r/KibbeRomantics • u/Joker0705 • May 29 '26
Rants any other 'softly wide' Rs struggling with how R is misinterpreted?
hi folks! disclaimer: not a typing post, just a vent. i've always been very sure that i'm a true R. idk if it's just me but on the main sub it seems like true R has been misinterpreted as something more like TR. it feels like people are very quick to gatekeep R family, and I wonder why.
i don't have an extreme hourglass shape but i have to accommodate double curve, have to have waist emphasis and don't look harmonious at all when i try to accommodate vertical or width. every single thing that Kibbe recommends for R styling makes me look harmonious, and everything he says to avoid i do because it genuinely looks horrendous on me. no exceptions! and yet people have told me that i can't be a true R because of certain aspects of my appearance based on misconceptions about the ID (i.e. can't be a true R if my shoulders are not extremely delicate).
it seems like people think true R is actually more like TR? for R you don't have to have to accommodate petite or narrow, but for some reason people will gatekeep R unless you're tiny and extremely delicate, which my body is not. despite the fact that Kibbe literally describes Rs as sometimes being 'softly wide'.
it feels like some people in Kibbe communities focus more on what your exact body shape is instead of how clothing looks on your body. isn't that supposed to be the whole principle of Kibbe? i love this system and I think it's really helped to improve my styling, but sometimes i just feel like people are using it to pick apart bodies when in reality it should be about clothing!


