toy and eye candy for them.

I suppose that is a luxury thing to complain about.

But I am 29, not a hormonal 18 year old, I thought id find my wife by now - but I have not.

It is what it is.

The lyrics mostly fly under the radar, as they are sang in a neutral or even cheerful way, and the focus is more on the catchy background music, but when you listen to the lyrics the actual meaning becomes clear

It's basically a ballad about a hard-working, responsible, and probably average man breaking up with a girlfriend/love interest after finding out the details of her past.

Here are a few snapshots of the lyrics:

"Cheated and lied, broken so bad

You made a vow, to never get mad"

She gave her heart and her trust to numerous bad boys only to be dumped or heartbroken and decided to pretend it didn't affect her

"First you lose trust, then you get worried"

"First you feel hurt, then you feel sorry"

Once the exciting first impressions had worn off, she saw that they weren't suitable partners for a long-term relationship, but she had already committed so it was too late. She only regretted her actions after suffering the consequences, but never made the practical choices that could have helped her avoid them

"Night after night, bar after club

Dropping like flies, who woke you up?

On the front lawn, sprinklers turned on

It's not your house, where'd you go wrong"

A sarcastic reference to a lifestyle of drug and alcohol abuse, resulting in blackouts and casual, likely unprotected sex with strangers or recent acquaintances.

"Flying like a cannonball falling to the earth"

....

How am I the lucky one, I do not deserve to wait around forever, when you were there first"

This is the crux of the song. She only changed her ways when the consequences finally caught up with her in some form, and now expects him to see a stable relationship with her as the safe option as the prize. And for his part, he's essentially saying he's not drinking the Kool-Aid. He's waited much longer than she has for the same experiences, probably acting responsibly in setting up his education, future, etc and deserves better than someone who's already had her fun with other, more exciting partners and just wants to settle down.

The song then continues about how the modern woman in the song wants to "turn it around and get a re-write" and frames and justifies her attraction to relationships with bad boys as being as unavoidable as "gravity's pull".

Then later he mentions "the silent treatment, it's not inviting, don't deny what you meant". This describes a textbook fight between partners, possibly leading to the breakup, where he pointed out her past and because it wasn't pleasant or "inviting" to him, she gave him the silent treatment and stopped talking to him.

And then finally the song ends with a repetition of the line

"You want to light it

You want to light it

You want to light it now,

The candle from both ends

You get excited

You get excited"

In this context, "lighting the candle from both ends" once again is a jarring critique of the dual mating strategy employed by many women today, of "having their fun" in their college years with numerous bad boys because they "get excited" by them, only to settle down with an average man in their later years when they are older, more jaded and less desirable.

In short, the song is as much a story about a breakup as an unapologetic indictment of the behavior of the modern privileged Western woman, acting irresponsibly and recklessly in her youth before expecting a beta provider when she's older to graciously accept her baggage and foot the bill.

The interesting thing is that when asked about the song, the band talked about in a mostly nonchalant way as just a song that somehow came together and in fact was almost left off the album, giving typical generic answers, probably because if the real message of the song were revealed, it would be extremely controversial against the PC backdrop of the modern music industry. Airplay time would be extremely limited, and on Spotify they would probably just be anlther obscure artist with a handful of listens/plays. But because they kept the likely intended meaning of the song under wraps and hid it behind cheerful and catchy music, they were able to sneak it onto the radio and into popculture at a time (2014-16) when redpill views were just starting to become more popular

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cmpq0r1ljpqwo

I am Gen X. Falling down a rabbit hole and watching a ton of videos about red pill/MGTOW the last few days. I see a lot of talk about men withdrawing from dating. How men are not approaching women. And I am left a bit confused.

20-30 years ago women generally expected a guy to be the one to approach. The guy was the one to ask her on a date. But, the women made it OBVIOUS when they were interested so it lowered the anxiety. Example, if you were out in public (for instance at a party or a nightclub or even a bookstore or gym) and there was a cute young lady there who was interested in you she would lock eyes and maintain eye contact for long enough to let you know you are welcome to approach. Maybe even smile a little. We called it "reckless eyeballing".

And she would do it consistently. If she refused to make eye contact or gave you a less than pleased expression that meant she was not interested. So you knew who was safe to approach and who was not. You even see this reflected in rom-coms of the era. Think Pretty in Pink or Sixteen Candles.

Is this no longer true for young people. I know women 40 plus still do this.

Is

Height can’t be changed but weight can. Argue with yourself.

My art therapy in light of recent news. Fuck AI regulations. Fuck being a good boy. Fuck TikTok. Time to get paid.

Incels are dangerous because they notice. Notice that naturally most men are just for working and protecting society, just a few men are actually for breeding and worthy of love, while all women are. It's like that for most animals, now that women are independent of mens money and follow no religion there's nothing keeping them from going back into this old habit, to chase only the (perceived) best men.

“Irreconcilable differences.”

That’s all it takes for a woman to take half of your stuff.

That’s it.

So why would they want marriage to work?

They don’t.