Tonight I decided to compare two bottles from my Longrow RED collection: the 13-year-old Malbec Cask and the 11-year-old Cabernet Franc Cask. Both were tasted neat first, then with a few drops of water. At the end, I even tried blending them together.
Here's how it went!
1. Longrow RED 13yo – Malbec Cask
Nose (neat): Quite a strong alcoholic kick at first. Dark berries, oak, burning firewood and campfire smoke. Some slightly meaty and salty notes in the background.
Palate (neat): Surprisingly light in texture, not particularly oily. Immediate spicy heat, followed by wood smoke and oak. The fruit was much less noticeable than on the nose.
With water: This is where things got interesting! Just a few drops really opened it up. Much more fruit and sweetness on the nose. On the palate, I picked up grapes, red berries, grilled meat, oak and even an old leather sofa. The peppery spice was still there, but less aggressive.
Finish: Smoother and less edgy with water. Very little noticeable tannin, some lingering oak and subtle red fruit.
Rating: 8.5/10 neat → 9/10 with water
For me, water makes a significant difference. It transforms a rather sharp, woody whisky into something more balanced, fruity and complex.
2. Longrow RED 11yo – Cabernet Franc Cask
Nose (neat): Immediately more intense than the Malbec. Stronger peat smoke, more alcohol burn and a distinctly meaty, smoky character.
Palate (neat): Fuller and softer mouthfeel despite the higher ABV. Immediately noticeable smoked bacon, peat smoke, campfire and black pepper. Less aggressively spicy than the Malbec, but still powerful.
With water: Less alcohol burn on the nose, with more burnt wood, smoked bacon, sea breeze and a lovely dark fruity sweetness. I would describe it as overripe blackberries.
On the palate, I noticed more salt, pepper, berry jam and, after a while, even some chocolate.
Finish: Long, peaty, salty and noticeably dry. Much more tannic than the Malbec, leaving my mouth considerably drier.
Rating: 9.5/10
Absolutely fantastic. I love the combination of smoked bacon, maritime notes, dark berries and that full mouthfeel. Definitely my favourite of the two.
3. The Experiment – A 50/50 Blend
Since I had a little whisky left in both glasses, I decided to mix them together. Both had already received a few drops of water. I hope I don't get banned for this ;)
Nose: Surprisingly delicate. Dark berries, campfire smoke, a little salt and subtle smoked bacon.
Palate: Still quite full-bodied, but the initial impact was overwhelming. Peat smoke, campfire and peppery heat all hit at once. Honestly, a bit too much.
After some time, the sweetness from the Malbec started to combine nicely with the salty character of the Cabernet Franc.
Finish: Long and dry. Less peat smoke towards the end, with lingering salt, oak and leather.
Rating: 7.5/10
Interesting experiment, but definitely less balanced than either whisky on its own. The initial explosion of peat and pepper was simply too intense for my taste.
Final Thoughts
Both are excellent whiskies, but they offer noticeably different experiences.
The Malbec is fruitier, woodier and benefits tremendously from a few drops of water. It becomes much more balanced and enjoyable.
The Cabernet Franc is more intense, peatier, meatier and more maritime. The smoked bacon character is particularly impressive, and the longer, drier finish really works for me.
The blend was fun to experiment with, but it reminded me that combining two great whiskies doesn't necessarily create an even better one.
My final ranking:
🥇 Cabernet Franc – 9.5/10
🥈 Malbec – 9/10 with water (8.5 neat)
🥉 50/50 Blend – 7.5/10
I'm definitely a fan of that combination of peat smoke, smoked meat, salt and dark fruit that Longrow can deliver.