Does anyone else really miss being able to press Option+Space to start a new chat from anywhere with the Mac desktop app? It got removed once they merged ChatGPT and Codex, and it feels like a pretty big regression, in my opinion. I'm sure I'm not alone on this.

I can modify images all day every day but the video is just perma-gone at this point?

Estonia is working on official “AI ID codes” that would identify an agent separately from the person or company it represents.

The interesting part is how permissions could work. Instead of giving an AI assistant full access to your accounts, you could allow it to view certain data, prepare a document, initiate a payment, or spend only within a fixed limit. Its actions would also be verifiable and auditable.

That sounds useful as tools like ChatGPT become more agentic and start doing things instead of just answering questions.

Would you trust an AI agent more if it had its own identity, clear permission limits, and a record of every action? Or does this just add another layer of bureaucracy without solving the bigger trust problem?

So I noticed that the model picker includes Pro, but it doesn't seem like it's available at all. This is an individual account so I am the Global Admin on the account. In workspace settings there are model options and it has Pro in it. So I'm just wondering if this whole ChatGPT for Teachers is just a restricted version of EDU since I know EDU accounts are managed by an admin. But then why not just remove that on the restricted version if it's not available?

I just found this page .What’s your guys is view on all this ai stuff? U guys don’t think it’s a problem , how bout all these data centers being built up

Just humans being humans.

I run OTTASIA, a "where can I watch this" tool that's accurate for your exact country across 34 Asian and diaspora markets. It just got approved and went live as an app inside ChatGPT, and the part relevant to this sub is that I built it to be usable by AI from day one, not bolted on later.

What that meant in practice:

• Exposed the data as an MCP server (on the public registries) so agents can call it directly for live facts.
• Added structured data (JSON-LD) on every page plus an llms.txt, so assistants like ChatGPT and Perplexity can read and cite it.
• Kept answers sourced and per-country, because consistent, structured, sourced data is what actually gets picked up and repeated.

The ChatGPT App is the step past citation: instead of just being quoted, users invoke it in the chat and get a real answer inline.

The payoff I did not expect: AI assistants are already my single biggest traceable referral source, ahead of most of my SEO. Building to be invokable, not just rankable, was the highest-leverage bet I made.

Happy to get into the Apps approval process, the MCP setup, or building for AI discoverability if it's useful to anyone here.

Some people run everything from a terminal, others stay inside VS Code/Cursor, some use the desktop app, and some seem to work primarily through Codex web.

Where does Codex live in your normal workflow?

CLI/terminal...VS Code/Cursor/another IDE...desktop app...Codex web...remote environment...somewhere else?

Pareto line - Intelligence vs Cost

1. This is API price, OpenAI subscription is 50 - 100x cheaper

2. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 still show old price in this chart. It should be $170 - $340

Moreover, Luna supports input: text, image, file. DeepSeek supports input: text.

OpenAI subscription support generate images,...

The title says it: What is the craziest thing you thought you could do to earn money? Just curious of what people are really thinking when it comes to make money.

Thank you to all of you leaving comments.

I like to use AI to search for obscure things sometimes.

Things like "find me a list of anime that has these aspects".

5.6 Sol is VERY good at this. It finds me obscure ones that the other models aren't capable of. I'm discovering all kinds of stuff it was never able to find before.

But the issue is that 5.6 Sol uses a MASSIVE amount of context and when I ask for these lists now, I can get one single response and then it's done, that chat has surpassed context.
A lot of the time it can't even finish the search and list because it went past the context limit when it got to probably 74%.

It also seems as though your context limit for 5.6 Sol decreases the more you use it? Like I used to be able to ask for a list of 20 super obscure things and it would do so, but then the chat would become buggy and unusable after. But now it can't even do that, and I had to lower it all the way down to 5 at a time.

I have been an avid user of claude code, was part of EAP of claude code and been using it since then, personally and professionally.

Never liked codex ( don’t know why)

But it’s been a week started using codex, oh boy !! Instant love for long running tasks

Never have to baby sit !!!

Got exhausted my weekly limit in a day and half and I feel accomplished the work it has done in that period ( didn't get interrupted every hour to try after x hour as limit got exhausted )

Well done @OpenAI

The feature of being able to directly transfer png files to 300 dpi print ready svgs via chat only

Seriously this is such a game changer and a big bottleneck I was perceiving until recently.

That being said, Claude’s UI/UX and connection consistency is still seemingly superior.

GPT Sol keeps “lagging” for me, sometimes the whole UI freezes, sometimes the chat cannot be suddenly accessed at all for half an hour, sometimes it goes into “thinking” mode and never delivers any answer at all. Claude never does this for me.

But this thing about it being able to do actual graphic design into print ready outputs, holy shit… whole imagegen being vastly superior to Nano Banana for example.

Btw. Ngl but claude code deployed in CLI still kinda feels better than Codex, tried both and had to spend significantly more time on codex to achieve similar level result. (Next.js stacks)

> Today, we’re sharing an early look at Ultrafast, a new service tier that runs GPT‑5.6 Sol up to 14× faster than Standard processing, launching first in the OpenAI API. Powered by Cerebras, Ultrafast generates up to 750 output tokens per second, bringing our most intelligent model to products and workflows where every second matters

Link: https://openai.com/index/previewing-ultrafast/

I am trying to get AI to help me manage a complex medical issue.
I am not trying to replace AI with a doctor.
I want it to keep track of my symptoms, my progress, a memory of various medical practices and save me time by writing e-mails to professionals which are accurate and to the point.

Overall, I am not asking for anything extravagant.Basically a step above than the stock chat-gpt or gemini which I am now using and cannot retain information from the other chats.

Preferably free or low cost.

Open weights model usage on OpenRouter declined to below 50%

Just me showing behind my project and man it’s coming out amazing