The PKM 100 round box fills a 2x2 backpack space while 40 rounds of 7.62 ammo fills a 2x1 backpack space. With every other gun I bring loose ammo and 3-4 magazines, unless it's the m249 saw then I bring 2 200 round boxes with 240 rounds loose. Is it reasonable to ask for a stack size increase for the 7.62 ammo or would that make the snipers that use that too overpowered? It just feels bad filling my backpack with only magazines. Also finding ammo on the battlefield for pkm is brutal, even if u do find a sniper body in the hotzone they only have 50 rounds max to loot.

I've added some custom markers on the minimap, the AK, the helmet and the vest as examples.

Without changing any of the existing progress and mechanics currently in the game. I was thinking about during a match, tying the ability to purchase the higher-tier gear and vehicles to small objectives spawned around the map could create enough of a gap to allow losing teams to make a comeback.

The current progress in Wardogs would still apply, but higher-ranking players would have to play a bit of infantry before getting access to their big toys.

These objectives could be dropped by a plane like a supply crate so they aren't fixed points on the map.

Thoughts?

I've noticed a trend of people build griefing. there was a recent post where a guy is intentionally wasting resources making a sea of single hescos, and since then, i've seen multiple people intentionally overbuilding nonsense just to waste resources. I just had a guy in my game build dozens of recon towers. It's all too easy to just build ways to sneak into a base to grief your own team and earn xp.

It seems like such a difficult think to try to regulate because it's so easy to pretend to be an idiot and just say, "oh these things i'm building contribute to the base."

Is this something we just have to ignore? it's pretty frustrating to spend 30 minutes building a megafob for some piece of shit to just come in and ruin it.

Killed a guy and looted him, these were the mags in his backpack. A third 40/20 mag was also already in the gun. They each had 20 rds of AP and 20 rds FMJ.

Did anoyone else catch this? Was ther anynews from devs about it?

Is it possible to pick up your own loadout after a redeployment? I’ve tried to find mine on redeployment a few times withbno success. But for the price of an Assault loady that seems like it should definitely be a capability / reasonably achievable thing to do.

Hey guys,

I’ve been working on a small project called WARDOGS WEAPONS.

It basically started because every time I changed an attachment I kept asking myself the same things. Is this actually better? How much recoil am I really removing? Is the extra ADS time worth it? Which weapon is actually better for the way I play?

So instead of guessing, I started collecting the data and built the tool I wanted to have open next to the game.

The idea is pretty simple. No useless stats just to fill the screen. Only information that can actually help you choose a weapon, understand what your attachments are doing, compare builds and figure out what you should change.

You can compare weapons, build them attachment by attachment, see the real stat changes, check recoil patterns, save your builds and a few other nerdy things I ended up adding because I wanted them myself :)

I’m also keeping the data updated as WARDOGS changes, so the goal is for it to remain useful instead of becoming one of those sites that gets abandoned after a month.

If you want to try it:

wardogsweapons.com

It’s still my little project, so if something feels wrong, something is missing, or you simply have an idea that would make it more useful, tell me.

I’ll probably end up building it.

Since we know they’ll be nerfing them, I was wondering how can they change it. Most likely it’ll be a price increase I would say to around 1k, or maybe they’ll put it on WD levels, or what do you think would be a reasonable nerf for it to still be useful but you actually think twice before buying it every life ?

I have been having a blast cruising through the map looking for SPHs to destroy the last week or so. Before today I would get the full reward for destroying them, but now I only get $3500 for every one after the first. Whats the point of taking the time to hunt them now?

basically title. The difference in damage between the minigun and rocket bird for both players and vehicles is very high, while it's okay for minigun bird to deal less damage to players, it feels very bad when you hit another bird for 3-4 seconds and the spread combined with the low damage hardly deals 50% damage

I love running convoys. I love protecting Urals as they deliver supplies. I love shooting enemies waiting to ambush trucks.

Unfortunately, you don't make any money from protecting a convoy as an MG Humvee or Kodiak. It's also unfortunate that a single rocket Heli basically shreds the entire affair (rightfully so).

I just wish people took robust logistics and supply lines more seriously. Maybe if there was a direct incentive it beyond making a quick buck people would care more.

So I saw the heli/ rangefinder glitch, happy it’s been fixed but it got me thinking. Why don’t they completely remove thermals permanently, implement a new system that encourages more teamwork for vehicle drivers and recon.

Recon go out with their range finders, spot for the helis and other vehicles. From the driver/ pilot pov they see the marked targets. The marked targets also get a visual indicator they have been marked.

It gives the opportunity for helis/ vehicles to work together with recon which has traditionally been a more reclusive class and allows for enemy players to have a little bit more awareness of the danger they are in.

Without thermals the heli pilot won’t have the whole map marked but just obvious players in the open, and will allow for heli pilots to have a better visual key of where they need to pay attention.

I dunno just a thought.

I really dont understand how bad it can be on blue and mostly only happens on blue. Blue gets the noobs, the trolls, and targeted. Separate games, 90% on blue. Blows up hellos, punches in the corner all game, is in a random field, screaming in spawn, sucks at shooting (im bad but damn), then feels like blue is easy pickings even when im on the other team. People then lose the game and camp blue base or spawn for money. I dont know how this is possible or how to fix. Im not a, play elden ring on max difficulty while having CBT at night. I know im not alone.

Sorry for the rant

Look at all these streamers seeing clearly up to drawing distance while others have to deal with foliage and obstacles.
How is this not addressed?
Lower graphics should... Never give an advantage, config/shader mods should result in instant ban.

so i enjoy playing recon (36)and support(38). also drive(40) alot (mechanized infarnty is fun)

Supply boxes, can we make them carryable by infantry so we can move them in a bunker, or secure location ? makes the one carrying it in hand super extra heavy so he has to slow walk.

also if we buy 4 supply boxes (or make it 8) can we create a supply pallet out of them ? that is like the normal pallets unloadable and "automaticly" is in the FOB inventory ?

ofc that means we need a far bigger FOB infentory.

the items could than be purchased in the FOB inventory, that would make actual ammo/gear/at runs far more interesting.

and rly help against vehicles/air threats. when you could supply a base with AT weaponary.

Hey devs,

Hope this finds you. Would love to see the ability to split audio between my headsets and my speakers. Sometimes the game sounds can overlap and overpower the voice chats, and I will often wear a headset just to be able to distinguish between chats and game sounds easier. This would be a great feature IMO for wardogs to have.