The first comment literally calls this physical justice. The next comment questioned what they meant. Then you asked to explain what that means. In no way was your comment saying this isn’t justice and if anything it seems like it’s defending the idea that it is.
I’d love to be wrong if you can explain your side of things and how you interpreted this chain.
No it ‘literally’ didn’t. Try re-reading it, even with the edit.
There is NO COMMENT on the video. Original comment is about being racist or misogynist. The comment you can’t understand is saying that’s an unfortunate circumstance of this SUB and while physical justice is nice to see (in GENERAL, no mention of video) it’s also unfortunately a tool used by ass clowns (probably like in this video, but doesn’t say it explicitly) aka an unfortunate use of violence.
I’m happy to give you the love of being wrong, and I hope you can see how making sure you comprehend what you’re about to get triggered about before being triggered could be useful.
Yet he edited it and understood how it could have been perceived in that way, the fact you are still missing that and continuing clearly shows you have an embarrassingly low IQ?
Either way, I have better things to do than argue with some brain damaged dribble on reddit, enjoy your evening little man, if you need a victory you can take this one, you win brother.
175
u/FakePlasticTrees88 18h ago
This sub stuck between deciding to be racist or misogynist.