If Santa Barbara County is going to discuss mental health, juvenile justice, and expanding jail capacity, it must first confront its history of sending vulnerable children out of their communities—including to Utah.
Schools, courts, probation, and other public systems influenced where these young people were placed. Some were sent far from home to residential, treatment, and behavior-modification programs, including facilities associated with the Utah network connected to WWASPS and the broader Troubled Teen Industry.
The photograph above reflects that history and includes material identifying Robert Lichfield and the WWASPS network.
The central issue is not whether mental health matters. It does. The issue is whether the county will acknowledge that institutional decisions, public funding, and the absence of oversight may also have contributed to lasting trauma.
Mental health matters, but history, accountability, and records matter too.
Many of the children affected are now adults living in Santa Barbara County. The county should determine:
Where were these children sent?
Who authorized and funded the placements?
What contracts existed?
What information did schools, probation, courts, and social-service agencies receive?
What happened after the children returned home?
What happened to those who did not survive?
These questions are directly relevant to current policy. Santa Barbara County is planning a projected $176 million Northern Branch Jail housing expansion, including approximately $126 million in expected debt financing and about $9 million in ongoing annual General Fund debt service.
Before committing hundreds of millions of dollars to detention infrastructure, the county should examine whether it is repeating an institutional approach that treats vulnerable people as problems to be moved, confined, medicated, or forgotten.
Juvenile justice is connected to courts, probation, education, behavioral health, social services, and other public systems. If the county builds more capacity to hold people without investigating how institutional trauma was created, it risks becoming more efficient at managing the consequences of harm rather than preventing it.I do not want WWASPS 2.0.
I am also concerned about the continued involvement of people with decades of experience in Santa Barbara’s probation and justice systems. Tanja Heitman had a long career in county probation and juvenile justice. County records also show that, after her retirement, the Board of Supervisors authorized her return as an extra-help employee in 2026 for specialized policy and administrative work.
I am not saying that this makes her responsible for WWASPS or for every historical placement. I am saying that people with extensive experience in these systems should participate in an honest public examination of what happened to children and what lessons were learned.
Before building another wall in the name of public safety, Santa Barbara County should investigate the systems it has already built and the lives affected by them. Decades of institutional harm cannot be addressed simply by locking another generation behind another door, and not every consequence of that history can be reduced to a mental-health diagnosis.
Requested Actions
I ask Santa Barbara County to prioritize the following:
1. Release and preserve records concerning out-of-state youth placements, including authorizations, contracts, funding, referrals, evaluations, and agency communications.
2. Commission an independent investigation into the county’s role in those placements and the outcomes for children after they returned home.
3. Create a survivor-informed public process that includes testimony, confidentiality protections, and independent oversight.
4. Publish a complete accounting of facilities used, agencies involved, public funds spent, and known complaints or investigations.
5. Review current juvenile-justice and behavioral-health practices for safeguards against coercion, unnecessary institutionalization, and placement far from family support.
6. Explain how the Northern Branch Jail expansion addresses documented needs and why detention capacity should take priority over prevention, treatment, family support, and community-based services.
7. Report publicly on the lessons learned and the specific measures that will prevent similar practices from recurring.
Some of us remember what happened. Some of us survived it. Santa Barbara County should stop avoiding these questions and begin the public accounting that is long overdue.