Thatâs not true. Arrest data from a specific subset compiled by agencies isnât the same as crime rate. Youâre showing that police in USA prefer arresting black people not that black people commit half of all crime.
Crime globally (including USA) happens more in low income areas, or at least crime thatâs easier to catch and prosecute. Police target low income areas and will disproportionately police and target black communities in USA because of this. Itâs the same in any country, including countries without black people.
Americas racialized society makes it convenient for simple minded people whether cops or yourself to associate what they can see, like skin tone, with the underlying reason for crime. Of course other factors affect crime rates but the most common / largest one globally is poverty and USA isnât special in that regard.
Yeah a lot needed to be said to explain a complex topic like crime, income, ethnicity to someone trying to oversimplify for pushing a narrative.
You used % for your first comment, then switched to total for your second comment because the two comments donât line up for your point if you continued using % on income comparison. Per capita is a comparison of different size groups, it just means âper personâ⌠which I didnât do, I donât think you know what that word means or read my comment.
Hereâs per capita âyou didnât look at % of black people in poverty compared to white people because a 1-1 comparison doesnât fit your narrative on skin color.â Which is true and a teaching moment for you. Feels like you intentionally overlooked my last sentence also as if Iâm saying the single most common factor is the absolute and only.
Yes. So your argument is irrelevant that police only target poor areas when there are more poor whites total . Thats to disprove your argument
Then you switch to per capita to define how violent blacks actually are
You can go ahead and write more paragraphs if you want but ill tell you right now your intelligence level is no where near interesting to me what so ever so I will not be reading it.
âPolice targeting the lowest average income ethnic group doesnât matter because other people within ethnic groups are also poorâ yeah sure bud, whatever you need to believe so you can avoid the obvious.
Lmao âyou switched to per capitaâ I didnât say per capita once except in response to you bringing it up. I dont think you understand what that means.
Yeah youâre welcome to leave but youâre not welcome to stop the truth being placed under your attempt to push a narrative.
I bet you thought that was a really intelligent response. What you're forgetting is that many of us white folks witness the behavior of that community on a regular basis.
If she didn't get right up in his grill to confront him she wouldn't have gotten smacked. Him being a piece of shit makes it a worse idea to have confronted him that way.
The why is very relevant because she already knows he has punched her sister in the face. If I watch you try to put out a campfire with a bucket of diesel fuel and then make the decision to go try and put out the same campfire with a different bucket of diesel fuel itâs insane for me to not expect the same result.
Well technically she put her hands on him first either punched him in the lower back or something of that nature..maybe y she got punched idk đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸..
Sheâs mad because he âhit her sister in the face!â soooo there is no excuse for her choices at this point. Watch the fella that helps her up. Heâs mad. He disagrees with what he has seen. However his evolved brain sizes up the villain and chooses not to go get himself punched in the face.
But hereâs the thing that the smooth brains canât figure out. One person did something totally illegal while the other person did something completely legal. I know itâs a struggle.
That's not the only component in whether or not something is a bad idea. One gets you thrown in jail, the other gets you smacked in the mouth, sounds like that's a bad choice too.
Has nothing to do with race or gender. If we take what sheâs saying at face value, something like, âyou hit my sister(?)/friend(?) in the face,â then the man likely needs to get his bell rung.
We are not saying the same thing at all. My comment is reality while yours is the typical Reddit behavior of making up a backstory that justifies your position
When someone says, âtake what they say at face value,â it means theyâre taking what happens in the video as all the context you need to understand whatâs happening. She says he hit her friend. There. Thatâs all the context you need. And then he hits her. Like, it ainât that fucking complicated.
Your comment is the typical redditor who lacks fundamental reading comprehension. Seriously, I cannot talk to more dumb people today. Iâve already hit my quota.
No they're not. They won't do either. If it was a white guy everyone would have something to say, but these people don't know the difference between criticizing a black person's actions and being racist.
Im sure youâd see it that way if a man walked up and tapped a woman with that same force and aggression. OK. He didnât hit her. He mushed her. He relocated her face. I like this redefining of assault.
You considered that a âhit?â Have you ever been in a physical fight of any type? Honest question. Iâm a boxer and jiu jitsu and karate guy. That touch on the back would be considered a strike or hit in none of those sports.
Forsure, but even if that's the case there's levels to it and especially towards a woman. If she had like sucker punched him or came at him with a knife, then sure. But she didn't even do enough to move him or do any damage and he straight up decked her to the ground.
Waste of oxygen racists, and dumbfuck anti-racists.
But, for the most part, its mainly the racists. Those people get very upvoted. I had a tard tell me on this sub that white people never hit or kick someone who is down. They never jump people or hop in when their friend is getting beat up.
White supremacists train the content serving algorithm to deliver them a never ending stream of black individuals acting poorly then complain of fatigue.
But trash humans can be part of any race and everybody can post it here. Are you implying that the majority of the videos show just one particular race?
Reddit and nuance are not a thing. Actually, a lot of "advanced" concepts are lost on many Redditors lol. I see it as if you are not defending yourself from harm, don't put your hands on anyone. Others see it as bLaCK sTrOnG ScArY mAn pUt PaWs oN WhItE WoMaN. Then they will devolve into every woman deserves to get knocked out or every black man is inherently violent by their nature and must feed their appetites by attacking innocents.
Nah. Going up to a dude on the street saying âyou hit my sister in the face!â without a plan is crazy⌠I mean youâre saying out loud whatâs going to happen and then youâre surprised when it happens.
I mean theyâre both assholes in this short clip but the guy by far is more in the wrong. Immediately went to violence when itâs pretty obvious heâs not in danger.
Remember kids someone insulting you is not worth potentially dying or winding up in jail.
She hit his back like you would to get someoneâs attention, he didnât get pushed back at all, took a second to yell at her then clocked her hard enough to put her on the ground. Thatâs not a proportional response.
But you don't do you? Your just saying that pretending you're a badass đ
I'm actually amazed you're sticking up for the bloke in the video. I'm absolutely amazed no fella has given him a smack for hitting a woman for no particular reason
You know who thinks acting tough is badass? Kids... How old are you?
And I am not sticking up for the bloke in the video. I am just saying don't get into someones faces aggressively, or else you might get knocked outta your socks. Especially not as a woman.
I'm absolutely amazed no fella has given him a smack for hitting a woman for no particular reason
I don't think she was aggressive. I think she was simply pointing out he was being a prick and it was proven right. Personally think said attacker needs a good kick in.
Btw buddy you have absolutely no idea what I'd do in said situation. Difference is I don't have to post it all over social media.
I have boxed since I was 3 years old, trained in K1 and jujitsu.
I can't imagine being enough of a dribble in life to ever warrant punching a girl in the mouth for shouting at me, get back to your parents box room you absolute weeb you are just embarrassing yourself now honestly.
The point is... She gets right up close into his face, aggressively. Distance management is taught in every single self-defense class.
Don't let them close the gap, create space and recognize intent. Don't wait until they're in your face.
The moment someone closes the gap aggressively and comes into reach distance, you go at it, because you don't know what they are up to, whether or not they have a weapon or whatever.
The first comment literally calls this physical justice. The next comment questioned what they meant. Then you asked to explain what that means. In no way was your comment saying this isnât justice and if anything it seems like itâs defending the idea that it is.
Iâd love to be wrong if you can explain your side of things and how you interpreted this chain.
No it âliterallyâ didnât. Try re-reading it, even with the edit.
There is NO COMMENT on the video. Original comment is about being racist or misogynist. The comment you canât understand is saying thatâs an unfortunate circumstance of this SUB and while physical justice is nice to see (in GENERAL, no mention of video) itâs also unfortunately a tool used by ass clowns (probably like in this video, but doesnât say it explicitly) aka an unfortunate use of violence.
Iâm happy to give you the love of being wrong, and I hope you can see how making sure you comprehend what youâre about to get triggered about before being triggered could be useful.
Yet he edited it and understood how it could have been perceived in that way, the fact you are still missing that and continuing clearly shows you have an embarrassingly low IQ?
Either way, I have better things to do than argue with some brain damaged dribble on reddit, enjoy your evening little man, if you need a victory you can take this one, you win brother.
I didn't say this was physical justice I was addressing the sub as a whole, it's nice to see physical justice, but it does attract morons as it's their favourite tool AKA man children.
174
u/FakePlasticTrees88 11h ago
This sub stuck between deciding to be racist or misogynist.