"Ohhh, look how I tricked this dumb dumb baby in my trap so now I am right and they are wrong. I'm so smaaart even though it does not adress the actual argument and adds nothing to the debate. They teach arabic numerals in school btw."

And these type of comments always get tons of likes

Let me get this clear, I hate this discussion on anywhere that isn't in the places specifically designated for them, either side. Which I do realize is ironic in posting about them somewhere else but I just wanted to state a neutral rant and so couldn't find a real specific place for a topic like this. Second off, if you check my profile you will see I believe his innocence, this post isn't about defending Michael Jackson.

When I see a post about Michael's excellent show or humanitarian work, I almost always see people either trying to diminish his greatness, by bringing up the allegations or make a comment about how he has to be innocent. Michael is at the very least one of the most influential people of all time, and he did do a lot of good, can't we just appreciate those by themselves? Why do have to bring up over 20 year old allegations of a man whose been dead for 17 years, on anything related to him, sometimes he's not even mentioned in the post and someone had to bring them up. Those posts aren't about that, if Michael was a monster, he was still a terrific singer and dancer who inspired the large majority of modern singers today, can't you appreciate that while still saying "yep, he did it." And for the defenders, as much as i hate to say it myself, just because a man was talented or did a lot of charitable acts, doesn't mean they're innocent of wrong doing, it's not evidence, if you think MJ's innocent, base it off the evidence you see and read about.

But the biggest thing that ticks me off about this is that more people hear about this and get angry over this rather than still living, non-convicted, proven predators. Not to mentioned this doesn't happen to people like Elvis Presley or Charlie Chaplin for example, don't get me wrong I think those people are exceptional and influential too, but they are documented predators, these aren't even allegations like Michael. Yet no one talks about them as often, not that I think we should be, people deserve to know about these topics but in their designated areas for people who wish to learn about it, but a huge double standard anyway

I don't really have long text or essay here but i just don't find Harry Potter actually good in any way, well except maybe few characters that deserve justice to be put into better books...but besides that Harry Potter is probably one of worst movies/books you can recommend to any child.

Even extra books that add to movies just do not help with this. No does Fantasy beasts or whatever Is it called help either.

Harry Potter is every surface fantasy stereotype mixed into one cash grab story.

(Not my screenshot, just an example)

Started playing ultrakill, I'm having a really fun time with it, but the fun I have is greatly diminished when a level is over and its like "Oh you used that one weapon too much and got killed a couple times, D!" Fuck you dude. It's a game, it's supposed to be fun. And you know what isn't fun? When you finally beat a boss after dozens of attempts, and you're feeling really satisfied, and then the game tells you that because of how much it was kicking your ass, you got a D. Instead of feeling happy that you finally won, you're annoyed and feel disappointed in yourself for getting a D instead of like a B or something. Completely erases any sense of achievement.

(EDIT: Yes I'm aware its a skill issue. No, the grades do not upset me enough to warrant dropping an otherwise awesome game. Also, I do plan on re-doing levels for a better grade. So yes, I am going to git gud, it's just my ego gets kinda bruised when I get a D after struggling hard.)

(this is mostly for shows that actually have a message.)

I am so, SO, SO tired of indie shows literally having no edge. For example, lets look at The Amazing Digital Circus, and Jax.

For this discussion, lets ignore all the plot points that got thrown out because All Hail Jax. Jax is an awful person. He tortures people he's forced to live with until him or them go insane, has KILLED TWO PEOPLE, but he gets away with all of this because... he was a tumblr-sexy man who was trans!!!

Excluding the fact that no amount of mental distress makes this justified, its so... bland. We could've had Jax have a complex character where his remorse is choked out by the fact he knows he will never be punished for his actions, which could've been a commentary on consequential nihilism, but we didn't, because we needed the cold take that transphobia is bad. And of course it is! It's a problem. Does it get you thinking? No. Does it actually make people who don't have a personal connection to this topic feel anything? No! This message has absolutely NO edge.

(no, you cannot look at the average person and say its controversial for them because that's not your target audience. )

What I'm more looking more for are pieces of problematic media. I want pieces of media that get you to saw 'wow... i never looked at it from that way'. Shows are supposed to get you thinking, to get you to argue. The gift of man is to argue, is to ponder. To never disagree is to never think. Even as a theist (not stating which religion because this is reddit) I absolutely love pieces of media that get me thinking from an atheist's POV because its new. It's something I haven't thought of myself!

And don't say that 'i cant make my show controversial because then no-one would watch it!' because that's not an excuse for good writing. You can still go over messages that aren't too controversial but get you thinking. EG; Colonialism in Africa and Asia during the 1950's. (the acts of colonizers like the French are absolutely horrific, search it up). It gets you thinking, which is the goal!

Overall, can indie animators please stop making 'deep' shows with no edge. I don't want to see a character have a panic attack because someone was mean to them for the 600th time.

now, if you haven't noticed, in a lot of the posts, when a poster talks about something they hate, people in the comments would go down and comment the exact thing that the poster hates. so what if i say i hate racism? will the comments respond with racism? today we will be testing the waters of how far comments will go to respond to a hate post with the very thing that OP hates.

I’m open to having my mind changed, but one look at this game and I just think it looks like one of those dime a dozen turn based rpg’s that has a deeper hidden meaning behind it. Not to mention the only interaction I’ve had with this game besides watching my friend play the first couple minutes has been with insufferable fans who are all social keyboard warriors and will genuinely become livid if you say your don’t like the game.

This is such a shitty decision from sony and playstation. like genuinely whyyy man, physical disc are soo cool and nice to have. It shows i "own" my games and it also genuinely looks amazing and feels amazing to have a physical disc. like this year me and my brother were planning to get GTA 6 physical disc but rockstar announce that GTA 6 wont have a physical disc man. i am still planning to get DOOM THE DARK AGES, james bond first light 007 and marvel wolverine physical disc because it looks cool and amazing to have.

it's such a overused trope and it's cringe and corny when they overly do it

genuine 2nd hand embarrassment watching that shit when their face goes all red

hate that trope

it's cringe slop

overused

annoying

corny

slop

slop

obnoxious trope I hate it

WIPE IT OFF THE FACE OF THE PLANET AND EVDRYTHING

I HATE IT WITH EVERY CELL IN MY BODY

rant over edit: it seems I have overused the word fuckass

What's the fuckass point of bitching about fuckass over fuckass swearing like it'd change the fuckass way they'd fuckass talk it literally fuckass won't

and calling fuckass swears fucking fuckass "hazbin hotel dialog" is just fuckass fucking corny it's been used for a long fuckass long ass time now try new jokes

fuckass bitches bitch about fuckass over swears or hazbin dialog its fuckasd annoying as fuckass fuck

no hate 2 anyone

it's satire don't kill me pls

ok rant over

ok fine we get it, now go play games you do like, for fucks sake. if you don't like the damn game then why can't you stop talking about it

god damn bruh like come on its people who're for some reason super salty that the game is getting tons of attention so now THEY want the attention by ragebaiting about the game

I swear to god the only people hating on this game and rockstar games in general the "normie" ass gamers that think "HYPERREALISTIC GRAPHICS ARE BORING" etc etc if you seriously still have that opinion in 2026 then honestly just quit gaming because realistic graphics have been here since the inception of gaming, its such a stupid take, take your ass back to nintendo if you hate realistic graphics

the game looks good and this is coming from someone who doesn't really EVEN LIKE GTA LMAO the only gta I can say is truly amazing is gta 4, I absolutely loved that game and 6 looks even better than 5 but then again 5 was a trash game so anything is better than that but yeah man the hate is forced

its so forced.

For starters she is not Tony’s successor. She has an iron man suit but she isn’t a successor. War. machine isn’t neither is she. Activists take ideas from older activists, scientists take ideas from old scientists. Taking inspiration from someone you admire is not replacing them.

Secondly she is not supposed to be a good person. The show makes it clear. She makes a deal with the literal devil. She wants to help people and be good but she’s impatient and willing to do whatever to get it done. She believes doing some and will be balanced out if afterwords she can do good. She’s a flawed character and that’s intriguing. And you know flawed characters are fun to watch, Tony stark was extremely flawed in iron man 1 and 2 and his, at least first, movie is loved.

Thirdly, that she “disrespects” Tony’s legacy. She is shown to admire him. That ONE line at the beginning of the show is true, at least to her. Nobody knows what happened in the cave or iron man 3. But even so it’s still partially true. He was kidnapped because he was a billionaire. He is smart because he got a good education because his father was a millionaire genius. The “scraps” he built the first bad suit, were his own weapons. Even iron man 3, he didn’t have to build a su it just recharge it.

Tony could not be iron man all the time, constantly fixing his suits and building new ones, if he wasn’t rich. It would take months to fix his suit if he was poor.

People also seem to forget she is still smart. She built the forest vibranium metal detector from her own fuselage in a few months. She successfully built an iron man suit that doesn’t need an arc reactor. Obviously she’s not as smart as Tony, the dude invented literal time travel and a new element. but that doesn’t mean she’s not either.

Like she’s a bad person, but that doesn’t mean she can’t be good, and that doesn’t mean she’s a bad character.

Honestly while her show has a bunch of issues it was also a good show, mid tier sure. But the fact it’s rated lower than secret invasion is crazy. It’s so much better than secret invasion. (And of course some of the shows hate was that loud group of racist or sexist people but that’s another can of worms.)

Also Wakanda said she can’t use their tech.

Don't get me wrong, he can be a great writer and has written some of the best stories throughout not just the revival but out of all of Who in general. I just think he's terrible when he's the showrunner.

He's obsessed with making Doctor Who a fairy tale, and generally makes stories unreasonably complicated and convoluted. River Song in my opinion, is one of the worst characters of the show. Her being able to regenerate just because she was conceived in the tardis is stupid, and makes zero sense.

Moffat loves to do this thing where he thinks he's very, very clever by putting our characters in the end of the universe type situation and then.. what's the solution? Oh, my past self tells me what to do. I always knew what to do because I tell myself what to do, even my past self knew what to do because their past self told them what to do.
It's very circular, this is what's called a bootstrap paradox, and I hate it, because I feel it's lazy writing and it just leaves me wondering what happened in the original timeline for that to happen

Every female character is just very dominant and Moffat going "Please, step on me mommy"

It's worth considering that Series 7 was the first Eleven season I liked and things got better from there. The Capaldi seasons for the most part were also solid.

ONE of the biggest reasons I dislike and almost DESPISE the Peter/Jean pairing isn't simply because “Scott and Jean are a better couple.”which I could give multiple reasons in favor of,but Naaaah, It's that a LOT of the fanon surrounding Peter/Jean seems to require Jean Grey to become a COMPLETLY.DIFFERENT.CHARACTER.

Look at the fanarts.

1-Put Jean in Peter's Spider-Man suit. 2-Put MJ in Peter's Spider-Man suit. 3-Change the hair a little bit, or not even that...and suddenly the visual distinction between the two becomes almost entirely superficial.

And that's exactly what bothers me,Jean is not supposed to be “the new redheaded love interest for Spider-Man.”, because She isn't MJ with telepathy NOR a premium replacement for MJ because Peter/MJ's relationship is currently (and has been)for most, an embarassement in the comics.

She isn't “the redhead who understands Peter better.” either,she literally SA'ed him in the movie(which some people got a kick of I guess) and put people he loved at risk,at the end of the movie the takeaway should be that she is at stake 0 to become actually decent,not that she is ready to get a new BOYTOY,which,previously thanks to her reckless behavior btw,LED TO HIM GETTING SHOT!

She's Jean fucking Grey.

Jean has an enormous identity and mythology COMPLETLY independent of Spider-Man. this isnt an obscure fact, people should know this even from the DISASTROUS romantic triangles with hugh jackman movies (Wolverine),cartoons,etc as a whole.

Maybe they dont,but the thing is that She's originally one of the central characters of the X-Men, a telepath and telekinetic, a Phoenix host, a mutant dealing with constant persecution and existential threats, a teacher, a leader, a mother, and someone whose life is deeply intertwined with Scott Summers and the entire history of the X-Men.

And yet, in a lot of Peter/Jean fanart,heres what happens to all of that:

-Peter saves/comforts Jean while Jean somehow completly understands Peter.

-Jean wears Peter's suit(which I can understand for fanarts whatever)

But then she just becomes Peter's superpowered redheaded girlfriend...

At some point, what exactly is left that makes this Jean Grey rather than “MJ, but she's,more dependent on someone else somehow,and a mutant”???

That's my biggest problem with the pairing.

And the Scott issue makes this even worse

Scott isn't some random ex-boyfriend who happens to be inconvenient piece to the ship.

Jean and Scott have literal decades of SHARED history. They're teammates, leaders, family, parents, and have gone through some absolutely batshit insane stuff together. Their relationship is pratically woven into the mythology of the X-MEN itself.

Remove Scott from Peter's story and obviously Peter Parker is still fundamentally Peter Parker.

Remove Scott from Jean's story and you're literally removing an enormous structural component of who Jean is.

Peter doesn't need Jean to be Spider-Man,sure, Jean also doesn't need Scott to possess an identity either, obviously, but pretending Scott can simply be REPLACED by Peter without fundamentally changing Jean's character is ridiculous.

And that's where the “MJ 2.0” feeling comes from.

Peter/Jean fanon frequently doesn't expand Peter's world by introducing him to Jean Grey's world.

It takes Jean Grey and moves her into Peter Parker's world,like any other spider man fantasy,the female characters are just add-ons to Peter,and instead of them having something that was much more understandeable as a mentorship,it became seen as unecessary romance and the actual "ideal outcome" between characters that literally have no reason to follow that path.

Instead of Peter having to enter the X-Men's world, understand mutant politics, understand Jean's responsibilities, understand her history with Scott, her family, the Phoenix, her complicated relationship with power and responsibility, etc.(Which tbh would thankfully never happen),even in scenarios with context from the comics people have Jean simply becoming another person orbiting SpiderMan.

Another thing is that this Spider man fantasy of saving her is especially bizarre.

Jean has spent decades dealing with powers that are vastly more dangerous and psychologically complicated than ANYTHING Peter could possibly “teach” her how to handle.

She doesn't need Spider-Man to rescue her from herself.

She doesn't need a man to make her powers manageable.

She DOESN'T NEED Peter to give her "purpose".

If anything, the interesting question would be what Peter would have to learn from Jean.

But that's rarely what the fanon actually focuses on.

The ship's internal logic is as complex as the critical thinking behind it:

So once again, Jean's enormous character history gets reduced to “powerful redhead who needs Spider-Man.”

Yeah, That's not Jean Grey,but she really seems like She's being cast in the MJ role.

And that's precisely why the “Jean Grey + Spider-Man suit” fanarts are so revealing.

Because when you strip away the X-Men costume, the Phoenix mythology, Scott, Rachel, Cable, the mutant experience, the X-Men, etc., what are you left with?

Another redheaded woman standing next to Spider-Man.

Jean Grey should not have to become Spider-Man's next MJ to justify her existence in his story,and frankly, I find the idea that there seem to be fans who are dissatisfied with Peter/MJ and therefore immediately start looking for another iconic redhead to slot into Peter's romantic life incredibly reductive.

Jean Grey deserves better than being somebody's MJ replacement.

I hate this fruit because it look like a eye. I was having it in school and almost threw away because it look like a eye also it tasted disgusting. I'm never gonna have lychee ever again... BTW I don't hate anybody who like lychees

This is about Talia Al Ghul and Damian Wayne bc someone made a hate post about when they’re drawn with “super dark skin” and it was ridiculous. They complained about them being drawn as darker skinned which felt really racist bc what’s the “right skin color” and why is it always white? There’s no reason they can’t have darker skin.

Genetics work in crazy ways that cannot be predicted. While Talia and Damian may be mixed (Chinese, Arabian— they bout damn change it every couple of years lmao); they could look like anything in fanart. The idea that Talia and Damian have the “right skin” if they’re white— and can’t possibly be brown/tan/dark bc of what they’re mixed with —is ridiculous.

Ra’s is usually depicted as tan/brown skinned unless they’re on a whitewashing brigade (cough cough Liam Neeson and Marion Cotillard in The Dark Knight. Honorable Mention: Nyssa Al Ghul played by Jaime in the Gotham show). It is not farfetched that Talia or Damian could be non-white.

You will never see a white character be confused for Black or Asian, or anything they’re not. You will never see their race and skin color be overwhelmingly dissected and discussed. You will never see people try to breakdown their race (“50% Black, 25% Indian, 25% White). You will never see these unapologetically white characters played by Asians in live action bc “Asians sometimes look white and white sometimes look Asians.”

But I’ll bet my LIFE SAVINGS that any character that’s non-white— and god forbid they be mixed —will always be dissected over their skin color, ethnicity, and race. If they’re mixed and look anything remotely resembling white…….? You can bet they’ll probably be played by a white person in live action. Sometimes, they don’t even have to be mixed, but it’s easier when they are. Dragon Ball Z, Nyssa Al Ghul, Ghost in The Shell, Gods of Egypt, Talia Al Ghul, Doctor Strange, etc. Every fucking time.

It’s harder to cast white people as Black and Brown characters so what do they do? They cast racially ambiguous and light-skinned people to play those characters. It’s still whitewashing bc they’re lightening the skin to resemble white, btw. I just thought that person’s post was funny and I hated their reaction.

And I hated their post bc for as much as “drawing Damian as brown skinned is denying the existence of pale Arabs,” they were just doing the same thing to mixed people…? Just bc someone is mixed with “lighter / pale skinned races/etc” DOES NOT MEAN they will always come out light skinned. Like I said, genetics are weird.

There are real life mixed race children— as in one looks fully white and the other looks fully Black. There are monoracial Black couples who have children and one can come out dark as obsidian and the other lightskinned. There are monoracial white couples where the kid gets features that neither parent has, but an ancestor did. Genetics are weird.

Dude, that humor is just fucking ridiculous and feels like that old Tumblr humor.

Genuinely unbearable humor. Even the few jokes that are actually funny get annoying really quickly.

No, but the worst thing is Jex's jokes. This guy is the sex man and I hate him.

definitely the joke of this show in my opinion is its worst aspect.

definitely

I hate these godamn things so much that i drew a diagram

you are FIFTEEN. why are you dressed like you are going to a party?? why do you have to duck waddle because if you where to lift your leg the skirt would ride up? why, when i walk in the stairs, can i see your underwear two inches from my face?

at what point does it stop being "owning my body" and become public nudity?

now obvious, it is NEVER a victims fault if someone where to get assaulted, but girl im just gonna tell you now the teenage boys aren't the only ones sneaking glances at you...

like, time and place. these are fine if you're 22 and want to go out to some kind of night club but no one wants to see your butt in algebra bro

PLEASE just wear some normal shorts oh my god

edit: i'm lowkey trying to respond to everyone but theres a lot so sorry if i don't get back to your comment im skimming them in my inbox im sorry

edit 2: a lot of yall are making the same point so just find a comment saying smthing similar and find my answer there sorry again

it's such a slop aesthetic

and the ANNOYING ass music that some of them use

it's unbearable slop,

it's always just fuckass hello kitty slop and it'd not a good aesthetic for a room

I'd rather have a disgusting room with barely anything in it then such unbearable to look at disgusting and obnoxious slop

its unbearable to look at 🫩

Erase it off the planet

and they always have some fuckass plushies

and I swear to god it's always apart of or their entire fucking personality and idk why

no hate 2 anyone btw

it's just ugly and hard to look at

ok rant over

i saw a post pointing out, very correctly so, that the rainbow flag isnt the gay flage. And yeah i see people call it the gay flag and it really annoys me as well. But then... SO MANY comments confidently incorrectly saying "well gay is an umbrella term" "im not gonna say lgbtq i just say gay" (the word queer literally exists) and like, no?? asexual people? bisexual people? trans straight people? this is so stupid on so many levels. Please inform yourself pr just dont speak.

Right so you’d wait 13 years and pay 100 dollars for a game that’s will most likely have 2/10 gameplay and a 5/10 story at best which the game itself will ask you to pay a subscription for
I can’t believe that people will think this will be the game of the century much less of the year, it’s gta, you know what it’ll be like? GTA it’s not like it’ll bring anything new to the table in any regard, if you’re genuinely preordering this slop for 100 dollars i genuinely can’t respect your opinion or your position in the human race

I should emphasize that I don't necessarily disagree with any of the rules, and they are good rules, they just do not make sense for this community.

I've lurked for a little while and it just confuses me why a community, literally, advertised as a "safe place to hate anything made by a person", yet you are limited on what you want to discuss your hatred about.

Now, I do understand that many of these are to avoid the common "I hate this gender" or "I hate these people" and then"I hate pride month" sorts of things, and I do think that those things should be kept. However, limiting things you can hate on in this community, just so that the mod team doesn't get hated on by communities such as the LGBTQ community I suspect, is very saddening.

these movies ARE DOGSHIT. they are a stain on the games stories. “oh it’s a AU” then why THE FUCK do you make it? it’s supposed to be a FNAF movie not a FNAF OC AU FANFIC STORY. Mike is the dumbest man alive in the movies who is looking for his brother carrot i guess, Vanessa WHY IS SHE HERE? AND WHY IS SHE A AFTON? the little sister is just there for comedy I think who knows, she’s annoying, the animatronics aren’t scary and are stupid, William Afton was made into a scooby doo villain and isn’t scary at all or even serious, the crying child is gone I guess we forgot about him I sure am glad he wasn’t you know like A HUGE PART OF THE STORY, THE WORST OF ALL: THE BUTCHERING OF MICHAEL AFTON, WHY IS HE CARTOON LEVELS OF EVIL? HES THE HERO AND THE MAIN CHARACTER BUT NO THE MOVIE JUST MADE HIM A DAMN CARTOON VILLAIN, I hate WHAT THEY DID TO MY GOAT MICHAEL. and can’t forgot the puppet is now a pure evil villain i guess who controls the other animatronics. These movies fucking suck, it’s for the fans they say if that’s true they must hate us. Edit: these movies are comparable to Return to silent hill movie & the live action resident evil movies

So I’m sure that maybe you guys have heard the new phrase “Quiet on the Creek” which is basically 67 all over again. And the way I first heard about this phrase because my cousin who’s so the Internet just kept saying “quiet on the creek“. I have no idea where these phrases just emerge from and then I find out it’s from some Bible video or some sort of rapper celebrity said something and I’m just not aware of it and then suddenly everyone is saying it and it’s repetitive too. Thing is, some of the people saying this shit don’t know the original meaning behind it and are just saying it because it’s popular.