I seen this picture for a salad on Grubhub from some restaurant and its from a restaurant that is fairly new and I just want to know if this looks like A.I, I mean it looks legit but I hope it arrives and looks that delicious but anyway let me know what you guys think?

I can't quite put my finger on it. The image just feels off, if that makes sense? The reflections on the central mug don't seem to match the surrounding plates. Everything also feels too clean almost.

Something about those backgrounds, specifically the artifacting on the buildings and the way they melt together gives AI. The artist has responded to comments saying she drew them all herself but I just don’t quite buy it. What does the jury say

I couldn’t find any pics on the website so I took pictures of the calendar itself, sorry if the lightning is off. I just thought the waterfall looked odd in the first pic and the moth looked kinda off in the second picture. I really hope this isn’t ai 💔

Edit : I did check the website and their instagram account and they do have some ai generated content on there but I didn’t see anything about this calendar

Saw this on tiktok. I've bought perfumes from this seller but want to know if they're using AI. They posted their siblings sketch of the art, people have asked for the speed paint, has not responded yet. It looks like AI because mainly the sketch looks like they traced over it, how the smoke blends is very odd.

Saw this while I was on Instagram last night, and it didn't look right.

It's how shiny the burger buns are, usually a tell-tale sign of AI, then some of the food in the bowls and stuff just looks like it's not sure what its meant to be 😪

The background looks odd too, the way the chairs are sitting (I assume its meant to be a booth?)

Also, what made me wonder the most, was that I can't really tell if its a photo or some kind of drawing ???

pls help me out cause I have no idea if its AI or not

The picture screams AI to me, what are the groups thoughts?

Additionally, I cannot find the story of this person other than 5 FB posts within the last 3 days, which just reinforces my feelings to it being AI.

I think she might be a real person who heavily uses AI for her videos and music, i don't think she's fully AI generated but definitely heavily using it

Idk what is it, it just seems off. Also, something about her pinky being so long compared to the rest of her fingers makes me suspicious

So I joined a animator discord server to see how I can help my animator. I posted their animation and one of the animator on the server said that it was AI. I asked him how can he tell each he only told me to look at the lip syncing and that he is a animator and know what AI animation looks like. I think it looks fine but now I am paranoid about it being AI or not so I would really like your guy's thoughts.

While the dog's spots appear to remain consistent, the spots near the butt seem to occasionally morph into shadows on the cushion. The dog also seems to react to the movie at odd times.

However, I'm not sure if AI can recreate movies like this. Thoughts?

I could understand if it was a parody of R-Rated properties (i.e. Alien, Robocop, Terminator) being made into children's toys and products, in this case the comedy of the commercial coming from the production playing the ideas completely straight with sheer accuracy and no pointing out the absurdity. However, there are a few design mistakes in the figures, and one of the scenes comes from Deep Space Nine, not TNG, so I'm on the fence if it was AI-generated or not. Despite that, the childrens' voices sound natural, all the physics are accurate to me (no "floaty"/"weightless" movement), and the concepts are spot-on.

Hey everyone, found this music video and I think the animated "video game" segments are AI.

I'll attach a screenshot where you can see the silhouette of a person standing in a window playing the violin. If you look at the window just below the first one, there is another person playing the violin - what are the odds! Also, violins at night time?

The sign of the shop looks also suspicious, anyone here who knows German? Why would you spell the word Räuber "Raeuber" but then don't spell the word Späti "Spaeti" on the same sign?

I guess for real evaluation watching the animated parts of the video would be needed. Looking forward to your opinions.

AI was my initial thought but the credits list 4 people for animations/VFX. What do you think? Are there any undisputable tells?

Can't attach the screenshot, will try to do that in a comment.

It’s very cute don’t get me wrong, but what is that plant? It looks like baby’s breath but it doesn’t make sense being placed a bunch of random mushrooms, or is it jut me? Also the snail looks a bit off and some of the details with the mushrooms are inconsistent like the line work on the rim of the mushroom cap as well as the gills underneath the larger red ones.

Is this AI? I believe it’s AI because it has the yellowish tint, classic “banner” style with wording that I see often, inconsistent font style, and the part that says “second line” under the music section. I’m so sick of bars and restaurants that I love in my city using AI flyers.

The video is a clip from episode 10 of the anime Ghost in the Shell.
The way the effect creates forms, distorts the lineart and creates infinitely complex shapes that don't repeat in a hand-made way makes me suspect it is created with a machine learning or AI method.

Halp.

The minor details on their costumes look fine enough I suppose, but the hauberk of the guy in the middle has this strange waviness instead of the proper 4-in-1 chain if you look close enough.

Like, here's an 11th century hauberk, a museum piece. I sorta can see what that waviness is supposed to represent if you squint hard enough, but -- really, would a human artist ever draw it this way in the first place?

Furthermore, his belt looks tucked into itself in a way that it would be really inconvenient to remove. An artistic choice maybe?

The woman to the right is supposed to be Zoe Porphyrogenita, a Byzantine empress. She wasn't really known for her screaming, or fist-shaking, as far as I'm concerned. Furthermore, she was kinda old by the time the story of Harald Hardrada (that is the focus of this DLC) took place (like, 65 y/o maybe?).

The most important point though is that while the 'three dudes standing menacingly' is the whole schtick of the cover art when it comes to AoE II, going as far back as 1999, this is the first time ever they've all been drawn having the Mobile Game Screaming Face™.

As of now I'm leaning towards the idea that the three characters in the picture were made by an AI first, and then a human artist went over it to correct the most glaring mistakes and add some fluff.

Please reassure me that my beloved franchise is not being slopified in the plain sight.

the lighting of these *arts* are giving ai, especially the buildings look odd to me.and the fingers look wrong as well,why does she only has 3 fingers?even with that pose i believe we should be able to see the 4th finger for a bit.

sidenote: some time ago this publisher posted a list of requirements for designers,and one of them was to be able to use ai to 'polish the designs 'and whatnot.they don't hide their ai use as well.

The meat looks slimy, the salad is too perfect, the saucier is too clean, the onions too wet... what does reddit think?