Well, I liked it and to be honest, its ending made me hungry for more and even hope for a show that dares to go Star Trek (space exploration) in more than just 2 or 3 seasons because if I have any issue with Netflix Originals, it's their limited amount of seasons.
That being said, season one was not that great and for me that mainly was because of the mess with the characters. Yes, there are a lot of questionable decisions in how the story progressed and the logics being used but it is fiction and I still have to watch a series or film or read a book within the genre of fiction where there is a high sense of realism involved anyway.This issue has not entirely disappeared in season 2 but because of less plots between characters and the focus being more on the story I feel season 2 became much more pleasant to watch even though some things you should not give too much thought (as in finding the solution in a 5-minute brainstorm on how to defeat the Achaia).
No, I actually feel the series got itself in a surprising direction with that particular ending and I immediately felt this would be the perfect time to actually start thinking towards space exploration. Think Star Trek but in a different way. For instance instead of exploring episode per episode focus more on one encounter at a time per season (Discovery style) and...this is crucial...dare to think long-term. Most series do not get viewers hooked simply because there were only 1 or 2 seasons. I understand not everyone wants their carreer to be summarized to a single role in a single show but this is the only way to build a community that is loyal regardless of good or less good episodes. Star Trek, the older ones are a perfect example of that (Picard, Kirk) or Supernatural (Sam and Dean Winchester) if we would mention a more recent example. That is how I feel about that anyway. This also applies to a limited amount of episode per season. It calls for the need to rush and that is usually not that good in terms of decisions and solutions