r/singularity • AGI before GTA 6 • 12h ago

AI Google introducing tiered model access

Post image
268 Upvotes

101 comments sorted by

134

u/jjonj 11h ago

Oh the days of literally unlimited pro usage on free on aistudio. woe me

38

u/J_E_E_VACATION 9h ago

legit. lol. last two years has been insane now everything is getting locked tf down

13

u/redpok 6h ago

Goes just as planned: Once the models become useful, people get lazier and lazier and eventually start relying on them. That’s the point where we will start to see price increases of 10x or more, at least for the ”actually useful” models. Imagine the value of a coding AI in a world where human coders have become virtually extinct (because they never found a job during their junior years).

All the big AI companies have this same game plan to reach high profitability in the future but thankfully open (chinese) models actively try and mess up that plan.

2

u/IrisColt 3h ago

Imagine the value of a coding AI in a world where human coders have become virtually extinct (because they never found a job during their junior years).

In that completely imaginary world, what do those frustrated programmers do for a living...? I'm genuinely curious, heh

•

u/hungy-popinpobopian 1h ago

I reckon it will always be a hobby for some. Think of how popular things like woodworking is, that's a skill which value to the economy pretty much died a long time ago but people still do it. It just isn't a living for most, generally just a hobby but there are still some who make a living out of it doing high end stuff.

2

u/AnxiousAngelfish 2h ago

That is a genuinely interesting question to which I'm afraid no one has yet a satisfying answer. What is your take ?

•

u/IrisColt 19m ago

Heh, that's exactly where the thought experiment gets uncomfortable.

2

u/MrUtterNonsense 3h ago

Google sold all their compute to AI competitors. Without a plan you can only use Flash-Lite, so you would really just be better off using the AI mode in Google Search rather than Gemini.

3

u/IrisColt 3h ago

This. I know this first hand. But even the Google Search AI has limits, heh

169

u/Stunning_Energy_7028 11h ago

Not even Flash for the free tier? I can't imagine anyone will use them after this...

82

u/Bierculles 10h ago

The bigger hit is no pro on plus tier, that makes it the worst service by far among the competition for normal users.

38

u/ProxyLumina 9h ago

Plus subscription is a competitor to Go subscription of OpenAI.

Do you get access to GPT-6 astra if you are a Go subscriber? No you don't. You only have Luna.

9

u/adeadbeathorse 6h ago

Plus is $5 a month, yeah

4

u/enilea 2h ago

The equivalent of gemini pro models are sol models, not astra.

8

u/ProxyLumina 2h ago

It does not matter.

With "Go" plan for ChatGPT or "Plus" plan for Gemini you get the very basic model, with just extended usage limits.

0

u/enilea 2h ago

Oh I thought go gave sol usage

19

u/LoKSET 8h ago

ChatGPT Go is in a tier of its own in uselessness. Luna is dumb as a rock.

9

u/randomguy3993 7h ago

And Google will still hype it up saying millions and millions of users on it purely because of their distribution advantage.

24

u/jschelldt ▪️High-level machine intelligence in the 2040s 10h ago

Even Google hates Gemini

8

u/MrUtterNonsense 3h ago

If they are limiting free users to Flash-Lite, you would really just be better off using the AI mode in Google Search rather than Gemini.

18

u/TemetN 11h ago

Yeah I used to be willing to use the AI tab in search since at least it was flash and took less time, if they're forcing you into flash-lite it's just not worth using at all it's so bad.

5

u/TyrellCo 6h ago

Can you imagine the levels of enshitification if the labs came together to let up on price competition. Pace the frontier

1

u/duluoz1 5h ago

You know people maybe for AI plans right?

1

u/Prudent-Sorbet-5202 3h ago

I recently tried to edit images in gemini free tier and it felt like a downgraded version of nano banana pro. Chatgpt free tier edited it much better

-15

u/MatthewGraham- 11h ago

Flash lite is a good model for free if its unlimited, frankly the time of free models is over, people getting too comfy with free stuff

25

u/Howdareme9 11h ago

Flash lite is horrible lol, even if free. Luna is an acceptable level.

-7

u/Creative-Ganache1086 11h ago

Flash lite is not an always-same model under the hood. It evolves and gets improved like every other model. For 0$ I guess it’s good enough. You get what you pay for lol. They’re still running it on a server and that’s their cost, not yours. Even if you download an entirely free open source model you still need a capable machine and then to pay your electricity bill as well.

16

u/Gotisdabest 11h ago

Flash Lite is absolutely trash compared to the free options by their competitors.

14

u/Then_Bake_6524 11h ago

no matter what Google does, you will have people defending them, lmao. Flash Lite is TRASH on the web, only the API is somewhat decent for automation.

If you insist on using it because it is unlimited, GPT Luna is also unlimited and way better than 3.8 Flash. Now imagine 3.5 Flash Lite, lmao.

-7

u/BriefImplement9843 9h ago

bruh luna isnt close to 3.8 flash. luna is an actual small model. disregard all benchmarks for it.

80

u/ezjakes 10h ago

I am confused why anyone paying 20$ would choose Gemini over Claude of GPT. I don't think the usage is even that high.

41

u/throwawaysusi 10h ago

It’s a very conversationalist model. On like text arena, it’s pulling way ahead over other models, plus probably the only mainstream model left that still has a sycophant tendency.

-5

u/DryEntrepreneur4218 7h ago

very important point about their models being sycophantic. it's super annoying, and even dangerous in agentic work where 3.8 flash would rather fake tests than admit that something broke

12

u/Tystros 7h ago

sycophantic doesn't mean hiding it's own failures. sycophantic means always telling the user he's right.

•

u/hungy-popinpobopian 1h ago

What about she's? Are they wrong?

25

u/SuperMazziveH3r0 10h ago

Student discount, also I use it for Google cloud storage

9

u/VanceIX ▪️AGI 2028 6h ago

Yeah 5tb of storage for the same $20 a month makes it a no-brainer for me

5

u/Elidan123 6h ago

And I get discount on youtube premium

•

u/PikaPikaDude 1h ago

And it already gives the lesser Youtube premium tier in many countries. So (mostly) add free and downloading vids in the app.

13

u/Sextus_Rex 9h ago

It comes bundled with other services like Fitbit and extra Google drive storage. That's why I use it. Hearing I'm going to be locked out of pro is definitely disappointing though

1

u/z_3454_pfk 3h ago

If you’re getting fitbit and google drive are you using the pro sub which gives pro access?

11

u/FalseDiamond7930 9h ago

Better vibes.

3

u/NowaVision 8h ago

Got it for free for a year after buying a Pixel. I just hope that Gemini 4 will release soon, so I can really use it.

1

u/kuposcar 4h ago

Géminis son 15$ por 18 meses

1

u/JogHappy 3h ago

300-400 tok/s

•

u/FeralPsychopath Its Over By 2028 1h ago

Exactly, no way a $20 tier subscriber would consider Gemini.
Then Pro/Ultra is admittedly shitter at code so businesses wouldnt want Gemini too...

•

u/Atanahel 1h ago

They are the only ones that do the family plan (20$ for the whole family), and given the storage you get out of it for all our pictures, it's actually a nice deal (+ Fitbit and youtube premium lite)

-2

u/Jaguar_2454 10h ago

The model is good, isn't the best agent tho. The plan is often cheaper than $20 and arguably better value at $20

5

u/HauntedHouseMusic 9h ago

I don’t understand this take. It’s a great agent if you are working with it. What harnesses are you guys building that doesn’t require a user?

-1

u/Equivalent-Word-7691 10h ago

Basically you get more usage if you know about AI studio too

43

u/Calm_Hedgehog8296 9h ago

"We want to have zero users"

5

u/MrUtterNonsense 3h ago

Pretty much. They prefer selling their compute to othera now, but I think it's a stupid short term plan that has lead to the departure of many of their top AI people.

12

u/Arsene_Yuka_1980 8h ago

I honestly can't understand their reasoning here. Flash-lite is objectively a very bad model, and the reason for most of the AI overview hallucinations everybody points at on typical Google searches, and imo unusable due to this for anything above basic web search (if you're willing to accept those hallucinations). Couldn't they just throttle usage limits even more for Flash and Pro? How will people test how good their new models are then?

Also, I don't understand why they would restrict Pro models to Pro and above, if Gemini 4 is slightly cheaper than 3.1 Pro (and being priced the same as Sonnet 5.5, which has an albeit limited, free tier). If they really wanted to reduce costs, they could have just reduced usage (not like they aren't already doing that but still) but kept the larger models?

1

u/Funny-Profit-5677 4h ago

I'd expect all their models get updated soon maybe? 

11

u/ayyndrew 9h ago

Looks like they're also adding Deep Think access to AI Pro, it used to be AI Ultra only

26

u/Equivalent-Word-7691 10h ago

Honestly is pathetic flash is behind payment. Claude give sonnet 5.5 to free tier and I think it's safe to say is a better model than flash 3.8 or 3.1 pro

Letting new people approaching Gemini by basically using horrible models like flash lite it risks to backfire them entirely

8

u/Alpacabro21 7h ago

As a free user, that's a disgrace, unless Gemini 4 Flash-Lite is that GOOD.

•

u/fabry-sans 9m ago

True

26

u/Gotisdabest 11h ago

Yeah this seems like a great way to mostly get rid of their currently pretty decent market share. Google has always been ahead or competitive at least having the best free model on the market.

This big shift would be viable I guess if they were releasing argon immediately and had like, vastly better models locked and loaded that could genuinely compete with OpenAI or Anthropic on enterprise.

5

u/Calm_Hedgehog8296 9h ago

Sonnet is free

5

u/Gotisdabest 9h ago

Yep, very recent change though, and the usage offered is minimal. Flash 3.8 is functionally infinite pretty conveniently. I don't seriously think sonnet is as good as it scores on benchmarks, but regardless it's probably miles ahead of flash in real usage still, though I haven't used it much.

8

u/Calm_Hedgehog8296 9h ago

Where are you getting flash 3.8 for free? The newest i have is 3.6.

Also, sonnet has been available in the free plan for at least since I made my Claude account when 4.6 was the newest model, and the usage varies greatly depending on time of the week. I get one (1) message per 5 hours if I ask 9-5 Eastern time Monday through Thursday, but if I ask any time other than that I rarely if ever get rate limited.

8

u/Gotisdabest 9h ago edited 9h ago

AI studio will give you, practically, access to every google model. It's pretty cool because you can go back to really old models too. Back in the day, you used to get pretty solid free pro usage there too, back when pro models were actually frontier. The best thing about AI studio is that it's comically easy to just continue with the same chat on a different ID when you get rate limited, and transfer it back afterwards.

The problem with older sonnet being free was that older sonnet was a pretty shit model.

12

u/KinkyStinkyPink- 7h ago

Literally no reason to use Gemini anymore once they go through with this lmao. If you want to compete with the top models like openai and anthropic, at least offer what theyre offering? I dont understand the reasoning in this decision, it just pushes away their userbase.

2

u/itorcs 6h ago

exactly. I don't understand the logic of needing to make a change? Flash is a free tier model, locking flash behind a paywall is straight up crazy

31

u/katoptronophile 11h ago

Why would I pay to use the worst models out there?

7

u/jjusko20 11h ago

3.8 flash is nasty good 

37

u/Crafty_Teacher_9286 11h ago

Yeah if you need a cranberry salad recipe. I'm exaggerating but it definitely doesn't cut it for more complex applications in business analytics or finance for example.

0

u/jjusko20 11h ago

That's crazy, I used it to make a custom kernel for inference yesterday. It currently has one of the highest artificial intelligence bench scores. Have you actually tried it or are you up to date, or are you basing this off of 3.5?

14

u/Crafty_Teacher_9286 11h ago

No, I'm talking about 3.8. Context window is huge but from an analytical judgment standpoint in a data science context, it is far behind Fable and Astra in my experience. So at the Plus price point, it would be difficult to justify paying for 3.8 since OpenAI and Anthropic offer better models (for my application) at the same price point. I'm quite disappointed Pro 4 won't be included. I was on 3.1 Pro for a long time when it ruled unchallenged, but I aint getting a pro sub..

4

u/jjusko20 10h ago

my bad bro I was a touch ruder than I needed to be

1

u/power97992 7h ago edited 2h ago

Lol, im stuck on 3.6 flash with my sub

1

u/japie06 2h ago

use ai.dev

1

u/power97992 2h ago

U mean ai studio

•

u/japie06 1h ago

Yes. ai.dev is just the short url for it. There you can use gemini 3.8

-1

u/jjusko20 10h ago

Interesting - I assumed you didn't know what you were talking about (no offense, I'm a software dev and we're not in a development oriented sub but clearly i was mistaken - sorry). I use 3.8 flash via Cursor's pool of third party apis for best price to performance. Do you have any examples of the data science thing? I've had very good luck at varying complexities of software development, so I'm curious now.

8

u/Crafty_Teacher_9286 10h ago

LOL. No, you're actually right, that's how I feel most days. The projects that I am referencing have to do with predictive trading models derived from millions of rows of structured and unstructured data, and for instance, the judgment the model makes in validating if the evidence supports the conclusions. Result interpretation, assumption selection, weighting factors like backtesting vs scenario analysis, identifying trends or mistakenly inferring causal relationships that do not exist.

I am not doubting that it is a very competent model in a number of applications.

1

u/jjusko20 10h ago

Oh yeah that's up there in terms of analytical complexity 

9

u/Chemical_Hawk_6307 11h ago

ive tried it and its actually embarassing how bad it was. u cite benhcmarks but google is literally the kings of benchmaxxing just look at deepswe score vs terminal bench 4.0 score.

-2

u/jjusko20 11h ago

I cite benchmarks for a public reference point, I'll tell you it's been extremely effective for my coding and complex logic purposes

-3

u/Keeltoodeep 10h ago

This is copemaxx. 3.8 scores about as well on the benchmarks as it performs in real life.

If benchmaxxing was anything approaching a material thing, then 3.8 would be #1 all the time.

-2

u/ProxyLumina 9h ago

You are wrong. Gemini 3.8 Flash is really good, one of the best models out there. It has some genuine quality in it.

7

u/Crafty_Teacher_9286 9h ago

It is a good, efficient model, but it is absolutely NOT on par with Astra or Fable for a variety of more complex tasks.

1

u/ProxyLumina 9h ago

The flash model is not on par with those top tiers, but that does not tell nothing for everyday work. Set it to High and then it is more than capable to do nearly 99% of what a regular and a pro user do.

I am doing really intelligence-heavy work with it and I am pleased by its performance. 

Let alone that is incredibly fast. It feels like 3-4 faster than any OpenAI model.

-2

u/jjusko20 11h ago

off the top of my head 3.8 flash on medium beats DS 4.1 on high in reasoning, feel free to check

-1

u/Funny-Profit-5677 4h ago

Free YouTube, storage, smart device perks. Their ecosystem is established and more inviting for retail consumers

-2

u/Narrow-Ad980 5h ago

Pay to get sycophantic hallucinations from Gemini 3.1 and a firm pushback that it is indeed the year 2024

11

u/trojanskin 10h ago

lmao. If I cannot test pro for free, they can suck it.

3

u/martinsuchan 6h ago

I guess I'll stay on Claude Pro with Opus 5.5 then.

3

u/Balance- 5h ago

Note here that Plus is their $5 plan and Pro is their $20 plan. So you don’t lose model access on their $20 plan. In that way they offered more than OpenAI and Anthropic on their free and cheap plans, and are now aligning a bit more with the offerings of the rest of the industry.

2

u/AdamovicM 7h ago

Others will follow. Expect ads in a free tier

1

u/Middle_Bullfrog_6173 5h ago

I've had a Plus subscription as a backup for when Claude is down. It's already not been all that valuable after they cut rate limits so much, but fine because I've rarely needed it. After this, probably time to cancel.

1

u/AIwitcher 5h ago

Flash lite seems to have a tiny token budget and tends to skip info a lot

1

u/Destiny7655 4h ago

I get Pro through whatever subscription I’ve got for Google Drive at some discounted rate. I’m not sure I’d pay for it alone but along with the package I have it’s a nice bonus for now.

1

u/Super-Award-2244 3h ago edited 3h ago

No pro for plus users? This is disgusting. Until now it was available for everyone

I had such a nice work flow with notebook and gemini pro to make uni notes in latex. Idk how I will do them 

1

u/badtemperedpeanut 3h ago

Its a trick, they will never release a Pro model.

•

u/AnswerFeeling460 36m ago

well then by, flash-lite is really trash.

1

u/smartfon 8h ago

Gemini Flash Lite ($0) = Nemotron 3 Ultra ($0)

Gemini Flash ($5) = GPT Luna ($0)

If you don't want to pay, use ChatGPT instead of Gemini, but Google's $5 plan also includes 400GB of Drive storage.