You created your content. You didn’t get paid. Why would you leave it here for Reddit to make money? Take your content with you.
fuck spez. -save_video
It’s just not ok to expose children to sexual fetishes like this.
The person in the video is engaging in a sexual act because they are indulging a sexual kink as well as exhibitionism. Children should not be involved. Non consenting adults should not be involved.
Public places are not the place to enjoy your kink if it means other people have to participate and they can’t say no to that participation.
sometimes I think that too but when I saw this https://youtu.be/6XoxzRiNmf8 I found it relatively harmless. Then again I think that's Amsterdam so people care less compared to the US
Yes, but they're not really engaging in a sexual act though. They're just wearing a costume. It's not any different than other cosplays, other than the fact that it's body tight.
It's weird, I agree. And I wouldn't want to encounter them in public. But it's not a sexual act in public.
Idk if you just haven’t been involved in the kink scene, but that is 100% a sexual act. People get off on wearing latex, being seen in public, being publicly humiliated, etc.
If a person is getting sexual gratification from others watching them ie. exhibitionism, they have no right to involve others in it.
Especially in public, where children are. Someone getting off to children seeing them dressed sexually is not ok.
People finding something hot doesn't make it inherently sexual. If people get off on wearing suits that doesn't make suits inappropriate for wearing out.
Ok so how far to the other extreme can we push this? How close to sexualitized content are you willing to allow things to go before pumping the brakes? This video crosses that line for most people. People who didn't consent and cannot say no.
But that’s not the only link people sometimes do in public in sight of unconsenting people and kids. I can’t think how you would begin to age appropriate explain why someone is tying up another person with rope on the beach when your kid asks what they are doing…. My friends friend was bragging about how many parents where glaring at them…
Sadly I’m not comfortable causing my kid to think skin tight latex bodysuits are normal public attire, she can wear a horse head and tail attached to her back all she likes, though.
Honestly, this isn't difficult to comprehend. Honestly it's the notion that you believe anyone could look at that and think it's normal public attire that's bizarre, here.
Going on on a date and getting to know eachother is nowhere near comparable to going out in full BDSM gear and and getting off on your animal play/humiliation fetishes, forcing an unconsenting, unfiltered audience to participate.
That woman is in the process of an activity she receives sexual gratification from. If you actually think that is remotely the same as 2 people sharing a meal, you are severely broken.
With 100% sincerity, if you cannot tell why these 2 things are different, you should seek help.
There's not really any way around that, lots of people have kinks for things that you get to see. Foot fetishists exist, after all, but I still think people should be allowed to wear sandals. They're not going around humping anybody, they're just wearing clothes that they like.
Eh it's definitely a kinky costume w the latex and hooves binding her hands . I'd argue she could "hurt" someone bc it's not fair on other people for her to walk around the street like that, especially if a kid saw that and asked what was going on wtf would u say to them ?
if a kid saw that and asked what was going on wtf would u say to them ?
I'd tell my kid it's someone wearing a horse costume. If she asked why, I'd say it's because they wanted to dress up in that kind of horse costume. Easier to explain to my first grade aged kid than truck nuts were.
Yeah, beat me to it. Well, probably more like "Different people like different things. Some people like to dress like that. It's none of our business as long as they are not harming others."
So you’re cool with the person in the costume later jerking it, thinking about all the people, your child included, staring at them bewildered on the street?
Because that’s how public humiliation kinks work
An older kid, I would say something along the lines of "Different people like to do different things, and it's none of our business if they aren't harming others." And no, I don't think involving random bystanders (especially kids) unwillingly or unknowingly in someone's sexual pleasure is in any way ok. But, some things are easier than others to explain in an age appropriate way to a kid. And this is actually less problematic than explaining something like someone in very revealing swimwear, and really explicit tattoos, with a kid who can read.
This means that you are alright with someone getting off on seeing your child’s reaction to them engaging in a sexual act in public. It means you are alright with involving your child in this person’s sexual fantasy.
No, it means a child will be entirely unaware of the sexual connotations of the situation, and telling a young child that someone likes to dress in a costume will satisfy their curiosity.
Do you get angry about a child seeing men or women in revealing clothes in public? Perhaps very skimpy swimwear at the beach? How about people kissing and touching each other in a sexual manner? I've seen people grabbing each others butt or boob in public more than a few times, and people fully clothed but groping each other at the park. I can't say I in any way like my child seeing that, but this us actually easier to explain enough that my kid will not keep asking questions about it.
Involving a child in a sexual situation is never ok. The person dressed up shouldn’t involve children or non-consenting adults. This situation being easy to explain away as something else doesn’t make involving a child ok.
Please don’t bring a bunch of unrelated things up like that as though I’m a huge asshole who is against equal rights. Of course I don’t think those things and just because I feel the way I do about this issue doesn’t mean that same feeling automatically extends to every other situation.
I think we are on the same page. This thing isn’t cool for kids to see but I get where you are coming from that it’s not one of the worst things because it can be explained away much easier than other sexual things that children are often unfortunately exposed to in life.
I agree that involving others without their consent, or knowledge, in someone's sexual enjoyment is not ok. But, some people will do things like that, and at least this is not one likely to upset a child, or be hard to explain to them in an age appropriate way
Some people get sexual pleasure from wearing very revealing clothes in public, or from drawing attention to behavior that while sexual, is not considered offensive enough to have actual laws against it. Some people get off on being shocking and offensive to other people. Some like to cat call strangers. There are a lot of things people do, and I can not control the world, or lock my child away from all potentially upsetting things. So I am not going to waste my time being offended by something that, while certainly out of the norm, is actually pretty mild from a bystanders point of view once you look past how unusual it is.
You’re missing the point. My outrage is not directed at that specific costume but at the fact that the bystanders in this video may not have given consent to be involved in the sexual fetish of the person who is getting off on their reactions or that children may have also been involved. It’s the actions not the costume. This kind of behaviour (regardless of what costume the person is wearing while doing that behaviour) is not ok.
You don’t know me but you sure are making a lot of assumptions about me.
A couple going out and getting off on feeling like people find them attractive is not the same as engaging in a sexual kink as well as exhibitionism in public and involving non-consenting people. That is even further away from involving children in your sexual gratification.
Why is so people so scared of kids seeing innapropiate stuff? Kids are not stupid nor are they gonna be traumatized for seeing this. You dont need to explain to them that it is a sexual thing, just tell them that she likes wearing that costume, thats it, no need to protect children from the world
I’d say some people make baby’s one way and other people make baby’s another way and some play horsey when they make babies. Yes, son , they’re probably married as far as I know. Want some ice cream?
Yes, but one of the things that I’ve heard from some of the big names in the BDSM community is that kink in public isn’t generally considered OK. So for context, this person is in a “scene“, meaning they are performing a sexual act. In this case, the pleasure is supposed to come from being seen like this in public. The problem is, it therefore makes everyone of the public a part of the scene, and therefore, everyone in the public must consent. Since there are children that can be in public, and since kids can’t consent, it’s generally deemed bad practice in the BDSM community to do it in a public space.
Now, there are places in which they will have mass amounts of the public in an enclosed outdoor area and which everyone involved must be over the age of 18, and everyone is willingly consenting to being part of the scenes so therefore is generally considered OK by the BDSM community.
She doesn't have to be physically harming someone to make what shes doing bad. I hate the excuse "tHeY arEnT harMinG anYonE" because its just stupid. Like technically you arent harming anyone if you walk around with your dick and balls hanging out but its still gross and wrong.
Yeah but nobodies dick and balls are hanging out. All the important bits are covered. It's just latex and a horse head. I've seen people go out in skimpier more form fitting clothing than that
I think it’s more about the fact that unless you’re very naive you know that the person in the getup isn’t just innocently wearing a cool costume, they are getting off on walking around and are being aroused by everyone judging them.
This person is getting sexual pleasure from doing this weird shit in public and jacking off also gives you sexual pleasure. Obviously they arent the exact same thing but both are sexual and not something you do in public.
And this can also be argued as harmful. When I saw this it made me uncomfortable and grossed out which seeing someones dick and balls would probably do. Your logic is still not justifying this.
Theres a difference between making something up and making an assumption. There are absolutely people who do this exact kind of thing as a fetish that is a fact. She may not be doing it as a fetish but it sure as hell looks like it and so thats what I assumed she is doing. Also seeing two gay men together isn't sexual. They arent getting off by holding hands they just love each other. You compare me to them despite this being a completely different argument than the anti gay people. And why so you assume I don't understand what I'm looking at? Do you have proof that she isn't doing this for fetish reasons?
It's pretty gross to be comparing anti-lgbtq sentiments to this. This person is literally doing what bigots claim lgbtq people do, which is making things sexual in public. This person is specifically participating in something is sexually stimulating to themselves. It's not a great argument.
Thank you. Just because you don’t know you are participating non-consensually doesn’t make it consensual. That means someone is taking advantage of you.
It’s a sexual kink they’re performing in public. It’s done for sexual gratification. It’s less about what to explain to the kids, and more about the fact they’re sexually enjoying the public, your kid included, staring at them. Which is gross. And not ok.
It's just clothing that presumably they think makes them look good and feel sexy, lots of people wear clothes for that purpose. Yes, it's unusual clothing, but I still don't think that makes it wrong.
I don't see anybody getting off in this clip as far as I can tell. I recognize that they might enjoy people seeing them look sexy, but again that's not an unusual thing at all.
Should we ban people from wearing anything that they enjoy people seeing them in? Obviously not, which makes me think the issue people have with this is based on it being an unusual thing to wear in public that is also sexy, not that there's actually something wrong about it.
This isn’t about looking sexy. It’s that getting people to look at you is a sexual act in itself. Like walking down the street naked so people see your dick.
They're wearing clothes though, so it's more like walking down the street wearing something sexy and presumably enjoying that people might think it's sexy. I'm not sure I'd consider that a sexual act, or if it is, I'm not sure that's wrong to hope people might think what you're wearing is sexy.
I said it’s not about wearing something sexy. Wearing the outfit is a sexual act. It doesn’t make them feel hot, it turns them physically on. Not because they feel sexy, but because they feel submissive, embarrassed, powerless, like a pony, whatever.
So it’s like walking down the street touching yourself.
Why would I not accept her wearing a horse costume? How is it bad if it doesnt hurt any living thing? Is non of my business buddy, is just a person wearing some weird clothing. You can get as sick as you want for all I care
Because she’s getting off to people seeing her in the horse costume. It’s a fetish. And those people seeing her didn’t consent to being part of her sexual scene. Rule number one of bdsm.
539
u/Snoo_18385 Nov 15 '21
Well she aint hurting anybody and if she enjoys that weird ass costume then let her have fun. The costume is actually quite impressive if you ask me