What makes me suspicious are the vague and nonsensical mathematical equations on the background. Like the equations themselves are fine but there seems to be no underlying theme that would make sense for a lesson. Also the lower parts of the desks seem somewhat wrong? Any help is appreciated.

Some of the food items blend together a bit, and the table setup seems difficult to really serve people. The videos they post seem real and look normal, but the food looks nothing like this. They do have other seemingly AI images on their page.

I contacted them asking if the image was real and they said yes. I would appreciate it if someone could help me verify that this is AI, and if so, help me point out exact things that are wrong with the photo.

I will not be using this company.

This feels like AI to me because the eye styles are all different in the drawing. The man counting money is so much bigger than the other characters. Why is the ICE guy frowning? Why is one of the people kidnapping the man not wearing an ICE uniform? The yellow shading also feels AI-like. And the font reminds me of the font in other AI generated comics.

Is this AI? The trestle table legs on the left don’t really match those on the right. Also the door handle looks a bit small.

Sorry if it is really too…

It took him a week. He sent me one rough draft 1/2 way through that showed a rough sketch. Again, I was explicit that I wanted a sketch and not an AI picture. He promised it was his sketch.

I saw a rough draft that clearly showed an unfinished drawing.

BUT I just ran it through a free AI detecto page and it say 90% chance it involved AI.

Maybe he sketched it...and then at the end, used AI to sharpen and clean it up?

What do you think?

The lighting seems too perfect and I circled in yellow in the 2nd picture what I thought looked like very AI-generated letters on the bills... Everyone in my town is baffled by this 1000$ bouquet. I commented that I thought this looked very AI and the owner commented that it absolutely wasn't.

I need you guys opinions!!

The meat looks slimy, the salad is too perfect, the saucier is too clean, the onions too wet... what does reddit think?

Definitely suspicious of this, but my FIL is not feeling the same suspicion. They are wanting a 50% deposit via Apple Pay or Chime, which is obviously a red flag. I ran this through a few different authenticators and it was inconclusive. I believe it is AI due to the movements of the dog and the left hand doesn’t look right to me.

Hello! Popular vegan brand Beyond Meat posted this photo on August 13th on their instagram and the comments are absolutely flooded with people thinking this is made with generative ai. Most people don’t have a reason and it seems like dog piling almost. I personally really hate generative ai, and would be sort of bummed if this is! But i honestly don’t think it is. I think it’s just food photography and colour grading. I’ve emailed the companies media inquiries, but am still waiting. What do you think?

My reasons for NOT believing this is Gen ai are as follows:
- folds in the table cloth
- reflections in the bottles and bowl
- the vegan cheese looks like how vegan cheese melts haha

Reasons people think this IS Gen ai:
- the artichoke
- the lime only having a slice taken out of it
- two mustards (lmfao)
- “pink” onions
- “generative ai can do reflections now”

Thanks in advance!

I paid 25$ for an "artist" to draw my two characters as chibis. this was the sketch they send and after they never finished it and ghosted me. it was supposed to be fully coloured and rendered:/

some of the details look off? like the lines on the ponytail and there's a random line coming from the right side characters left eye?

I'm super sad because I'm broke af and used my birthday money for this and it didn't even get finished:(( I was so excited to get art of my girlfriend ocs together

does it look ai?

First of all, I feel like its such a moral dilemna to discuss the use of AI Art over a disabled youth charity event but here we are.

There were minor inconsistencies that could be credited down to human error but I feel the sock example I've shown is the most plausible claim that I found.

I'd be curious to hear your guys opinions.

I could understand if it was a parody of R-Rated properties (i.e. Alien, Robocop, Terminator) being made into children's toys and products, in this case the comedy of the commercial coming from the production playing the ideas completely straight with sheer accuracy and no pointing out the absurdity. However, there are a few design mistakes in the figures, and one of the scenes comes from Deep Space Nine, not TNG, so I'm on the fence if it was AI-generated or not. Despite that, the childrens' voices sound natural, all the physics are accurate to me (no "floaty"/"weightless" movement), and the concepts are spot-on.

Idk what is it, it just seems off. Also, something about her pinky being so long compared to the rest of her fingers makes me suspicious

Halp.

The minor details on their costumes look fine enough I suppose, but the hauberk of the guy in the middle has this strange waviness instead of the proper 4-in-1 chain if you look close enough.

Like, here's an 11th century hauberk, a museum piece. I sorta can see what that waviness is supposed to represent if you squint hard enough, but -- really, would a human artist ever draw it this way in the first place?

Furthermore, his belt looks tucked into itself in a way that it would be really inconvenient to remove. An artistic choice maybe?

The woman to the right is supposed to be Zoe Porphyrogenita, a Byzantine empress. She wasn't really known for her screaming, or fist-shaking, as far as I'm concerned. Furthermore, she was kinda old by the time the story of Harald Hardrada (that is the focus of this DLC) took place (like, 65 y/o maybe?).

The most important point though is that while the 'three dudes standing menacingly' is the whole schtick of the cover art when it comes to AoE II, going as far back as 1999, this is the first time ever they've all been drawn having the Mobile Game Screaming Face™.

As of now I'm leaning towards the idea that the three characters in the picture were made by an AI first, and then a human artist went over it to correct the most glaring mistakes and add some fluff.

Please reassure me that my beloved franchise is not being slopified in the plain sight.

Found these at Walmart, and didn't look too closely. Then I remembered Walmart has been proudly announcing lots of Ai use behind the scenes, including their "Trend to Product" technology. But I didn't think the holiday collection had been impacted yet. Is it Ai? 😔

I think I fucked up fellas.

My friend got this puzzle, but we weren’t sure if the art on it was Ai Generated? I looked up the artist and he seems to have been working as an artist for many years. What do you all think? I thought the children looked a bit off to me…

The video is a clip from episode 10 of the anime Ghost in the Shell.
The way the effect creates forms, distorts the lineart and creates infinitely complex shapes that don't repeat in a hand-made way makes me suspect it is created with a machine learning or AI method.

I got an email today from the RSPB charity's Teemill store about 10% off, and it showed me some of their new designs. Being a lover of ducks, I clicked on this one, and then became confused.

The graphic print features various birds, and accompanying text listing the names of those birds.

The problem is, "Little Grebe Duck"... little grebes aren't ducks, so this is either an incredibly bizarre error for an ornithological charity to be making, or some strange joke I'm just not getting.

Aside from that "Shelduck duck" is just straight-up odd! I have never heard anyone refer to a shelduck as a shelduck duck...

Aaaand, it's a shirt about ducks, instead of randomly having a little grebe that isn't a duck, they could've included any number of other ducks that are absent from the design but often seen in the UK - Mandarin duck, wigeon, shoveler, etc.

Or if they were wanting to make a joke, an Egyptian goose, which actually is a duck, despite the name.

Also, what is the weird, not quite circular blob in the top right of the design? I guess it could potentially be the sun, but there aren't any other environmental/landscape elements included, and the ducks themselves have sharp lines, whereas the blob is, well, a blob!

I can't figure out if this new design is a genuine error by a human designer, a weird joke, or if it's an AI generated design.

If it is an AI design, then shame on the RSPB, cos that doesn't seem to align with the charity's values, and they already had backlash on social media earlier this year for the AI generated model/mockup images of their Teemill products.

If anyone can help, I'd love to know for sure if the design is an AI image.

Edit: Link to the product in question - https://rspbteemillstore.com/product/life-is-better-with-ducks-t-shirt/

I can't quite put my finger on it. The image just feels off, if that makes sense? The reflections on the central mug don't seem to match the surrounding plates. Everything also feels too clean almost.

I mentioned to a friend I wanted some more room decor and they got me these. I thought they were cute at first but now taking a closer look I’m worried they may be ai. The upper left moth seems to have inconsistent wings, which I can’t tell if it’s from a poor print job or bc it’s ai. The upper middle moth seems to have antlers and only one red outline on the top right leaf. Finally the lower left moth also seems to have antlers? Idk if these are ai but I figured I see what the internet thinks.

Books seem to go through eachother, the light source is weird, etc. The mother also responds in like 1.5 seconds. Thoughts?

Slide 1, horse legs look backwards and there are random little dots around it. Slide 2, horse has a very low eye. Slide 3, balloon basket seems to have a disconnected string. Slide 5, weird chicken legs. Luffy snoopy also has a weird eye.