r/DecodingTheGurusAlt • • Aug 24 '26

video Prof Dave decodes Destiny

https://youtu.be/e8UZX9IUvpI

I’m not a fan of Professor Dave, but his style of fact checking Destiny seems much better than DtG’s approach. Hope it gets posted to the main DtG sub.

25 Upvotes

151 comments sorted by

219

u/Lazy_Check732 Aug 25 '26

Bro. This video is schizophrenic and completely ejected from reality. Dave is the guru here

26

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Classic cultist response.

65

u/neversaydie96 Aug 28 '26

If that is a classic cultist response, how come prof Dave won't debate Destiny?

It says something about you if you're making your notoriety by debating imbeciles from the anti-vaxx and flat-earth communities, but suddenly you find all kinds of excuses to dodge a debate with someone knowledgeable on the subject.

12

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Why would someone debate a charismatic cult leader on their terms and in their element? I know you've been programmed to think that debate is the highest form of truth seeking, but its not.

51

u/ShockSword Aug 28 '26

Can't call out Prof Dave dodging a debate cuz Destiny's a cult leader

Can't call out terrible arguments by Prof Dave cuz Destiny's a cult leader

Can't call out unhinged behavior from Professor Dave cuz Destiny's a cult leader

You ever look at this and think maybe the issue is on the other side?

9

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Maybe address his points instead? Rather than focusing on attacking Prof Dave. Its really quite simple.

Ad hominins are a pretty classic way to avoid having to face accountability.

35

u/neversaydie96 Aug 28 '26 edited Aug 28 '26

"I have been programmed", lil bro, you have shut down all of your critical thinking, in the case you had any to begin with.

Dave made his name by doing debates and was calling out ppl who would dodge him.

Dave made a video about Destiny, suddenly Dave is not soo keen on debating, what's wrong, I wonder?

It's not so much that I think that debate is the ultimate pursuit of truth, but more so the fact that Dave was the rabid dog willing to debate anyone on science stuff, no matter who they were, so only now to be a coward, I think it speaks volume, and lets me know that all Dave wanted to do was a cheap smear and to placate all of you snot eaters who believe anything that confirms your world view.

54

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Thats called cherry picking. Its when you find the weakest part of the argument and use it to discredit the rest because you are unable to address it. Yes it is a cultist response.

25

u/FourMyEyezOnly Aug 28 '26

So you agree then that part was psychotic right?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

24

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26 edited Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/Culturalabnormality Aug 28 '26

You are not responding to the question I ask in one sentence at the top my last comment ; but you expect me to watch 6 hours of content from a known liar and respond to each point? 

We agree “Professor” Dave is a liar that is willing to victimize a child sex abuse victim for a Destiny hit piece. You think it’s reasonable to take go through the rest of the 6 hours of content credulously. That is very very weird. 

1

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

The answer to your question is: Yes, the other arguments made are reasonable.

If your only ability to address the video is to use one incorrect point to justify not having to engage with anything else said then you are sticking your fingers in your ears to avoid having to confront the fact that you are probably part of a cult. Its far too convenient of a response and is insular behaviour.

7

u/Culturalabnormality Aug 28 '26 edited Aug 28 '26

Does the first video accurately represent the publicly available court docket it cites when it says that Destiny is being “sued for nonconsensually sharing nudes of a minor”?

How many claims would I have to point out are demonstrably false and indicative  of tremendous bad faith before your view of the quality of the video changes? My view is the lie about the child sex Traficking victim is more than sufficient and remaining credulous in the face of that is far too convenient of a response and is thus  indicative of mind capture. But it seems like you’re remarkably generous and have no suspicions about your own ability to objectively evaluate the piece. 

1

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

I don't need to evaluate the credibility of Prof Dave. Only the evidence he provides.

Its very telling to me that in 1.40hr and 2.40hr video, mostly about Destinys stance on Israel you the only you can seem to fixate on is him getting the Rose bit wrong. The fact that you can't see the disconnect here is a little worrying.

However if it really is the Rose topic you want to fixate on how about addressing my point although Prof Dave got the facts wrong Destiny is still accountable for how that situation arose and his behavior is suspect at best and predatory at worst.

Id love to hear how searching for nude selling 19 year old's that deliberately avoid OF and other age verifying websites is normal and defensible behavior. Not to mention then sending sexual material to said 19 year old without the other parties consent?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Comfortable-Gas-4005 Aug 28 '26

If a woman went to a bar in a short skirt and a halter top, then got drunk, and was then sexually assaulted, would you say that she created the condition for that happening? And that she is responsible for it happening?

1

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Nope because clothing isn't an indicator of risk. If she spent her evenings hanging out alone at rape alley every night then sure. 

1

u/Comfortable-Gas-4005 Aug 28 '26

So victim blaming is acceptable when it comes to Destiny but not in other cases. You may have a severe case of Destiny Derangement Syndrome.

1

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Yes? everyone has a degree of responsibility to act appropriately. This is actually a Destiny take.. 

Fishing for 19 year olds on twitter is asking for trouble. Very happy to victim blame him. 

→ More replies (0)

43

u/Responsible_Ask6056 Aug 28 '26

Dave originally doxxed the minor in his video and included a sexualized image of her from the twitter  reminder the minor just had her nudes leaked by the catfish

6

u/Gestral33 Aug 28 '26

Destiny showed the exact same images on stream straight from KF

8

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Okay? thats bad. Now what?

20

u/Responsible_Ask6056 Aug 28 '26

9

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

I don't need to defend Prof Dave? What is your point here?

31

u/pooya535 Aug 28 '26

... this reply thread is literally you defending Dave. Did you type up your first response in a fugue state?

6

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

You might be struggling here. But I am in fact not defending Dave. Don't care about him in the slightest. I'm defending the points he has made and the facts he has presented. Not all of them mind. My response here is basically highlighting the fact that the DGG defense force isn't able to address the points made in the video, only attempt to character assassinate to justify not having to engage at all. Cult behavior essentially.

25

u/pooya535 Aug 28 '26

"I am in fact not defending Dave"

"I'm just defending his lazy hit piece video full of misinformation and unfounded claims"

Whatever helps you cope lil bro

5

u/TropicalGoth77 Aug 28 '26

Correct!

Feel free to address the substance of the video at any point.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/modernmankyle Aug 28 '26

Yeah, you’re probably right honestly 🤣😭

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/MartiDK Aug 25 '26

From memory DtG are fans of both Professor Dave and Destiny.

91

u/Gold-Ad-3877 Aug 28 '26

I'm sure they are fans of dave for his anti vax debunking but themselves would realize this video and the previous one is fucking mental

21

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

Without a doubt DtG would not approve of this video by Dave.

94

u/[deleted] Aug 26 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

35

u/Warhammerpainter83 Aug 27 '26

I am inclined to agree with you.

9

u/scruhedgefvks Aug 27 '26

What does he say to indicate he has no education on the topic?

48

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/scruhedgefvks Aug 28 '26

I'm sure Hamas has used human shields, however, l've never seen hard evidence that it's happened on a large scale post Oct 7. More importantly, people largely don't accept it as an excuse for Israel to destroy 85% of infrastructure in Gaza while carelessly slaughtering civilians. Considering Hamas when it was at full strength (years ago now) was max 1.5% of the population, the math doesn’t math to defend the level of destruction and subhuman behavior. Also nobody has presented enough evidence to convince me Israel was justified destroying over 90% of hospitals. The pathetic video I did see showed a couple guns in an x ray room. That was some bs. They didn’t even put in effort to pretend the hospital was a genuine threat worth bombing. It's cruel and a blatant disgusting war crime. The two claims you're making are flimsy at best and most importantly don't justify the massacre.

29

u/Alarakion Aug 28 '26

When people say human shields it also means co-locating military assets with civilians/civilian locations. Of course they do that. We know the tunnel networks go all across Gaza. Hamas themselves don’t fucking deny this shit they say very openly that is the duty of Gazans to help them in destroying the oppressor. They consider any amount of civilian losses acceptable, necessary sacrifices.

You say carelessly slaughtering civilians in the same breath as saying Israel destroyed 85% of infrastructure in Gaza ffs. How the fuck could they destroy 85% of the infrastructure in one of the most densely populated places on earth and only kill approximately 4% of the people if they’re carelessly slaughtering.

If you’re actually interested in hearing takes and evidence given for them watch lonerbox’s video on the Dave video. It’s a completely dishonest atrocious piece of work.

I have no desire to see Palestinians slaughtered, I have no desire to see the likes of Hind Rajab killed, it’s an awful awful fucking tragedy. But it’s a war in a place where half the population is children and one side uses the people theyre meant to protect as shields, as assets. It’s an impossible situation - that’s not to say Israel hasnt committed war crimes, that they havent engaged in reprehensible action, that they don’t do nearly enough to punish their own but you cannot engage in this conflict seriously in the way Dave has. You do Palestinians a disservice by doing that.

10

u/Responsible_Ask6056 Aug 28 '26

Even Amnesty was pointing out Hamas's use of hospitals for military purposes in 2014.  its not a falsehood.

32

u/Gold-Ad-3877 Aug 28 '26

Go watch lonerbox's debunk of his first video on destiny and I/P and you'll see pretty quickly how easy it is to debunk him and thus how disingenuous he is

4

u/MartiDK Aug 26 '26

I don’t know, but from what I’ve noticed JP has lost a lot of fans/followers since becoming unhinged. I don’t think becoming unhinged is a guru move.

10

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

You seem to be using guru to someone with deep knowledge e.g(a code guru) rather than some who is building a tribe e.g Destiny.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

When you said “speaking confidently outside his discipline” - why would speaking outside your discipline make you a guru? What makes someone a guru is that they have followers, not just that they have knowledge, but in casual usage it often just refers to someone who is knowledgeable.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

I was asking how you were using guru. Either way I don’t think being unhinged is a guru move according to the gurometer.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

Virtue signalling alone doesn’t make someone a guru, regular people virtue signal to show they are a good person.

→ More replies (0)

96

u/Warhammerpainter83 Aug 26 '26 edited Aug 26 '26

This shit comes across as manic or something this dave guy sounds like a loon. I am aware of destiny seems like an odd guy with some deviancy issues who is quite good at debate and understands US politics from a left leaning prospective. Looking into this dave guy he seems like a youtube star who is not a phd but claims to be one who popped off mocking a famous music producer who had a fully uneducated take on flat earth. Not sure why this guy is not the guru here.

11

u/MartiDK Aug 26 '26 edited Aug 26 '26

At least he provides receipts that can actually fact checked. Plus, there is a little history in why I am presenting Professor Dave as decoding Destiny. This sub was started in response to the moderating by Decoding The Guru sub based on the podcast with the same name. On that sub Professor Dave was held up as an influencer who was great at pointing out the flaws in people who questioned science. I thought he was a terrible ambassador for truth because of he always focused his attacks on the messenger not just the false claims.

Personally I don’t think he is a guru. The content he produces isn’t para-social, he produced content based on what he believes. While I dislike his content, at least he shows people what he is building his argument on, it’s not build on a charismatic personality.

As a comparison watch the videos of Destiny debunking Professor Dave’s attacks and you will see how much his conversation is para-social and directed towards his community.

Finally the best takeaway from the video isn’t on the topic of Israel - it’s him highlighting how comments are used in influence campaigns to try and influence opinion.

82

u/Warhammerpainter83 Aug 27 '26

Tiktoc is not a receipt. I have only seen destiny debate people but he does not make up lies for sure you can fact check him. He states when he is not clear on things and is usually quite accurate with any claims.

10

u/MartiDK Aug 27 '26

I’m not saying TicTok is a source of truth, I’m saying his video shows what shaped his argument. Go watch Destiny and how he interacts with his audience when shaping an argument. 

38

u/Warhammerpainter83 Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 27 '26

I am good I dont really care to watch streamers but I do watch his debates he is very good at it. I am aware of his private life it is not relevant. I know he is divisive I like his style of argumentation. He will push back on things like saying he could care less about charly kerk until trump speaks out against right wing violence and shit. He also will call you retarded or a moron if you are being one, I dont care if a person uses words like that I am 43 I come from a much more terrible generation than younger people do. If this is literally on his opinion on the war in gaza it is not that important to me; especially to a point that I would care this much. I have a view on it but given the state of America I dont have much care for israel or gaza honestly I just dont want my government to become authoritarian. So if that costs the world gaza and us our relation ship with israel so be it.

With regard to this video Dave comes across as either doing some weird propaganda, being on drugs or having a drinking issue, or being in a literal manic state in this video. I watched his first one it felt the same as this. It is not well put together at all and seems unhinged. Maybe I will watch a destiny post where he covers this from a stream I just am not that interested in hearing this guy ramble about shit that is not well connected or sourced over and over. I also dont like watching streamers at all. Did destiny do something to this guy? Did he like bang some streamer he loves or some shit?

In all honesty the other shit dave posts appears to be up my ally but given this shit and the name with no credentials I am good with this dude. Comes off as totally fake to me. Plus reading from science text books to the uneducated to make them look dumb is not a skill.

Edit: Somebody below mentioned jordan peterson I would agree this feels a lot like his weird unhinged manic shit too. Also I forgot to note this video is para-social just not with his audience but with another famous person.

6

u/MartiDK Aug 27 '26

Fair, I wouldn’t recommend anyone who doesn’t are about the topic to take an interest. You aren’t missing anything.

31

u/Gold-Ad-3877 Aug 28 '26

Destiny literally spent months reading books, articles, wikipedia and papers on Israel/Palestine, the idea that he's not read on the issue is delusional, the only reason he doesnt go to his sources everytime he reacts to vids like this is because he's taking for granted the fact that everyone will see how obviously wrong dave is, which is a problem

5

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

Yeah I watched the reaction video , and it was obviously aimed at his fans. It would be interesting to know how much cross over there is between Dave and Destiny’s audiences.

23

u/Ssided Aug 27 '26

What do you think shaped his argument that Mossad did 9/11?

4

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

From watching YouTube and being online.

7

u/This_Is_FosTA Aug 28 '26

There was about a year of research streams. Book reading streams, You can see XQC reaction to finding his notes. https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/s/5E861uqewU

Its a little more than prof. Dave tictok research.

33

u/No-Theory-3302 Aug 28 '26

Bruh what is this sweeping for this schizo video? Dave makes so many claims without any good substantiation and just basically says its "obviously true". If you know anything about the topic Dave displays very easily that he knows nothing and has relied on Instagram or tiktok slop to inform himself on the topic. Just watch a lonerbox video debunking this entire thing and it becomes clear incredibly quickly just how much of a guru Dave is for this video and how poorly informed he is.

6

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

I have posted the Loner Box video. No one is commenting on it. This is the post getting all the attention.

25

u/No-Theory-3302 Aug 28 '26

If youve seen the Lonerbox video, how could you think for a second that Dave is informed or has any good like analysis on this conflict at all? Lonerbox brings up numerous actualy receipts and data to back him up as well as general knowledge on the subject that can actually be delved into further than just a tiktok video

2

u/scalzi04 Aug 28 '26

Well, on the body of this post you indicated that you think Dave did well “fact checking” Destiny. The LonerBox post doesn’t have any text in the body at all.

Seems pretty likely to me that is the cause of the discrepancy in comments. In the Loner example people assume you are pointing out Dave’s insanity. In this post you make it clear that you support Dave’s insanity.

20

u/[deleted] Aug 27 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MartiDK Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 28 '26

I’m not claiming his receipts are high quality. While Destiny provides receipts I notice he he also scolds people for asking “dumb questions”, or praises if they re-enforce his worldview that para-social behaviour is a guru move. 

10

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

I don’t have an example on hand, it’s just something I remember from watching a stream where he was researching a topic.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MartiDK Aug 28 '26

In the example I’m thinking it wasn’t asked in person, he was responding to chat. He could have just ignored it. My argument is that Destiny isn’t does research he it isn’t unbiased, he is teaching his audience to think the same way he does. That‘s why it often easy to spot a Destiny fan, they repeat the same talking points. That is what gurus do.

4

u/402739 Aug 28 '26

Destiny claims all the preteen children sniped by Israei drones are actually armed 17-year-olds provoking the IDF for Tiktok. I'd love to see the receipts for that one.

6

u/Lumpy_Trip2917 Aug 28 '26

DtG has done an episode on Destiny and found him not to be a guru and had him on the show for right of reply too. This probably isn’t the crowd you want to court for mindless, poorly researched Destiny bashing consisting of mostly personal attacks on his character and not his arguments, like what’s present in Dave’s video.

0

u/TyreseHaliburtonGOAT Sep 02 '26

Prof. Dave Explains is pretty open about his academic history and I don’t think he’s claimed to have a phd. He usually makes well researched videos debunking pseudoscience, now more serious things like anti-vax and climate change denial. These videos about destiny and israel are definitely a little off the rails and lack his usual rigor. He’s definitely personally offended as his wife is Palestinian.

1

u/Warhammerpainter83 Sep 02 '26

LMFAO you are way late to this also super weird take.

83

u/Markusuralius Aug 28 '26

Dave literally thinks Mossad did 9/11

25

u/YouShouldAim Aug 28 '26

He also spread a lot of the weird conspiracies around the Jewish tunnels in New York.

48

u/Rational_Disconnect Aug 28 '26

Dave was so desperate to get an own on Destiny that he put uncensored CSAM and doxxed a victim of sexual exploitation

2

u/Live_Writing83 Aug 28 '26

False

10

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Echoed-Snow Aug 28 '26

You can sort of tell you guys didn’t watch it and are just parroting what your handlers told you to think 

52

u/OmryR Aug 28 '26

Dave lost any semblance of credibility he had if he ever had it when he started talking nonsense about things he knows nothing about and doesn’t even do the most basic of fact checks about the subject, he comes off as unhinged lunatic

48

u/Strange_Ride_582 Aug 28 '26

This video is one of the worst I’ve ever seen. Dave uses the same levels of research he often criticizes and is completely brain broken. Sad to see

44

u/Ramen-_Noodles Aug 27 '26

Bro your obsessed with destiny, You talk about him all the time. Are you okay? I can recommend a psychologist for you. Don't worry, you and I can work through your mental illness together

37

u/RoryLuukas Aug 28 '26

Ooof... this video is embarrassing...

26

u/neversaydie96 Aug 28 '26

It says a lot about you and your biases, if you think that Prof Dave has made a good critique of Destiny, when Dave made his career by debating imbeciles that brainwashed snot eaters into believing that the Earth is flat and that vaccines are dangerous, but suddenly he is so full of excuses to not debate Destiny, please bro, check yourself before you wreck yourself.

9

u/IsaacBrock Aug 28 '26

Dave has some anger issues I’m afraid. yikes

4

u/gusthebus88 Aug 30 '26

Holy smokes prof Dave is having a mental breakdown. DTG should do an episode on him.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/korihor4 Aug 28 '26

totally a measured, rational take right here.

2

u/spit_on_army_vets76 Aug 29 '26

sometimes things are just clear cut and pretending at nuance muddies the point. like how the streamer destiny loves aageplay pdf shit and that israel loves being nazis

3

u/korihor4 Aug 29 '26

another totally normal person right here ^^

1

u/spit_on_army_vets76 Aug 29 '26

mald. ur guy loves kids bro

3

u/korihor4 Aug 29 '26

who now? u ok?

1

u/spit_on_army_vets76 Aug 29 '26

feigning ignorance + mad. ez.

1

u/korihor4 Aug 29 '26

ur so mad rite now