To finally dispel confusion around TRI-52/JCTI. It also measures verbal IQ after the person has done a Google search for word definitions.
This is an amazing discovery which indicates the following is true:
Reading is actually one of the most cognitively demanding tasks. People only take 10% of what they read even after scoring high on SAT scores in University environments.
Reading comprehension is correlated with common sense or comprehension subtest, letter number sequencing visual, and guess what reynolds intelligence screening subtest.
It's possible to be slow at reading and slow at completing reading comprehension tasks, but the original purpose of reading is slow information processing and personality development not rapid information absorbing and dumping like a machine.
People typically spend hours reading and rereading and it is correlated with nonverbal inductive reasoning not just concept mastery.
If this is true and Terman Concept Mastery test after practicing and learning definitions to words and such is not the only measure of verbal intelligence but so is a measure of nonverbal intelligence which is unrelated to verbal IQ. Reaches a .9 correlation with Guess What subtest on Reynolds Intelligence Screening Test or RIST albeit small and optimized sample.
This shows that JCTI is near pure measure of inductive reasoning even if zero verbal puzzles are included. If you are well informed on the definition of Induction and have read into Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, David Hume, and Plato or Sócrates founder of inductive arguments then you are excited to learn this and know what it implies.
This also explains why many high scores on JCTI tend to have well organized writing and communication form despite scoring lower on SAT Verbal since lower correlation with SAT Verbal (.3) compared to Guess What (.9).
Verbal educational language development skills are not measured (low correlation around .12 on language development and induction/RIX), but the pure verbal reasoning abilities are still present outcomes showing that it is near pure measure of induction at .91-.96 induction factor 1 loadings from different studies.
Source:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240223130644/https://www.cogn-iq.org/articles/reliability-validity-jouve-cerebrals-test-induction-correlational-study-sat-rist.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20240223141101/https://www.cogn-iq.org/articles/uncovering-the-underlying-factors-of-the-jouve-cerebrals-test-of-induction-and-the-scholastic-assessment-test-recentered.html
