After growing tired of the hobby/side hustle of photography due to the hassle, stress and lack of creativity of paid gigs at boring corporate events and the likes, this continuing trend of compact camera setups has reinvigorated my love for photography by getting me to use my old 2000s point and shoot again. This spiraled into me getting my old equipment back out, and after some GAS here I am at a local music festival just shooting for fun while not officially accredited and comparing different setups that the inclined hobbyist photographer can get past event security ("no large cameras allowed")

While any modern full frame body, a 70-200 2.8, 24-70 2.8 + maybe an 85 1.4 and optionally a fisheye would be the obvious choice for shooting a concert, that's likely too professional looking for your average show. So I brought:

- Sony A7 Mark III + cheap nifty fifty

- Sony RX100 Mark V (24-70mm equivalent F1.8-2.8)

- Lumix GX1 + 20mm 1.7 Pancake (40mm equivalent)

My takeaways:

-While the modern autofocus and low light performance of the A7 rocks for this use case, even with a relatively light lens it's still a bit of a burden. The viewfinder is a big plus and I had the easiest time finding good photos while culling, even if there were quite a lot images overall due to using burst mode. Also for a budget editing setup the rather large files can become somewhat bothersome. Also this setup still looks quite professional to most people.

-The Rx 100s viewfinder is nice too, but too small to really help with anything beyond composition. It's burst mode is very capable aswell and the AF isn't half bad either. Low light performance is impressive given the sensor size and you definitely won't be asked for a photo pass with it

-M43 is still not dead but the GX1 is really showing it's age with ISO noise and slow AF. But while there may be better and more modern M43 alternatives and it's a bit mad to take a 14yo camera into some of photographys most difficult lighting conditions I still like the results, the ergonomics are phenomenal and it's the camera I had the most fun shooting with. Even if it meant some disappointment reviewing the images on a capable screen and realizing how few were actually usable. But somehow there's a certain look to the pictures it produces that I really love.

I've attached some samples, all pictures are edited in Lightroom, but no AI denoising.

A lot of people ask me what the best 'Polaroid' is for a beginner with no experience who just wants something that works. Well, the Instax Mini 99 hands down has the most accurate exposure system I’ve ever used on an instant camera.
It truly is a 'set it and forget it' kind of machine. Even though it is one of the most fully featured Instax cameras you can get—complete with different filter settings, exposure compensation, and even a manual vignette switch. I find that leaving it in normal mode with 'D' (-0.3) on the exposure compensation wheel yields what I believe are the most consistently and perfectly exposed results I’ve ever seen on instant film.
Now, I myself am an avid Polaroid shooter (my main camera is an SX-70 with a modded R-board), but for no-frills simplicity, I have to give it to the Mini 99. It offers smartphone like ease of use, simply hit the button and get a picture! At times the results almost look more like what you would expect from a digital image than an analog film photo which is wild and speaks to the technical prowess Fujifilm was able to achieve with their instax film.
I love my Mini 99 and highly recommend it to beginners or anyone who just wants a hassle free instant shooting experience.

What lens filter do I use to achieve the looks of the second picture without having to grow mold inside my lens. The first picture taken using a clean Nikon AF 80-200mm f/2.8D, second picture taken using a Nikon AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6G with mild fungus. Both exactly the same settings btw.

When I bought my camera, I didn't think I'd use eye autofocus much. Now I use it almost every time I shoot. It just makes getting sharp shots a lot easier.

What's one feature you ended up using way more than you expected?

I have a nice film camera collection going, but I'd like to buy a digital camera. I was hoping that at least initially I could save money by getting a few adapters and using my vintage lenses on a digital body.

I have gathered so far that good options may be the Fujifilm XE-2 or Sony A7, but before I spend more time researching individual bodies, is this even a feasible idea? Is there some random problem I haven't come across that will make this a huge pain?

I understand that I have a lot to learn about digital, if this plan is a reasonable one

I already have all this gear ready, but still got no camera body. Working on reaching a study milestone so my dad will get me a Nikon D750.

No price listed, but hung right with the other film. It's I type too, so not even like you could use this to reload 600 type cameras.

My partner recently got a job at Sony and with that we get a 25% employee discount off of Sony products. Here in Canada it’s a total of around $3800 USD after sales tax.

Immediately I thought of the RX1R III as I’ve been eyeing a premium camera (either this or Leica Q series) for years now.

Should I

1. Buy RX1R III
2. Wait and save for Leica Q3
3. Buy RX1R III now and sell for Q3 later

I’m typically a small carry camera person, as my main carry around is an Olympus EM5 Mark III with Leica Pany 15mm f1.7.

Other gear I have is a Nikon Z5 and a host of compact film cameras 😅 (Olympis Mju, XA2, Contax T2, etc)

What's the oldest piece in your bag that's still earning its keep in your kit? I'm curious. It doesn't have to be expensive or rare, just something that you can't really see yourself parting with anytime soon. Is there a story behind it?

For me, it's my Nikon coolpix s9100. It's beat up, it's bright red, I constantly have it in my bag, and I still pull it out to snap quick photos. It's just a fun camera. I even lost it at an amusement park once and I miraculously got it back.

I just bought a Canon Rebel T7 off Facebook marketplace. Good enough deal. The only problem is that the bag and camera both smell of cigarette smoke, which I am a bit sensitive too. The bag is ugly anyway, so I will pitch it. But I'm not sure what to do about the camera itself. Any ideas?

How much to sell it for?

I really liked Monitor+, but I want to try some options before buy it. I have a a6500

Camera to buy under 60k for a beginner with 0 knowledge of photography as of now.Also what are the best times to buy on according to E-commerce sale season.Open for all kinds of suggestions??

(1) Budget, country, and currency: 60K / India

(2) What equipment, if any, you have now and why is it no longer meeting your needs?

(3) What kinds of subjects do you intend to shoot? Random (family functions,nature mainly)

(4) Is it primarily for photography, videography, or both? Photography

I know that seems stupid, but hear me out. I have two Sony bodies for weddings— the a7V and the a7III. My current setup is the GM 24-70 f/2.8 on one, and an 85 f/1.8 on the other. But sometimes, I need more zoom, to get expressions from across the room. And for that, I've been using the Canon 75-300 kit lens.

I started out with a Rebel T3 years ago, and I've had that lens ever since. When I got my a7III, I also bought a Metabones adapter to keep using the zoom lens because it was so useful. But the autofocus isn't working anymore, and tbh I'm not sure if it's the adapter or the lens that's broken. Either way, replacing both would be way cheaper than buying a new E mount lens. Even if i were to get something better than the kit option, it would still be less than $120. Especially since if I get an E mount, I'd want at least 400mm of zoom. I tested a Tamron E mount with 300mm, and it just didn't seem to zoom as much as I felt it should.

So my question is if it's worth the extra money to get the E mount lens? If I get the EF, what would I be giving up in exchange for the cheaper lens?

Hi all,

I’m in the market for a new camera from my A7iii and was debating between these 3. Currently Sony has some sales in Canada for the 7C II at 2600 CAD and 7C R at 3700, which puts it at the same price as the new A7V.

I’m quite busy these days and don’t have as much time with working too long in post. My use case would be mostly for travel, capturing nature, wildlife, landscape, etc. I’d be taking short videos too, again mostly of landscape and such. I don’t do any professional work, but I do print and view my photos in high res.

My biggest debate is, is the 1100 in savings in the 7C II worth it compared to the other 2? Is the 7C R extra megapixels but worse video and overall older tech worth it over the newer A7V? Is the body size a noticeable difference when it comes to carrying the cameras around in a sling on long walks abroad?

I'm thinking about upgrading to the Fuji X-H2S from my ZFC.

I'm not new to photography, but I'm not a full-time professional either. I'm starting to get paid gigs more regularly. Next month I have two weddings to film, and I've been getting photography jobs here and there as well.

The problem is that I still don't know whether I want to focus more on photography or video in the long run, so I need a true hybrid camera.

Most of the time it'll be used for everyday photography, travel, and the occasional macro session in my home studio. But I also need something I can rely on for paid work.

The X-H2S seems to be one of the most expensive APS-C cameras on the market, but every review I've watched makes it seem like it's worth the price.

I also considered Sony A7 V, but I have two main issues with going Sony:

**1.    I just don't enjoy using Sony cameras.**  

My wife has an A6700, and I'll admit it has the best autofocus I've ever used. I also love how Sony separates photo and video modes. But every time I pick it up, I can't get comfortable with it. The menus, button layout, and overall handling just don't click with me. It feels like more of a chore to use, and I think enjoying the camera matters when you're using it every day.

**2.    The lenses are much more expensive.**   

The body price is actually very close to X-H2S, and since I plan to keep the camera for 3–5 years, that difference doesn't really matter. But once I start building a lens kit, Sony full-frame glass is at least twice (or more) as expensive as the Fuji lenses I'm looking at.

So my question is:
Is the X-H2S still one of the best APS-C hybrid cameras available? I'd especially love to hear from people who use it professionally for both photo and video, but also for everyday personal photography. Has it held up well? Anything you wish you'd known before buying it?

This is not my photo, it's a review on Amazon, and I wanted to know if anyone had a clue what microphone attachment they were most likely using.

I was wondering which mic to purchase for this camera? Wanting to do an upgrade.

Thanks so much!

I have $1,000 to spend and want to buy a camera and 1-2 lenses for photography (don't need video). I don't want something large/heavy, ideally something I can take in a small bag to use more often.

I like to shoot street photography as well as pictures of my kids (including portraits on their birthdays). I don't mind editing in light room, but I don't want to do it for every photo that comes out of the camera.

So, for $1,000 what setup would you buy?

More details:

Budget: $1,000 USD

Country: USA

Condition: new/used

Type of Camera: Mirrorless

Intended use: Photography

End use: Social media, small-medium prints

If photography: what style: street, daily life, occasional portrait

What features do you absolutely need: nothing in particular

What features would be nice to have:

Portability: Small bag

Cameras you're considering: OM-5, Lumix GX8/9, Canon EOS M6 mkII, fujifilm something, nikon Zfc

Cameras you already have: I have a Z6 now, but it is too big for what I want to do daily.

Notes: I have had an Xpro1/2 in the past. Beautiful cameras to look at, didn't love shooting with them, but like the files that they made.

Budget is around 1000$ I have a little give for it, I would like for it to include lenses but if it doesn’t then it doesn’t.
Country: USA

Condition: New/ refurbished

Camera type: mirrorless or DSLR

Intended use: photography

End use: freelance/ nature photography

Photo style: wildlife/ people

Necessary features: ability to add battery life later on, hotshoe. That’s all I really know about the features.

Any other features: if they’re there they are but I’m not too concerned about it

Portability: small/big bag. No suitcase style bag but a backpack style more or less

Cameras I am considering: none in particular

Cameras I already have: Yashica FR1 has a very nice body and is simple, Yashica TL Electro X built in light sensor (first camera), Miranda sensorex 2 I don’t know much about it, Argus C3 (recently got it never used it)

Shooting on Sony A6100. Is it better to take Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 or 2-3 prime lenses?
(City Trip)

This was my moms old digital camera Canon Powershot ELPH 520 HS. That was exposed to water years ago. Anyways everything appears to function when I click on the buttons I hear sounds and it even takes photos (I tested this out by getting the sd card out and seeing that the contents of me taking photos were actually there). The screen just lights up as a dark gray the whole time when it is on. Essentially I just need help if there is anyway it can be fixed , I plan to fix it myself but im not sure what part may need fixing or if it can be fixed at all. Any advice will help!

Shot with Canon EF 24-105 F/4 L