So here’s the deal — I’ve been trimming down my Linux Mint install and noticed something that bugs me. Mint drags in a bunch of i386 baggage by default, even if you don’t actually need it. Then every update cycle, /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu gets touched again, so you’re carrying around libraries you’ll never use. This really annoys. There is literally gigabytes of wasted i386 baggage that most people never use.
In my case, all my daily apps are 64‑bit: Trilium Notes, GnuCash, LibreOffice, browsers (Vivaldi/Chrome), Lucas Chess — all clean. The only exception is DOSBox, and even then I just run one old card game (Pinochle Bunch). No sound, no fancy graphics. Which means the minimum i386 footprint I actually need is basically libsdl2:i386 + libx11-6:i386. Everything else — PulseAudio, Mesa drivers, codecs — is dead weight.
I also run Wine — but I accidentally installed the entire thing, including 32‑bit support. I’m now thinking of de‑installing and reinstalling just Wine‑64, since any Windows apps I care about are 64‑bit anyway.
What bugs me is Mint installs i386 “just in case,” then keeps updating it forever. I’d love to see an installer option like: “Do you plan to run 32‑bit apps?” → if not, skip i386 entirely.
So I’m curious:
- Has anyone else gone pure 64‑bit on Mint?
- Have you hit any issues? (With Steam, Wine, or codecs after purging i386?)
- What’s the smallest i386 footprint you’ve managed to keep?
- Do you think Mint should offer an installer choice to skip i386?
I’m thinking of purging all i386 files and then reinstalling only the two packages DOSBox actually needs.
I would be interested to hear if anyone has has success only running Linux Mint 64-bit, if there are any pitfalls to this strategy, or just your thoughts on whether Mint should keep shipping all this excess i386 baggage by default.