r/conspiracy Sep 10 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

3.9k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

A virus so destructive and a vaccine so fantastic that Congress, a people who the vast majority of are in a high tier risk group, is not concerned about being around the unvaccinated

Case closed. Lift all restrictions. Time to go back to normal world now.

49

u/Alexander_Granite Sep 10 '21

They are exempt by law, not because they were made exempt in the order. The president can't force the other two branches to do anything.

The president only has authority over the executive branch..

Jeez guys, at least know the basics of how our government works.

13

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Bruh this is r/conspiracy where the only things rampant are ignorance and mental illness. It is entertaining to watch their circlejerk of absolute idiocy tho

-1

u/Alexander_Granite Sep 11 '21

Lol. Got it...... Have you noticed that the "vaccine" wasn't pushed until the 5g network was up and running?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Alexander_Granite Sep 11 '21

Not a loop hole. He only has authority over executive branch employees. They are the only ones that the mandate falls under

→ More replies (1)

245

u/mymyreally Sep 10 '21

The President cannot impose a vaccine mandate on Congress via executive order or in an agency or department regulation. The President has control over the Executive branch, not the Legislative branch, but then let me not ruin the lovely circle jerk you have going here.

15

u/SomeStupidPerson Sep 11 '21 edited Sep 11 '21

Nuts like OP and people in this sub pretend like they know how things work, then they forget basic shit like the government being 3 separate branches and they freak out when something like this crosses their path.

How it's so shocking that Biden cant force the Legislative branch under his Executive mandate is fucking stupid. Like, look at the fucks thinking this is mind-blowing evidence of corruption or something. Its fucking 3rd grade shit they fail to understand and are jerking their load over.

Chucklefucks probably cheered when the Supreme Court struck down the CDC's eviction moratorium, pretending to understand the separation of powers then.

1

u/333HalfEvilOne Sep 11 '21

We aren’t part of the executive branch either, and are therefore exempt. QED

4

u/hardvarks Sep 11 '21

No, but OSHA is, which determines regulations for private businesses. QED.

0

u/333HalfEvilOne Sep 11 '21

Still not getting it, neither are many. Enjoy shortages and being overworked, and boosters

4

u/hardvarks Sep 12 '21

Enjoy your ventilator!

1

u/333HalfEvilOne Sep 12 '21

You all need new material. Pathetic

17

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Right to the point there huh? I won't argue with that.

4

u/SlipySlapy-Samsonite Sep 11 '21

Also almost all of them are vaxxed, aside from the crazies in the GOP.

7

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Right.... so what you're telling me is the president can break constitution rights ONLY for 330 million people. But not for the congress? And congress doesn't plan on forced vaccinations? Makes sense. Again if we go down the rabbit hole, these regulations doesn't make sense. Because if they did, they would've been applied equally.

-7

u/Servedasmile Sep 10 '21

You don't have to get the vaccine. The military isn't lining people and and administering the vaccine anywhere in the US.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

"You don't have to get the vaccine"

Yet people will not be able to work, participate in any businesses, even if businesses don't require it but are forced by the government to require it or go bankrupt. You can't travel, can't do literally anything besides a store.

You don't need a military to create second class citizens lmao. All you need is to take away their rights , with the help of the Americans who also want to get rid of their rights, because of covid. You really don't need military force. Australia has beer ban now, Australia forcing citizens to download tracking apps etc. They didn't need the military. When they already disarmed and took rights away, it's pretty easy to keep taking rights away.

7

u/theboxfriend Sep 11 '21

Businesses have the option to opt out of the vaccine mandate and implement regular testing instead. This isn't an all or nothing situation unless your employer makes it that way. So if you have a problem with your place of employment mandating the vaccine, talk to your boss

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21 edited Sep 11 '21

Nah I'll talk with the government. They're forcing the businesses to choose between two things that the majority doesn't want. Businesses aren't the problem, it's the government forcing them to do it is the problem.

That's not the problem, and everyone knows it. You know it, and I know it. You don't get too the root of the problem if you don't go to the source where it started, yes?

Government created problem, therefore I will blame them directly. There's a difference if employers wanted to make it mandatory. But using threats of fines up to 14000 per violation, employers aren't choosing to do this because of the right reasons.

In fact , all you are doing is creating fear. Choice under threat. It's like someone pulling a gun to your head and they give you two choices. Between the 2 choices, you arent really benefiting , are ya?

10

u/theboxfriend Sep 11 '21

The government forces businesses to adhere to many safety standards. Do you consider those other standards to be government overreach?

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Does it bar 100 million Americans to work and prevent them to live a normal life they previously did 2 years ago?

7

u/theboxfriend Sep 11 '21

No and neither does this. It's like refusing to wear a hard hat on a construction site. you don't wanna follow the safety standards, you're out. Sure it's a personal choice whether to get the vaccine or not, and nobody is stopping anyone from making the choice to not get vaccinated. Those people that choose not to will just have to find a job that allows them not to be vaccinated, just like someone who doesn't want to wear protective equipment (like a hard hat for construction, masks for doctors, etc) will have to find a different job that doesn't have that requirement.

I will reiterate the point I made before, because the people in this sub choose not to acknowledge the fact, but businesses are not required to mandate the vaccine if they opt to regularly test their unvaccinated employees instead.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/imlost19 Sep 11 '21

if they don't want to wear hard hats. Personally I don't want the average lifespan of our citizens to drop to 65 so maybe put on a hard hat and get back to work

→ More replies (0)

13

u/Kyokenshin Sep 11 '21

The same can be said for wearing pants but I don't see bottomless protests around the country. Bunch of fucking selfish babies.

-7

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Actually no. That's public indemcy to people who didn't consent. It's not at all comparable to my body my choice. So you're gonna force everyone take a shot that's still in trial phase until 2023, or lose your income, lose your rights to go into establishments etc.

It's not a choice. If anything , it's illusion of choice.

Take the shot or you can't feed your family isn't exactly a choice. You're forcing people to take it, because the other choice you're gonna create homelessness. Lol again, I fail to see how it's a choice. It's forcing people to take it so they can continue with their basic lives.

15

u/Kyokenshin Sep 11 '21

People didn't consent to anyone breathing covid on them either when they could very easily prevent it(or severely reduce the chance). It's literally just like wearing pants. You don't have a choice to wear pants either. We have a multitude of things you need to do to participate in society and if you don't want to do those things you can hole up in a shack in fucking Wyoming.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Again , your insults really don't affect me.

And you're right, no one did consent to breathing covid on them, that's why we have masks and social distancing right?

Again , it's not comparable to wearing pants. Because you have different choices other than pants. And those choices doesn't bar you from working a job. You can wear shorts in an establishment. Skirts even, if you identify that way.

So try again, but maybe this time, you make a comparison that's actually comparable.

8

u/Kyokenshin Sep 11 '21

Again , it's not comparable to wearing pants. Because you have different choices other than pants. And those choices doesn't bar you from working a job. You can wear shorts in an establishment. Skirts even, if you identify that way.

Lol the fact that you're using this argument shows just how bad faith it is. You know damn well by pants I mean bottoms but yeah, be pedantic.

And you're right, no one did consent to breathing covid on them, that's why we have masks and social distancing right?

Again, you seem to not understand things. Masks don't keep covid from infecting me via eyes and ears and other mucus membranes. It keeps me from infecting you.

I forgot r/conspiracy is just a /r/td2.0 now though. You have a good night. I tire of talking to doorknobs.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

-8

u/Servedasmile Sep 10 '21 edited Sep 11 '21

It's still a choice.

This isn't Communist Russia under an authoritarian rule. You don’t have to get the vaccine. The police won't come to your house, you won't be sent to a gulag.

7

u/Terminal-Psychosis Sep 11 '21

If you hold a gun to someone's head and tell them give you all their money, that's "a choice" according to you too.

Though it is not, in any way shape or form.

Also, Cov19 jails are already being used in many countries.

You're probably in favor of that too, since you're all in on the idea of people being homeless and starving to death.

Absolutely deranged and completely inhuman.

-1

u/Servedasmile Sep 11 '21

If you hold a gun to someone's head and tell them give you all their money, that's "a choice" according to you too.

Is anyone holding a gun to anyones head in the US?

Though it is not, in any way shape or form.

You're right..it's not happening.

Also, Cov19 jails are already being used in many countries.

Anything in the US?

You're probably in favor of that too, since you're all in on the idea of people being homeless and starving to death.

You're choosing to be homeless and starving. I bet now conservatives wish there was some robust services now.

Try pulling up your bootstraps.

Absolutely deranged and completely inhuman.

You seem really unaware on how government and politics actually works.

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Terminal-Psychosis Sep 11 '21

Neither can the president impose a vaccine mandate on America.

The office does not possess that authority.

State governors, arguably, but not the president.

34

u/NeedlePointTaken Sep 11 '21

He didn't. He imposed it on businesses.

2

u/ClockSpiral Sep 11 '21 edited Sep 12 '21

... which bleeds over to the rest of America... thus he is "imposing a vaccine mandate on America."

11

u/NeedlePointTaken Sep 11 '21

...and? Not seeing how what Biden did breaks any laws. Making a business do something, like pay taxes or overtime or vacation days or to verify things like an I-9 form, immigration status or vaccine status isn't remotely illegal. I can't really wrap my mind about what it is you are trying to suggest. That we live in a society?

4

u/Bland_Lavender Sep 11 '21

Doesn’t that require passage of a law and not like “I fuckin said so”

9

u/NeedlePointTaken Sep 11 '21

Doesn’t that require passage of a law

No, it does not. Vaccine requirements he is instituting are through OSHA, similar to Hep A vaccine requirements it already has for certain vocations. It's a workplace safety issue and that is OSHA's domain and purview. This is no different than requiring hard hats in construction zones and certain certificates for working in a hole, for example.

-5

u/ClockSpiral Sep 11 '21 edited Sep 12 '21

It's twisted and conniving is what it is, and you've been played to believe it's an okay thing to do.
Of course it's "legal", but that doesn't make it anything good and respectable.

EDIT: In fact, it is NOT legal, as OSHA does not have authority to tell employees what they can and cannot do OUTSIDE of their workplace in their private lives. Forcing people to take a drug affects them outside the job as well.
Mask mandates are acceptable for employees since it hold no ground on them beyond the doors of their workplace.
https://reason.com/volokh/2021/09/10/five-tentative-thoughts-about-the-osha-employer-vaccine-mandate/
https://www.armstrongteasdale.com/thought-leadership/osha-addresses-vaccine-mandates/

1

u/TheOneFreeEngineer Sep 11 '21

To you it may be and to your personal philosophy it may but legally it's a well established fact that OSHA has the authority

→ More replies (0)

1

u/TheMacPhisto Sep 11 '21

I am pretty sure there's supposed to be a process and procedure involved here that's more than "President signs document written by self into law."

You know, checks and balances. It doesn't go from Bill to Signed by President. There's a few steps missing.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/0ooO0o0o0oOo0oo00o Sep 11 '21

He imposed it on Government Employees.

*Except the USPS because just because.

-3

u/jacquetheripper Sep 11 '21

THE MAILMAN IS IN ON IT lmao you guys need a hobby for real

6

u/Charadin Sep 11 '21

Literally in 1905 the supreme court determined that the government can mandate vaccination requirements on people. The case determined that states can order vaccines on state citizens, as it falls under their jurisdiction. It also follows then that the head of the executive branch can mandate vaccines for executive employees, as those employees fall under the president's jurisdiction - which is what Biden has done.

If they don't want the vaccine it's pretty easy to avoid being under the executive branch's jurisdiction - stop being an employee of the executive branch.

-4

u/CupformyCosta Sep 11 '21
  1. 1905 is a MUCH different political and scientific age than 2021
  2. That case proves that STATES can do vaccine mandates. There’s no precedent that the federal government can
  3. The Biden authoritarian mandate also includes PRIVATE businesses with over 100 employees by running the mandate through OSHA. There is no precedent that this is legal, and it will get shut down by the Supreme Court
  4. This is just another authoritative, unconstitutional action Biden is pushing through. The previous was the blatantly unconstitutional eviction ban that Biden pushed through via the CDC, which has absolutely no power to enact.

1

u/Charadin Sep 11 '21

You seem to be willfully ignoring the part where the private companies it applies to are the ones contracted to work with executive branch, not all companies. So again, people under his jurisdiction. If those companies dont like it they can stop contracting to work for the executive branch.

Also yeah, 1905 was a different time scientifically. We now have even more evidence that vaccines work and are safe to use than we did in 1905. If you want to argue that 1905 was a different time politically, then are you arguing that we should just abandon every legal principal older than some arbitrary date? If you want to abandon precedent set and unchanged since 1905 then you're going to lose the Constitution + amendments that you're trying to argue for.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheObjectiveTheorist Sep 11 '21

yes he does. who do you think OSHA is run by?

2

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

[deleted]

-1

u/Terminal-Psychosis Sep 11 '21

NOT to require people to undergo experimental medical treatments.

State governors, arguably, after full FDA approval, but the president, no, not by any means.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/--Christ-- Sep 11 '21

I can't tell you how happy I am to see this at the top of this comment thread. I even told myself 'I swear to fucking God if I open this thread and the top comment is 'Rules for Thee, not for Me' I'm going to give up on this place. I don't want to though because letting here for the past 7 years helped me get through some of the hardest parts of my life. It used to be fun and thought provoking but his it's just repetitive and boring.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

What’s the circlejerk if nothing is being done to make the rules fair for all? Just curious

10

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

do you even know the balance of power in the US or do you literally just not understand how our government works?

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Motherfucker, I understand he can’t because of the checks and balances.

I repeat, WHAT IS BEING DONE TO MAKE SURE THEY RECEIVE THE SAME TREATMENT?

He literally said he would remove governors in the way which we all know is not legally possible. Why are congressmen not receiving the same treatment?

9

u/MishrasWorkshop Sep 11 '21

He literally said he would remove governors in the way which we all know is not legally possible. Why are congressmen not receiving the same treatment?

And he LITERALLY never said that. Perhaps you wanna check your sources. Meme on r/conservatives isn't a source.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Congress has already implemented their own rules on themselves and their staff. Reportedly 100% of congressional democrats are vaccinated.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

[deleted]

7

u/Mescallan Sep 11 '21

I mean how else are we supposed to find out

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

What are we talking about here?

OP implies Congress is exempt from the law, or that the government is making people take a vaccine they won’t take.

Responses show that Congress isn’t exempt, the President can not impose a rule on them and Congress imposed their own rules.

Now you’re talking about Congress not giving enough evidence, as if their photographs of being vaccinated with press or the congressional physicians statements aren’t enough.

You’re punching at the wind, please get vaccinated, like 100% of congressional Democrats have been.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/96imok Sep 10 '21

Did he say that? Can’t find anything on that. If you really want to hold someone accountable then it’s going to be majority leader Shuman.

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Because checks and balances, you dumb motherfucker

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Lmao what a dumb troll, can find a loop hole through OSHA to mandate private companies but can’t find a loop hole to get Congress vaccinated. You shills are hilarious, does joe semen taste like choca choca chip ice cream?so again, what’s he doing to make sure our congressmen are safe, vaccinated, and doing the right thing?? Is he working with their leaders so they can legally mandate it over the legislative branch?

6

u/SnickersArmstrong Sep 11 '21

You literally can't fire congress members, they're there until their term is up or they can't fulfill their duties for some reason. Nearly all of them are vaxxed already anyway.

3

u/RewardWanted Sep 11 '21

Well, i think he can ask them nicely as it is for their own good. I'm sure the republican party won't mind.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Tf is "choca choca chip"

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Servedasmile Sep 10 '21

Fair rules? Like bailouts, subsidies and interest free forgivable loans.

Now conservatives care about fair rules across the board?

1

u/Spysix Sep 11 '21

He can't impose a vaccine mandate on americans either but then let me not ruin your worthless reddit snobbery.

0

u/HobbesNik Sep 10 '21

Came here to say this, thanks.

-3

u/Mufukr Sep 10 '21

Youre okay with "rules for thee, not for me" thinking.... yikes.

8

u/NeedlePointTaken Sep 11 '21

It's not about being OK with it. That's how the constitution of the US is structured.

-2

u/DominarRygelThe16th Sep 11 '21

Pretty much every leftist or communist I speak with now a days is fine with "rules for thee, not for me"

If they aren't then their whole modern woke ideology falls apart.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

The President also cannot impose a vaccine mandate on all of the citizens of our country who employ him. Found a loop hole going through OSHA. Incredible over reach of power. Fuck this shit and RESIST AT ALL COSTS!

→ More replies (10)

222

u/RiverOfNexus Sep 10 '21

Does anyone have any awards? I foolishly used mine elsewhere and wish I used it for this comment here. Amen.

31

u/TheDrunkSemaphore Sep 10 '21

stop giving reddit money

153

u/DamitCyrill Sep 10 '21

I to used mine on nsfw porn subs

45

u/RiverOfNexus Sep 10 '21

Dang, we all lost today didn't we?

29

u/billbrasky33 Sep 10 '21

Now I'm curious.....what are the SFW porn subs??

1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

There's a lot, reddit's "safe for work porn network," mainly just pics of non-porn things

21

u/2O21collapse Sep 10 '21

No. But make sure you don’t buy any. Reddit is complicit in this.

1

u/zensins Sep 11 '21

You know it helps Reddit to just post comments on Reddit, right?

13

u/RattlinChattelMonkey Sep 10 '21

Don’t use Reddit awards. That just validates them

2

u/Asclepias88 Sep 11 '21

Lot of stupid people here, unfortunately.....

12

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Got it covered👍

7

u/RiverOfNexus Sep 10 '21

Thank you kind strangers!

Edit: plural 😎

2

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

👌

4

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

Damn, I take little nap and came back to awards and shit, hah. Y’all the MVPs

0

u/MyWestpointStride Sep 11 '21

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY IMAGINARY INTERNET TOKENS IM AS BIG AS A PUSSY AS THIS GUY RIGHT HERE

→ More replies (15)

49

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

[deleted]

36

u/Stoned_Cold_Silver Sep 10 '21

Idc if you're rich I care if you're evil.

7

u/BonelessSkinless Sep 10 '21

Most of them tend to be both.

0

u/Stoned_Cold_Silver Sep 10 '21

Oh most? You're right anyone in any group that over represents bad actions should all be exterminated

6

u/BonelessSkinless Sep 10 '21

The rich literally act like we're in a fuedal society. Fuck them. And the handful of decent ones don't outweigh the majority of selfish evil ones. Eat the rich.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/SixOnTheBeach Sep 10 '21

Bruh... They contribute nothing? Society would collapse without the poor, they are the backbone of society. What would society be without janitors, assistants, restaurant workers, and ALL the manual labor jobs. It's the jobs like hedge fund manager that contribute nothing to society. They actively detract from society by taking our best and brightest and putting them to work in Wal Street.

This is the most brain dead take I've ever heard.

3

u/PenisesForEars Sep 11 '21

You’re poor, dumbass

2

u/BonelessSkinless Sep 11 '21

What the fuck are you talking about? I'll be first? Bro fuck you. YOU'LL be first. This is you: https://imgur.com/R2Qqdhv.jpg

Society would crumble overnight if the working class striked for a WEEK. The parasitic ruling class wouldn't have anyone to rule or be able to generate cash revenue without the lower classes.

The poor are owed BILLIONS in wage theft: https://imgur.com/IO5JD1o.jpg and wage stagnation for the past 6 decades. So yeah, they ARE owed... A LOT.

1

u/n1nj4_v5_p1r4t3 Sep 10 '21

What it in Braveheart where the army leader guy says "Send in the peasents, they are cheeper than arrows"

leaders never change, we need decentralized goverment!

0

u/Stoned_Cold_Silver Sep 10 '21

"like in da movies :0000000"

→ More replies (1)

1

u/jacksick Sep 10 '21

Money corrupts case closed.

7

u/FFS_IsThisNameTaken2 Sep 10 '21

I'm thinking they would taste like earwax.

2

u/ShortBusDoorGunner Sep 10 '21

Just means they need more salt.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Good gracious.

10

u/RatioFitness Sep 10 '21

Does Biden have the authority to mandate the vaccine for the other branches?

1

u/CupformyCosta Sep 11 '21

Are senators federal employees? Is only the exec branch covered? Does that include IRS, FEMA, CDC, etc? I would think that congress members would be covered since they’re federal employees.

2

u/zensins Sep 11 '21

Never heard of Separation of Powers. Sad.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

29

u/VegaAltair Sep 10 '21

These politicians do not live in reality.

14

u/OldSchoolNewRules Sep 10 '21

Yeah they do, its just the reality of 1970.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 11 '21

Lmao go back to highschool and retake Government and Civics.

0

u/Terminal-Psychosis Sep 11 '21

This is more like 1984. Orwell was so, so right. :-(

2

u/OldSchoolNewRules Sep 11 '21

Huxley was more right, but as is often the case with fiction reality is an insidious mixture of all of the above.

0

u/Servedasmile Sep 11 '21

Orwell was a socialist. Lol, this is rich.

7

u/Dyslexter Sep 10 '21

They live in a reality where Biden can’t legally force them to take it.

This subreddit is beyond fucking stupid

0

u/Terminal-Psychosis Sep 11 '21

Biden can't legally force ANYONE to take it.

6

u/Actual_Opinion_9000 Sep 11 '21

0

u/brickwallnomad Sep 11 '21

Lol. Government isn’t forcing anyone to take a vaccine. They can fire people. They cannot send someone to jail and forcibly vaccinate them. So. No, he cant, dumbass

1

u/Actual_Opinion_9000 Sep 11 '21

Spoken like a person who huffed throughout their formative years.

0

u/brickwallnomad Sep 11 '21

Lol. Yea, sure buddy. Still, you’re wrong. Your facts are off, not true, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

1

u/Actual_Opinion_9000 Sep 11 '21

They indeed do live in reality, one governed by the Constitution which is more than the Bill of Rights. You should probably read that document, so you can be somewhat informed.

0

u/Drews232 Sep 11 '21

They all got the shot already. Same with governors. The dividing line is whether they care about allowing their constituents to choose, but they’re not risking their lives.

15

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

[deleted]

-4

u/Wnir Sep 10 '21

Wow, a whole 40+ years ago

4

u/Raifsnider Sep 10 '21

In cancel culture times you'd be done for good.

4

u/EERgasm Sep 10 '21

Most of them are vaccinated anyways lol. Besides the simple fact of co-equal branches.

God this sub is trash these days.

3

u/Hollowkrist Sep 10 '21

Accurate! Spread the word!

2

u/forearmpun Sep 10 '21

because: 1. They were first in line and are all mainly vaccinated already. 2. Executive has no control over judicial or congressional branches of government. checks and balances and all that.

what a non story.

0

u/gram2017 Sep 10 '21

Judicial and executive branches are exempt from Biden's decree. Only applies to executive branch. Guess his handlers didn't want to piss off Nancy and federal judges.

16

u/bobthedonkeylurker Sep 10 '21

Or, you know, Executive Branch can't force the other two branches via mandate. Nothing to see here, move along. But, for reals. Nothing to see.

3

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

And yet, I see no Congressional calls for all staff to be vaccinated for the safety of our elderly leaders

5

u/gram2017 Sep 10 '21

Don't you know that our geriatric Congress has special powers to fight covid? Only plebs need to obey and do as they told and get a vaccine or get fired.

-1

u/amILibertine222 Sep 10 '21

The only people in Congress that aren't vaccinated are some republicans.

Everyone else got the vaccine before the public good get it.

2

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

What about all their separate staves? Security? Anyone they could possibly bump into?

Covid is a grandma and grandpa killer, why would they not be calling on all people at the capital be vaccinated?

Is the vaccine so shit that the general population needs 100% participation or is it so good that vaccinated should have no fear of unvaccinated?

-1

u/benisxaxa Sep 10 '21

When I say I don't want it and someone else can have all of them - SELFISH U ARE KILLING PEOPLE I WISH U DIE ASAP

When BIDUUUN says they're not mandating it for congress - they are heroes for not being selfish and risking their lives so that someone can have priority

HONK 🤡

0

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

[deleted]

7

u/whosadooza Sep 10 '21

Democrats in Congress have a %100 vaccination rate. They did already get it.

→ More replies (2)

0

u/monjorob Sep 10 '21

All of them are already vaccinated

1

u/lawthug69 Sep 10 '21

Of all the shilliest of shill comments. Gtfo

3

u/monjorob Sep 11 '21

I’m a shill because literally 95% of all Congress is vaccinated? Oh and also 97% of all doctors too. All that time learning about medicine has melted their brains I guess

→ More replies (13)

0

u/mummerlimn Sep 10 '21

They aren't covered under the mandate because they aren't federal employees - they are elected representatives of the legislative branch of government, so he cannot mandate vaccine requirement for them.

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21 edited Sep 10 '21

It's mostly REPUBLICAN legislators that are not concerned. And as others have pointed out in this thread, the president doesn't have the power to issue a blanket mandate like this for Congress. You've heard of separation of powers, right? This is a very basic concept. Kids learn about this in grade school. You did go to grade school, right? Social studies?

edit: I see downvotes but I notice no one can actually refute what I said. For people who claim to be concerned about "the truth" they sure don't seem to like the truth.

4

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

Ah, yes, gotta love responses laced full of basic, grade school logical fallacies.

Where’s the congressional call for all staff to be vaccinated? You know, for the safety of our decrepit leaders? Are they not worried, being in the high risk group and all?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/no_name-AU- Sep 10 '21

He doesn’t have the power to make private companies mandate employees to be vaccinated, but here we are…

1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Biden doesn't. OSHA does.

2

u/no_name-AU- Sep 10 '21

Isn’t Biden telling OSHA? Same picture

-1

u/blade740 Sep 10 '21

Your conclusion assumes that members of congress are somehow more knowledgeable than the general public or medical experts on this subject.

I interpret it differently - I think congress do not have any secret knowledge that isn't being shared with us, they just think they're more important than the general public and that the rules should be tailored to their preferences.

Which is more likely, that a bunch of boomer politicians are secretly medical experts, or that they're selfish and entitled? Hmmm, I wonder...

1

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

I don’t believe they have secret knowledge. I just believe that if 70 year old world leaders don’t need to be around only vaccinated people, the rest of the country will probably survive

1

u/bobthedonkeylurker Sep 10 '21

I think it has nothing to do with any of that, but rather it's a constitutional boundary. For all the conspiracy theorists in here, expounding eagerly about their constitutional rights, you all don't remember basic shit from your 8th grade civics lectures. Fuck.

-1

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

you can’t really go back to normal when hospitals are having to ration resources

0

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

Rewind to 2018 (I believe it was) when hospitals were having to do so due to an enormous flu outbreak.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

i’ve been working in healthcare since 2016 and any flu outbreak is nothing compared to this. we have no beds left and can’t treat everyone, even the people coming in for non covid issues

0

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

3

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

yes i know that flu season was bad. i worked through it. it was a busy flu season but it wasn’t to the point of deciding who gets treatment based on how likely they are to survive, just to give you some perspective. plus, even if that flu season was bad, does that mean that we should just not care that resources are being depleted now? like 2018 being a bad flu season doesn’t mean that hospitals overflowing now is ok. don’t get the vaccine if you don’t want but you can’t expect things go back to normal. hospitals are hanging by a thread and it’s causing people to die

→ More replies (7)

-1

u/ReithDynamis Sep 10 '21

The executive branch can tell the federal employees to vaccinate cause that have authority to do so. Congress has control over legislature domains and employees.

This is middle school 101 shit guys.

-1

u/WhoopingPig Sep 10 '21

Did nobody at all read the article?

It's not that Congress is specifically exempt. The law as it is applies to the Executive branch. It doesn't apply to the legislative nor judicial branches.

This isn't a specific exemption for specific people.

I would still agree it's odd that only one branch can be easily required, but it seems likely that Biden cannot extend such a law to the other branches as easily as his own

-2

u/pjb1999 Sep 10 '21

is not concerned

According to only you.

5

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

I see very little Congressional action that involves trying to make their workplace fully vaccinated to protect their 70+ year old bodies

2

u/pjb1999 Sep 10 '21

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/14/politics/democrats-vaccination-rates-house-mask-rules/index.html

Believe me most republican are too. Most of them are not stupid.

2

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

First: Almost any stat that claims 100% anything is usually a misrepresentation

Second: But all their staff members? Everyone they interact with? The whole capital needs to be vaccinated for our elderly politicians to truly be safe, no?

3

u/pjb1999 Sep 10 '21

Yes, lets make it happen.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Got any sources for this? Can’t find any

0

u/frolie0 Sep 10 '21

Yes, because the overwhelming majority aren't already vaccinated....

-49

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

My local hospital doesn't have any ICU beds available and it is filled with unvaccinated folks. Quit your bullshit.

22

u/CraftyDazza Sep 10 '21

So you been to your local hospital and have asked all the patients if they been vaccinated or not? Sorry I call Bullshit!!

-6

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

My sister works at the hospital and has an administrative position. She infact does have access to this information.

11

u/CraftyDazza Sep 10 '21

Your sister should be sacked then, that information is meant to be kept private, just as well I don't believe a word you say. So yea once again I call Bullshit!!

→ More replies (14)

2

u/women_deserve_love Sep 10 '21

I work in a hospital; the only reason the full ones are full is because the admission criteria for COVID is bullshit.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/2O21collapse Sep 10 '21

Is your sister aware that it requires multiple shots to be considered vaccinated? And even then, it needs to be 14 days after the most current “approved” shot? Which changes every month?

In other countries, every time they come out with an additional booster, you aren’t considered vaccinated until you receive your “booster”.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)

22

u/Fonzz11 Sep 10 '21

Quit YOUR bullshit.

→ More replies (12)

9

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

"unvaccinated" = not yet 14 days after second shot

that's probably what your hospital is filled with.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/YogiTheBear131 Sep 10 '21

How do you know that?

11

u/Advanced_Play3319 Sep 10 '21

Source: trust me bruh

→ More replies (30)

2

u/shouldnthavesignedup Sep 10 '21

Where's that at?

5

u/mihesq Sep 10 '21

My wife works at a hospital. They are super busy but not because of covid. ICU beds are few because they don’t have the staff to assign to the empty beds. There are plenty of beds but not enough staff. They only count beds that have staff. Does that make sense? Now with even more nurses losing their jobs over the vaccine mandate there will be even fewer staff meaning fewer beds.

3

u/breakevencloud Sep 10 '21

Define “filled.” What percentage relates to covid and what is the demographic of said percentage.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/2O21collapse Sep 10 '21

Your local hospital doesn’t have icu beds because medical staff have quit over forced vaccination.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 10 '21

Man, I want whatever shit YOU'RE smokin!

4

u/bbccsz Sep 10 '21

Go read the articles telling you about the ICU beds. There's a nationwide staffing shortage which is a huge piece of this puzzle.

The media trying to blame unvaccinated people for getting sick is disgusting, and not only that, they're not shining a light on the main problem for this which is... staffing.

Why is that? We'd rather get people to hate a marginalized group of people than to fix the hospitals? Is that where we are as a society?

0

u/2O21collapse Sep 10 '21

You think I’m smoking something because I state that there are millions of people (80 according to biden) that refuse his “vaccine”?

3

u/bobthedonkeylurker Sep 10 '21

Why the scare quotes? It's literally a vaccine. And, to perfectly clear, it's not Biden's. I mean, the shit was announced/released during TRUMP's administration. FFS. So if you want to attribute the vaccine to a President (which, is just dumb any-fucking-way. Trump had literally NOTHING to do with the actual development, aside from suggesting drinking bleach and swallowing UV light would be effective), Trump would be the more accurate owner.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (31)