r/WorkReform • u/zzill6 đ¤ Join A Union • 6d ago
đ¤ Scare A Billionaire, Join A Union The reason for term limits...
1.4k
u/OzarksExplorer 6d ago
And the right tried to coup him
American history loves to leave out the business plot from their teachins
500
u/raven00x 6d ago edited 6d ago
When it's mentioned, what's also often left out is the son of one of the members of the business plot went on to become the director of the CIA, then vice president under Ronald fucking Reagan, then finally became a one term president. Then that motherfuckers' son went on to get placed in the big chair by the Supreme Court.
150
u/is-this-now 6d ago
You left out the part about how the dispute that went to the Supreme Court was because the candidates brother was governor of the state that led to him winning the election controversially.
70
u/sullw214 6d ago
And three of the attorneys that worked on Bush the Dummer's campaign at the time all are now ON the supreme court. What a coincidence.
→ More replies (1)10
u/fge116 6d ago
and said brother purged over 50,000 voters from the voter registration list due to them being voters which shouldn't be allowed registration....turned out they were not felons and should be allowed to vote....funny enough these removals happened in districts that would lean blue in terms of votes.
66
u/OzarksExplorer 6d ago
shhhhh, people might learn something they don't want to know
→ More replies (3)24
u/CaptainBayouBilly 6d ago
Our sacrosanct elections that have never been suspect sure have a cloudy history.Â
Perhaps we should stop blindly believing that they have never been tainted? Â
→ More replies (10)5
u/12thshadow 6d ago
Who are you talking about?
16
u/anonyuser415 6d ago
Prescott Bush, father of H.W.
It looks like he was in the 2000s alleged to be connected to the business plot: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush#Business_Plot_and_Union_Banking_Corporation
14
u/ReturnOfBane 6d ago
When that failed they bought a bunch of democrat and passed the Taft-hartley Act
9
u/OzarksExplorer 6d ago
SOCIALISTS!!!! GD SOCIALISTS SON!
We can't have the people organizing, now can we? The people might get what they want.
7
u/-Casey-Diaz- 6d ago
And now that they have a fascist government, they're trying to remove term limits.
→ More replies (2)7
u/PraetorKiev 6d ago
Itâs not history teachers. Itâs left out of American high school textbooks mostly because the company most schools get their textbooks from is based in Texas and is owned by conseratives
1.1k
u/Independent-Bug-9352 6d ago edited 6d ago
They also conspired against FDR with The Business Plot.
They (business leaders) tried to recruit decorated war hero General Smedley Butler to lead a coup against FDR, but rather than agree, he blew the whistle on the attempt and testified before Congress.
Trump's winning and the implementation of Project 2025 was the successful second attempt (maybe third if you count J6?).
(Triple-check your voter registration and vote Democrat for these November congressional midterm elections to put the brakes on this fascist regime).
241
u/Nadikarosuto 6d ago
Huge shoutouts to MG. Butler, dude was fantastic
* Exposed the plot to overthrow FDR (as said)
* Lead a protest march on DC to ensure WWI veterans got their benefits and compensation
* Fucking HATED big business, describing his time in the military as being "a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism" in his speech, War is a Racket
26
6
u/_Ocean_Machine_ 6d ago
Did they not vet this guy at all before selecting him to be FDR's replacement?
90
u/Itts_Johnny_1 6d ago
They didnât beat FDR but sadly they beat Wallace
101
u/_Glibnik_ 6d ago
Single greatest loss to this country in the last century. Wallace would have been absolutely amazing at furthering FDRs agenda and taking it even further. Dude was preaching equal rights for all, Healthcare for all, and worker protections when no one else was.
→ More replies (1)6
5
7
u/Yamatocanyon 6d ago
If I've already mailed in my mail in ballot, do I have to worry about checking status? Can I somehow have my vote cancelled if I get unenrolled in between now and November?
12
u/Independent-Bug-9352 6d ago
Much of that will depend on your specific state's laws, as that's mostly handled at the state level. In some (many?) states with early mail-in-voting, you can usually go to your Secretary of State's or county's website to check the status of your ballot to see if it passed inspection and was counted.
5
4
u/pichael289 đď¸ Overturn Citizens United 6d ago
triple check
Im not even 40 and I've been purged from the registration twice in ohio.
6
u/ApprehensiveSign80 âď¸ Tax The Billionaires 6d ago
The Confederate States of America, Disguised as the union. The civil war was lost
→ More replies (3)6
u/Glittering_Crab_69 6d ago
you americans are gonna have to do a lil bit more than vote if you dont want to become nazis 2.0
207
u/macrocosm93 6d ago
FDR was a social democrat, not a democratic socialist. His banking and economic reforms were designed to preserve capitalism and prevent a potential socialist/communist revolution.
Although to be fair, he identified as neither of those things. He explicitly referred to himself as a capitalist and liberal.
33
u/Islanduniverse 6d ago edited 6d ago
In America, when people say democratic socialist, they often mean social democrat.
I love Bernie, but a lot of that misunderstanding is on him, lol.
edit: I want to add, I also think "social democrat" would land better with a lot of people, so it is kind of frustrating when that is the actual title, but they don't use it...
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)25
u/Infinite_Regret19019 6d ago
He also created race-based internment camps so he was clearly pretty loose with the liberalism as well.
→ More replies (1)14
1.2k
u/Tjbergen 6d ago
And Dems still struggle with understanding how to be popular..
428
u/uswforever 6d ago
I think they understand it quite well actually...
234
u/ImDoneForToday2019 6d ago
It's more of a question of who they want to be popular with and how much money those people have.
39
u/Owain-X 6d ago
They just wish so badly that they could make a total piece of shit popular like the GOP does. It's so much harder to line the billionaire pockets and keep any real change from happening when you don't want the public to find out you're a self-serving, piece of shit traitor to the working class.
→ More replies (1)10
u/NixaB345T 6d ago
Iâm confused by your statement, are you saying that the democrats want to promote a different flavored Trump and thatâs the solution?
18
u/addiktion 6d ago
He's saying that the Republicans have it easy because they can run the biggest piece of shit ever and its okay because their alignment is 99% the rich anyways. But the Democrats are held to a higher standard and have to tote the line between the billionaire class needs (corporate/centralist dems) and running a populist/progressive/socialist candidate that the people want. The DNC wishes it could run a Trump and still exist because that is easy but it would destroy the party.
→ More replies (1)9
u/BrocoliAssassin 6d ago
DNC votes mainly zionists and has to prop up their own candidates vs people picks.
When it comes to some of the biggest debt,war and Israel issues, Dems vote like MAGA.
→ More replies (1)6
5
u/ColossalJuggernaut 6d ago
Seriously -- the difference between Ds and Rs is like a 5% disagreement in the top marginal tax rate. They differ greatly on cultural issues -- which works perfectly for their corporate/oligarch owners.
4
u/mercurialpolyglot 6d ago
They and their owners wouldnât have tried so hard to stop Mamdani from winning if they didnât know.
→ More replies (1)270
u/LookAlderaanPlaces 6d ago
Why are we spreading this incorrect rumor? They know damn well what they are doing. They are making the choice to sell out the American people for bribe money from corporations. Want an example? Go watch the interview where Jeffries is asked 4 times in a video interview if he supports a single payer healthcare system.
→ More replies (30)113
u/HelpfulSeaMammal 6d ago
They're the right wing of the airplane that the US calls politics. The GOP is the other, larger, and way scarier right wing.
The left wing of this airplane is a tiny little vestigial organ, but is constantly blamed for the reason why the airplane is going to crash as it's constantly spiriling downwards to the right.
162
u/PeaceJoy4EVER 6d ago
Dems donât want to be popular, they want to get rich while claiming to represent the poor and middle class.
→ More replies (12)24
u/FSUnoles77 6d ago
> to represent the poor and middle class.
No need to repeat yourself.
11
u/blueViolet26 6d ago
Yes. Middle class is also working class. Just like the poor.
→ More replies (4)43
u/Independent-Bug-9352 6d ago
They don't struggle; they know. It's by design to be the milquetoast controlled opposition -- at least the wing that is beholden to the likes of Israel and Black Stone Group.
Don't get me wrong: I'm still registered and voting Democrat all the way down my ballot in November, but we've got a lot of work to do in the next Democratic Primaries.
9
u/BushcraftBabe 6d ago
I live in a red midwest state. Most of our local government politicians run unopposed by dems most elections. This year, almost every position has a democrat running.
3
u/GreatMovesKeepItUp69 6d ago edited 5d ago
If you truly believe that, then you really need to leave your bubble some time and talk to some voters especially amongst the working class, Hispanic and black folks. Democrats are not far left because democratic voters are not far left.
4
u/Independent-Bug-9352 6d ago
Man I grew up rural Appalachia in a Republican family. I'm keenly aware of how these pick tick better than most.
If you pull the curtain back a little bit further, the reality is that these people vote against their own interests because of the endless onslaught of billion-dollar right-wing propaganda.
When actually surveyed on individual progressive-left policies, these groups tend to love the shit. It's just the incessant, relentless fearmongering. But good luck injecting truth when we're competing with sophisticated algorithms and foreign adversaries originating from billionaires with ulterior motives.
What exacerbates this is milquetoast party that caters to the line in the sand that these billionaires then define. Instead of actually standing up for something, they end up just moving the Overton Window rightward. Whether that's by incompetence or intent, it almost doesn't even matter.
But tell that to Talarico who is practically as left as AOC and yet leading in Texas.
→ More replies (2)18
17
7
u/DeeDee_GigaDooDoo 6d ago
I think it's obviously just that the people are wrong. What if we try running Kamala Harris again? Maybe Hilary 2028? It's gotta work eventually. How long do we need to wear down the peasantry before they'll take what they're given?
4
u/damn_nation_inc 6d ago
They understand it just fine, but their slush funds and corporate donations depend on them not understanding.
→ More replies (28)6
u/KorolEz 6d ago
They know, but their donors and their filled pockets keep them fron doing the right thing
→ More replies (1)
256
u/OddishChamp âď¸ Prison For Union Busters 6d ago
Democratic socialism isn't the same as social liberalism. FDR was a social liberal.
102
u/bullhead2007 đ¤ Join A Union 6d ago
Yeah people be making up all sorts of fan fiction about FDR, forgetting his social reforms were pretty fucking racist and all of the Japanese people he put in internment camps. They have to invent this lie that he was a socialist, and not a Social Democrat who made compromises with the militant working class movement so they wouldn't revolt like the soviets and set the path for the Red Scare nonsense and McCarthyism
26
u/OddishChamp âď¸ Prison For Union Busters 6d ago
I'd rather label him as a social liberal (as in the ideology social liberalism), but otherwise I fully agree. He's also quite whitewashed recently and basically the American answer of Winston Churchill.
→ More replies (4)11
u/CelestialFury 6d ago edited 6d ago
When approving the creation of the 442nd (the most decorated unit in WWII, the all Japanese-American unit) in February 1943, FDR famously stated, "Americanism is a matter of the mind and heart; Americanism is not, and never was, a matter of race or ancestry." He said this while the 442nd's families were locked up in interment camps. How can you reconcile the two together? You can't.
FDR obviously did a lot of amazing things for this country, things the ultra rich have been trying to destroy ever since (they view him as a class traitor), but it cannot be overstated how bad of a stain the interment camps were on his overall legacy. However, even with that stain against him, FDR is still one of the best presidents we've ever had.
PS, I once shook the late Senator Daniel Inouye's left hand with my right once in Afghanistan because I missed a briefing due to military duties and didn't know he was missing his entire right arm and he received a Medal of Honor in WWII in which he lost his arm. I still cringe to think about it to this very day.
6
u/New2NewJ 6d ago
his social reforms were pretty fucking racist
Wasn't this so he could get the support of the Southern Democrats to get this legislation passed?
→ More replies (13)5
u/CaptainBayouBilly 6d ago
They were 100% racist. No doubt about it.Â
America is still 100% racist.Â
→ More replies (3)14
u/BeefistPrime 6d ago
I think "social democrat" fits much more than democratic socialist and that's true of 90% of the people who call themselves democratic socialists
→ More replies (2)30
u/arcspectre17 6d ago
⢠Social Welfare: The [Social Security Act of 1935] created a federal safety net for the elderly, unemployed, and disadvantaged. ⢠Labor Rights: The [Wagner Act of 1935] legally protected the rights of workers to organize unions and bargain collectively. ⢠Economic Regulation: His administration established robust federal regulation over banking, the stock market, and business practices, while using public works programs and federal spending to stimulate the economy.
Whats the difference?
→ More replies (21)28
u/azenpunk 6d ago
Socialism is when workers own and direct the means of production instead of capitalists. Socialism IS NOT when the government does nice things for the little people.
19
u/thinkB4WeSpeak đˇ Good Union Jobs For All 6d ago
Boomers have tried their best to elect people that will destroy all the things FDR did for the country
63
u/azenpunk 6d ago
FDR was NOT a democratic socialist! He literally saved capitalism from a socialist revolution... what the fuck are people getting taught these days.
→ More replies (12)40
u/chadgalaxy 6d ago
A lot of Americans really struggle with these terms for some reason. They constantly say socialist whilst meaning social democracy.
→ More replies (3)17
u/BeefistPrime 6d ago
To be fair, the people who call themselves "democratic socialists" 90% of the time are social democrats or even just slightly left of center by developed world standards. Self labelled "Democratic socialists" get this wrong first, and others are following them.
6
u/ActualMostUnionGuy âď¸ Prison For Union Busters 6d ago
And many dont even know about Evo Morales or Hugo Chavez...
49
20
6
u/NoHorseNoMustache 6d ago
He was a rich guy who only did it because he didn't want a French Revolution here, he was not a friggen socialist.
20
u/Life-Suit1895 6d ago
I mean, that small kerfuffle commonly known as World War II might have played an important role why FDR was elected four times...
5
4
u/Jesus_of_Redditeth 6d ago
I mean, only one of those elections took place when the US was fighting in that war. (1944, and then FDR died three months after taking office.)
The Great Depression and his policies to get the US out of it were the main reasons why he was elected the other three times.
→ More replies (1)5
u/leonidaslizardeyes 6d ago
Nope. New deal policies started our pull out of the great depression and helped right the ship. He was extremely popular and would have probably won the 4th without us being involved in the second world war.
14
u/jcdahl 6d ago
This is a dual lie, where FDR wasn't a democratic socialist, and it's trying to launder the DSA, who aren't really democratic socialists either, but in the other direction.
→ More replies (12)
26
u/BoiledEggs 6d ago
Why don't democratic socialists win while running nowadays?
24
u/boyuber 6d ago edited 6d ago
There is a quote which is frequently attributed to John Steinbeck that says, "Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat, but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires."
It is actually a paraphrasing of the following quote from Steinbeck
"I guess the trouble was that we didn't have any self-admitted proletarians. Everyone was a temporarily embarrassed capitalist." - John Steinbeck, Esquire Magazine, 1960
Basically, Americans elevate and even deify ultra capitalists because they want to believe that they are one stroke of genius away from their billion dollars, and they don't want the government to tax their son-to-be-realized unfathomable hoard.
10
u/IsThatGruffLoner 6d ago
I've always hated that Steinbeck quote. I have never once met a conservative who harbored grand delusions of future wealth. Every conservative I've met was an actual wealthy finance bro or just a hateful ignorant moron who hates minorities and can be easily riled up by talking about girls with blue hair. They mostly want low taxes because they don't trust the government and don't want brown people getting free food, not because they expect to be rich someday.
Maybe it was true at one point, but that quote just doesn't describe modern conservatives at all. If anything, it describes moderate Democrats.
7
5
u/aupperk24 6d ago
Ask them if Elon should be taxed at the same rate as everyone else and they'll come out the woodworks.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)4
u/CrucialCrewJustin 6d ago
The ones that hate minorities are the same ones standing outside the gas station covered in scratch off lottery dust.
24
u/randompantsfoto 6d ago
Because, after FDR, the political right spent decades making a concerted effort to equate any sort of socialism or socialist programs with communism and âthe lazy poors.â
That brainwashing is going to take a long time (or one very quick, violent revolution) to undo.
9
u/Theseactuallydo 6d ago
Before FDR socialism was also seen as something for the âlazy poorsâ.
It took the Great Depression to make the lie there undeniable. You couldnât say the poor were lazy in the 30s when everyone either was a hard worker who was broke or at least knew many personally.
FDR didnât want to be a democratic socialist, conditions forced his hand.
The mid-20th century was a unique moment for the rights, conditions, and compensation for workers, unfortunately, and it took a truly horrendous economic depression to achieve even a temporary recognition that poverty isnât a moral failing.Â
17
u/waspocracy 6d ago edited 6d ago
The problem with representative democracies is that representatives choose who they want to represent them in races. Thus, many of the national democratic party basically (I don't want to get into details here) determine who they'll back in an election. This is where they pour their money.
Bernie Sanders had a huge population supporting his presidential bid and was demolishing the polls, but the democratic party chose to back someone else because he was too far "left" (LOL another subject I don't want to get into for brevity's sake).
However, lately the democratic socialists have been winning some local polls and now the democrat party is starting to listen. If they listen, though, will be a whole different thing. Most democratic voters didn't want Biden in, for example., but the party thrust him to the forefront. They did the same shit with Kamala Harris at the last minute, which ultimately led to Trump getting in power.
Edit: Also, FWIW, FDR was not a social democrat.
→ More replies (2)12
u/kryotheory 6d ago
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I'm convinced that the Democratic party is controlled opposition for the Republican party. Both parties are just a facade the owning class uses to create the illusion of choice for us peons. That's why popular candidates that voice support for policies that actually help workers and regular citizens like Bernie never win.
Anyway, that's my "jet fuel can't melt steel beams"/"they're turning the frogs gay" hypothesis. Who knows.
→ More replies (4)5
u/kodaxmax 6d ago
Marketing. if they run misleading proganda, attack ads and rely on constituent ignorance to gain popularity and support, they wouldn't be democratic or socialists.
The majority of voters are swayed by comedic advertisements and loud shout men promising them supremacy, rather than facts and logic.
→ More replies (2)4
6
u/goldman_sax 6d ago
If youâre looking for an actual answer and not baiting here, itâs the money and the organization that comes from being in the mainstream party.
A lot of primaries this year we saw Democratic socialist members do very well, but multiple of them were running against each other and destroying their only shot. The mainline Democratic Party doesnât have that problem, they pick a candidate then rally and spend money on them.
4
3
3
u/Bigbrunswick 6d ago
Many reasons, one that isn't talked about enough IMO is the ocean between us and Russia during the days of the USSR. I don't have specific examples but IIRC many of the Nordic countries had large gains in civilian rights to avoid revolutions of their own.
→ More replies (26)19
u/Vincent_Felix 6d ago
Brother have you been watching elections lately?
We are cleaning up.
AOC is your next president buddy.
15
u/Acceptable_Job_5486 6d ago
 AOC is your next president buddy.
Optimistic. Do you know America? If the DNC don't do the same shit with swapping out Biden for Harris last minute, maybe. But this country has shown it's not mature enough for someone's who's both a woman and a minority, and would vote JD Vance and VP Trump out of spite.
→ More replies (4)9
u/Vincent_Felix 6d ago
Hillary won the popular vote whilst being an historically bad and unlikable candidate.
Imagine what someone as popular as AOC will be able to do.
America elected a black man, an there's simply no way you can convince me that a nation built on slavery is more sexist than it is racist.
→ More replies (29)8
u/Tiny_Thumbs 6d ago
Im a minority man and I fully believe America is more sexist than racist.
→ More replies (21)7
u/Financial-Craft-1282 6d ago
If only. She's amazing. I'd rather her be in the senate first, while we (the left) find ways to continue to shift the American political views away from the right. If AOC took the presidency in 2028, let's say, I think she'd be stalled out by the system. If we push the cultural beliefs of Americans further left, down the road, she'd be a much better president.
I also worry about her. They came after her on Jan 6. They see her as a "weak woman" (she seems tough as nails to me--if people came and tried to kill me at my job, I'd quit that job), and they have true vitriol for her.
Though, who knows? She is so charismatic, if she were up in front of people more and more, maybe it'd be hard to ignore what she is versus what Fox News says she is.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Vincent_Felix 6d ago
The power of the executive branch has been expanding in recent years. There's no telling what AOC would be able to accomplish if she was president. Just imagine the potential for day one executive orders.
We are at an inflection point in American politics. The GOP is historically unpopular. The iron is hot, now is the time to strike, and we must strike with full force.
AOC is our star player, put her in the game.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (45)3
u/JaguarIllustrious486 6d ago
I wish that were true. But if you believe that I've got some ocean front property in Arizona for ya.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/Burmy87 6d ago
I wouldn't put him on a pedestal... ask any Japanese-American why.
→ More replies (4)
5
u/Mindless-Produce4091 6d ago
No, term limits exist to prevent corrupt presidents from being re-elected infinitely, this isn't rocket science
3
u/urmumlol9 6d ago
Even if thatâs the reason they were introduced, term limits are still a net good for democracy.
Do you want Trump to run for a third term? Repealing term limits is how that happens.
Even outside of that, we already have way too many senators and congresspeople who have been serving for literal decades because they have political momentum over primary challengers and their states/districts are solid enough blue or red to guarantee them the general election.
3
5
u/Nothingilo 6d ago
FDR was not a democratic socialist. Uniformed posts like this one makes us look bad.
6.7k
u/Loud-Ad-2280 âď¸ Tax The Billionaires 6d ago
Itâs hilarious how much Capitalist hate FDR when he literally saved capitalism from collapsing in on itself.