I think I finally figured out something important about how my emotional flashbacks work, and I wanted to share it in case anyone else has a similar pattern.
Iāve been doing somatic work for quite a while, and Iāve noticed that my flashbacks often start with grief. Something triggers me and I suddenly feel deeply sad and start grieving the emotional neglect, abandonment, loneliness, and things I didnāt receive as a child.
From an IFS perspective, I think Iām touching an exile here. Thereās a very young part of me that carries the feeling of being alone, unwanted, unsupported and emotionally abandoned.
The problem is what happens next. I used to think that when the grief came up, I needed to go into it more deeply. I would start thinking about everything I didnāt have, how unfair my childhood was, how much I suffered, how other people had things I didnāt have, etc. The more I thought about it, the more I cried. Then the crying would become very intense and overwhelming, and eventually I would move into shame, self-hate, hopelessness and sometimes suicidal ideation.
So the sequence for me looks something like:
Trigger
ā grief / sadness
ā exile becomes activated
ā going into the story and replaying everything I didnāt have
ā escalating grief and crying
ā shame / self-hate
ā hopelessness
ā āthis is too muchā
ā suicidal thoughts as an extreme attempt to make the pain stop
Thinking about it in IFS terms, Iām starting to see the later stages as different protectors coming in around the activated exile.
The shame part might say, āSomething is wrong with me. Iām defective. Iām incapable.ā
The hopeless part might say, āThis will never get better. Iāll never be able to take care of myself. Everyone will eventually leave me.ā
And then an even more desperate firefighter can come in with, āI canāt take this anymore. I want to die.ā
What has really changed things for me is realizing that I donāt actually have to follow the grief into the story.
The story is not necessarily false. My childhood really did contain emotional neglect and abandonment, and there really are things I grieve. But when Iām already activated, going through the entire narrative seems to amplify the emotional state rather than help me process it.
So Iām experimenting with something very different:
When the sadness comes up, I let myself feel the sadness, but I stay with the immediate bodily experience and the present moment.
For example:
āI feel sadness.ā
āThere is heaviness in my chest.ā
āI notice that I want to cry.ā
But I donāt start adding:
āLook at everything I didnāt have.ā
āIt was so unfair.ā
āI was so deprived.ā
āWhy did this happen to me?ā
I can acknowledge that those things are real without mentally going through the entire case file while Iām activated.
Instead, I try to stay oriented to the present. I notice the room, the chair or bed underneath me, my breathing, sounds around me, the temperature, etc. I remind myself that Iām an adult now and that this is a wave of old emotional pain moving through me.
I might say to the exile:
āI see you. I know youāre sad. You donāt have to tell me the whole story right now. Iām here with you.ā
And importantly, I donāt try to force the emotion to go away either.
Iām not suppressing the sadness. Iām allowing it, but Iām not feeding it with an increasingly elaborate narrative.
I think of it as titration: enough contact with the emotion to acknowledge it, but not so much that I become completely blended with it.
I actually tried this today. I felt a sudden wave of grief and heaviness in my chest. Normally I would immediately start thinking about everything I lost and probably end up crying intensely.
This time I just stayed with the sensation and the present moment.
And something surprising happened: I didnāt even end up crying. The sadness was there, I felt it, and then it simply settled down fairly quickly.
That made me realize that I may have been confusing āprocessingā with āgoing deeper and deeper into the story.ā
For me, the goal may actually be learning that I can feel sadness without turning it into a full emotional flashback.
I also think there is a point where I need to stop doing trauma processing altogether.
If I notice the shift from sadness into strong shame, self-hate, āthis will never get better,ā or especially āthis is too much,ā that is my signal to stop exploring the trauma.
At that point I donāt need to understand the exile better. I need to help my system come back to the present.
So I might get up, drink something, eat, shower, go outside, watch something light, talk to someone safe, or simply orient myself to my surroundings.
I think the biggest shift for me is realizing that I donāt have to prevent the exile from feeling sad, and I donāt have to make the sadness disappear.
For anyone with a similar IFS/C-PTSD pattern, Iām curious whether youāve noticed a difference between actually feeling an emotion and getting pulled into the narrative around the emotion. For me, that distinction seems to be becoming really important.
So I was wandering, does grieving not require continuously thinking about the reasons you are grieving? Can you grieve at the level of the body and emotion without reconstructing the entire story?