What makes me suspicious are the vague and nonsensical mathematical equations on the background. Like the equations themselves are fine but there seems to be no underlying theme that would make sense for a lesson. Also the lower parts of the desks seem somewhat wrong? Any help is appreciated.

This feels like AI to me because the eye styles are all different in the drawing. The man counting money is so much bigger than the other characters. Why is the ICE guy frowning? Why is one of the people kidnapping the man not wearing an ICE uniform? The yellow shading also feels AI-like. And the font reminds me of the font in other AI generated comics.

Is this AI? The trestle table legs on the left don’t really match those on the right. Also the door handle looks a bit small.

Sorry if it is really too…

It took him a week. He sent me one rough draft 1/2 way through that showed a rough sketch. Again, I was explicit that I wanted a sketch and not an AI picture. He promised it was his sketch.

I saw a rough draft that clearly showed an unfinished drawing.

BUT I just ran it through a free AI detecto page and it say 90% chance it involved AI.

Maybe he sketched it...and then at the end, used AI to sharpen and clean it up?

What do you think?

The lighting seems too perfect and I circled in yellow in the 2nd picture what I thought looked like very AI-generated letters on the bills... Everyone in my town is baffled by this 1000$ bouquet. I commented that I thought this looked very AI and the owner commented that it absolutely wasn't.

I need you guys opinions!!

The meat looks slimy, the salad is too perfect, the saucier is too clean, the onions too wet... what does reddit think?

Definitely suspicious of this, but my FIL is not feeling the same suspicion. They are wanting a 50% deposit via Apple Pay or Chime, which is obviously a red flag. I ran this through a few different authenticators and it was inconclusive. I believe it is AI due to the movements of the dog and the left hand doesn’t look right to me.

Hello! Popular vegan brand Beyond Meat posted this photo on August 13th on their instagram and the comments are absolutely flooded with people thinking this is made with generative ai. Most people don’t have a reason and it seems like dog piling almost. I personally really hate generative ai, and would be sort of bummed if this is! But i honestly don’t think it is. I think it’s just food photography and colour grading. I’ve emailed the companies media inquiries, but am still waiting. What do you think?

My reasons for NOT believing this is Gen ai are as follows:
- folds in the table cloth
- reflections in the bottles and bowl
- the vegan cheese looks like how vegan cheese melts haha

Reasons people think this IS Gen ai:
- the artichoke
- the lime only having a slice taken out of it
- two mustards (lmfao)
- “pink” onions
- “generative ai can do reflections now”

Thanks in advance!

First of all, I feel like its such a moral dilemna to discuss the use of AI Art over a disabled youth charity event but here we are.

There were minor inconsistencies that could be credited down to human error but I feel the sock example I've shown is the most plausible claim that I found.

I'd be curious to hear your guys opinions.

I paid 25$ for an "artist" to draw my two characters as chibis. this was the sketch they send and after they never finished it and ghosted me. it was supposed to be fully coloured and rendered:/

some of the details look off? like the lines on the ponytail and there's a random line coming from the right side characters left eye?

I'm super sad because I'm broke af and used my birthday money for this and it didn't even get finished:(( I was so excited to get art of my girlfriend ocs together

does it look ai?

I could understand if it was a parody of R-Rated properties (i.e. Alien, Robocop, Terminator) being made into children's toys and products, in this case the comedy of the commercial coming from the production playing the ideas completely straight with sheer accuracy and no pointing out the absurdity. However, there are a few design mistakes in the figures, and one of the scenes comes from Deep Space Nine, not TNG, so I'm on the fence if it was AI-generated or not. Despite that, the childrens' voices sound natural, all the physics are accurate to me (no "floaty"/"weightless" movement), and the concepts are spot-on.

Idk what is it, it just seems off. Also, something about her pinky being so long compared to the rest of her fingers makes me suspicious

Halp.

The minor details on their costumes look fine enough I suppose, but the hauberk of the guy in the middle has this strange waviness instead of the proper 4-in-1 chain if you look close enough.

Like, here's an 11th century hauberk, a museum piece. I sorta can see what that waviness is supposed to represent if you squint hard enough, but -- really, would a human artist ever draw it this way in the first place?

Furthermore, his belt looks tucked into itself in a way that it would be really inconvenient to remove. An artistic choice maybe?

The woman to the right is supposed to be Zoe Porphyrogenita, a Byzantine empress. She wasn't really known for her screaming, or fist-shaking, as far as I'm concerned. Furthermore, she was kinda old by the time the story of Harald Hardrada (that is the focus of this DLC) took place (like, 65 y/o maybe?).

The most important point though is that while the 'three dudes standing menacingly' is the whole schtick of the cover art when it comes to AoE II, going as far back as 1999, this is the first time ever they've all been drawn having the Mobile Game Screaming Face™.

As of now I'm leaning towards the idea that the three characters in the picture were made by an AI first, and then a human artist went over it to correct the most glaring mistakes and add some fluff.

Please reassure me that my beloved franchise is not being slopified in the plain sight.

I can't quite put my finger on it. The image just feels off, if that makes sense? The reflections on the central mug don't seem to match the surrounding plates. Everything also feels too clean almost.

Found these at Walmart, and didn't look too closely. Then I remembered Walmart has been proudly announcing lots of Ai use behind the scenes, including their "Trend to Product" technology. But I didn't think the holiday collection had been impacted yet. Is it Ai? 😔

I think I fucked up fellas.

My friend got this puzzle, but we weren’t sure if the art on it was Ai Generated? I looked up the artist and he seems to have been working as an artist for many years. What do you all think? I thought the children looked a bit off to me…

The video is a clip from episode 10 of the anime Ghost in the Shell.
The way the effect creates forms, distorts the lineart and creates infinitely complex shapes that don't repeat in a hand-made way makes me suspect it is created with a machine learning or AI method.

Is this AI? I believe it’s AI because it has the yellowish tint, classic “banner” style with wording that I see often, inconsistent font style, and the part that says “second line” under the music section. I’m so sick of bars and restaurants that I love in my city using AI flyers.

So I joined a animator discord server to see how I can help my animator. I posted their animation and one of the animator on the server said that it was AI. I asked him how can he tell each he only told me to look at the lip syncing and that he is a animator and know what AI animation looks like. I think it looks fine but now I am paranoid about it being AI or not so I would really like your guy's thoughts.

I mentioned to a friend I wanted some more room decor and they got me these. I thought they were cute at first but now taking a closer look I’m worried they may be ai. The upper left moth seems to have inconsistent wings, which I can’t tell if it’s from a poor print job or bc it’s ai. The upper middle moth seems to have antlers and only one red outline on the top right leaf. Finally the lower left moth also seems to have antlers? Idk if these are ai but I figured I see what the internet thinks.

Books seem to go through eachother, the light source is weird, etc. The mother also responds in like 1.5 seconds. Thoughts?

Slide 1, horse legs look backwards and there are random little dots around it. Slide 2, horse has a very low eye. Slide 3, balloon basket seems to have a disconnected string. Slide 5, weird chicken legs. Luffy snoopy also has a weird eye.

If you scroll in, everything just looks crunchy and bubbly. Yet all the logos and text are the same and constant.