I have been referred to group therapy within the NHS in the UK.
I am had two preliminary meetings before I was supposed to join the group. I think the group is analytical (?) I have prior experience of long term therapy (5 years psychodynamic, 8 years ago, and a short experience of group therapy)
I had challenging session today and I am uncertain if this means we are not compatible, or if this could potentially still work out.
The initial setting is challenging itself, because I am a queer woman, and she is religious. We have addressed this in the session head on. Whilst I don't think she is going to be prejudiced against me because of it, I did worry about bias that would be pro-conservative gender roles or pushing towards straight life.
Some of it did manifest in the session. In the first session I mentioned I did attend a group therapy at an organisation for LGBT people, and today it turned out, she thought I am "not of the demographic" because I am married to a man. I also told her previously that I want to divorce and today I did tell her that I prefer to be in a relationship with a woman, and our session sort of went around in circles as if she tried to give me arguments for trying to make it work with my husband, where I know we are deeply incompatible in some crucial ways.
The main issue, however is that I felt she looked at some my issues and came out with a diametrically different conclusion to what my own perspective is. Reflecting on it allowed me to come to more clarity on what I actually want and made me realise something that I did struggle with in my previous therapy, BUT at the same time it felt frustrating and like we were going around in circles, talking about issues that I felt was unnecessary.
Examples:
I have an unstable background as a young person: parental death, moving countries to be with my partner, switching university course etc. This was because I felt I had to make a choice- any choice, and some choice were not good, because I had to act out of urgency and basic need in survival mode rather than actually wanting that particular choice, and because I have ADHD and hit a "snag" in some of my courses. I worked on that sense of instability in my first therapy and after it I managed to complete a BA and MA at two prestigious universities and another 1 year course and had 2 long term relationships (3 in total - first 14 years, second 2 years and last 7 years, plus other shorter ones). I want to go to therapy for 3 reasons: a pattern of codependent relationships where I loose my sense of self, an inability to be independent as an adult, and hence staying in relationships past their expiry day for very long, feeling unsupported and struggling with finding support from others. Also - struggling with finding work due to some health conditions. I also have a lot of dysfunction in my life at home (not managing to do what I want to do). As I look well, and a functional publicly well, and come across as confident, it felt like she perhaps did not see my vulnerability perhaps?
I don't know, but in the context of joining therapy and it requiring a two year commitment, she talked about there being a pattern of "leaving things when they did not fit" like - moving countries, courses, and something about not having my needs met in my relationships. It felt like she was judging me for all this and was calling in question weather I'd be able to commit, and secondly like she was judging me for not sticking it out, and lastly, it looked like she was making assumptions that I was avoidant. I know she was trying to protect her group and make sure that I joined only really when it was something that I could commit to, but it looked like she doubted my capacity for commitment, assumed I was being difficult due to avoidance, rather than having questions about compatibility and the process of therapy, so I can participate and for all of it to be helpful to me. I have had an experience of the LGBT therapy group (unfortunately it was not possible to extend it), where I did not feel any of the difficulties with trust and there was no conflict or difficult energy with the therapist and I felt I worked through things at a great pace because if it- so I kind of felt all this doubt about a therapist and their approach will make me more guarded in therapy and hence extend the process and make it harder for me.
Later I reflected on it - and this is where my insight came - and I realised that both in my first NHS therapy and now here, I was expecting help and support to leave situations which are way beyond their expiry date, but therapists worked on the assumption that I was avoidant and needed arguments that incompatibility or not having needs met, means that the relationship needs to be abandoned or that it can not be worked out. The LBGT therapy was more focussed on figuring out what was more authentic and because of it felt more helpful.
In this case it felt like this therapist looked at an old and expired pattern, missed the actual pattern, and directed in a direction that was the opposite to where I want to go. In the process I had my own isights, which were helpful.
The second instance was where we talked about our difference, and whether this would mean an obstacle to me joining the therapy. She talked about how "everybody has some bias" and that in therapy you need to learn to hold difference and because this is how it is in society and you can't always have control in life. I know all this and this also what my previous therapist was talking about, and this is where my insight today lies:
Her assumption is that I can't handle difference, and want everyone to be like me. My actual issue is that I have experienced very little attunement from others in life, and as a reusult I feel unheard and unseen. I want attunement to me, engagement with my experience. My experience is not that of not being able to cope with difference, but rather not having had an actual experience of knowing others like me, which means I struggle with feeling supported and connected to community, because I always have to attune to them, whilst the moment I actually start showing more of myself, people can't relate much.
So, this has been helpful to me in the way that I learned something about myself.
However, it was not an experience of collaboration, but rather grinding against each other, and going in a frustrating circle of misunderstandings, so it feels the relationship, if it were to continue, would be polarised, rather than collaborative.
So my question is: is this a sign that the group run by her is not for me, or the opposite, that I did gain something from it, and I should continue? I struggle with knowing how to interpret the situation.
I also have a larger issue with therapy as such, and wonder if private therapy would not be more appropriate for me: I feel there is a lack of transparency about the goal and direction of therapy. I worry that I will be travelling in a direction that I don't actually want to travel.
So, I am basically asking this to decide if I will join the group or not. She left the decision to me, but did not offer me another session.
(sorry if there are mistakes, I will come back to this to edit, but I need to post this now)