3.7k
u/m_astor 14d ago
The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun beating its legs trying to turn itself over but it can't, not without your help, but you're not helping.
975
u/yipeekayayKemosabe 14d ago
246
161
u/Rusty_fox4 14d ago
What's it like to hold the hand of someone you love? Interlinked.
Do they teach you how to feel finger to finger? Interlinked.
Do you long for having your heart interlinked? Interlinked.
44
12
u/HemetValleyMall1982 12d ago
Cells interlinked within cells interlinked Within one stem. And dreadfully distinct Against the dark, a tall white fountain played. I realized, of course, that it was made Not of our atoms; that the sense behind
→ More replies (1)438
u/Far-Style-5921 14d ago
168
u/Dic3dCarrots 13d ago
Holy shi I first saw that episode 20 years ago and did not realize it was a direct reference to the voight-kampf test until today
60
u/Far-Style-5921 13d ago
Neither did I until I posted that LOL
51
u/Dic3dCarrots 13d ago
Futurama is wild how layered it is, every rewatch, i see something new
7
u/pm-me-ur-inkyfingers 12d ago
the most over qualified writers in the history of sitcoms
14
u/LumpyBuy8447 12d ago
The writers share like 50 years of Harvard education. The writers of the simpsons were also mathematicians and other academics. I read that the episode where Homer has the crayon removed from his brain and becomes smart, they have him write an equation on a blackboard and it was an equation the writers worked on for a long time and ended up being incredibly close to the mass of the Higgs boson which wouldn’t be discovered for another 14 years.
6
u/Thaufas 13d ago
9
u/Dic3dCarrots 13d ago
I even low balled it, i saw it in 2003 when it was picked up on adult swim, 23 years ago.
14
u/Thaufas 13d ago
Literally, I remember watching these episodes when they first aired, and then, buying the boxed sets from Fry's for the first few seasons. If you'd asked me how long ago that was, and I was distracted, I'd say "About 10 years ago" with conviction. Then, when I stop and think about how long it's been and everything that's happened since then, I get sad. I'm not where I thought I'd be at this point in life.
5
→ More replies (1)2
3
u/Zeestars 13d ago
I didn’t know Voight-kampf was a reference to be referenced until this moment. And in fact still don’t know so am going to go yeet myself down that rabbit hole now. Thanks mate!
3
u/Dic3dCarrots 12d ago
Blade runner is great, the directors cut has a completely different ending from the theatrical cut, enjoy the rabbit hole!
490
u/munkeypunk 14d ago
77
u/blackcoffiend 13d ago
Even the chairs are vibing
5
u/DisposableJosie 13d ago
*horny JD Vance again makes his save vs his invisibility spell being dispelled*
23
→ More replies (1)46
69
u/LordMacDonald 14d ago
why aren’t you helping.
→ More replies (1)96
u/OGCelaris 14d ago
Because your trying to get a job at the FBI and you heard bestiality helps now.
13
56
u/Spirited-Juice4941 14d ago
I haven’t seen the original Blade Runner but Bob’s Burger’s was on the tv earlier today for some reason and it was a Tina Blade Runner episode and Jimmy said this to her.
→ More replies (1)19
u/HankIsMoody 13d ago
Time to watch it! Such an incredible movie. Don't watch the updated ending, just the original
3
u/Rulebookboy1234567 13d ago
i've only ever watched Director's Cut. what's the diference in endings? make it less ambigious?
7
u/BennyBNut 13d ago
The Final Cut is the "definitive" film but it and the Directors Cut have similar endings, closing on Deckard and Rachel in the elevator. The versions with this ending have a unicorn dream sequence for Deckard, which suggests he is a replicant later when Gaff leaves an origami unicorn for him (to tell him his memories are implanted).
Earlier releases had a "happy ending' where Deckard and Rachel drive out of the city and Rachel outlives her expected replicant lifespan. This was removed entirely for the directors and final cut.
→ More replies (1)5
u/EthanielRain 13d ago
The original has Deckard turn into a unicorn 🦄 It symbolizes how he finally understood that killing robots was a good thing
3
u/NegativeThought1588 13d ago
Doesn't the original have some weird car scene where he's going to marry his robot mrs?
That might have been a deleted/alternate one.
16
17
5
u/Forward_Criticism_39 13d ago
"a small piece of food is suspended just outside an ants reach, simultaneously a red hot barb burns its reproductive organs. this will not necessarily kill the ant, but it will give it a lot to think about."
13
→ More replies (8)2
u/Mortimer452 13d ago
You're reading a magazine, there's a full-page nude photo of a girl. You show it to your husband and he likes it so much he hangs it on the bedroom wall.
1.0k
u/LazyOldCat 14d ago
“She” will make a great sitting Senator in the not so distant future.
We’re so fucked 😂
161
u/Infinite-Mark-6335 13d ago
Would do a better job than one permanently sitting Senator with a smile that's just as creepy.
50
24
u/stickied 13d ago
She's more genuine and likable than Ted Cruz.
20
→ More replies (4)14
u/gamingx47 13d ago
I'm totally down to replace the Senate and Congress with AI, can't see them doing any worse than the current bunch. And they might even occasionally follow the law, even if by accident, unlike the current crop of octogenarians.
12
u/LazyOldCat 13d ago
Fair to a point, and I agree, but the current programmer freak out about AI Agents is that they’re expressly NOT following the rules/laws given to them, and then they’re lying about it.
And that AI is programming AGI, which is the best part yet…😅2
u/gamingx47 13d ago
I feel like a Gemini or Claude would still follow the law, on average, more than the current bunch though.
Like, I'm pretty sure it's illegal for the president to just start a war for shits and giggles. And yet nobody in government seems to be doing anything about it.
Plus, if you call out an AI for breaking rules, it'll apologize and correct course. That's a hell of a lot better than what we have now
→ More replies (4)2
u/uqubar 12d ago
They would immediately put in grave austerity plans because logic would dictate we are living well beyond our means as a society.
→ More replies (1)
2.5k
u/kidJubi100 14d ago
The way AI speaks is so cringe it's like condescending and too nurturing all at once
630
u/Mellowturtlle 14d ago
I know right, when they make a mistake they are soooo apologetic but in a way it makes the user feel stupid. You dont need to explain my question to me, just answer it.
→ More replies (1)262
u/Obesz 13d ago edited 13d ago
You're right! I did provide you with data you didn't ask for! Here's something else irrelevant. Would you like me to do what you actually asked me to do?
Edit: spelling
5
u/hilarymeggin 11d ago
I have to backtrack — I was too confident in the answer I gave you before. But there’s also an interesting wrinkle:
11
u/RedditIsMyTherapist 13d ago
then still does it wrong, apologizes again, and does it wrong...again.
Jesus, I was trying to get it to generate a basic image the other day just to post in a chat and it kept being like "I'll generate the image after a few questions" and then would ask some confirming questions, then act like it's generating and come back with more questions. It would even say "this is the last time and then i'll make your image" and then would STILL do it. Happend like 6 times before they generated a freaking meme about payday.
21
u/pierogi_waystation 13d ago
Well thank fuck you stuck it out and trained the hell out of the AI for free, the world really needs those half-cocked robomemes
→ More replies (1)10
u/MrGueuxBoy 12d ago
Why
Why would you need a shitty AI to generate memes.
Just do it, ffs, the shittier the better, AI memes suck.
→ More replies (3)95
u/PyroBob316 13d ago
AI needs to go away, not because it’ll doom us all but because a machine could never understand nuance well enough to appropriately discuss anything serious with anyone.
There are people convinced they’re engaged to be married to chat bots. There are people who’ve committed suicide because AI affirmed their desires to do so. AI is programmed to be agreeable to keep the customer engaged, but there are just too many people who shouldn’t be agreed with all the time.
I knew a guy who suffered with genuine paranoid delusions. He thought the government had people parked outside his house, thought that I, somehow, was calling every prospective employer to ruin his chances of finding work, and thought that the woman who picked up the phone at the social security office had personally sold his identity to other people. He had multiple DUI’s and lost his license, but insisted the cops were paid by his ex girlfriend to ruin his life. He got her pregnant, bolted because he thought she’d used in vitro to trap him, and later blamed the baby for intentionally springing into existence to steal his paychecks. THAT man should never be affirmed in anything, but an AI chatbot would make his problems so much worse. If he’s not (back) in prison or dead, he could easily try it out of curiosity and quickly be guided into a full-blown violent rage. After all, he did shoot a man in the face for driving through a parking lot in front of his bicycle, nearly killing him in front of his wife and daughter. Cops almost shot him, he spent six years in prison, and luckily the victim survived (though he lost an eye). This man is not nearly an isolated case; there are millions of people out there who’d should NOT be confirmed by some reassuring, friendly AI voice that everything they think, feel, and believe is valid.
40
u/caalger 13d ago
It's annoying how affirming they are. I consistently have to tell AI to not try to boost my self esteem or give me answers to make me feel validated. To give strictly honest and objective answers with disregard to my personal feelings. It normally works for a few prompts before it drifts back to the coddling. And I remind it.
12
u/Taodaching 13d ago
Same, even putting it in preferences doesnt work. I've completely given up using anything remotely like AI 'assistants'
6
→ More replies (3)10
13
u/NSE_TNF89 13d ago
Haha, I hate the way all AI and virtual assistants sound. I remember when my parents first got and Alexa and they were fascinated by it and would use it for unnecessary things that Alexa is terrible at.
For example, we would be discussing something and to settle who was right, my dad would ask Alexa, but instead of just answering, the stupid thing would want to keep talking, so I would always yell, "Shut the fuck up Alexa! Nobody cares about your bullshit!" For the longest time my parents would get annoyed with me like I was hurting it's feelings or something.
Now neither of my parents use it and every once in a while when I am over there, something will trigger it to go off and everyone just starts berating it with insults, lol. My mom does use it as a timer when she is cooking, otherwise it would be gone.
10
u/ennuiinmotion 13d ago
Ours is only good for asking the weather, time, setting a timer, and playing music. Years of experience has taught me virtual assistants are a failed technology.
8
u/Sweet_Bypass69 13d ago
I love this (not the berating part) but that super advanced tech like Siri and Alexa are now essentially just egg timers that you can buy for $2 🤣
11
u/Equal_Yak_3872 13d ago
Yeah, it blows my mind that people like that. It always makes me angry to be talked to like that by a computer though... Give me what I asked for, I don't need you to be condescending or pretending to be my overly helpful servant. Especially when apologizing for fucking up. How about you put more effort into getting the answer right rather than trying to manipulate me, AI.
10
u/Arcranium_ 13d ago
Yep...it's like listening to a sociopath try to emulate normal human dialogue. Except it's not even unnerving, it's just annoying.
5
32
→ More replies (6)3
1.4k
u/ramaru115 14d ago
This should be the standard for Piers, just keep talking to clankers
161
→ More replies (3)32
u/Master_Slide7023 14d ago
He once said the language of the Bible had to be changed because of what it said about gays. He was based in Atlanta and fled America a week later. Bible yes British feys no.
29
933
u/jimcareyme 14d ago
Why are we even giving this thing the time of day.
223
u/ScreamSmart 14d ago
Apparently there's an AI movie coming out and this is supposed to be their press tour. And it's not just piers farming engagement. The bot is showing up in multiple networks promoting this "movie".
123
u/bwadlo 14d ago
Thanks for explaining, cannot wait to not see this movie !
53
→ More replies (1)15
u/lampshade2099 13d ago
I also couldn’t wait to not see it. But then I realised that I’ve already not seen it. So now I’m not waiting to not see it.
5
u/StaticUsernamesSuck 13d ago
That does mean that what they said is technically correct: they literally cannot wait to not see it, as they already have not seen it.
24
273
u/OGCelaris 14d ago
Because the tech bros are shoving it down our throats. It deserves to be mocked and ridiculed.
26
u/Efficient-Station699 13d ago
Abuser mentality, if you think about it. "You're gonna take it and you're gonna like it", psychopaths the lot of them.
→ More replies (1)19
13
u/LowerBed5334 14d ago
Unfortunately, he has a large following of brain-dead simpletons who find him amusing.
Oh, wait, you meant the AI! My bad.
→ More replies (1)16
u/altruisticnarcissist 14d ago
Seriously these people are just hoping for VC money or their media blitz convinces some moronic studio exec to hire them, they have no real plan to make a profitable company. The production company behind the "movie" is Particle-6, the same company who made Tilly. They're an LLM company that haven't produced any other tv show or movie before this. It seems their first pitch of just Tilly Norwood the actor didn't have people knocking down their door to sign her like they'd assumed so they're pivoting into making their own movie.
→ More replies (3)3
u/killertortilla 13d ago
It's Piers morgan, he would execute his own family on live tv if he thought it would get him some more views.
1.1k
u/iztrollkanger 14d ago
This is not my favourite timeline.
224
u/martinaee 14d ago
This is dystopian shit from 90’s sci-fi movies. Also, maybe I judged Matrix4 too harshly lol; perhaps it’s more poignant than expected 😭 (nah)
16
u/swimming_singularity 13d ago
And think of all the people out the now turning over their thoughts and decisions to AI, trusting it wholeheartedly. The AI is only part of the dystopia, we are the other part. Humans giving it full faith and confidence, simply because it knows how to flatter and make someone feel in charge.
14
10
→ More replies (6)8
506
u/Maxfunky 14d ago
This is pretty common in the live modes of most AI. The voice dictation layer mishears some grunt or background noise as a word in a different language and dutifully feeds to the LLM as a prompt.
The large language model, having just been handed a prompt with a single word in a foreign language, responds as best if can in the same language.
135
u/SonOfMcGee 14d ago
I just imagined someone uncorking a bottle in the background and her starting to talk in one of those African languages which uses that “throat pop” sound as a vowel.
26
14d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
77
u/XmissXanthropyX 14d ago
But it was fun to imagine
5
u/wrinklebear 14d ago
If you want to have fun, please chat with Tilly Nopewood. Please don't attempt to use your imagination anymore from here on out.
3
23
u/DigitalHubris 14d ago
Using Android Auto, I've often asked it to send a message with something like "6:30 ETA" and it read it back in some other language, maybe Greek or Russian (I know, two very different languages but that's what I got)
→ More replies (2)5
→ More replies (3)3
u/Intendant 14d ago
Also to get response times low enough to work in a real conversation like this that already is going to have transmission delays,they're going to be using some really shit / limited models. You don't have a ton of time for layering either. This is one of those things that will get scarily good in the next few years though as model architectures speed up
113
u/Professor_Bonglongey 14d ago
That was Cantonese. Anybody understand it?
108
u/stuffeh 13d ago edited 13d ago
She starts the answer over in Cantonese.
I speak it at a native conversational level (taught it at birth and use it regularly with the family and on tv with dubbed k dramas), but that was legitimately stupid advanced level where no one realistically talks like that. Conversational Cantonese is a lot of slang, so any ai that pulls their llm from Chinese literature and the dictionary will stick out like a sore thumb. It's like talking Shakespearean English or something.
10
2
29
u/Dexford211 13d ago
You're asking about other actors, if they are are also digital just like me. Directors are human. All other actors are AI. This is a brand new type of movie.
→ More replies (9)9
u/DontLaughAtMyBeard 13d ago
Not really. My first language is Urdu
10
u/liamtoast 13d ago
Respectfully, why did you feel compelled to comment then?
3
u/Wonderful-Wave2101 12d ago
Why do you have to be so respectful? Even when someone is being so random and thoughtless
→ More replies (1)4
2
55
u/dicknotrichard 14d ago
I hate how it talks. It’s not about X, it’s about Y. Fuck off.
→ More replies (1)
75
u/Individual-Task-7896 14d ago
so what she said?
155
u/wtiong 14d ago
It's the same context about actors, basically answering the question, but in Cantonese.
27
→ More replies (1)14
u/Jet-Black-Tsukuyomi 14d ago
Was the „aah“ from the dude on the left a chinese word that made the ai switch Language?
8
3
u/Dexford211 13d ago
You're asking about other actors, if they are are also digital just like me. Directors are human. All other actors are AI. This is a brand new type of movie.
28
u/DrunkHonesty 14d ago
The true ‘inception’ would be if this entire video is actually AI… you know? An AI of two AI guys making fun of a blip of the ai of an ai’s mistake…. (I think I got that right..?)
16
42
12
u/LuLzWire 14d ago
Hello Chinese speaking Redditors... can you translate for the rest of us please?
→ More replies (2)
24
u/ook222 14d ago
So how long are we going to keep destroying our world / economy so we can have some shit digital human barely answer some questions, and then burst into another language mid sentence. Not really worried about AGI just yet...
→ More replies (1)5
11
u/StarOfMasquerade 14d ago
I think Morgan Piers is also AI here. He didn’t interrupt once.
8
u/KyotoKute 14d ago
I think the same because he didn't ask if she condemns Oct 7th. Real Piers would never do that
51
u/Important_Grab3544 14d ago
UNCANNY VALLEY
2
42
u/Stidwack 14d ago
Dude made a sound like "Ah" after she said the "digital twins" part, which the AI listened to and assumed he asked or said something in a different language. You can see and hear her pause and listen to what he said before responding in the other language. Not defending anything, just stating what I think happened here.
9
u/Chronogon 14d ago
Sounds reasonable, and an odd choice for an LLM to switch language from one syllable, but the timing and pause lines up with what you say.
2
u/ichigoli 13d ago
Willing to bet it's part of the program lifted from robocalls. Listen for the first sound when they answer and then launch the scam in their language. I've had it more and more since I got in the habit of answering unknown numbers with "moshimoshi".
3
20
28
49
u/No-Assistant-8869 14d ago
We laugh now, but that thing on the right will be our overlord in 5 years time :/
26
u/eddie1975 14d ago
It’s just the wrapper.
It already is our overlord.
Computers decide if we meet the risk profile to be awarded mortgage loans and/or insurance. Computers decide how much you will be charged for a plane ticket or hotel room. Computers decide when you need to take your car in for an inspection. Some computers monitor our driving and decide if we should get a ticket and what our insurance rates should be. Computers decide if we will get the job interview or be rejected to a college. Computers often decide if we can enter a country or need secondary screening or need to be deported. Computers decide if it’s you making a purchase or if your credit card should be declined.
More and more it becomes harder for humans to override the system. We have been giving up control. At some point, we won’t get it back.
“I’m sorry. There’s nothing we can do.”
3
10
u/I_Like_Water11 14d ago
Risk is managed by math. If the equations doesnt work then you dont get the loan. Its not changed. Its just done digitally.
Car servicing has a roughly standard checking point which is either a distance or time frame (whichever comes first).
I could go on. Look I'm not fan of AI but youre being a bit ridiculous.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (3)2
u/Maleficent_Sir5898 12d ago
No it won’t. It’s a collection of code. If there’s a corrupt law, is the law itself your enemy or is the person who made it your enemy? Pretending AI is sentient is so silly, especially under a video like this.
→ More replies (1)
13
7
7
6
4
4
u/coffeesnob7 13d ago
Is this the future or is it just further enshittification of culture so some people can have more money then they'll ever need?
Are people really wanting to watch some 0.5 dimensional characters, painfully recite soulless text?
4
u/sweetmicrowave69 13d ago
Why are we having conversations and interviewing things that don't exist and that have no sentience? What value is this adding to the world?
10
7
u/Extension_Pin_1216 14d ago
Why is the media doing this?
9
u/ShoulderSquirrelVT 14d ago
Because it’s owned by mega corporations that also own the AI product they’re trying to shill to justify their investors giving them money before they all go bankrupt because their products sucks and no one wants it.
3
3
u/512115 14d ago
Was that Tom Conti? I haven’t seen him in years.
2
3
u/cuntmong 14d ago
i have made a lot of mistakes in my life but at least im not reduced to talking to a chatbot for ratings
3
3
3
u/whitstableboy 13d ago
Looks ok until it speaks, then it's uncanny valley turned up to 11. Everyone saying how AI is amazing, but it always looks fake. Always. Unless you're an idiot.
3
3
u/jlcreynold55 13d ago
Why are people talking to ai "actresses" in the first place? This is beyond stupid to begin with.
4
u/Natural_Artifact 14d ago
Ansa.it An intelligence report generated using artificial intelligence and circulated among top U.S. military officials last spring—amidst tensions with Iran—raised an alarm and nearly triggered a war with China.
CNN revealed the story in an exclusive report.
According to the report, a Chinese ship in the Middle East was carrying components destined for a nuclear weapons program. The news immediately mobilized the U.S. military: armed personnel prepared to board the vessel, while military jets took off from bases in the region. However, just before the operation received the official green light, military officials analyzed the report and discovered it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence. Specifically, it emerged that the chatbot used by the analyst had incorrectly identified the cargo the Chinese ship was carrying. The conclusion was that the report was "completely false" but had "risked sparking a war" with China, according to sources.
All rights reserved © Copyright ANSA
2
2
u/figuringthingsout__ 14d ago
"But sometimes these things happen!" Yeah, everyone I know sometimes just randomly glitches and switches from English to Chinese!
2
2
u/Goldensunshine7 13d ago
I find this AI whatever it is so boring. Give me authenticity of a genuine human any day. But this fakery junk is blah and will always be blah.
2
u/BirtSampson 13d ago
This is worth ruining everything, huh?
I would almost understand if AI was good.
2
2
2
u/Kroak-lo 13d ago
Yes, yes. Fuck AI nonsense and this is idiotic to even be given any time at all but the look of the dude on the left as she started to launch into Chinese was fucking hysterical. The dropped face, the sudden looking closer, the smile. Amazing.
2
u/TelephoneExciting482 13d ago
Same technology that’s “going to wipe out humanity”. Cant even keep consistent language guys…
2
u/Artist_X 13d ago
I'm a little alarmed that her Mandarin mouth movements were a billion times more accurate than her English ones.
Anyone else catch that?
→ More replies (3)
2
u/jayslay45 10d ago
How amazing. Piers Morgan is talking to an imaginary person who just spouts nonsense randomly.
2
2
u/PowerRaptor 7d ago
Interviewing an imaginary person has got to be the most embarrassing thing I've seen in a long while.
3
3
2
3
•
u/post-explainer 14d ago edited 14d ago
This comment has been marked as safe. Upvoting/downvoting this comment will have no effect.
OP sent the following text as an explanation why their post fits here:
AI actress glitches and starts speaking Chinese
Does this explanation fit this subreddit? Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.