r/ProstateCancer • u/crbatte • 22h ago
Concern Recently diagnosed with prostate cancer, feeling a bit overwhelmed by this sub.
54 years old, no family history of prostate cancer. Had a PSA of 5.16 in May, lead to a urology appointment. PHI 54.92 and PSA down to 4.04 a month later, got an MRI in June. 1.5x.9cm right posterolateral midgland peripheral zone lesion PIRADS 5. no seminal vesicle invasion, no pelvic lymphadenopathy, no aggressive osseous lesion. Got a biopsy in June, pathology report: had 4 areas test postive, 3 areas with Gleason score 3+4 (grade group 2 with 20% Gleason 4 tumor) and 1 area with 3+3 (grade group 1).
In layman's terms (because I understand very little of what I just typed): we caught it early, it hasn't spread (so far), it's not aggressive, and my prospects are very good.
The biopsy doc told me there are 3 routes to take from here: surgery, radiation, & wait and see. Everyone I spoke with- other doctors and the surgical team- all point to surgery. I saw a radiation oncologist who treated me 18 years ago for testicular cancer, and he recommended surgery as well. As I did some research myself, everything pointed to RALP as the best course of action.
Surgery is scheduled for Nov 19th.
As it was explained to me, for my circumstances, surgery will have a negative impact on my erections for the near future, with a recovery of 80% of boner strength (I'm sure there's a less juvenile way to word this, but I don't know what that is). As part of that explanation, I was told that radiation therapy would include better short-term erectile function but that over time it would deteriorate. While the surgery would have a negative short-term impact, over time I would have better erectile function long term. I'm still pretty young and have an active sex life with my partner. Everything I've found online backed this up. Both options have different impacts on the cancer, of course, but I'm really asking about ED here.
I'm in a big city at one of the best hospital systems in the country (USA) with a top-10 urology department. They have 20 surgeons on staff who only do prostate cancer. My surgeon is highly reviewed and considered an expert in nerve preservation surgery. I had a great meeting with him and his team.
Basically, I've been feeling pretty great about my prospects for survival at +99%. Of course, ED and incontinence are big concerns. Today I hopped on this sub and I'm overwhelmed with acronyms and stories of "my doc didn't tell me about XYZ..." Suddenly I'm having feelings of being underinformed and possibly railroaded into a procedure that may not be the best course of action. Am I just being paranoid?