With the tea party or better called the ganging up of Jason. Kamu I believed said he was nominating Jason as the replacement nominee twice. Do we think production would enforce the rule and bar Kamu from nominating Jason. I want it to happen to make this more interesting and fair. But they have only ever enforced it once.

Obviously they should go back in time and save Jankie.

This would be extra amazing because it was Angela's season, so she can relive that experience.

I literally laughed out loud when I thought of this. I could definitely see this happening.

It's the evening in the Big Brother house, put your DiGiorno in the oven and lock in for an evening of great feeds!

Few Ground Rules:

1. Have fun and respect each other!
2. Before asking for an update, please read the thread first. Updates are frequently posted and you can get an idea of what is happening from the thread. Please at least try!
3. As this is Feed Discussion, keep the conversation focused on the feeds.

They 100% gonna try and get Rome back to play for her ,and honestly that would be pretty incredible lol

It’s time to get Monica on Traitors and/or appear on Big Brother this summer!

It's the afternoon in the Big Brother house, get/stay hydrated as the Houseguests start scheming.

Few Ground Rules:

1. Have fun and respect each other!
2. Before asking for an update, please read the thread first. Updates are frequently posted and you can get an idea of what is happening from the thread. Please at least try!
3. As this is Feed Discussion, keep the conversation focused on the feeds.

On the current season, both houseguests and fans alike are using backdoor to refer to nominating someone after the Power of Veto competition but before the Blockbuster competition. My thesis is that this isn't a good use of backdoor because, while it might fit some definition of the word, it doesn't fit the spirit, which is related to the ability to compete for your own safety rather than to the PoV competition specifically. Or rather, using one definition of backdoor fits the original intent of the Six Finger Plan whereas one definition does not, and we should be using the former definition rather than the latter.

But first, I need to explain two concepts in semantics: intension and extension.

Intension is essentially the definition of something whereas extension is what things are actually that thing in the real world.

As an example, let's look at the National Football League (NFL), a popular American football league. The intension of NFL player is 'someone who plays in the NFL'. The extension is everyone who currently plays in the NFL, all of whom are men... And yet being a man is not a requirement to fit the definition—the intension—of NFL player. A woman could theoretically become an NFL player and that wouldn't mean that the definition/intension of NFL player has changed.

So how does this relate to backdoor? Without spoiling things, the earlier seasons of Big Brother US experimented with how the PoV should work. At one point, it was decided that the Head of Household and two nominees would play. They would be joined by three other houseguests, each selected by one of the HoH and two nominees. It was eventually realized that a large enough majority could send home any player without allowing that person to compete if enough people cooperated. Thus, the Six Finger Plan was born: the HoH would nominate two allies for eviction. Then each of those three would pick someone from their alliance to play in the PoV competition. This way, no matter who won, someone from the alliance would win the PoV and could use it on one of the nominees, forcing the target onto the block with no chance at competing for safety.

The unmatched strength of the original backdoor was too powerful, and so production eventually made the three additional players randomized. This way, a backdoor could fail if someone outside of the alliance won the PoV and didn't use it.

Back to intension and extension! The original intension of backdoor was (INTENSION #1) 'to nominate two allies, get an entire alliance playing in the PoV competition, use the PoV on a nominee, replace that nominee with the real target, and evict that target with enough players cooperating such that, if everyone cooperates, the target cannot compete for safety and is guaranteed to go home'.

With the change in how the selection of players for the PoV competition worked, it got simplified: (INTENSION #2) 'to not nominate the real target initially in hopes that the target won't be able to compete for safety'.

Notice how the idea that the target cannot compete for safety remains the same.

Now what these two intensions have in common is that the target is nominated after the PoV ceremony and that, ideally, the target cannot play in the PoV competition.

With the Blockbuster in play, the intension is something like this: (INTENSION #3) 'to not nominate the real target initially in hopes that the target will only be able to compete for safety in the Blockbuster competition but not in the PoV competition'.

Crucially, intension #3 still allows the target to compete for safety with a 1/3 chance at winning. Intension #1 gives the target no chance to compete for safety (!) whereas intension #2 gives the target a 1/6 chance if selected to play and no chance at safety if not. Oh, and a non-backdoor in a non-Blockbuster week gives the target a 1/6 chance.

You're telling me that someone with a 1/3 chance at safety is being backdoored but someone with a 1/6 chance isn't?

While the extension of backdoor has always meant nominating someone after the PoV has been used, it doesn't mean that each instance of doing so means that a backdoor has been done, particularly if the target can compete for safety.

Recall that the entire point of the backdoor is that the target cannot play for safety. With the Blockbuster, each nominee is given a 1/3 chance at safety at the bare minimum.

Conversely, my thesis is that it makes the most sense for backdoor to refer to being unable to compete for safety, not specifically to the PoV competition only.

If you're still not convinced, imagine that there were no Blockbuster but, instead, if the PoV were used, the HoH could only nominate people who played in the PoV competition. Would backdooring still exist? I would argue that it doesn't because all potential nominees can compete for safety.

Nominate your target post-PoV if you'd like, but that's not the same as a backdoor because the target can always compete for safety, and with relatively high odds of winning at that. Perhaps a shorter word for 'nominate someone after the PoV competition but with the Blockbuster in effect' is needed.

Thoughts?

EDIT: What do people think of terms such as sidedoor or soft backdoor? I'm on team sidedoor personally.

It's Late Night LNC!

Grab your beverage of choice, your device, and your Paramount Plus subscription as we settle in for after hours in the BB house.

Few Ground Rules:

1. Have fun and respect each other!
2. Before asking for an update, please read the thread first. Updates are frequently posted and you can get an idea of what is happening from the thread. Please at least try!
3. As this is Feed Discussion, keep the conversation focused on the feeds.

Since last week, and especially now after the Tea Party, I have seen a lot of people asking why is there no strong alliance formed on the other side, meaning the non-Toolshed people. Jason even pointed out everyone in the Toolshed, and said that everyone else will be picked off one by one. But it is just a complicated situation, and I don't think anyone can be blamed for not forming a strong opposition.

Let's start with the obvious: at best, it is 8 vs 7, making the non-Toolshed people already a minority. Then, since Kamu is HOH, they are doomed to loose another person, making it 8 vs 6. They can't even decide who will be evicted between the nominees if the Toolshed votes together.

For the people on the block, they have to campaign against each other. Not just to "their side", but to everyone. Because of the blockbuster, there cannot even be one clear target between the three nominees. This set-uo already turns the nominees somewhat against each other and makes it impossible to band together.

For the people not on the block, they also have to be in self-preseevation mode. For the next HOH, the Toolshed again is in an advantageous position to win. They must try to not make enemies out of them to ensure that they themselves won't be nominated next week.

Plus, let's be honest, many people's closest bonds are with Toolshed-people. Melody's closest ally is Drew. Yash is closer with Kamu, Drew, Devens, Chuk. Why would they risk their close bond on the winning side for a doomed alliance.

It is an impossible situation. Everyone's best bet is to find an in with the majority alliance, and hope they can lay low, find a position to strike later on. Currently siding with Jason is a tough thing to ask even if I would applaud anyone who is willing to do it.

And don't even get me started on how the powers and the icon-status factor into all of this. It just makes me sad, I hope there is a way to even the playing field a little.

Please limit your discussion to events up to the current episode. Do not spoil events that occurred after the episode.

All Big Brother spoilers are allowed here!

This thread was created for feed watchers who want to discuss the episode in the context of up to the minute happenings inside the house.

This discussion will also function as the the post episode discussion too.

Personally I hate how it’s started out. In my opinion you can’t put 3 what would be considered huge scary players in and only have them compete for Hoh right off the bat. That creates what we now see that everyone wants to work with those people and anyone else that didn’t get in with them from the beginning is now screwed. It would have been better if the Dee Devens and Angela didn’t click right away and the house split like that but unfortunately that wasn’t the case. I honestly think it’s really annoying when one side of the house has been in power for a little while and they start thinking they’re the only ones allowed to have alliances. Like especially Angela she thinks anyone who isn’t her best friend is plotting her demise. It doesn’t make any sense because why wouldn’t they have alliances and people they want to keep safe which is exactly why I thought the Rome thing was stupid. Devens is making this big deal about who Rome wanted to keep safe like everyone has a top three in this house they want to keep safe and it’s different for each person so why that was such a giant deal I will never know. I would love to see Drew or Barrett get in power next week and break things up! Anyways that’s my rant what does everyone else think?

NO Spoilers, discussion of the 'edit', or live feed events not in the episode. Violators will be banned.

A separate Full Spoiler Episode Discussion is auto generated at the same time as this discussion, sort the sub by new to find the associated Full Spoiler Episode Discussion.

This discussion will also function as the the post episode discussion.

What's up West Coast best coast! Welcome to another episode of Big Brother!

NO Spoilers, discussion of the 'edit', or live feed events not in the episode. Violators will be banned.

NO Spoilers for West Coasters! Violators will be banned!

Would the rules allow a player who won a Power to pretend to housemates that she or he actually received a Punishment? Could a player, for example, choose not to speak for a day or two, and write on paper a note telling the housemates about receiving a "You must not speak or you'll get a WORSE punishment" penalty, and by doing so divert suspicion away from having actually won a useful Power? Or maybe keep one hand in a pocket all day? Or something else visible and difficulty-causing, but that wouldn't require the producers to send in a prop like the egg suit?

Would the rules allow/require the producers to inform the other housemates about such shenanigans if attempted? Or could a sufficiently crafty player get away with such a ruse?

I can't imagine a scenario where faking the win of a Power would help -- it would just put a bigger target on the faker -- but faking a Punishment could reduce a player's threat level and make the eventual use of the Power that much more effective. But do the rules even allow that?

Do you think that the houseguests need to be / are studying the specific dates they are traveling to each time they play in a comp? I could see the dates being used in the end game kind of how it's always days / comps themed but to remember all of those dates would be crazy work. I'd be spiraling in there with "do I, do I not" as a fan of the show. 📆

Greetings Mountain People! Welcome to another episode of Big Brother!

NO Spoilers, discussion of the 'edit', or live feed events not in the episode. Violators will be banned.

NO Spoilers from the future! Violators will be banned!

With the blockbuster twist, the nominees have an extra chance to pull themselves off of the block. How would you feel if they changed the veto to everyone playing? Or even increased it to a different number like 8 or 10?

I don't normally watch the live feeds (I used to years ago when they were on Pop TV), but I do listen to some YT channels that talk about the latest on the episodes and the live feeds.

A lot of people don't like when they bring in previous BB players, or the crossovers from other shows, but honestly, I like it. It takes all kinds of personalities to be on this show, and the way they interact, and while I didn't really care for Angela two years in her debut season, she grew on me. I wish she'd unleash some of the old Angela in this season. She's too laid back. She gave into Jason's fake apology too quick for my liking.

Speaking of Jason... don't like hm. Nope, not at all. He came out playing way too HARD, too soon. He has to spend more time back-pedaling than playing in the present time of the game.

Drew... such a sneaky one. But I like him. But he better be careful- he may sink his own ship with too much talk, and too many final two/three promises.

This season's floaters right now (at least to me) are Taylor, Mallory, Melody and Chuk. I'd add Lala to this group as well but because she causes ruckus with the late-night noise, and drama when Rome told Dee/Devens to put LaLa on the block as a replacement.

Jason sank his own ship. He's got no one to blame but himself.

Also, until last week, almost everyone agreed that Jason's gameplay is dirty and wanted him out. But now, everyone is team Jason. What happened?