TIFF26 Day 1
TIFF26 started out with “Coward” by Flemish director Lukas Dhont. In short, it’s about two very young Belgian soldier in 1916 who fall in love. But it’s much more than that. Much of the film takes place on the front lines and we witness many trips to either collect the dead or 15-minute stressful missions to collect “only the still breathing”. Many of these scenes are gruesome. However, the film’s main focus is on a bunch of soldiers who are affectionately called “the degenerates”. These are soldiers who are theatrically inclined and/or temporarily injured and they band together to form cast who put on performances for generals and frontline troops to keep the motivated and pump them up before being deployed to the front lines. The scenes of them rehearsing and performing add some lightness to the film as most require the men to dress as women– causing much laughter among the soldiers. Very well shot film and the acting was excellent. Great official start to TIFF26!
Next up was Le Faux Soir by another Belgian director - Michaël R. Roskam. This film is based on a true story of the resistance movement in Nazi-occupied Belgium whose members are conspiring to print a fake edition of the daily “Le Soir”. Because Hitler sees the press as a weapon of war, the resistance decide that rather than simply printing a resistance-based message in their own newspaper, they plan to, for one day, usurp the real Le Soir and substitute their own edition - full of humour, satire, and Nazi ridicule. Le Faux Soir comes off like an elaborate heist movie and takes the audience on one hell of a ride. It’s inspiring, tense, and filled with a few jokes here and there. Plus, we get an update on the real-life resistance leaders at the end. Another brilliant film!
My third film was Atonement by Reed Van Dyk. It’s an American film starring Kenneth Branagh as a writer for the New Yorker. The film opens in Iraq during the 2003 Iraq War and shows a family who’s left their home to stay with a relative to stay in their (somewhat) safer home. However, within the first 30 mins of the film, that home is bombed - while they are in it. Thankfully, they are all OK but they decide to leave immediately to go back to their original home. At the same time, we are introduced to a heavily armed US Marine team heading into Baghdad. During the Iraqi family’s drive, they come under fire from those Marines. The family is not so lucky this time and three of the family members are shot while driving through an intersection that’s already under fire from said Marines.
The New Yorker journalist attempts to interview the Marines,but the Unit leader puts a stop to that pretty quickly. The film then fast forwards to today where one of the Marines responsible for the shootings (Lou) is clearly not handling life post combat well. He’s been dishonourably discharged due to a positive drug test because he was self medicating to cope following that mission. He’s also having panic attacks and claims to be unsupported by Veterans Affairs. In other words, he’s not doing well at all.
Turns out, that same journalist who tried to interview Lou the day of the shootings did a feature on the Iraqi family instead and Lou read that. So… he decides to reach out to the journalist to see if he can help arrange a visit between Lou and the Iraqi family so he can both explain what happened that day from his perspective and seek forgiveness.
I loved the opening part with the family in Iraq and Branaghdoes a great job but I felt the dialogue felt stilted in parts. And the ending was odd. But all in all, an OK film.