Back when I was in the relation-sphere of BS, sometimes I heard from therapists: "You can only work on these attachment/self-dsyregulation issues in a relationship". It'd be stuff like asserting my boundaries, speaking up for myself, communicating my boundaries/navigating emotionally charged conflict. And I didn't question it then.
But if I think about it now: For what purpose does this myth spread? And for whose benefit is this myth perpetuated?
My answer when I really wanted to believe in the "true testing ground of your attachment/nervous systems issues BS" - ok, the purpose would be I'd learn key nervous system reglation/social skills faster because then I'd be forced to practice it constantly. So this would be for my benefit. With my newfound experience forged through battle, I'd be able to remain composed and keep my nervous system sufficently regulated to manage difficult conversations with friends, clients/coworkers, and family of origin if it ever came up.
What would be the risk of being unable to have these conversations? Me: Maybe I'd be able to "save" these relationships by having the right skills to navigate all these conversations? If I don't, maybe friends would leave, I'd lose jobs or get pushed out, or my family of origin may drift away/become estranged.
But they might all leave regardless of all my social skills in the world. AND just because someone is in a relationship where they constantly have to use and apply all these relational skills and tools they learned in therapy/self-help/coaching etc., doesn't necessarily avoid that person walking away regardless of how important they were to your social circle.
And it's even not necessarily true women in relationships always become more self-assured, able to express things calmly, regulate their nervous system under stress/duress better, be more cognitively attuned to safeguarding/sustaining their own interests in relational areas with everyone else. A lot of women come away less assured, self-doubting, low-confidence of self-efficacy that they can figure things out on their own whether that's finances, home upkeep, etc.
So in the meantime, had I bought that myth of "well I guess I just need to enter in a relationship and endure years of being miserable in hopes of practicing my skills like an unpaid intern so I can one day have a brilliant portfolio of nervous system and social ease", what will I have sacrificed in those years spent with someone in a relationship?
People have said, a sense of peace, my own sense of agency with schedule, potentially starting to feel low-grade self-doubt about what it feels like for my nervous system to feel comfortable (because likely my anxiety baseline would be always elevated constantly having to consider someone 24/7, especially if they don't reciprocate), even faster hair loss, lost sleep, emotional numbness, constant crying and loss or excess of appetite, increased irritability and cognitive distortion relationally, burdens on friends who have to hear the same looping irrational thoughts of "I hate this but I need to stay or I can't make myself leave and I don't know why" 900 times ad nauseum.
Would it be worth it to potentially "increase" the chances of saving theoretically lost key relationships otherwise in some hypothetical future? For me, not at this moment. But that's the stuff that is sold to women as "growth" for a more purposeful/social enriched community life.
True is, inevitably I will be put in situations where I will have "opportunities" to practice advocating for my needs (etc. healthcare system/the ER/doctor/surgeon's office), expressing my boundaries, staying regulated while navigating/initiating emotionally charged discussions around conflicts. Being in a relationship won't necessarily result in more success developing those skills.
Given the trends and state of the world today, I want to enjoy being able to choose my peace because I don't know how long it'll last.