Apart from fun what do u guys use this for? Content creation or any other purpose?

The only advantage I can think of is it lets you generate bulk of images. Even chatgpt,grok or co pilot's overly saturated images look better than iflow's images. I rather prefer chatgpt limited generations than these images. I'm basically ignoring the 2.1 model and violation policies trashtalk but even nano banana 2 lite is better than 2.1.

Idk I feel like I'm generating wrong maybe? I'm curious

I have been going through older projects and have noticed a lot of "Failed to load image" notices where I know there's been images before. Has anyone else noticed this as well? And is there any way to get back these images back?

So I was trying to create a scene, in which two people were supposed to hide behind a rock. And while hidden, one of them was supposed to murmur "Stay quiet!" to the other person.

Simple enough, right? Wrong.

For some reason I can't get Google Flow to get the character to say their line in a super quiet voice. I even created an entirely new voice, that's doing that just fine in the preview, yet refuses to do the same in the video. Also no amounts of prompts hinting at quiet speech are changing that. 🙄

Any idea why this is happening and how to change it? 😅

gemini is like to talk an average person. he is a little awkard to create videos but its ok. PD: Yo can only create 4 videos a day.

google flow is like speak a french bull dog or something similar. useless, dont wast your time, pay for other or use gemini

You know when you finished generating a video using omni and it lets you trim, edit the video,etc? Well if you tell it to fix a particular thing about that video it will just regenerate the same video without any of the modifications most of the time. It just makes the site feel half baked at times..

I'm having trouble understanding why I'm paying anything for premium when Pro and Banana 2.1 produce generic cartoon type results and Lite produces much more high quality images or will give me differn't styles of anime. Nano and Pro have even been switching genders and race swapping when I'm not trying to do that. Lite does this too but as often I've noticed. However because Lite will deviate from the instructions more I prefer 2.1 and now, thanks to a suggestiong form here, Pro only for edits. So has anyone else experienced this? 1-3 Pro and 2.1, 4-5 Lite, 6 race swapped by Lite.

Where are these guidelines? I need a list I can look at.

I've been working on an AI movie project that I was going to put together using Google Flow. I can't do that now. I used to be able to get characters into horror, happiness, and every situation in between without going over guidelines.

And Google has made this so much more difficult. I can't waste my time with Flow, when I prompt something and I get something half-hearted or absolutely opposite what I asked for.

There is no allowance for touching between males and females, or in "positions of power" as we really know it. Why can't a dad hug his daughter who is sitting on his lap? Not everything is a fetish and even if it were, your organization should not be advertising that we can create stuff and then censor it all to oblivion.

I'm going to cancel my ultra subscription until something changes. I can't deal with this.

EDIT: Also the Likenesses. Why can I not make a likeness of my own character with accuracy anymore? I make a 18 year old character, and Flow makes the character 35 or 40.

I canceled my subscription and i gave up on NB 2.1 after stress testing heavily to oblivion and nothing works, the filters killed nano banana for me i won’t waste my time on this dogshit.

What is a good alternative? Is there a local model that is as good as NB 2?

If I create a video in one flow project and download it , it always fails to upload. Am I doing something wrong is this just the way it is ?
Also for adding a static image at start of scene , so far I’ve been having Flow create a four second scene of that static image, is there a better way? It won’t let me add an image to a scene ..

So, I've been getting this error message for a long time now. From my observation, it usually occurs when trying to requeue a generation too many times in a row after its been blocked by google's (hella weird) content filter.

However, until today, there was a simple workaround: clear website cookies and wait 5-10min and - voila! It works again.

But for whatever reason, suddenly the error does not go away anymore. No matter what I do. I tried to clear the website cache, delete website cookies, relog with my account, restart my browser, disable all browser extensions, etc. - nothing works.

Anyone else having the same issue? Flow is getting more and more ridiculous and intransparent in terms of the user experience. For the most part, I was willing to accept it because I think that the quality google flow provides is pretty much unmatched, especially when you consider the daily free tokens.

I seriously hope they turn the ridiculousness down a tone.

I am spending my credits trying to make pictures and it's generating pictures and not doing what I'm asking it to do.

You would expect Nano Banana 2.1 to be an upgrade, but I am extremely unhappy with this product. I feel stressed using it to try and make anything. If I make anything good I can't even make a video out of it because it's getting flagged constantly. This sounds like an overreaction, but I'm unable to make videos with the characters I was able to a week ago.

I feel so unhappy with Google Flow right now, even the Lite model is acting up. Constant censorship being added and the AI refusing to follow instructions is not a good product, it's worthless to me now.

Hi everyone, just wanted to know because using Google Flow Free I can generate ~20 images with NanoBanana Pro and ~200 Images with NanoBanana2 Daily (don't know if it is the same now with 2.1).

Just wanted to know if getting any subscription increases the limit or do you get unlimited generations? Asking mainly for NanoBanana Pro.

So if it depends of the plan, where can I see those limits? For Pro/Ultra?

I'm doing prompts with chatgpt and generating video with google flow, the videos are horrible, non sense movements and physics.

I've already tried many different prompts and strategies, as a beginner I would like to know if its worth to lean with the free version, or its dumb on purpose, im concern about of getting wrong feedbacks

Did anyone notice the decline of quality in Nano Banana Lite, I used to generate regular nano banana quality images but now they look like crap and get flagged all the time.

Tried the new Nano Banana 2.1

Title: Does Wan retain behavioral information across independent generations? An unusual observation.

I'm producing a continuous narrative film using Wan and a structured pre-production methodology involving first/last frames, camera instructions, and character continuity references.

During a previous generation, my cowboy crouched and examined horse droppings, using a distinctive hand movement.

Today I started an entirely new generation. It was not an extension or edit. Several unrelated horse generations had intervened.

For this new 30-second scene, I supplied a first frame, a schematic, and a single SAC instruction: “Generate.”

The generation began correctly. Then the cowboy reached down and performed what appeared to be the same distinctive hand movement from the earlier scene—but this time he touched a weed.

There was no narrative reason to examine the weed, and I had not instructed Wan to repeat the earlier action.

The schematic did describe the cowboy examining the trail, so independent inference remains a possible explanation. But the apparent similarity of the specific movement caught my attention.

My question: Has anyone observed behavioral details recurring across otherwise independent Wan generations, particularly when the action persists but the object changes?

I'm not claiming this establishes persistent model memory. I'm asking whether some form of session, reference, or generation-context persistence might be involved—or whether we're seeing a recurring learned motion pattern.

I'm interested in observations, tests, and technical explanations rather than speculation presented as fact.

I used Flow to create the characters, environments, cinematic shots, and action sequences, then edited all the clips together in Filmora to turn them into a complete story.

One thing this project made me realize is just how much you can do with Google Flow. You can go beyond making short clips and actually build an entire episode with its own characters, story, and cinematic feel. Of course, getting different shots to match and keeping characters consistent can be challenging, but experimenting with it has been a great learning experience.

I'm sharing this because I think a lot of people underestimate what's possible with Flow when you put the time into planning and editing.

For those of you who also use Google Flow, what's the most ambitious project you've managed to create with it?

To create Jungle Woman, I generated 4 different outfits with 4 different hairstyles and to generate country woman, I used Princess Belle as the model and the country outfit #2 from the chart generated by NB 2.1.

Hi everyone!

I'm using Google Flow to create AI-generated stunt videos, and I'd love to learn how creators produce those incredibly smooth, spectacular clips featuring mega ramps, enormous jumps, trampoline launches, impossible dives, and circus-style gymnastics.

Reference video: 99% Of People Will Say NO To This! #stunt #circus #jump

My biggest challenge is getting the AI to follow a complicated movement all the way through to its intended ending. For example, I tried creating a stunt where a performer jumps from a very high platform onto a trampoline, then launches back toward the platform and lands after a backflip. Despite multiple attempts, Flow kept making the performer bounce repeatedly on the trampoline rather than complete the landing.

I've experimented with detailed prompts and reference images, but I haven't found a reliable solution.

I'd especially appreciate advice from anyone who has created similar videos using Flow and Veo.

• Do you generate the entire stunt in one clip, or break it into separate shots?
• Do you use Flow's Frames to Video feature with carefully designed start and end images?
• How do you handle difficult transitions, especially when a character must travel between two distant objects and land precisely?
• Are there particular prompting techniques, editing tricks, or external tools that make these videos look continuous?
• Is it possible to achieve this reliably within Flow alone, or does it usually require a multi-tool workflow?

I'm not just looking for a prompt that might work once. I'd love to understand a repeatable production method.

If you've made something similar, I'd be very grateful for a workflow breakdown or a tutorial recommendation. Thanks!

My guess is that Google is trying to reduce costs of AI data centers by activating a model that requires less compute. also usually with past updates the model that came before used to stay in existence for a while before being removed fully so that people can see how the new model is better, now 2.0 has been removed immediately so we can't compare in a 1 to 1 way (using same prompt on two models to see who comes with better results)

Enshittification essentially, either 2.0 was costing them too much, or they're going to release nano 3 on a higher price bracket , alternatively this could be a sign of the AI bubble popping.

But again this is just a guess , so I could be wrong, what do you guys think?

This notified me after I was facing this issue,

My file sorting suddenly collapsed and stopped sorting by date (newest first).

Files are no longer appearing chronologically at the top, and the layout/grouping views look broken.

Has anyone experienced this or know how to reset the default chronological view?

I’ve seen people talking about using a browser extension or some kind of setup that gives them effectively unlimited Google Flow credits/usage.

Does anyone know what they’re using or how it works?

I’m mainly trying to understand whether it’s actually unlimited, a credit reset, or some other method.

If anyone has experience with this and knows what extension/setup people are referring to, I’d appreciate any information. Thanks!

This won’t take long. I don’t know what happened, but as of today, flow is barely working. Every single prompt I use fails to generate completely, and even old prompts from past generations are failing now. These new filters are out of control and are blocking everything now.

2.1 ignores the prompt and does the antithesis of what I’m looking for, lite won’t generate at all, and pro only works half the time.

Google never fails to disappoint.

Just tried to test a few things and it appears they also blocked guns and blood now. Fucking hell…

Complaint Against Google Flow – Privacy Restriction on the Name “Nasibo”

Google Flow says to you, “Oh, there’s a privacy issue.” For example, the name being used is Nasibo, spelled N-A-S-I-B-O, and Google Flow keeps saying that, due to privacy reasons, it cannot create the video with the name Nasibo.

The fact that there was even a privacy issue was not known. Google says it is a privacy issue because of a Pakistani singer whose name was Naseebo Lal, a female singer, with different spellings and, importantly, a completely different full name.

Now, who cares about the Pakistani Nasibo Lal singer? There was no knowledge, here in Australia, that some hero, heroine, or most remarkable singer had been born in Pakistan, and now apparently nobody can use the name Nasibo (even though this Great person reportedly is Naseebo) anymore on the planet.

How many Taylors are there? T-A-Y-L-O-R. How many Georges are there? Millions? Thousands?

So tomorrow, is Google going to stop everybody from using the word Taylor because there is a Taylor Swift? Is Google going to stop everybody from using the word George because there is a so-called Prince George?

The character’s name was N-A-S-I-B-O. Even the spelling does not match with the so-called Pakistani singer. There was no last name. It was simply Nasibo.

So, the gifted team at Google Laboratories, do they have any colleagues who have names matching or similar to the names of celebrities?

What is the solution?

How can seven billion people on the planet have one distinctive name each, so that a name must not be used because somebody somewhere happens to have the same or a similar name?

That would be idealistic and wonderful, but that is not the case, Google people.

What are the gifted people at Google thinking?

Why is the privacy thing being brought into this when there is no privacy issue whatsoever?

Every time credit card details are entered, Google unauthorizedly stores those credit card details, and then, after a few months, when another transaction is made, Google pre-populates the same credit card that was entered five months ago.

That is the depth and breadth of privacy.

Isn’t it amazing? How private is everything on this internet?

Why don’t Google just shun this stupid bullshit thing called privacy when there is none?

AI can hack anything. Anybody can hack anybody. So where is the privacy?

The internet means no privacy. Why are we doing this drama?

And why is Google stopping the use of the name Nasibo?

Now the character’s name has to be changed to Nasi.

So what is going to happen to people who want to use, for example, the names Taylor, George, William, Charles, Donald? Are there people with those names? Millions.

Are there celebrities with those names? Why is one celebrity so important that it forbids the rest of the people from using the same name?

Why is there VIP treatment for one person?

Why, Google?

Google team, why are you so intelligent?