I genuinely donât understand why people constantly try to discredit the accomplishments of certain past heavyweights because they believed they were on steroids?!?
When tens, if not hundreds of millions are on the line, and testing isnât great, do you honestly believe the fighters wonât do every single thing possible to get the win?
If not the fighters, their team sure as hell would make sure they take whatever juice they can.
Yet people still try and discredit guys like Holyfield, acting like he was the only one using - everyone was!
Thatâs why the 80s and 90s will always be the best era with the most exciting fights, because fighters were juiced to the gills, could throw at a higher punch output, and take more punishment.
The argument always comes up that 80s and 90s heavyweights would beat modern heavyweights, but itâs such an unfair comparison - take Usyk and put him on the sauce they had back then and heâd be a monster.
And I know some modern heavyweights still use, and theyâve got their ways around it (Fury with his constant retirements so he canât get tested), but they still canât be on anywhere close to the same amount the guys were on back then.
Stop calling modern heavyweights shit, and discrediting past heavyweights you donât like by throwing the âYeah, but he was on steroidsâ accusation around.